<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
It's cool. <br>
<br>
And cute, too.<br>
<br>
But the sad truth is that these young men who could see the benefits<br>
of friendship, and had in their hands the tools (the weapons) to stop<br>
the war, CHOSE (made a conscious decision)<br>
to hunker back down under their Evil Masters and <br>
horrifically slaughter one another for over 3 more years.<br>
<br>
After all, it was what your government expected of you...<br>
<br>
"Shooting Germans is sort of like shooting rabbits."<br>
<br>
And they fought to make WW2 possible.<br>
<br>
Cheers.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On 12/26/2010 3:56 AM, Robert Naiman wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:AANLkTik1F03gSnmnaiKbnKwr+NxXrte6kqgy+kJOJXCg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div>
<div class="h5">
<div class="gmail_quote"><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-naiman/the-christmas-truce-of-19_b_801243.html"
target="_blank">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-naiman/the-christmas-truce-of-19_b_801243.html</a>
<div><br>
The Christmas Truce of 1914: "Threat to National Security"?</div>
<div>
<p>As we celebrate Christmas 2010, 100,000 US troops languish in
Afghanistan, and Bradley Manning sits in "<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/daphne-eviatar/bradley-mannings-confinem_b_800737.html"
target="_blank">maximum custody</a>" in Quantico for the alleged crime
of disclosing classified "secrets" about U.S. foreign policy -
"secrets" like the <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/apr/05/wikileaks-us-army-iraq-attack"
target="_blank">video</a> of U.S. troops killing two <em>Reuters</em>
employees in Iraq, a video that the U.S. military refused to release to
<em>Reuters</em>. </p>
<p>It is a particular stain on our country to be at war during the
Season of Peace, just as it is a particular stain on our country to be
at war during the Olympics. "Peace on Earth" should stick in our
throats a bit this holiday season, when our own government is bombing
other people's countries, a practice which we have, so far, been unable
to stop.</p>
<p>The idea that there is something especially offensive about
prosecuting war during Christmas is longstanding. On December 7, 1914,
Pope Benedict XV <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.harrisondaily.com/opinion/article_758ae5c8-a68d-59f3-9a4f-bb5df3dbcbce.html"
target="_blank">called for</a> an official Christmas truce in the war
in Europe, "that the guns may fall silent at least upon the night the
angels sang."</p>
<p>The Pope's call was rejected by the warring governments, and two
words he used suggest a reason: "at least." The Pope's remarks strongly
suggested that he objected to the slaughter on the other 364 days as
well. And so, the generals may have argued, it was a slippery slope.
Allow the troops to have a Christmas holiday from killing each other,
and they might begin to get even funnier ideas. Next they'll be
demanding Easter, then Yom Kippur and Eid al-Fitr. Soon you won't be
able to have a war on any day of the year. So there was no official
truce.</p>
<p>However, in what was arguably one of the most morally compelling
acts of spontaneous mass civil disobedience in recorded human history,
German and British troops took matters into their own hands,
negotiating their own Christmas cease-fires in their opposing trenches
on the Western Front, exchanging Christmas carols and gifts, and even
playing soccer. The story is told in the 2005 movie, Joyeux Noel
("Merry Christmas"), which was nominated for an Academy Award for Best
Foreign Language Film in 2006. It would be a significant advance in
human civilization if this movie would take its rightful place
alongside "Miracle on 34th Street" and "It's a Wonderful Life" as
standard Christmas fare. </p>
<p>It's particularly appropriate to reflect on this history now, as
TV talking heads repeatedly pontificate without a shred of evidence
that the WikiLeaks disclosures "threaten our national security,"
because in its time, as Stanley Weintraub reported in his 2001 book "<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://books.google.com/books?id=vUKgAAAAMAAJ" target="_blank">Silent
Night: The Remarkable Christmas Truce of 1914</a>," not only was the
Christmas truce considered a threat to "national security" in the
warring countries; even the knowledge that it had taken place was
initially suppressed. The <em>New York Times</em> finally broke the
press blockade on December 31, 1914, after which the British press
followed suit.</p>
<p>Doesn't it seem ridiculous today that news media initially tried
to suppress reports about the Christmas truce of 1914, apparently in
the belief that such information was a "threat to national security"?</p>
<p>Won't it seem ridiculous someday that people who knew better once
claimed that WikiLeaks was a "threat to our national security," and
were taken seriously?</p>
<p>How long do you suppose that will take to occur?</p>
<p>Merry Christmas. Let there be peace on earth.</p>
<p> </p>
<div> </div>
-- <br>
Robert Naiman<br>
Policy Director<br>
Just Foreign Policy<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://www.justforeignpolicy.org"
target="_blank">www.justforeignpolicy.org</a><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:naiman@justforeignpolicy.org"
target="_blank">naiman@justforeignpolicy.org</a><br>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<pre wrap="">
<hr size="4" width="90%">
_______________________________________________
Peace-discuss mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net">Peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss">http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>