<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
[rom
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,750810,00.html"><http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,750810,00.html></a>.]<br>
<br>
Nuclear Disaster 'Will Have Political Impact as Great as 9/11'<br>
<br>
The nuclear disaster in Fukushima makes it hard to ignore the
vulnurabilities of the technology. It could spell the end of nuclear
power, German commentators argue on Monday. The government in Berlin
may now cave in to mounting pressure to suspend its 12-year
extension of reactor lifetimes, they say.<br>
Info<br>
For reasons of data protection and privacy, your IP address will
only be stored if you are a registered user of Facebook and you are
currently logged in to the service. For more detailed information,
please click on the "i" symbol.<br>
<br>
The nuclear accident at Japan's Fukushima plant following Friday's
earthquake and tsunami has led to anxious questions in Germany about
the safety of its own nuclear reactors and is putting the government
under intense pressure to rethink its decision to extend plant
lifetimes by an average of 12 years.<br>
<br>
German media commentators across the political spectrum are saying
the accident in a highly developed nation such as Japan is further
evidence that nuclear power isn't safe. One commentator in the
conservative Die Welt went as far as to liken the global impact of
the Fukushima explosions to that of the 9/11 terrorist attacks.<br>
<br>
Chancellor Angela Merkel's coalition of conservatives and the
pro-business Free Democratic Party (FDP) reversed the planned
phaseout of the 17 nuclear reactors by 2021, amending a decision
taken by a previous center-left government in 2002 to end nuclear
power generation in Germany.<br>
<br>
She argued that nuclear power was needed as "bridge technology" to
ensure the supply of affordable power as Germany converts to
renewable energy generation. She plans to increase the share of
renewable generation to 80 percent by 2050, from a current level of
only 16 percent.<br>
<br>
A majority of Germans are opposed to nuclear power and the Fukushima
accident is becoming a campaign issue ahead of state elections, the
most important of which is being held in the conservative-ruled and
wealthy state of Baden-Württemberg on March 27. Merkel's Christian
Democratic Union (CDU) party has held the state since 1953, and a
defeat would be a major psychological blow to the chancellor and her
party.<br>
<br>
It would also make it harder for her to pass legislation because the
opposition parties would gain power in the country's upper
legislative chamber, the Bundesrat, which represents the interests
of the states and has the right of co-determination on many
important laws.<br>
<br>
On Monday, support in Merkel's coalition for extending nuclear
lifetimes started to crumble. Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle,
the leader of the FDP, called for a safety review at all German
nuclear plants. Power stations whose cooling systems were found to
lack multiple safety levels would have to be switched off "until the
situation is totally clear."<br>
<br>
Other members of the coalition have also been calling for a rethink.<br>
<br>
German media commentators say Fukushima may force Merkel to shut
German reactors down sooner.<br>
<br>
<u>Center-left Süddeutsche Zeitung writes:<br>
</u><br>
"The events in Japan, which geographically couldn't be much further
from Germany, will influence politics in this country. They could
soon start changing majorities and make governing even harder for
the center-right coalition. The decision it made on nuclear power in
September 2010 could be its undoing."<br>
<br>
"There are few issues that can fire up people's emotions and
mobilize them politically as much as nuclear power can. That's not
good news for a government that supports nuclear power. Especially
ahead of important regional elections, which won't affect the
balance of power in national politics but which could well influence
the morale of party workers to preserve that power."<br>
<br>
"It's not good news because in the end, for example in
Baden-Württemberg, it will only take a few percentage points more or
less to determine the election outcome. Doubts among the supporters
of the conservatives or the FDP could keep a few thousand voters
from the ballot boxes -- or drive them into the arms of the
center-left parties."<br>
<br>
"For Merkel, it is hard to imagine a greater accident at present
than the loss of a CDU governor in Baden-Württemberg."<br>
<br>
"The safety precautions (at the Japanese nuclear plant) weren't just
insufficient; the operating company TEPCO systematically breached
them, as the government ascertained in 2002. TEPCO falsified
security reports in more than 200 cases."<br>
<br>
"Japan is a democracy, but so far the control of the government by
the voters has hardly worked. Things only got a little better after
the Democratic Party came to power two years ago. Before that, the
often incompetent and corrupt governments were never voted out of
office. The perestroika that Japan so urgently needs has scarcely
begun."<br>
<br>
"The unpopular government of Prime Minister Naoto Kan has been on
the brink of collapse in recent weeks. It seemed paralyzed,
distracted, disoriented and divided. Now it has to lead the country
through what may be its worst disaster since 1945. Can it? In the
Soviet Union the Chernobyl disaster accelerated the downfall of a
broken, paralyzed political system."<br>
<br>
<u>Left-wing Die Tageszeitung writes:</u><br>
<br>
"It was always said that danger only came from rickety old reactors
