<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
    <title></title>
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
    "Apart from the dramatic increase in thyroid cancer incidence
    among those exposed at a young age..."!<span
      class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: normal;"></span><br>
    <br>
    Obviously there's no reason to consider them. <br>
    <br>
    <br>
    On 4/7/11 11:22 PM, Morton K. Brussel wrote:
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:C677EAA8-5286-4963-83B2-73CCD2B4DC9E@illinois.edu"
      type="cite">This report is a snow job, and is not confirmed by
      other world authorities on the Chernobyl accident.
      <div>Right up front UCS states:</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div><i>The international expert group predicts that among the
          600 000 persons receiving more significant exposures
          (liquidators working in 1986-87, evacuees, and residents of
          the most ‘contaminated’ areas), the possible increase in
          cancer mortality due to this radiation exposure might be <b>up
            to </b>a few per cent. This might eventually represent <b>up
            to</b> four thousand fatal cancers in addition to the
          approximately 100 000 fatal cancers to be expected due to all
          other causes in this population. Among the 5 million persons
          residing in other ‘contaminated’ areas, the doses are much
          lower and any projected increases are more speculative, but
          are expected to make a difference <b>of less than</b> one per
          cent in cancer mortality.</i></div>
      <div><i><br>
        </i></div>
      <div>Note the words<i> "up to" <span class="Apple-style-span"
            style="font-style: normal;">on the third and fourth lines,
            and "of less than in the final sentence, meaning the result
            might well be zero! Pretty sneaky  to use this for the their
            conclusions. UCS has led a campaign against nuclear power
            for some time. </span></i></div>
      <div><i><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: normal;"><br>
          </span></i></div>
      <div><i><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: normal;">Aside
            from that, one can consult a comprehensive review from the
            Chernobyl Forum, 2003, a large collaboration from world
            health authorities, which states:</span></i></div>
      <div><i><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: normal;"><br>
          </span></i></div>
      <div><i><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: normal;">
            <!--StartFragment-->
            <div class="MsoNormal"><i>Apart from the dramatic increase
                in thyroid cancer incidence
                among those exposed at </i></div>
            <div class="MsoNormal"><i> <o:p></o:p></i></div>
            <div class="MsoNormal"><i>a young age, there is no clearly
                demonstrated increase in
                the incidence of solid cancers </i></div>
            <div class="MsoNormal"><i> <o:p></o:p></i></div>
            <div class="MsoNormal"><i>or leukaemia due to radiation in
                the most affected
                populations. There was, however, </i></div>
            <div class="MsoNormal"><i> <o:p></o:p></i></div>
            <div class="MsoNormal"><i>an increase in psychological
                problems among the affected
                population, compounded </i></div>
            <div class="MsoNormal"><i> <o:p></o:p></i></div>
            <div class="MsoNormal"><i>economic depression that followed
                the break-up of the Soviet
                Union.</i></div>
            <div class="MsoNormal"><i> <o:p></o:p></i></div>
            <div class="MsoNormal"><i>It is impossible to assess
                reliably, with any precision,
                numbers of fatal cancers caused </i></div>
            <div class="MsoNormal"><i> <o:p></o:p></i></div>
            <div class="MsoNormal"><i>by radiation exposure due to the
                Chernobyl accident — or
                indeed the impact of the </i></div>
            <div class="MsoNormal"><i> <o:p></o:p></i></div>
            <div class="MsoNormal"><i>stress and anxiety induced by the
                accident and the response
                to it. Small differences in </i></div>
            <div class="MsoNormal"><i> <o:p></o:p></i></div>
            <div class="MsoNormal"><i>the assumptions concerning
                radiation risks can lead to large
                differences in the predicted</i></div>
            <div class="MsoNormal"><i> <o:p></o:p></i></div>
            <i>health consequences, which are therefore
              highly uncertain. …</i><!--EndFragment--></span></i></div>
      <div><i><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: normal;"><i><br>
            </i></span></i></div>
      <div><i><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: normal;"><br>
          </span></i>
        <div>Quoting another report from the World Health Organization
          (2006): </div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div><!--StartFragment-->
          <div class="MsoNormal"><span class="apple-style-span"><span
                style="font-family: Arial; color: black;"><i>Apart from
                  the large increase in thyroid cancer incidence in
                  young
                  people, <b>there are at present no clearly
                    demonstrated radiation-related
                    increases in cancer risk.</b> This should not,
                  however, be interpreted to mean that
                  no increase has in fact occurred: based on the
                  experience of other populations
                  exposed to ionising radiation, a small increase in the
                  relative risk of cancer
                  is expected, even at the low to moderate doses
                  received. Although it is
                  expected that epidemiological studies will have
                  difficulty identifying such a
                  risk, it may nevertheless translate into a substantial
                  number of
                  radiation-related cancer cases in the future, given
                  the very large number of
                  individuals exposed.</i></span></span><span
              style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Times;"><o:p></o:p></span></div>
          <div class="MsoNormal"><span class="apple-style-span"><span
                style="font-family: Arial; color: black;"><i><br>
                </i></span></span></div>
          <div class="MsoNormal"><span class="apple-style-span"><span
                style="font-family: Arial; color: black;">Definitive
                conclusions, therefore are hard to come by, so quoting
                cancer related deaths in the multiple thousands and
                above, as UCS does, is irresponsible<i>. </i>One might
                furthermore note that the estimates on which most of
                these reports are based use the LNT model, which is
                unproven for low radiation doses. </span></span></div>
          <div class="MsoNormal"><span class="apple-style-span"><span
                style="font-family: Arial; color: black;"><i><br>
                </i></span></span></div>
          <div class="MsoNormal"><span class="apple-style-span"><span
                style="font-family: Arial; color: black;"><i>--mkb</i></span></span></div>
          <div class="MsoNormal"><span class="apple-style-span"><span
                style="font-family: Arial; color: black;"><i><br>
                </i></span></span></div>
          <!--EndFragment-->
        </div>
        <div><br>
          <div>
            <div>On Apr 7, 2011, at 2:45 PM, C. G. Estabrook wrote:</div>
            <br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
            <blockquote type="cite">
              <div>Two noteworthy articles from the Union of Concerned
                Scientists, one on<br>
                careful calculation of excess cancer deaths from
                Chernobyl, the other on<br>
                internal documents obtained from NRC via FOIA showing
                concerns about<br>
                station blackout prior to Fukushima catastrophe:<br>
                <br>
                   <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="http://allthingsnuclear.org/tagged/Japan_nuclear">http://allthingsnuclear.org/tagged/Japan_nuclear</a><br>
                <br>
                _______________________________________________<br>
                Peace-discuss mailing list<br>
                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:Peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net">Peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net</a><br>
                <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss">http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss</a><br>
              </div>
            </blockquote>
          </div>
          <br>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>