<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<STYLE type=text/css>DIV {
MARGIN: 0px
}
</STYLE>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.18904"></HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>What does it mean? don't
mean...........</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>The conclusion that mr. crumb came to in his usual
irascible skepticism and analysis of the </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>human situation and the personal war on existential
terror was that the most important thing </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>and the most useful thing was to do
nothing.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>By the way, a correction and apology..
Although the "Ruff-Tuff Cream-puff" made his debut in "Despair"
(1969),</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>the "Kick Their Ass Take Their Gas" mantra
appeared in "<FONT size=3 face="Times New Roman">The Ruff-Tuff Cream-Puffs
Take Charge</FONT>", </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>"Hup No. 1" (1987), </FONT><FONT size=2
face=Arial>also reprinted in "R. Crumb's America".</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>From Mystic Funnies #2 (1999):</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><IMG style="WIDTH: 572px; HEIGHT: 816px" border=0 hspace=0 alt=""
align=baseline src="cid:DE2828496A7F4AC8A5A78FAD3A5D0300@ACERLAPTOP" width=773
height=1311></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT: 10pt arial; BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=ggregg79@yahoo.com href="mailto:ggregg79@yahoo.com">Gregg Gordon</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=ewj@pigs.ag
href="mailto:ewj@pigs.ag">E. Wayne Johnson</A> ; <A
title=galliher@illinois.edu href="mailto:galliher@illinois.edu">C. G.
Estabrook</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Cc:</B> <A
title=peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net
href="mailto:peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net">Peace-discuss</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, October 21, 2010 11:49
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Peace-discuss] [Peace] Fw:
Money Can't Vote</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt">
<DIV>Huh! That's a strange take. The quote I've been using lately
is: "The surest way for evil to triumph is for good people to do
nothing." To each his own, I guess.<BR></DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt"><BR>
<DIV
style="FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt"><FONT
size=2 face=Tahoma>
<HR SIZE=1>
<B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">From:</SPAN></B> E. Wayne Johnson <<A
href="mailto:ewj@pigs.ag">ewj@pigs.ag</A>><BR><B><SPAN
style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">To:</SPAN></B> C. G. Estabrook <<A
href="mailto:galliher@illinois.edu">galliher@illinois.edu</A>><BR><B><SPAN
style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Cc:</SPAN></B> Gregg Gordon <<A
href="mailto:ggregg79@yahoo.com">ggregg79@yahoo.com</A>>; Peace-discuss
<<A
href="mailto:peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net">peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net</A>><BR><B><SPAN
style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Sent:</SPAN></B> Thu, October 21, 2010 10:33:50
AM<BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Subject:</SPAN></B> Re:
[Peace-discuss] [Peace] Fw: Money Can't Vote<BR></FONT><BR>That bumpersticker
mantra is older than you imagine.<BR><BR>"Kick their ass! Take their
Gas!" was on the t-shirt of the horn-tooting protagonist in R. Crumb's "It's
the Ruff Tuff Creampuff", <BR><BR>(who appeared in [Fall into the Depths of]
Despair Comix, 1969)<BR><BR>"The best solution anyone has found is to sit and
do nothing".<BR><BR>On 10/21/2010 11:08 PM, C. G. Estabrook wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE type="cite">That quite remarkable contempt for the political
perspicacity of your fellow citizens is all too typical of the political
class in this country, but it's not very democratic. <BR><BR>The federal
government doesn't quite agree with you. That's why it spends so much
time and money on "the manufacture of consent" (and why snake-oil salesmen
like Obama get ahead). The public has to be managed, not indulged,
they think - it's their only real enemy, as Vietnam showed.<BR><BR>That
after all was Jefferson's view: he thought that people "are naturally
divided into two parties: (1.) Those who fear and distrust the people, and
wish to draw all powers from them into the hands of the higher
classes. (2.) Those who identify themselves with the people,
have confidence in them, cherish and consider them as the most honest and
safe, although not the most wise depositary of the public
interests."<BR><BR>I'm a democrat, so not a Democrat.
