<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <p>Looks like it is compatible with OpenWRT so I might give
      compiling it myself a go.</p>
    <p>Wireless G isn't really a concern - we're only shooting for TCP
      throughput of 5-10mbps.</p>
    <p>We're an amateur radio group and managed to get these units on
      the cheap, the M2 gear is a little outside of our budget :( <br>
    </p>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 9/15/2016 10:32 PM, Ben West wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CADSh-SNks3vdJfG_inDhq1=OFukE=rmB05xwHueLzPrP-a2-Zw@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
      <p dir="ltr">The OpenWRT compile target for this device would be
        'atheros,' but as Josh mentioned, its 802.11g radio really isn't
        worth the effort (besides the limited flash). You'll get better
        spectral efficiency with the 802.11n Nano M2.</p>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">On Sep 15, 2016 11:46 PM, "Christopher
          S. Munz-Michielin" <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:christopher@ve7alb.ca">christopher@ve7alb.ca</a>>
          wrote:<br type="attribution">
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
            .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Thanks for
            the reply Josh, Cheers!<br>
            <br>
            Chris<br>
            <br>
            <br>
            On 15/09/2016 18:39, Josh King wrote:<br>
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
              .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
              Hi Christopher,<br>
              <br>
              Unfortunately, no, they're not compatible. The wifi
              chipset is pretty<br>
              old, and I believe they have too little flash storage (4MB
              rather than<br>
              8MB). Sorry!<br>
              <br>
              On Thu, 2016-09-15 at 18:33 -0700, Christopher S.
              Munz-Michielin wrote:<br>
              <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
                .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
                Hey Guys,<br>
                <br>
                I have a couple of Nanostation5's (NOT the M5) and was
                wondering if<br>
                they<br>
                were compatible with the commotion firmware?  If so,
                what image would<br>
                I use?<br>
                <br>
                Cheers!<br>
                <br>
                ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
                Commotion-discuss mailing list<br>
                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:Commotion-discuss@lists.chambana.net"
                  target="_blank">Commotion-discuss@lists.chamba<wbr>na.net</a><br>
                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/commotion-discuss"
                  rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.chambana.net/mai<wbr>lman/listinfo/commotion-discus<wbr>s</a><br>
              </blockquote>
            </blockquote>
            <br>
            ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
            Commotion-discuss mailing list<br>
            <a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:Commotion-discuss@lists.chambana.net"
              target="_blank">Commotion-discuss@lists.chamba<wbr>na.net</a><br>
            <a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/commotion-discuss"
              rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.chambana.net/mai<wbr>lman/listinfo/commotion-discus<wbr>s</a><br>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>