[IMC-US] Re: [Imc-us-editorial] post feature on nyc imc redirect
bradley at riseup.net
bradley at riseup.net
Sun Jul 17 16:14:40 CDT 2005
Hello all,
couple things:
I can post the info about nyc-imc, sorry to hear that happened!
There was supposed to be a meeting today at 4pm EST.... I'm guessing it
did not happen.
if anyone wants to schedule (or try to schedule) the next meeting for
indymedia.us, please go for it!
http://docs.indymedia.org/view/Local/ImcUsFutureMeetings
sincerely,
Bradley
* * * * *
Chris Anderson wrote:
>I don't have feature posting access. Can someone put
>this up at the imc-us site?
>
>chris
>nyc
>
>---
>
>You may have noticed that New York City Indymedia's
>website is currently redirecting here to US Indymedia.
>This is due to a defacement of our website which took
>place on Saturday, July 16, along with other websites
>stored on the same computer as ours. Members of the
>NYC IMC tech collective, working with the machine's
>administrators, are still looking into the incident,
>but it appears that the defacement was NOT politically
>motivated or specifically targeted at IMCs.
>
>Rather than using up our limited resources attempting
>to restore the site as it was, we're going to instead
>accelerate the launch of the new website that we've
>been working on building for the last few months.
>Please bear with us as we make this transition, and
>continue to watch nyc.indymedia.org as we launch the
>new site.
>
>--- imc-us-editorial-request at lists.ucimc.org wrote:
>
>
>
>>Send IMC-US-Editorial mailing list submissions to
>> imc-us-editorial at lists.ucimc.org
>>
>>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,
>>visit
>>
>>
>>
>>
>http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/listinfo/imc-us-editorial
>
>
>>or, via email, send a message with subject or body
>>'help' to
>> imc-us-editorial-request at lists.ucimc.org
>>
>>You can reach the person managing the list at
>> imc-us-editorial-owner at lists.ucimc.org
>>
>>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it
>>is more specific
>>than "Re: Contents of IMC-US-Editorial digest..."
>>
>>
>>Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. RE: list archives (sing and dance!)
>> 2. Re: Redbuds Story (roblock at riseup.net)
>> 3. Re: Redbuds Story (bradley at riseup.net)
>> 4. Re: Redbuds Story (roblock at riseup.net)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>>Message: 1
>>Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 10:49:17 -0700
>>From: sing and dance! <jenka at indymedia.org>
>>Subject: [Imc-us-editorial] RE: list archives
>>To: imc-us-editorial at lists.ucimc.org
>>Message-ID:
>><1121536157.42d9489d8c20f at mail.riseup.net>
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>>
>>hmm....
>>well I guess it has to be up for some more
>>discussion.
>>can we try to decide on it by the 20th?
>>I don't think Pete and our anonymous requestor will
>>ever agree.
>>But I think it's important to point out that the
>>anonymous requestor is NOT from
>>the US, and in some places an association with
>>indymedia may not be 'resume'
>>material....and it is not just full names, but also
>>personal email addresses,
>>that are made public.
>>
>>The problem is that, unlike on the lists hosted on
>>indymedia's site, on the
>>ucimc lists it is impossible to hide individual
>>posts.
>>i'm forwarding to tech also to see if there might be
>>a way to add this
>>functionality to the admin template of the lists?
>>
>>thx
>>jenka
>>
>>Quoting Pete Stidman <pstidman at yahoo.com>:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Yes I object. don't know how far this has gotten,
>>>just saw it. But there are solid transparency
>>>
>>>
>>reasons
>>
>>
>>>for publicly archiving these lists. I think it
>>>
>>>
>>would
>>
>>
>>>be a major departure if we didn't. Perhaps there
>>>
>>>
>>is a
>>
>>
>>>different way to solve the problem, like making a
>>>suggestion that people do not use their full
>>>
>>>
>>names.
>>
>>
>>>Besides, is it so bad to be associated with
>>>
>>>
>>indymedia?
>>
>>
>>> Personally I put it on my resume.
>>>
>>>-Pete
>>>
>>>
>>>--- sing and dance! <jenka at indymedia.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>This request came in from someone who googled
>>>>
>>>>
>>their
>>
>>
>>>>name and found the top three
>>>>things listed were posts to the imc-us-editorial
>>>>list, which the person had
>>>>thought were archived privately.
>>>>
>>>>well, the request has turned into this proposal
>>>>(which we should decide in the
>>>>next few days - say by the 16th?):
>>>>Make the archives of the list private - ie.
>>>>available only to list members. any
>>>>objections?
>>>>
>>>>thx
>>>>jenka
>>>>-volunteer with indymedia pluto (oh wait, we
>>>>
>>>>
>>didn't
>>
>>
>>>>get an indymedia there
>>>>yet...soon........sooon...)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Quoting bradley at riseup.net:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Hello Jenka and all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I do suggest/request that the list
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>imc-us-editorial at lists.ucimc.org have
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>private archives.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I also think this would satisfy the request
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>being
>>
>>
>>>>made by XXXXXXX.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>There is not any notice to people that when
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>they
>>
>>
>>>>email imc-us, their
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>email will be publically archived.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>----------
>>>>>>
>>>>>>If there are no objections, then i formally
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>request that the list
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>imc-us-editorial be made a private working
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>list
>>
>>
>>>>(archives available to
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>members only)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>sincerely,
>>>>>>Bradley
>>>>>>
>>>>>>* * * * *
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>sing and dance! wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>hi bradley et all....
>>>>>>>i am assuming you mean that the list archives
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>is
>>
>>
>>>>NOT private, which is why
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>it's
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>showing up on google searches.
>>>>>>>should the archives be made private (ie.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>available only to members)?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>i haven't found anything on the admin
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>interface
>>
>>
>>>>to hide specific posts like
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>the
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>ones mentioned below
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>thx
>>>>>>>jenka
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Quoting bradley at riseup.net:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Hey UC-IMC,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>The list, imc-us-editorial at ucimc.org is
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>hosted
>>
>>
>>>>in Urbana, or by folks in
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>Urbana.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Th list archives are currently closed,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>though
>>
>>
>>>>personally i would like to
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>change this, and therefore some sensitive
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>personal information is coming
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>up in google searches, etc...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Someone name XXXXXXXX has kindly asked me to
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>have the following links
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>hidden, or her personal information (address
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>and
>>
>>
>>>>e-mail) be removed from
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>the archived emails.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Please help with this as soon as possible.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>Please let me know the status
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>of this so I can return an email to
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>XXXXXXXX.
>>
>>
>>
>=== message truncated ===
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>http://mail.yahoo.com
>_______________________________________________
>IMC-US-Editorial mailing list
>IMC-US-Editorial at lists.ucimc.org
>http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/listinfo/imc-us-editorial
>
>
--
bye bye,
Bradley
for sending encrypted email; my public key can be found like this:
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 3683D076
Key fingerprint = 0519 0638 F36A 0B1E 2338 C3E5 5561 DAB0 3683 D076
More information about the IMC-US
mailing list