--CGE<BR><BR><BR>On 10/21/10 9:51 AM, Gregg Gordon wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE type="cite">
<DIV
style="FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt">
<DIV>I don't disagree with any of that. So what? And as for
wars for oil, maybe you better hope they <EM>keep</EM> lying about it,
because if Americans were confronted with that stark reality, most of
them might be down with it. When Alan Greenspan said so
publicly, there was no big outcry. Barely lasted a full news
cycle. I remember seeing a bumper sticker when the Iraq war
started: "Kick their ass. Take their gas." I think
that's basically where most Americans are on the issue, and the main
reason the Iraq war has become so unpopular (people were 2-1 in favor at
the time, if the polls can be believed) is that the cheap gas never
materialized. We're still paying through the nose. Most people
support resumed drilling in the Gulf right now. They don't care if
it turns into the Rancho La Brea tar pits. They want gasoline for
their cars. I saw a poll just within the last week -- can't remember
exactly, but something like, would you be willing to pay an additional 4
cents a gallon for, I don't know -- lower CO2 emissions or
something. The majority said, "No." So that's where you need
to start -- not with the Democrats. I think the Democrats
are about the left party that the American left deserves right
now. We've been ineffectual and inept. That's our
reward.<BR></DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt"><BR>
<DIV
style="FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt"><FONT
size=2 face=Tahoma>
<HR SIZE=1>
<B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">From:</SPAN></B> C. G. Estabrook <A
class=moz-txt-link-rfc2396E href="mailto:galliher@illinois.edu"
rel=nofollow target=_blank
ymailto="mailto:galliher@illinois.edu"><galliher@illinois.edu></A><BR><B><SPAN
style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">To:</SPAN></B> Gregg Gordon <A
class=moz-txt-link-rfc2396E href="mailto:ggregg79@yahoo.com" rel=nofollow
target=_blank
ymailto="mailto:ggregg79@yahoo.com"><ggregg79@yahoo.com></A><BR><B><SPAN
style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Cc:</SPAN></B> Jenifer Cartwright <A
class=moz-txt-link-rfc2396E href="mailto:jencart13@yahoo.com" rel=nofollow
target=_blank
ymailto="mailto:jencart13@yahoo.com"><jencart13@yahoo.com></A>;
Peace-discuss <A class=moz-txt-link-rfc2396E
href="mailto:peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net" rel=nofollow target=_blank
ymailto="mailto:peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net"><peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net></A><BR><B><SPAN
style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Sent:</SPAN></B> Thu, October 21, 2010 9:03:01
AM<BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Subject:</SPAN></B> Re:
[Peace-discuss] [Peace] Fw: Money Can't Vote<BR></FONT><BR>On the Carter
administration, see the famous interview his National Security Adviser
gave to Le Nouvel Observateur in 1998: <A class=moz-txt-link-rfc2396E
href="http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/BRZ110A.html" rel=nofollow
target=_blank><http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/BRZ110A.html></A>
(in English)...<BR><BR>"Q: And neither do you regret having supported the
Islamic fundamentalism, having given arms and advice to future
terrorists?<BR>"B: What is most important to the history of the world? The
Taliban or the collapse of the Soviet empire? <I>Some stirred-up
Moslems</I> [sic] or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the
cold war?..."<BR><BR>It's true that the US has been committing crimes in
order to control Mideast oil since the Truman administration, when we saw
that we could displace an exhausted Britain in the region. First,
British oil companies were replaced with American ones, and concomitantly
the US began the policy - which Obama continues - of controlling the
countries of the region by alliance, subversion, or aggressive war (= what
we were busily condemning German leaders for, at Nuremberg).
