[Peace-discuss] [Prairiegreens] Women's March

[CindyMann]

As someone going to a march, my concern is for everyone. That callous
rhetoric is dehumanizing, for everyone. It does matter. So is the sexual
abuse and defense of predation he has displayed. Many people are going for
that.

C.





On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 7:13 PM, Karen Aram <karenaram at hotmail.com> wrote:

> The President is unlikely to have an impact on Roe vs. Wade, however those
> he has appointed may.  Of course this has been an ongoing project for some
> time, with the closing down of Planned Parenthood Clinics, under the Obama
> Presidency
>
> While the march is focusing on several issues, some of which I support,
> there is almost no concern being shown for the thousands, millions of women
> killed as a result of US wars. What seems to be bringing on the crowds is
> concern over the “glass ceiling” and “callous rhetoric”.
>
> One can hope that those women going to DC, who are concerned with the
> lives of non American women being slaughtered along with their children by
> the USG, will have an opportunity to speak or engage, in the enlightenment
> of others.
>
> > On Jan 19, 2017, at 16:53, E. Wayne Johnson <ewj at pigs.ag> wrote:
> >
> > It is feared that Donald Trump will turn back Roe v. Wade.  Abortion is
> instituted as a national eugenics program but it is popularized
> successfully as a women's rights issue.
> >
> > Those is power who were not interested in the esoteric points of
> genetics were swayed by the prospect of having their peccadillos managed
> medically at the expense of the state.
> >
> > Sent from my Sony Xperia™ smartphone
> >
> > ---- Karen Aram wrote ----
> >
> >> Nice, but what is the issue, and why women, yes I know men can go to if
> they support women.
> >> What is meant by support?
> >> Any mention of the deaths of women occurring in Somalia? They are
> women, women and children being starved, two million already dead due to
> air strikes for which our government, current government, meaning Obama
> presidency, is responsible for supporting. Supporting with weapons,
> training, logistics, all of that which the Saudi’s lack.
> >> Ten thousand in dire circumstances now.
> >>
> >> Human Rights Watch NYC.
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Jan 19, 2017, at 08:34, C. G. Estabrook <cge at shout.net> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> A close friend who's going to the Women's March in DC (about which I'd
> expressed hesitation) says of the following,
> >>>
> >>> "One CW thinking about women's march. As close as I've seen to how I
> think about it and other ways I've been spending my time these days. And
> more Marian than I'd realized til I read this."
> >>>
> >>> https://www.ncronline.org/blogs/ncr-today/standing-mary-foot-cross
> >>>
> >>> --CGE
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Prairiegreens mailing list
> >>> Prairiegreens at lists.chambana.net
> >>> https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/prairiegreens
> >>> http://www.prairienet.org/greens/
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Prairiegreens mailing list
> >> Prairiegreens at lists.chambana.net
> >> https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/prairiegreens
> >> http://www.prairienet.org/greens/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Prairiegreens mailing list
> Prairiegreens at lists.chambana.net
> https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/prairiegreens
> http://www.prairienet.org/greens/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20170119/8cf12b09/attachment-0001.html>