in former Eastern Bloc states -- while conveniently ignoring that
Sweden, France or the United States kept on narrowly avoiding
maximum credible accidents. The disaster of Fukushima has made
clear: There are situations in which even triple safety systems
fail."<br>
<br>
"The weak argument offered by the nuclear lobby that Germany isn't
prone to heavy earthquakes and tsunamis doesn't apply. If a chain of
serious events and stupid coincidences cause prolonged power
outages, if the access routes are blocked or if the control room is
destroyed by a plane crash, German reactors too will overheat. "<br>
<br>
<u>Conservative Die Welt writes:</u><br>
<br>
"The earthquake of March 11 was no terrorist attack. But its
political and psychological consequences will be as great as 9/11
because it has shown what a terrorist attack on nuclear plants would
look like."<br>
<br>
"The photos of burning buildings being swept away are disturbing
enough, but nuclear power makes the decisive difference. The
shockwave that went out from Fukushima may have only reached three
kilometers in physical terms. But in mental terms it went around the
whole world."<br>
<br>
"Chernobyl was a special case. Nuclear energy was viewed with
suspicion but it was accepted as long as modern democracies
harnessed it with security precautions."<br>
<br>
"That is over now. Faith in redundant, coincidence-proof security
precautions has been wiped out by Fukushima. The high-tech democracy
Japan has shown what could happen if an Internet attack on German or
French nuclear reactors were to happen as it did with the 'Stuxnet'
program against the Iranian nuclear program. Or if a determined,
technologically skilled terrorist group were to seize control of a
power station. One knew it before. Seeing it has made the
difference."<br>
<br>
<u>Conservative Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung writes:</u><br>
<br>
"It seems inappropriate to criticize the information policy of the
Japanese government. Some of its statements may seem a bit overly
reticent, but one should allow a government the right not to descend
into speculation about all the theoretically possible scenarios.
People are already being inundated by enough of such speculation."<br>
<br>
"Japan has always been at the forefront of disaster relief efforts
in other parts of the world. That is why the country now has at
least a moral claim to assistance from its friends. People abroad
may find it irritating that the country will probably have to keep
on using nuclear power in the future. But this isn't the time for
know-it-all advice. One should imagine what would have happened if a
reactor in a country with less rigid safety standards had been
subjected to such an earthquake."<br>
<br>
<u>The mass-circulation Bild tabloid writes:<br>
</u><br>
"The nuclear accident is giving even firm supporters of nuclear
power cause for thought, because the unthinkable happened in
Fukushima. But even if we wanted to, we couldn't switch off all
nuclear reactors overnight. Because the lights would literally go
out. The maximum credible accident of Fukushima forces us to check
the safety standards of our nuclear power stations. And to think
harder about the quickest possible way to get out of nuclear power
generation."<br>
<br>
"The Japanese tragedy will dramatically change the debate over
nuclear power. But the issue is too serious to start fanning
people's fears in election campaigns. It may be tempting for
campaigners to go out hunting for votes with the suffering of the
Japanese. But that would be shabby, pitiful and repellent."<br>
<br>
<u>Left-wing Berliner Zeitung writes:<br>
</u><br>
"This hasn't hit a run-down Soviet reactor, a badly constructed
Russian plutonium machine which supplied the army with material for
their nuclear weapons, as was the case with Chernobyl in 1986. Then
and ever since, the builders of nuclear power stations in Europe,
North America and Japan boasted that a serious accident could be
virtually ruled out thanks to superior Western nuclear technology."<br>
<br>
"Every country -- Germany, the US and Japan -- claimed to have the
world's best reactors. Everything was secured several times over,
all conceivable problems could be handled, all eventualities were
prepared for, they said."<br>
<br>
"The disaster at Fushima shows: It's simply not true."<br>
<br>
"It is unlikely to be a coincidence that it was an old reactor with
a design from the 1960s that got into trouble. The technology of
this type of plant, which also operates in Germany, is outdated. Its
safety level is significantly below that of modern nuclear plants,
they wouldn't get construction approval these days. The accident has
reinforced the lessons to be drawn from this: The plants that were
originally intended for a lifespan of 40 years must not have their
lifetimes extended, as is being done everywhere both in the West and
the East -- because it yields major profits for the operators."<br>
<br>
"On the contrary: the old reactors in particular must be taken off
the grid as soon as possible. Germany realized that more than a
decade ago, when the center-left government negotiated the nuclear
phaseout with the power companies. For the center-right risk
prolongers in Berlin, Fukushima is the writing on the wall, whether
they're ready to realize that or not."<br>
<br>
"The radioactive fallout from Fukushima won't hit Germany, but the
political fallout has already arrived. People are alarmed and there
is major uncertainty about 'peaceful' nuclear power, not just among
diehard anti-nuclear campaigners."
</body>
</html>