<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=windows-1252">
<STYLE>.hmmessage P {
        PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; MARGIN: 0px; PADDING-TOP: 0px
}
BODY.hmmessage {
        FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma
}
</STYLE>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.17063" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY class=hmmessage bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message -----
<DIV style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A
title=mgriffwzef@comcast.net href="mailto:mgriffwzef@comcast.net">Mike</A>
</DIV>
<DIV><B>To:</B> <A title=lvpsf@igc.org href="mailto:lvpsf@igc.org">steve
zeltzer</A> ; <A title=alanwasdahl@sbcglobal.net
href="mailto:alanwasdahl@sbcglobal.net">Alan Wasdahl</A> ; <A
title=nursedebbie1@comcast.net href="mailto:nursedebbie1@comcast.net">Debbie
Swink</A> ; <A title=Newdem@aol.com href="mailto:Newdem@aol.com">Dave
Strattman</A> ; <A title=diamond.1777@hotmail.com
href="mailto:diamond.1777@hotmail.com">tim Skurzewski</A> ; <A
title=duckpondchuck@aol.com href="mailto:duckpondchuck@aol.com">Chuck Shaw</A> ;
<A title=Red1pearl@aol.com href="mailto:Red1pearl@aol.com">Red1pearl@aol.com</A>
; <A title=agitate@frontiernet.net href="mailto:agitate@frontiernet.net">John
Newell</A> ; <A title=kellycm2@bellsouth.net
href="mailto:kellycm2@bellsouth.net">Chuck Kelly</A> ; <A
title=hkelber@earthlink.net href="mailto:hkelber@earthlink.net">Harry Kelber</A>
; <A title=dlj725@hughes.net href="mailto:dlj725@hughes.net">David Johnson</A> ;
<A title=Donhudson@cwlp.com href="mailto:Donhudson@cwlp.com">Don Hudson</A> ; <A
title=deegarygriffin@msn.com href="mailto:deegarygriffin@msn.com">Gary
Griffin</A> ; <A title=cloggingj@comcast.net
href="mailto:cloggingj@comcast.net">Jan Griffin</A> ; <A title=mrdoda@mchsi.com
href="mailto:mrdoda@mchsi.com">Dwayne Abney</A> </DIV>
<DIV><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, April 17, 2011 10:50 AM</DIV>
<DIV><B>Subject:</B> Fw: Republican Plan Will Slash Jobs</DIV></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message -----
<DIV style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A
title=tanstl@hotmail.com href="mailto:tanstl@hotmail.com">David Sladky</A>
</DIV>
<DIV><B>To:</B> <A title=mgriffwzef@comcast.net
href="mailto:mgriffwzef@comcast.net">mike griffen</A> ; <A title=lvpsf@igc.org
href="mailto:lvpsf@igc.org">lvpsf@igc.org</A> ; <A title=websterhome@aol.com
href="mailto:websterhome@aol.com">websterhome@aol.com</A> ; <A
title=nursedebbie1@comcast.net
href="mailto:nursedebbie1@comcast.net">nursedebbie1@comcast.net</A> ; <A
title=alanwasdahl@sbcglobal.net
href="mailto:alanwasdahl@sbcglobal.net">alanwasdahl@sbcglobal.net</A> ; <A
title=diamond.1777@hotmail.com
href="mailto:diamond.1777@hotmail.com">diamond.1777@hotmail.com</A> ; <A
title=duckpondchuck@aol.com
href="mailto:duckpondchuck@aol.com">duckpondchuck@aol.com</A> ; <A
title=nea.peter.miller@gmail.com
href="mailto:nea.peter.miller@gmail.com">nea.peter.miller@gmail.com</A> ; <A
title=kellycm2@bellsouth.net
href="mailto:kellycm2@bellsouth.net">kellycm2@bellsouth.net</A> ; <A
title=dlj725@hughes.net href="mailto:dlj725@hughes.net">David Johnson</A> ; <A
title=donhudson@cwlp.com href="mailto:donhudson@cwlp.com">donhudson@cwlp.com</A>
; <A title=deegarygriffin@msn.com
href="mailto:deegarygriffin@msn.com">deegarygriffin@msn.com</A> ; <A
title=cloggingj@comcast.net
href="mailto:cloggingj@comcast.net">cloggingj@comcast.net</A> ; <A
title=mfroemke1@aol.com href="mailto:mfroemke1@aol.com">mfroemke1@aol.com</A> ;
<A title=scaflcio@bellsouth.net
href="mailto:scaflcio@bellsouth.net">scaflcio@bellsouth.net</A> ; <A
title=mrdoda@mchsi.com href="mailto:mrdoda@mchsi.com">mrdoda@mchsi.com</A>
