<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
In an article online in the Wall Street Journal's Opinion Journal
this week, the younger Paul seems to include cutting war spending.
But in the event he seens not to go beyond the rodomontade we get
from Obama's oh-so-flexible war secretary. Paul writes, <br>
<br>
"My proposal would also cut wasteful spending in the Defense
Department. Since 2001, our annual defense budget has increased
nearly 120%. Even subtracting the costs of the conflicts in Iraq
and Afghanistan, spending is up 67%. These levels of spending are
unjustifiable and unsustainable. Defense Secretary Robert Gates <i><b>understands
this</b></i> <i><b>and has called for spending cuts</b></i>,
saying 'We must come to realize that not every defense program is
necessary, not every defense dollar is sacred or well-spent, and
more of everything is simply not sustainable'" [emphasis added].<br>
<br>
<br>
On 2/15/11 9:07 PM, E. Wayne Johnson wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4D5B3F87.40705@pigs.ag" type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
Many Ron Paul supporters criticized his son Rand quite severely
during
his campaign for <br>
some neoconnish leanings and other deviations from fundamental
principles. <br>
<br>
I do have to admit that Rand is doing pretty well at holding the
line
so far.<br>
He is also unashamedly calling himself a Tea Party-er of the 16
Dec
2007 variety.<br>
He doesnt seem to bother in saying that he is different from the
astroturfers.<br>
<br>
HuffPost has a pretty good piece on Rand -<br>
<br>
<i>Rand Paul is a dangerous man. The thing is it's difficult to
tell
whether the Freshman Senator from Kentucky is more dangerous to
the
Left or the Right. Unarguably, he is dangerous to 'The System',
for if
nothing else he isn't screwing around...Apparently Rand Paul
wasn't
merely piggybacking the anti-government groundswell of 2010. He
was
damned serious. And now that 2011 begins with him on the inside,
he's
going to stand on principle, at least for the time being. This
is
nothing Republicans want to hear...</i><br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/james-campion/the-tea-party-man_b_821796.html">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/james-campion/the-tea-party-man_b_821796.html</a><br>
<pre wrap="">
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
_______________________________________________
Peace-discuss mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net">Peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss">http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>