<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
    Bob, you're urging votes for the Democrats and calling Chris Floyd
    "a dogma-head moron"?!<br>
    <br>
    Now I realize that your arguments in support of the war-makers are
    so weak and contradictory that you're reduced to playground taunts,
    but I suggest that people who have not done so read Floyd's blog,
    "Empire Burlesque: High Crimes and Low Comedy in the American
    Imperium" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://www.chris-floyd.com/">&lt;http://www.chris-floyd.com/&gt;</a>. They will see that
    there are moronic comments being made in these matters, but not
    usually by him.  --CGE<br>
    <br>
    <br>
    On 10/19/10 8:33 AM, Robert Naiman wrote:
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:AANLkTim2qop7ZSjBmVGge4h0RBxE9oCBgPd5dS+rQ-tJ@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">Perhaps it is that simple for someone who is as much
      of a dogma-head moron as Chris Floyd obviously is. For some people
      it is simple that "abortion is murder." This assertion merits as
      much claim on our attention as Chris Floyd's.<br>
      <br>
      <div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 8:23 AM, C. G.
        Estabrook <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:galliher@illinois.edu">galliher@illinois.edu</a>&gt;</span>
        wrote:<br>
        <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt
          0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);
          padding-left: 1ex;">
          <div bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> "Friends, it's very
            simple: if you support Barack Obama and the Democrats --
            even if reluctantly, even if you're just being all
            sophisticatedly super-savvy and blogospherically strategic
            about it... -- you are supporting the outright murder of
            innocent people who have never done anything against you or
            yours. You have walked into a house, battered down the
            bedroom door, put the barrel of a gun against the temple of
            a sleeping child, and pulled the trigger. That is what you
            are supporting, that is what you are complicit in, <i><b>that
                is what you yourself are doing.</b></i>"<br>
            <br>
            Full article at
            <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://chris-floyd.com/articles/1-latest-news/2035-obamas-finest-hour-killing-innocent-people-for-qmade-up-crapq.html"
              target="_blank">&lt;http://chris-floyd.com/articles/1-latest-news/2035-obamas-finest-hour-killing-innocent-people-for-qmade-up-crapq.html&gt;</a>.
            <div class="im">
              <br>
              <br>
              On 10/18/10 10:32 PM, Jenifer Cartwright wrote: </div>
            <div>
              <div class="h5">
                <blockquote type="cite">
                  <table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
                    <tbody>
                      <tr>
                        <td style="font: inherit;" valign="top">Tim
                          Johnson is one of those who believes Life
                          starts at conception and ends at birth.
                          <div> --Jenifer<br>
                            <br>
                            --- On <b>Mon, 10/18/10, Morton K. Brussel
                              <i><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                                  href="mailto:brussel@illinois.edu"
                                  target="_blank">&lt;brussel@illinois.edu&gt;</a></i></b>
                            wrote:<br>
                            <blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid
                              rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px;
                              padding-left: 5px;"><br>
                              From: Morton K. Brussel <a
                                moz-do-not-send="true"
                                href="mailto:brussel@illinois.edu"
                                target="_blank">&lt;brussel@illinois.edu&gt;</a><br>
                              Subject: Re: [Peace-discuss] Punish the
                              Democrats, yes<br>
                              To: "C. G. Estabrook" <a
                                moz-do-not-send="true"
                                href="mailto:galliher@illinois.edu"
                                target="_blank">&lt;galliher@illinois.edu&gt;</a><br>
                              Cc: "Ron Szoke" <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                                href="mailto:r-szoke@illinois.edu"
                                target="_blank">&lt;r-szoke@illinois.edu&gt;</a>,
                              "Peace-discuss" <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net" target="_blank">&lt;peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net&gt;</a><br>
                              Date: Monday, October 18, 2010, 7:00 PM<br>
                              <br>
                              <div>The outrage of Estabrook seems
                                reserved for Democrats, without
                                regarding the very probable (consider
                                what they're saying) consequences of
                                having Tea-Party types and/or
                                Republicans controling government. None
                                of the execrable policies of the G.W.
                                Bush or Obama administrations are likely
                                to be revised or retracted.   He has
                                forgotten about the Bush administration?
                                <div><br>
                                </div>
                                <div>The mania of the current campaign
                                  aimed at David Gill, characterized as
                                  a stand-in for Obama, is perverse and
                                  contary to what has come from
                                  statements and presentations of Gill.
                                    It's remarkable how much faith Carl
                                  has in Tim Johnson. 
                                  <div><br>
                                  </div>
                                  <div>--mkb</div>
                                  <div><br>
                                  </div>
                                  <div><br>
                                  </div>
                                  <div><br>
                                    <div>
                                      <div>On Oct 18, 2010, at 5:29 PM,
                                        C. G. Estabrook wrote:</div>
                                      <br>
                                      <blockquote type="cite">
                                        <div> This is outrageous special
                                          pleading.  It says to return
                                          the Democrats to office, even
                                          though they're the ones
                                          responsible for "unnecessary
                                          deaths of people in wars from
                                          [Palestine to Pakistan and
                                          from Central Asia to the Horn
                                          of Africa]."<br>
                                          <br>
                                          Of course the Democrats are
                                          also responsible for not
                                          extending Medicare to all, not
                                          taking over the
                                          too-big-to-fail banks and
                                          companies and running them for
                                          the public good, not stopping
                                          foreclosures, not establishing
                                          an effective jobs program,
                                          etc., etc. - and not by
                                          accident, but because they're
                                          working for the banks, the
                                          insurance companies, the oil
                                          companies, the construction
                                          companies, et al.<br>
                                          <br>
                                          The Democrat’s allegedly
                                          reformist agenda masks
                                          programs to ensure that no
                                          major stakeholder in his
                                          coalition of corporate backers
                                          will suffer significant
                                          losses, and will even enjoy
                                          spectacular gains — the
                                          perfection of the long right
                                          turn of the Democratic Party
                                          since the 1970s, as
                                          financialization of the
                                          economy led to shedding New
                                          Deal commitments so as to
                                          compete with the Republicans
                                          for corporate patronage. <br>
                                          <br>
                                          Reject the policies by not
                                          voting for them.  Vote Green
                                          or for individual legislators
                                          who e.g. vote against the war,
                                          like Kucinich, Paul, or
                                          Johnson (IL).  We'll still
                                          have to settle accounts with
                                          the new Congress on war and
                                          social legislation, whoever is
                                          elected. <br>
                                          <br>
                                          Say to the Democrats what
                                          Cromwell said to the Rump
                                          parliament: "Depart, I say;
                                          and let us have done with you.
                                          In the name of God, go!"<br>
                                          <br>
                                          <br>
                                          On 10/18/10 4:50 PM, Ron Szoke
                                          wrote:
                                          <blockquote type="cite">
                                            <pre>        
<a moz-do-not-send="true" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.consortiumnews.com/2010/101510.html" target="_blank">http://www.consortiumnews.com/2010/101510.html</a>
         