</DIV>
<DIV><B>Sent:</B> Saturday, April 16, 2011 7:48 PM</DIV>
<DIV><B>Subject:</B> RE: Republican Plan Will Slash Jobs</DIV></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<TABLE id=ViewArticleTable cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=4 width="100%" border=0>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD vAlign=top align=left colSpan=2>
<DIV class=articleTitle></DIV>
<DIV class=articleTitle><STRONG><FONT size=5>Obama's Deficit Plan will
Impoverish Main Street America</FONT></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV class=articleSubTitle></DIV><BR>
<DIV class=articleAuthorName>by Kevin Zeese</DIV><BR></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD align=left width=1><IMG
src="http://globalresearch.ca/coverStoryPictures2/24321.jpg" border=0></TD>
<TD align=right>
<SCRIPT type=text/javascript>
google_ad_client = "pub-1591488516340780";
/* 200x200, created 11/9/09 */
google_ad_slot = "9178639779";
google_ad_width = 200;
google_ad_height = 200;
</SCRIPT>
<SCRIPT src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"
type=text/javascript>
</SCRIPT>
<INS
style="BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; BORDER-TOP: medium none; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; VISIBILITY: visible; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; MARGIN: 0px; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; WIDTH: 200px; PADDING-TOP: 0px; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; POSITION: relative; HEIGHT: 200px"><INS
id=aswift_0_anchor
style="BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; BORDER-TOP: medium none; DISPLAY: block; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; VISIBILITY: visible; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; MARGIN: 0px; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; WIDTH: 200px; PADDING-TOP: 0px; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; POSITION: relative; HEIGHT: 200px"><IFRAME
id=aswift_0 style="LEFT: 0px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 0px" name=aswift_0
marginWidth=0 marginHeight=0 frameBorder=0 width=200 scrolling=no
onload="var i=this.id,s=window.google_iframe_oncopy,H=s&&s.handlers,h=H&&H[i],w=this.contentWindow,d;try{d=w.document}catch(e){}if(h&&d&&(!d.body||!d.body.firstChild)){if(h.call){i+='.call';setTimeout(h,0)}else if(h.match){i+='.nav';w.location.replace(h)}s.log&&s.log.push(i)}"
height=200 allowTransparency></IFRAME></INS></INS>
<SCRIPT type=text/javascript>google_ad_client = "pub-1591488516340780";/* 200x200, created 5/22/09 */google_ad_slot = "1471974688";google_ad_width = 200;google_ad_height = 200;</SCRIPT>
<SCRIPT src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"
type=text/javascript></SCRIPT>
<INS
style="BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; BORDER-TOP: medium none; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; VISIBILITY: visible; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; MARGIN: 0px; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; WIDTH: 200px; PADDING-TOP: 0px; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; POSITION: relative; HEIGHT: 200px"><INS
id=aswift_1_anchor
style="BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; BORDER-TOP: medium none; DISPLAY: block; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; VISIBILITY: visible; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; MARGIN: 0px; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; WIDTH: 200px; PADDING-TOP: 0px; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; POSITION: relative; HEIGHT: 200px"><IFRAME
id=aswift_1 style="LEFT: 0px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 0px" name=aswift_1
marginWidth=0 marginHeight=0 frameBorder=0 width=200 scrolling=no
