[Imc] Evaluating IMC work

[Paul Kaiser]

Criteria to evaluate the IMC's work:

First, what's our mission?
a. To report local news overlooked or underrepresented by "other" news
sources, being certain all facts from both sides are presented?
b. To report same with some bias?
c. Something else?

I know 3 meetings ago Eric brought this up in a way, mentioning that the
"other" sources often tend to be biased due to various influences. I was
unable to stay after the meeting, when I believe it was going to be
discussed further. The question seemed to be "do we slant, in response
to their slant?"

So, before thinking of ways to evaluate our work -- what is the common
conception of the goal of our work?

Thanks,
Paul K