<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
On 4/12/2011 8:00 PM, Outback Dingo wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:BANLkTikToamuPPqVnVznOL2wXnMy0npGaQ@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite"><br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 8:56 PM, Ben West
<span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:me@benwest.name">me@benwest.name</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt
0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);
padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div>On a more serious note, I am curious if folks on the
list have experience using tinc for secure tunnels thru
production meshes (= being used by folks not on a
OLSR/OpenWRT/Commotion/etc listserv ;). I understand the
routing plane will continue to be vulnerable to outages
brought on by brute force DOS of some variety.</div>
</div>
<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>N2N is better suited, either that or WPA-NONE comes to mind</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Beat me to the punch on this. I agree N2N seems to have the absolute
lowest overhead of the vpn systems out there today. <br>
<br>
</body>
</html>