onload="var i=this.id,s=window.google_iframe_oncopy,H=s&&s.handlers,h=H&&H[i],w=this.contentWindow,d;try{d=w.document}catch(e){}if(h&&d&&(!d.body||!d.body.firstChild)){if(h.call){i+='.call';setTimeout(h,0)}else if(h.match){i+='.nav';w.location.replace(h)}s.log&&s.log.push(i)}"
height=200 allowTransparency></IFRAME></INS></INS></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD noWrap align=left colSpan=2>
<DIV class=bigArticleText12><A href="http://www.globalresearch.ca/">Global
Research</A>, April 14, 2011</DIV></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD noWrap align=left colSpan=2>
<DIV class=bigArticleText12></DIV></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD noWrap align=left colSpan=2><BR>
<DIV class=bigArticleText12><A id=printLink
href="javascript:printarticle(24321);"><I></I></A> </DIV></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD noWrap align=left colSpan=2><BR>
<TABLE id=digTable cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=4 width="100%" border=0>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD width=60>
<SCRIPT src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js"
type=text/javascript></SCRIPT>
</TD>
<TD vAlign=baseline width=60>
<SCRIPT>reddit_url='http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=24321'</SCRIPT>
<SCRIPT>reddit_title='Obama's Deficit Plan will Impoverish Main Street America'</SCRIPT>
<SCRIPT src="http://www.reddit.com/button.js?t=2"
type=text/javascript></SCRIPT>
</TD>
<TD width=60><A
href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.globalresearch.ca%2Findex.php%3Fcontext%3Dva%26aid%3D24321"></A></TD>
<TD width=100><A style="TEXT-DECORATION: none"
href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fglobalresearch.ca%2Findex.php%3Fcontext%3Dva%26aid%3D24321&t=Obama's%20Deficit%20Plan%20will%20Impoverish%20Main%20Street%20America&src=sp"
type=box_count name=fb_share fb_rendered="true" fb_count="82"><SPAN
class="fb_share_size_Small fb_share_count_wrapper"><SPAN
class="FBConnectButton FBConnectButton_Small"
style="CURSOR: pointer"><SPAN
class=FBConnectButton_Text></SPAN></SPAN></SPAN></A></TD>
<SCRIPT src="http://static.ak.fbcdn.net/connect.php/js/FB.Share"
type=text/javascript></SCRIPT>
<TD width=100></TD>
<SCRIPT src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"
type=text/javascript></SCRIPT>
<TD vAlign=bottom align=left> </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD align=left colSpan=2>
<DIV class=bigArticleText style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 10px"><BR>
<DIV class=yui-t1 id=bd align=justify _yuid="yui_3_1_1_7_130279696881767">
<P class=yiv1771852097MsoNormal style="LINE-HEIGHT: normal"><FONT
face=Verdana><EM>President Obama announced the outlines of his deficit
plan, leaving a lot up for negotiation. He planted his poll at the center
right and where he ends up, with his history of compromising to bring
right wing Republicans and Democratic corporatists together, can only be
worse.</EM></FONT></P>
<P class=yiv1771852097MsoNormal style="LINE-HEIGHT: normal"><FONT
face=Verdana><EM>I was pleasantly surprised to see groups that usually
side with Obama even criticizing him. True Majority/US Action wrote
“<B>Obama wants to cut $4 trillion, but not $1 from the Pentagon</B>,” in
their headline. They go on to point out that “President Obama today
proposed reducing the deficit through almost </EM></FONT><A
href="http://www.npr.org/2011/04/13/135383045/president-obamas-speech-on-deficit-cutting?ps=rs"
target=_blank rel=nofollow><FONT face=Verdana><EM>$800 billion in
cuts</EM></FONT></A><FONT face=Verdana><EM>.” They correctly point
out that the country needs jobs not deficit cuts, and if cuts are going to
be made they should not be made in domestic programs where funds are