<BR><BR>Benchmarks are our destruction of democratic government in Iran
(1953), which Americans have forgotten but the Iranians haven't; adoption
of Israel as our "cop on the beat" (as the Nixon administration said)
after they launched their 1967 war to destroy secular Arab nationalism;
our sponsorship of Saddam Hussein in the Iraq-Iran war, 1980-88; our
covert sponsorship of the religious-based Hamas to undercut the secular
PLO; and Clinton's murderous sanctions on Iraq (by which he killed as many
people as Bush did, many of them children whose deaths were "worth it,"
according to Clinton's Secretary of State).<BR><BR>The US has consistently
demanded control of Mideast energy resources since WWII, not because we
need them - the US was a net exporter of oil until recently, and now
imports less than 10% of the oil we use at home from the Mideast, mostly
from our ally Saudi Arabia - but because control of world hydrocarbon
supplies gives us an advantage over our real economic rivals, the EU and
East Asia (China and Japan). That's what Obama (and other
presidents) is sending Americans to kill and die for, so it's obvious that
he like the others has to invent excuses, especially when two-thirds of
the US public, even though they're being lied to, thinks the war a bad
idea. <BR><BR>When Al Qaeda launched their criminal raids on US
cities in 2001, they were clearly and consciously staging a counter-attack
to more than a generation of US crimes in the Mideast. They said at
the time that there were three reasons for their counterattack: (1) the
sanctions on Iraq, called "genocidal" by successive UN overseers; (2) the
suppression of h the Palestinians by America's chief client, Israel; and
(3) the occupation of Saudi Arabia (and the Muslim holy places) by
American troops after Bush I's Gulf war, in 1991. <BR><BR>It's not
just those who point out that the Obama administration is, by and large,
Bush's third term who note the continuity of US policy in the Mideast,
which Obama if anything has intensified - as he said he would, as far back
as his campaign for the Senate, when he discussed "surgical strikes" on
Iran, still I think a real possibility, along with open war with
Pakistan. BHO is down with the program, and only a few are
criticizing it - of course many more in the country that in
Congress.<BR><BR><BR>On 10/21/10 8:05 AM, Gregg Gordon wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE type="cite">
<DIV
style="FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt">
<DIV>Well, that strikes me as quite a stretch to lay responsibility for
the Iraq and Afghanistan wars on the back of Jimmy Carter. I could
take your logic just a small step further and put it on FDR. Or
William McKinley. Or James K. Polk. Plus it ignores the
question of why three subsequent Republican presidents failed to end it,
as your premise indicates they should have done. It is a sad
fact that since the disastrous and misguided McGovern campaign (God
bless him), Democrats have been so bullied and intimidated by charges of
being anti-military (not that there's anything wrong with that) that
they too often feel compelled to prove they have gonads. I
thought Clinton kept Saddam around just to have somebody to bomb when he
needed to look tough. That's murderous and deplorable and
certainly won't get him into heaven, but that's the political landscape
we find ourselves in. Deal with it. Anyway, wealth
and power breed arrogance. Americans, like the British, Spanish,
Romans, and every great empire before us, think we should have our way
just because God obviously loves us so. (If He didn't, we
wouldn't be an empire.) That's human nature, and liberals are just
as susceptible to it as conservatives. More often than not,
Democratic militarism just takes the form of seeing to it that veterans
actually receive the benefits they've been promised, for which they get
no credit whatsoever. And "spineless" is not the same as "evil" in
my eyes. The "spineless" need to be encouraged. The "evil"
need to be stopped. Who can blame the Democrats for being
spineless? Who's got their backs? The left?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I'm a Bernie Sanders kind of guy. I don't really consider
myself a Democrat, but I caucus with them because I think the
alternative is so much worse. But if you <EM>really</EM> can't see
<EM>any</EM> difference between, say, Karl Rove and Dennis Kucinich, I'm
not going to waste any more time arguing with you. You're not
serious.<BR></DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt"><BR>
<DIV
style="FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt"><FONT
size=2 face=Tahoma>
<HR SIZE=1>
<B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">From:</SPAN></B> C. G. Estabrook <A
class=moz-txt-link-rfc2396E href="mailto:galliher@illinois.edu"
rel=nofollow target=_blank
ymailto="mailto:galliher@illinois.edu"><galliher@illinois.edu></A><BR><B><SPAN
style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">To:</SPAN></B> Gregg Gordon <A
class=moz-txt-link-rfc2396E href="mailto:ggregg79@yahoo.com"
rel=nofollow target=_blank
ymailto="mailto:ggregg79@yahoo.com"><ggregg79@yahoo.com></A><BR><B><SPAN
style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Cc:</SPAN></B> Jenifer Cartwright <A
class=moz-txt-link-rfc2396E href="mailto:jencart13@yahoo.com"
rel=nofollow target=_blank
ymailto="mailto:jencart13@yahoo.com"><jencart13@yahoo.com></A>;
Peace List <A class=moz-txt-link-rfc2396E
href="mailto:peace@lists.chambana.net" rel=nofollow target=_blank
ymailto="mailto:peace@lists.chambana.net"><peace@lists.chambana.net></A>;
Peace-discuss <A class=moz-txt-link-rfc2396E
href="mailto:peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net" rel=nofollow
