[IMC-US] open publishing and the us imc

[john duda]

i guess my original request for clarification needs clarifying.....


usimc went through the new-imc process, part of which involves
agreeing to the use of open publishing: 

http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/mailman/archive/imc-us/2003-September/000096.html

since the project was approved by new-imc/imc-process as a website
which would conform to the (in my opinion fairly fundamental) policy
of offering open publishing, i fear that if we go live without making
good on this promise we are liable to start an unproductive and
draining argument and debate on the global lists.  i don't see what
gives us the right to use the domain "us.indymedia.org" if we aren't
going to hold by the statements which were made in order to convince
the rest of the network we deserved it.

-john





On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 07:24:03PM -0400, daniel scott wrote:
> i like the solution, although i think its unnecessary to have any back 
> open publishing page on the US site. directing people to local sights 
> is more important and effective.
> 
> dan
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IMC-US mailing list
> IMC-US at lists.cu.groogroo.com
> http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/imc-us

-- 

this is where my public key can be found:
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 03817826
Key fingerprint = 6C11 8D70 2ADE EFA9 498D  72CB 77EA 391A 0381 7826