needed but in the military writing: “</EM></FONT><A
href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-04-13/obama-is-said-to-target-4-trillion-deficit-reduction-in-12-years-or-less.html"
target=_blank rel=nofollow><FONT face=Verdana><EM>Over half of the money
Congress makes decisions on goes directly into the Pentagon’s
pocket</EM></FONT></A><FONT face=Verdana><EM>, and that doesn't count the
money for actual wars. But instead of cutting the Pentagon budget, Obama
is proposing over $700 billion in cuts to programs that benefit the poor,
seniors and children, while only trying to save $400 billion on war and
weapons.”</EM> </FONT></P>
<P class=yiv1771852097MsoNormal style="LINE-HEIGHT: normal"><FONT
face=Verdana><BR>When there are no real cuts for the Pentagon, just slower
growth, it means that the rest of discretionary spending will face real
cuts. Everything from education to the environment, health care to
safety will be cut and every American will feel it. </FONT></P><FONT
face=Verdana>When it comes to taxes, the president is seeking small
increases on the wealthiest. A critical part of solving the economic
problems in the United States, not just the deficit problems, is fixing
the dramatic upward shift of income and wealth to the economic
elite. The corporate cronyism of the last three decades has left the
middle class, working class and poor with few resources, but the
wealthiest have become gluttonously rich. </FONT><BR><FONT
face=Verdana>The vast majority of the income gains in the United States
over the last three decades have gone to the richest 5% of the population
with the greatest gains in the top 0.5%. This funneling of wealth to the
top came as a result of policies that were explicitly designed to
redistribute income upwards beginning with President Reagan’s “trickle
down economics” and continuing with the Bush tax cuts and the Obama/Bush
Wall Street bailouts. In fact, during the economic expansion from
2002-2007 the top 1% captured two-thirds of income growth. Now, the top 1%
has 70% of the wealth of the nation. To balance the budget, the government
needs to go where the money is. As a result, it is far more appropriate to
tax the richest that have prospered then to cut essential services for the
broad middle class which has suffered.</FONT><BR><FONT face=Verdana>The
funneling of wealth to the top has been due to tax payer subsidies, tax
breaks and corporate welfare to concentrated corporate interests and tax
breaks for the wealthiest Americans. This is a major source of the
national debt. From 2001-2008, tax cuts for the wealthy cost the U.S.
Treasury $700 billion, all adding to the national debt. </FONT><BR><FONT
face=Verdana>There are 7,500 households in the United States with annual
incomes over $20 million. Over the last two and a half decades, this is
the group that has profited from a tax system designed to favor the
wealthiest. America’s highest earners – the top 400 – have seen their
share of income paid in federal income tax plummet from 51.2% in 1955 to
16.6% in 2007, the most recent year with top 400 statistics available.
Congress should boost the top tax rate to 50% on annual incomes over $5
million and to 70% on incomes over $10 million. This would generate an
additional $105 billion annually, going a long way toward getting our
fiscal house in order.</FONT><BR><FONT face=Verdana>Last week the
Institute for Policy Studies issued a report, </FONT><A
href="http://www.ips-dc.org/reports/unnecessary_austerity_unnecessary_government_shutdown"
target=_blank rel=nofollow><FONT face=Verdana>Unnecessary Austerity,
Unnecessary Shutdown</FONT></A><FONT face=Verdana>, which showed that
austerity was not really needed. The report pointed out “we're not broke.