target=_blank
ymailto="mailto:peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net"><peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net></A><BR><B><SPAN
style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Sent:</SPAN></B> Wed, October 20, 2010
11:09:24 PM<BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Subject:</SPAN></B>
Re: [Peace-discuss] [Peace] Fw: Money Can't Vote<BR></FONT><BR>First,
Iraq and Afghanistan are both part of what the Pentagon calls "The Long
War" (for oil) in the Mideast. So far, the US has killed a million
people in Iraq under Clinton (whose Secretary of State said that the
tens of thousands of dead children were "worth it"); a million under
Bush; and apparently hundreds of thousands in AfPak under Bush and his
third (Obama) term.<BR><BR>That falls short of the perhaps 4 million we
killed in SE Asia, but of course Obama's escalated murders in SW Asia
are in no way justified by being fewer in number than
Kennedy-Johnson-Nixon's in Vietnam. <BR><BR>It's difficult to determine
when the Long War begins, but it takes a tick up in the Carter
administration when Carter (and Obama's) adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski
sends Osama bin Laden and friends into Afghanistan (before the Russian
invasion) "to give the Russians a Vietnam of their own," as he said at
the time, in the most expensive CIA operation to date.<BR><BR>If a
Republican administration after 2012 brings Obama's AfPak war to an end,
then we'll have a third example of a Democratic war concluded by
Republicans in as many generations. But that may not be likely. The news
suggests that the Obama administration is looking to expand the war with
an attack on Pakistan and/or Iran. It certainly isn't looking to
abandon the world's greatest energy-producing region.<BR><BR>Control of
Mideast energy resources has been a cornerstone of US foreign policy
since 1945. Obama is simply lying when he says the war is to "stop
terrorism" - it obviously increases terrorism - but he has to lie,
because the only Constitutional authority he has to wage war in the
Mideast is Congress' "Authorization for the Use of Military Force" of
September 2001 - which is directed against terrorism. <BR><BR>Something
positive to do: years ago, there was a great debate in America, "How do
we get out of Vietnam?" The best answer was given by Herb Caen:
"Ships and planes." Load up the troops and bring them home. The
Russians did - and survived and prospered from the end of their
war.<BR><BR>Eventually we did, but it took two presidents' being driven
from office and (even more important) a revolt of the American conscript
army to do it. <BR><BR>Regards, CGE<BR><BR>On 10/20/10 7:15
PM, Gregg Gordon wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE type="cite">
<DIV
style="FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt">
<DIV>So I conclude from your statement that you don't consider either
Iraq or Afghanistan to be "major" wars. So why are you so worked
up about them? I think you're just still mad at Lyndon
Johnson.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>And please, don't accuse me of being some kind of racist who
doesn't mind us murdering brown people. That is <EM>so</EM>
lame. It's just that not all of us see the world in as simple
terms as you seem to. Simple solutions are nice, but they're
mainly for the simple-minded.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>All I'm saying is if you're so gung-ho on stopping the war, why
don't you come up with something positive to do (as opposed to
sniping from the sidelines) that might help get us closer to that
goal? We'll all get behind you.<BR></DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt"><BR>
<DIV
style="FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt"><FONT
size=2 face=Tahoma>
<HR SIZE=1>
<B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">From:</SPAN></B> C. G. Estabrook <A
class=moz-txt-link-rfc2396E href="mailto:galliher@illinois.edu"
rel=nofollow target=_blank
ymailto="mailto:galliher@illinois.edu"><galliher@illinois.edu></A><BR><B><SPAN
style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">To:</SPAN></B> Gregg Gordon <A
class=moz-txt-link-rfc2396E href="mailto:ggregg79@yahoo.com"
rel=nofollow target=_blank
ymailto="mailto:ggregg79@yahoo.com"><ggregg79@yahoo.com></A><BR><B><SPAN
style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Cc:</SPAN></B> Jenifer Cartwright <A
class=moz-txt-link-rfc2396E href="mailto:jencart13@yahoo.com"
rel=nofollow target=_blank
ymailto="mailto:jencart13@yahoo.com"><jencart13@yahoo.com></A>;
Peace List <A class=moz-txt-link-rfc2396E
href="mailto:peace@lists.chambana.net" rel=nofollow target=_blank
ymailto="mailto:peace@lists.chambana.net"><peace@lists.chambana.net></A>;
Peace-discuss <A class=moz-txt-link-rfc2396E
href="mailto:peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net" rel=nofollow
target=_blank
ymailto="mailto:peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net"><peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net></A><BR><B><SPAN
style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Sent:</SPAN></B> Wed, October 20, 2010
5:10:40 PM<BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Subject:</SPAN></B>
Re: [Peace-discuss] [Peace] Fw: Money Can't Vote<BR></FONT><BR>You are
aware, are you not, that America's major wars since WWII - called by
synecdoche "Korea" and "Vietnam" - were started by Democratic
administrations and ended by Republican administrations. Since
the current Democratic administration has greatly expanded the killing
in AfPak, it's hard to argue that they're going to reverse their
policies. Voting for them is an acquiescence to those policies.
