<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:09 PM, C. G. Estabrook <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:galliher@illinois.edu">galliher@illinois.edu</a>></span> wrote:</div>
<div class="gmail_quote"><br> </div>
<blockquote style="BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex" class="gmail_quote">Glad you saw it. At least this much & more was wanted.<br></blockquote>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div>Yes, by 52% of the sample. But 82% wanted this much or LESS, according to the poll you cited. I'm still waiting for your point. Not that I place a great deal of trust in polls, or indeed in "democracy" as we see it in practice.</div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div><br>John W. wrote: </div>
<blockquote style="BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex" class="gmail_quote">
<div>
<div></div>
<div class="h5"><br>
<blockquote style="BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex" class="gmail_quote"><br>On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 8:29 PM, C. G. Estabrook <<a href="mailto:galliher@illinois.edu" target="_blank">galliher@illinois.edu</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:galliher@illinois.edu" target="_blank">galliher@illinois.edu</a>>> wrote:<br>
<br><br><br>CNN has a new poll on health care reform, taken over the weekend:<br><br><<a href="http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2010/images/03/22/rel5a.pdf" target="_blank">http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2010/images/03/22/rel5a.pdf</a>><br>
<br>Results:<br><br>39% Favor 43% Oppose, too liberal 13% Oppose, not liberal enough 5%<br>No opinion<br><br>So, in favor + not liberal enough = 52%.<br><br>[From Doug Henwood at Left Business Observer. --CGE]<br><br>
<br><br>On the other hand, Favor + too liberal = 82%. But I'm sure you have a point<br>somewhere.<br></blockquote></div></div></blockquote><br>
<br />--
<br />This message has been scanned for viruses and
<br />dangerous content by
<a href="http://www.mailscanner.info/"><b>MailScanner</b></a>, and is
<br />believed to be clean.