The 'Teach-the-Dems-a-Lesson' Myth

By Robert Parry (A Special Report) 
October 15, 2010

If my e-mail inbox is any indication, many American progressives plan 
to use the Nov. 2 election as an opportunity to “teach the Democrats a 
lesson” by either not voting or casting ballots for third parties, even if 
this contributes to the expected Republican (and Tea Party) landslide.

The thinking seems to be that the loss of the congressional majorities 
will punish the Democrats for accepting half-measures and compromises 
on issues from health care and financial reform to job stimulus and war. 
The Left’s hope apparently is that the chastened Democrats will then 
shift toward more progressive positions and be more assertive.

However, modern American political history tells us that this strategy 
never works. After the four key elections in which many progressives 
abandoned the governing Democrats – in 1968, 1980, 1994 and 2000 – 
not only did Republicans take U.S. politics further to the right, but the 
surviving Democrats tacked more to the center and grew more timid.

All four elections also were marred by GOP dirty tricks that drew little or 
no reaction from either the governing Democrats or the progressives, 
emboldening the slash-and-burn Republicans to operate in an ever 
more audacious style.

Tragically, too, the Left’s sideline-sitting contributed to the unnecessary 
deaths of millions of people in wars from Vietnam and Central America 
to Iraq and Afghanistan. Arguably even worse, U.S. inaction on global 
warming – a neglect surely to be continued if Republicans and Tea 
Partiers are victorious in Election 2010 – may doom the future of a 
livable planet.

In other words, the “teach-the-Dems-a-lesson” strategy not only 
doesn’t work, it’s extremely dangerous.

.  .  .
&lt;much more&gt;  
 




</pre>
                                          </blockquote>
                                        </div>
                                      </blockquote>
                                    </div>
                                  </div>
                                </div>
                              </div>
                            </blockquote>
                          </div>
                        </td>
                      </tr>
                    </tbody>
                  </table>
                </blockquote>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>