<BR><BR>To say of Obama and the Democrats, "Let them kill some Asians,
because they might do some good someplace else," is at best a counsel
of despair, if not an outright criminal attitude.
Particularly when it seems that they're doing precisely the wrong
things elsewhere, too - not surprisingly, because they're working for
the owners of the banks, the insurance companies, the oil and
construction companies, etc. --CGE<BR><BR><BR>On 10/20/10 4:48
PM, Gregg Gordon wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE type="cite">
<DIV
style="FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt">
<DIV>Maybe because there are other important issues that she
<EM>does</EM> agree with him on. The only way you're going to
find a candidate you're in 100% agreement with is to run for
office. If support for the war is an absolute deal breaker for
you, fine. Not everybody sees it that way. But if you
think the war will end sooner if more Republicans get elected, I
think you're out of your mind.<BR></DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt"><BR>
<DIV
style="FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt"><FONT
size=2 face=Tahoma>
<HR SIZE=1>
<B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">From:</SPAN></B> C. G. Estabrook
<A class=moz-txt-link-rfc2396E href="mailto:galliher@illinois.edu"
rel=nofollow target=_blank
ymailto="mailto:galliher@illinois.edu"><galliher@illinois.edu></A><BR><B><SPAN
style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">To:</SPAN></B> Jenifer Cartwright <A
class=moz-txt-link-rfc2396E href="mailto:jencart13@yahoo.com"
rel=nofollow target=_blank
ymailto="mailto:jencart13@yahoo.com"><jencart13@yahoo.com></A><BR><B><SPAN
style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Cc:</SPAN></B> Peace List <A
class=moz-txt-link-rfc2396E href="mailto:peace@lists.chambana.net"
rel=nofollow target=_blank
ymailto="mailto:peace@lists.chambana.net"><peace@lists.chambana.net></A>;
Peace-discuss <A class=moz-txt-link-rfc2396E
href="mailto:peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net" rel=nofollow
target=_blank
ymailto="mailto:peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net"><peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net></A><BR><B><SPAN
style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Sent:</SPAN></B> Wed, October 20, 2010
4:33:52 PM<BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Subject:</SPAN></B>
Re: [Peace] [Peace-discuss] Fw: Money Can't Vote<BR></FONT><BR>This
guy supports the war. I can't see why anyone on an anti-war list
would contribute to him.<BR><BR><BR>On 10/20/10 4:28 PM, Jenifer
Cartwright wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE type="cite">
<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD vAlign=top><FONT class=Apple-style-span size=4><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt" class=Apple-style-span>Another
request for help...</SPAN></FONT>
<DIV><FONT class=Apple-style-span size=3><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 13px" class=Apple-style-span>I love this
guy!</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT class=Apple-style-span size=3><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 13px"
class=Apple-style-span> --Jenifer</SPAN></FONT><BR></DIV></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></DIV></DIV><BR></BLOCKQUOTE><PRE><HR SIZE=4 width="90%">
_______________________________________________
Peace-discuss mailing list
<A class=moz-txt-link-abbreviated href="mailto:Peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net" rel=nofollow target=_blank ymailto="mailto:Peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net">Peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net</A>
<A class=moz-txt-link-freetext href="http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss" rel=nofollow target=_blank>http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss</A>
</PRE></BLOCKQUOTE><BR></DIV></DIV></DIV><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>