<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><DIV>Of course the professional credential marketplace has kept the number of practitioners artificially low in every major profession--law, medicine, accounting, and I assume vets as well.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Every professional school should be competely government funded, free, and open to everyone meeting basic qualifications, by education, test, or both, whether after high school or college (which should also be free and open to everyone). There shouldn't be artificial "intelligence" tests, or artificially difficult tests, but just tests of basic knowledge. Schools wouldn't have to be unreasonably competitive or difficult in order to "weed people out"--just as difficult as the knowledge and skill requires; and institutions like internships, clerkships, etc. would be solely for preparation rather than one way of socializing professionals into a culture in which they feel that due to the gauntlet they have run they deserve exponentially higher rewards than those who care for their children or prepare their food.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Credentials would be for certifying people, not rejecting people. State bar exams are probably the most blatant example of any of this that I've heard of.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>We would quickly find that plenty of people would be motivated to pursue various professions because they interest them. We would find the availability of services goes up while the price goes down. In medicine, the government would of course pay for that as well, and less what we're all paying now, even with twice as many doctors.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Of course, all this would require libertarian socialism; or perhaps all of us just moving to Cuba.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>DG<BR></DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt"><BR>
<DIV style="FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt"><FONT size=2 face=Tahoma>
<HR SIZE=1>
<B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">From:</SPAN></B> E.Wayne Johnson <ewj@pigs.ag><BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">To:</SPAN></B> peace discuss <peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net><BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Sent:</SPAN></B> Sun, April 18, 2010 2:51:38 PM<BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Subject:</SPAN></B> [Peace-discuss] a critique of american medicine and the flexner report<BR></FONT><BR>
<META content=off http-equiv=x-dns-prefetch-control>
<STYLE></STYLE>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>My contention has long been that one of the primary problems with medical care in the USA is that there are too few providers and that the number of health care providers is held low artificially by the deceit of the AMA. I have suggested a drastic loosening of the standards to promote more providers. There havent been many takers for my notions, but here someone examines the history of medicine and the Flexner report and the fake reform of Obama and Co.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial><A href="http://mises.org/daily/4276" rel=nofollow target=_blank>http://mises.org/daily/4276</A></FONT></DIV><BR>-- <BR>This message has been scanned for viruses and <BR>dangerous content by <A href="http://www.mailscanner.info/" rel=nofollow target=_blank><B>MailScanner</B></A>, and is <BR>believed to be clean.
<META content=on http-equiv=x-dns-prefetch-control></DIV></DIV></div><br>
<br />--
<br />This message has been scanned for viruses and
<br />dangerous content by
<a href="http://www.mailscanner.info/"><b>MailScanner</b></a>, and is
<br />believed to be clean.
</body></html>