[Imc] Response from Seattle IMC, Re: RED ALERT: Contact Info Posted For Springfield IMC

[Paul Riismandel]

>Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2000 16:06:34 -0800
>From: Stefani Banerian <banerian at u.washington.edu>
>Organization: me
>X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (WinNT; U)
>X-Accept-Language: 
>en,fr,fr-FR,fr-BE,fr-CA,nl-BE,it,pt-BR,tr,es-MX,es-ES,fr-CH,ja,Ar
>To: "Sakolsky, Ron" <Sakolsky.Ron at uis.edu>
>CC: "'micah at riseup.net'" <micah at riseup.net>, "'jay at tao.ca'" <jay at tao.ca>,
>    "'stefani at indymedia.org'" <stefani at indymedia.org>,
>    "'blowingthewhistle at blowingthewhistle.org'"
>  <blowingthewhistle at blowingthewhistle.org>,
>    "'media_act at hotmail.com'" <media_act at hotmail.com>,
>    "'leonardo at fgi.net'" <leonardo at fgi.net>,
>    "'p-riism at uiuc.edu'" <p-riism at uiuc.edu>
>Subject: Re: RED ALERT: Contact Info Posted For Springfield IMC
>
>This is another example of why not to creat any new imc site too
>quickly.  Up til now, the BTW group was the only one which contacted me,
>or has made the effort to contact imc via the newimc.indymedia.org site.
>
>Since only one person was listed as the contact, i've kept that one
>person as *a* point of contact for springfield, certainly now the
>"owner" of andy Springfield IMC.
>
>It sounds like (deja vu all over again i.e. like quebec) there are two
>groups of folks who are interested in Springfield for an IMC.  I could
>create a mailing list for people to work together, and decide for
>themselves how they want to handle this.
>
>I can remove the mailto link on Springfield for the time being, and
>point it to the (proposed) mailing list, which is what i have done for
>other groups organizing IMC's.  Until Springfield folks decide how they
>want to share the name, none will be created (by me).
>
>stefani banerian