<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" ><tr><td valign="top" style="font: inherit;">Fyi, some good news for a change.<br><br>--- On <b>Mon, 3/28/11, James Rucker, ColorOfChange.org <i><info@colorofchange.org></i></b> wrote:<br><blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"><div id="yiv513631128"><span style="margin:1em 0px;font-family:Arial, Verdana, sans-serif;font-size:10pt;"><span style="font-size:10pt;"><p style="margin:1em 0px;">Dear Jenifer,
</p>
<p style="margin:1em 0px;">
Last week, in less than a day, more than 43,000 ColorOfChange members successfully demanded that The Huffington Post stop elevating Andrew Breitbart and deny his blog prominent placement on their site. After initial resistance,<sup>1</sup> <b>The Huffington Post complied.</b><sup>2</sup>
</p><p style="margin:1em 0px;">
<i>(If you missed last Wednesday's email describing the situation, click <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://act.colorofchange.org/go/802?akid=1943.394109.92tNFI&t=1">here</a>.)</i>
</p><p style="margin:1em 0px;">
With their move, The Huffington Post reclassified Breitbart to the status he should have had from the beginning. He is now simply one of the more than 3,000 bloggers who contribute to the site and who write without the endorsement or validation of Huffington Post editors.
</p><p style="margin:1em 0px;">
This is a huge victory. It's the <strong>second time within the last 6 months<sup>3</sup> that Breitbart has tried to achieve validation by aligning himself with a credible news effort, and the second time ColorOfChange members have denied him </strong> the opportunity.
</p>
<p style="margin:1em 0px;">
To be clear, our petition called on Arianna Huffington and her editors to stop elevating Breitbart—not ban him from the site altogether. It's an important distinction to make, as The Huffington Post, in addition to serving as a news outlet, is an open platform for bloggers where anyone can create an account and post, with the user assuming the burden of marketing what they write.
</p><p style="margin:1em 0px;">
The Huffington Post should never have elevated Breitbart in the first place given his track record of lies aimed at destroying Black leaders and institutions, and once they heard from tens of thousands of you, management at the site had to figure a way out. The problem was creating tensions within the Huffington Post, and we had several campaign tactics lined up to bring even more heat—both to The Huffington Post and to its parent company AOL. In the end, Breitbart's trademark acting out in response to our campaign<sup>4</sup> made clear that The Huffington Post couldn't survive a relationship with the charlatan and keep its reputation intact. And his behavior gave them a way to pull back from their relationship with Breitbart, without having to admit that they made a poor decision in the first place.
</p><p style="margin:1em 0px;">Thanks again to all the members who helped us win this important victory. We couldn't have done it without you. Remember, ColorOfChange.org is powered by you, our members—your energy and your dollars. Our tiny staff ensures your contributions go a long way. <strong>If you can support our work financially, whatever the amount, please click the link below</strong>:
</p><p style="margin:1em 0px;">
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://act.colorofchange.org/go/205?akid=1943.394109.92tNFI&t=2">http://www.colorofchange.org/donate</a>
</p>
<p style="margin:1em 0px;">
Thanks and Peace,
</p>
<p style="margin:1em 0px;">
-- James, Gabriel, William, Dani, Matt, Natasha and the rest of the ColorOfChange.org team<br>
March 28th, 2011
</p>
<p style="margin:1em 0px;">
References:
</p>
<p style="margin:1em 0px;">
1. “Huffington Post will stand by Andrew Breitbart, despite criticism,” The Washington Post, 3-23-11<br>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://act.colorofchange.org/go/799?akid=1943.394109.92tNFI&t=3">http://act.colorofchange.org/go/799?akid=1943.394109.92tNFI&t=4</a>
</p>
<p style="margin:1em 0px;">
2. “Huffington Post yanks Breitbart from front page,” The Washington Post, 3-24-11<br>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://act.colorofchange.org/go/800?akid=1943.394109.92tNFI&t=5">http://act.colorofchange.org/go/800?akid=1943.394109.92tNFI&t=6</a>
</p>
<p style="margin:1em 0px;">
3. “Victory — ABC News drops Andrew Breitbart,” Jack and Jill Politics, 11-2-10
<br><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://act.colorofchange.org/go/789?akid=1943.394109.92tNFI&t=7">http://act.colorofchange.org/go/789?akid=1943.394109.92tNFI&t=8</a>
</p>
<p style="margin:1em 0px;">
4. “Breitbart attacks Color of Change ‘freaks’ for campaign to have The Huffington Post censor him,” The Daily Caller, 3-24-11
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://act.colorofchange.org/go/801?akid=1943.394109.92tNFI&t=9">http://act.colorofchange.org/go/801?akid=1943.394109.92tNFI&t=10</a>
</p>
<p> </p>
</span><img src="http://act.colorofchange.org/o.gif?akid=1943.394109.92tNFI">
</span>
<p style="font-size:small;"> -- <br> <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://act.colorofchange.org/cms/unsubscribe/unsubscribe/?akid=1943.394109.92tNFI&t=1">You can unsubscribe from this mailing list at any time.</a> </p>
</div></blockquote></td></tr></table>