Not even close. The United States of America is awash in wealth. Our
corporations are holding record trillions in cash. And overall individual
wealth in the United States, the Credit Suisse Research Institute reported
this past fall, has risen 23 percent since the year 2000, to $236,213 per
American adult.”<B> </B>They point to five tax revenue reforms that
could raise a total of as much as $4 trillion over the next decade. The
vast majority of Americans would see no tax increase from any of these
reforms:</FONT><BR>
<P class=yiv1771852097MsoNormal
style="MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0pt; LINE-HEIGHT: normal"><FONT face=Verdana>•
Establish several higher income tax brackets for millionaires: $60-$80
billion a year</FONT></P>
<P class=yiv1771852097MsoNormal
style="MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0pt; LINE-HEIGHT: normal"><FONT face=Verdana>• Scrap
overseas corporate tax havens: $100 billion a year</FONT></P>
<P class=yiv1771852097MsoNormal
style="MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0pt; LINE-HEIGHT: normal"><FONT face=Verdana>•
Introduce a modest financial transaction tax: $150 billion a
year</FONT></P>
<P class=yiv1771852097MsoNormal
style="MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0pt; LINE-HEIGHT: normal"><FONT face=Verdana>•
Revamp the estate tax to include progressive rates: $25 billion a
year<BR><BR>• End preferential treatment for income from dividends and
capital gains: $88 billion</FONT></P>
<P class=yiv1771852097MsoNormal
style="MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0pt; LINE-HEIGHT: normal"><FONT face=Verdana><BR><A
href="http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=20425"><IMG
src="http://www.globalresearch.ca/articlePictures/GEC%20book%20ad%20copy%202.jpg"></A><BR><BR><BR>The
largest caucus in Congress, the Progressive Caucus, put forward an
alternative budget as well. The </FONT><A
href="http://grijalva.house.gov/uploads/CPC.Budget.112th.Memo.pdf"
target=_blank rel=nofollow><FONT face=Verdana>CPC Budget</FONT></A><FONT
face=Verdana> would balance the budget by 2014 and create a budget surplus
by 2021. And, they were also able to reduce the deficit by $5.7 trillion
from 2012 to 2021. They do not do this with magic, they achieve
these goals with common sense – they go to where the money is the
wealthiest Americans and corporations that have profited from government
programs, the military and security state apparatus that spends 66% of
federal discretionary spending and by getting the economy growing
again.</FONT></P><FONT face=Verdana>These are the types of taxes on the
wealthiest Americans and corporations where President Obama should have
started the discussion. It he had taken this approach and seriously cut
the military budget he would surpass the deficit cutting goals of even the
most extreme Republican and provide enough money to build a clean energy
economy that would be sustainable for the 21<SUP>st</SUP>
Century.</FONT><BR><FONT face=Verdana>That brings me to my final point,
health care. Rep. Paul Ryan has made destruction of Medicare the
centerpiece of his deficit cutting plan. Medicare is the most
cost-efficient part of U.S. health care that covers everyone over 65 years
old. Ryan is seeking to give it to the insurance industry and funnel
trillions of dollars to them. Sadly, this builds on the mistake of
President Obama’s health care bill. Rather than building on a
successful public health program, Medicare, Obama and the corporate
Democrats decided to further entrench the insurance industry. The
hundreds of millions in annual tax subsidies they will get from ObamaCare
are not enough. Their appetite for profits is unquenchable, now they
want trillions by privatizing Medicare and Rep. Ryan is trying to sell it
for them. On its face the proposal is absurd: how do you save money
by putting in place a middleman who takes 15% to 20% of the funding of
health care for its profits, executive salaries, advertising and
investments in property and other profit centers? Ryan would leave
seniors with insufficient funds to pay for health care.</FONT><BR><FONT
face=Verdana>On health care another Democratic loyalist got it right in
reaction to the budget debate. Robert Reich wrote pointedly: <I><A
href="http://www.readersupportednews.org/opinion2/272-39/5605-medicare-for-all-is-the-solution"
target=_blank rel=nofollow><SPAN style="FONT-STYLE: normal">Mr. President:
Why Medicare Isn't the Problem, It's the Solution.</SPAN></A><B> </B><SPAN
style="FONT-STYLE: normal">He points out facts that every American paying
attention should know. The U.S</SPAN></I> spends “more on health
care per person than any other advanced nation and get less for our money.
Yearly public and private healthcare spending is $7,538 per person. That's
almost two and a half times the average of other advanced nations.” He
points out a few more nuggets about the failed American health care
system:</FONT><BR>
<P style="MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in"><FONT face=Verdana>-<SPAN
style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal; LINE-HEIGHT: normal; FONT-STYLE: normal; FONT-VARIANT: normal">
</SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt"><FONT size=3>America spends $30
billion a year fixing medical errors - the worst rate among advanced
countries.</FONT></SPAN></FONT></P>
<P style="MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in"><FONT face=Verdana>-<SPAN
style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal; LINE-HEIGHT: normal; FONT-STYLE: normal; FONT-VARIANT: normal">
</SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt"><FONT size=3>Administrative costs eat
up 15 to 30% of all healthcare spending in the United States. That's twice
the rate of most other advanced nations.</FONT></SPAN></FONT></P>
<P style="MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in"><FONT face=Verdana>-<SPAN
style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal; LINE-HEIGHT: normal; FONT-STYLE: normal; FONT-VARIANT: normal">
</SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt"><FONT size=3>A third of nursing hours
are devoted to documenting what's happened so insurers have
proof.</FONT></SPAN></FONT></P><FONT face=Verdana>And, how is Medicare the
solution? Well first off, many economists correctly point out that
health care is the driver of deficits at the state and national levels of
government for the foreseeable future. Cutting Medicare funding does
not deal with any of the underlying problems in the U.S. health care
system it just results in seniors having less health care. Reich
points out: “Estimates of how much would be saved by extending Medicare to
cover the entire population range from $58 billion to $400 billion a year.
