As I will continue to stress---Steve Carter is the ultimate power. He makes the administrative decisions. He hired Finney and can also not renew his contract. If Norbits was found to have used the wrong methods per policy---then Finney surely didn't instruct him to do differently.<br>
<br>I am getting ready to post that point online as soon as I finish another deadline. <br><br>What I can say is that it is really insulting that the city continues to cherry pick what laws apply to whom, what, where and when. I mean---didn't all of the reports state Finney never told Norbits anything? You mean Norbits had a moment to "hand signal" or "verbally tell" Reynolds (depending whose interview/version you are reading) to go to the southwest side of the house---and whatever moment/second that took----Reynolds understood and proceeded to do so. You mean the Chief----couldn't find some way to indicate to Norbits what to do and what not to do? You mean---even if the kid escaped---like---you really think they couldn't find him? Like----where was he gonna go? How far could he get? How many places would there have been to hide? This is Champaign for God's sake.<br>
<br>So if Norbits didn't do something---his supervisor (Finney) should be held accountable----and Finney's supervisor (Carter) should be held accountable for not citing Finney-----<br><br><br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Jenifer Cartwright <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jencart13@yahoo.com">jencart13@yahoo.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td style="font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; font-size: inherit; line-height: inherit; font-size-adjust: inherit; font-stretch: inherit;" valign="top">
Obviously the Carrington's lawyer should also be considering the culpability of Norbits' supervisors AND whoever actually employs police officers and their supervisors -- the City of Champaign?? Seems there's plenty of guilt to go around. Has anybody had an update on this lately??<div>
--Jenifer <br><br>--- On <b>Sun, 4/25/10, Karen Medina <i><<a href="mailto:kmedina67@gmail.com" target="_blank">kmedina67@gmail.com</a>></i></b> wrote:<br><blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;">
<br>From: Karen Medina <<a href="mailto:kmedina67@gmail.com" target="_blank">kmedina67@gmail.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: [Peace-discuss] [Announce] And the FOP's response to Norbits'suspension<br>To: "Peace-discuss List" <<a href="mailto:Peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net" target="_blank">Peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net</a>>, "C-U Citzens for Peace and Justice" <<a href="mailto:discuss@lists.communitycourtwatch.org" target="_blank">discuss@lists.communitycourtwatch.org</a>><br>
Date: Sunday, April 25, 2010, 8:38 AM<br><br><div><div><div></div><div class="h5"> <div>>
There's a legal doctrine in civil law - I can't recall its Latin
name at the moment - that makes the employer <br>> liable for acts of its
employees - even arguably negligent acts - if the employee is acting
within the regular <br>> scope of his/her employment.</div>
<br><i><a rel="nofollow" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Respondeat_superior" title="Respondeat superior" target="_blank">r</a><a rel="nofollow" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Respondeat_superior" title="Respondeat superior" target="_blank">espondeat superior</a></i> – the
responsibility of the superior for the acts of their subordinate<br><br>Vicarious liability in private litigation. There is vicarious liability in criminal litigation too.<br>
<br></div></div>--
<br>This message has been scanned for viruses and
<br>dangerous content by
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.mailscanner.info/" target="_blank"><b>MailScanner</b></a>, and is
<br>believed to be clean.
</div><br>-----Inline Attachment Follows-----<br><br><div>_______________________________________________<br>Peace-discuss mailing list<br><a href="http://mc/compose?to=Peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net" target="_blank">Peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss" target="_blank">http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss</a><br></div></blockquote></div></td></tr></tbody></table><br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Discuss@lists.communitycourtwatch.org">Discuss@lists.communitycourtwatch.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.communitycourtwatch.org/listinfo.cgi/discuss-communitycourtwatch.org" target="_blank">http://lists.communitycourtwatch.org/listinfo.cgi/discuss-communitycourtwatch.org</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>
<br />--
<br />This message has been scanned for viruses and
<br />dangerous content by
<a href="http://www.mailscanner.info/"><b>MailScanner</b></a>, and is
<br />believed to be clean.