More Americans would get quality health care, and the long-term budget
crisis would be sharply reduced.” Improved Medicare, expanded to
cover everyone is the solution to the U.S. health care crisis it results
in lower costs, better coverage and better health outcomes for everyone in
the United States.</FONT><BR><FONT face=Verdana>Once again President Obama
has missed an opportunity to get the country on the right track.
And, if his previous negotiations with the Republicans are a measure of
the likely outcome, his already weak proposal is going to get worse –
worse for the middle class, working class and poor. The military,
security state and wealthy – they will be fine.</FONT><BR><I><FONT
face=Verdana><STRONG>Kevin Zeese</STRONG> directs Its Our Economy,
</FONT><A href="http://www.itsoureconomy.us/" target=_blank
rel=nofollow><FONT face=Verdana>www.ItsOurEconomy.US</FONT></A><FONT
face=Verdana>. </FONT></I><BR></DIV></DIV></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><BR> <BR>
<HR id=stopSpelling>
From: mgriffwzef@comcast.net<BR>To: lvpsf@igc.org; websterhome@aol.com;
nursedebbie1@comcast.net; alanwasdahl@sbcglobal.net; tanstl@hotmail.com;
diamond.1777@hotmail.com; duckpondchuck@aol.com; nea.peter.miller@gmail.com;
kellycm2@bellsouth.net; dlj725@hughes.net; Donhudson@cwlp.com;
deegarygriffin@msn.com; cloggingj@comcast.net; mfroemke1@aol.com;
scaflcio@bellsouth.net; mrdoda@mchsi.com<BR>Subject: Fw: Republican Plan Will
Slash Jobs<BR>Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:55:14 -0500<BR><BR>
<META content="Microsoft SafeHTML" name=Generator>
<STYLE>
</STYLE>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message -----
<DIV style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A
title=hkelber@earthlink.net href="mailto:hkelber@earthlink.net">Harry Kelber</A>
</DIV>
<DIV><B>To:</B> <A title=mgriffwzef@comcast.net
href="mailto:mgriffwzef@comcast.net">Mike Griffin</A> </DIV>
<DIV><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, April 14, 2011 9:45 PM</DIV>
<DIV><B>Subject:</B> FW: Republican Plan Will Slash Jobs</DIV></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><FONT face=Verdana><BR>------ Forwarded Message<BR><B>From:
</B>Harry Kelber <<A
href="mailto:hkelber@earthlink.net">hkelber@earthlink.net</A>><BR><B>Date:
</B>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 22:28:40 -0400<BR><B>To: </B>Harry Kelber <<A
href="mailto:hkelber@earthlink.net">hkelber@earthlink.net</A>><BR><B>Subject:
</B>FW: Republican Plan Will Slash Jobs<BR><BR><BR>------ Forwarded
Message<BR><B>From: </B>Harry Kelber <<A
href="mailto:hkelber@earthlink.net">hkelber@earthlink.net</A>><BR><B>Date:
</B>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 21:50:42 -0400<BR><B>To: </B>Harry Kelber <<A
href="mailto:hkelber@earthlink.net">hkelber@earthlink.net</A>><BR><B>Subject:
</B>Republican Plan Will Slash Jobs<BR><BR><BR><BR>------ End of Forwarded
Message<BR><BR><BR>------ End of Forwarded Message<BR></FONT></BODY></HTML>