<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.19222">
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>
<DIV id=header-wrapper>
<H2 id=header><A href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/" rel=index><IMG alt="BBC News"
src="http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/img/1_0_1/cream/hi/news/news-blocks.gif"></A>
<SPAN class=section-title>Europe</SPAN> </H2>
<DIV id=blq-local-nav>
<UL id=nav class=nav>
<LI class="first-child "><A
href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/correspondents/paulmason"><SPAN
class=correspondent-portrait><IMG
alt="Paul Mason, Economics editor, Newsnight"
src="http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/58414000/jpg/_58414003_aaa6c317-8926-4e8f-9a09-f95f8bffae7c.jpg"
width=144 height=104></SPAN> <SPAN class=byline-lead-in>Article written
by</SPAN> <SPAN class=name>Paul Mason</SPAN> </A><SPAN
class=bbc-role>Economics editor, Newsnight</SPAN> </LI></UL></DIV></DIV>
<DIV id=content-wrapper class=us>
<DIV id=main-content class="story correspondent-story blq-clearfix">
<DIV class=layout-block-a>
<DIV class=story-body>
<DIV class=correspondent-byline>
<DIV class=correspondent-byline-inner>
<UL class=social-links>
<LI><A href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/correspondents/paulmason" rel=me>More
from Paul</A></LI></UL></DIV></DIV>
<H1 class=story-header>Greece: Trying to understand Syriza</H1>
<DIV class="has-icon-comment dna-comment-count-simple"><A
href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-18056677#dna-comments">Comments
<SPAN class=dna-comment-count-number>(50)</SPAN> <SPAN
class="gvl3-icon gvl3-icon-comment"></SPAN></A></DIV>
<P>This is less of a blog more of a series of notes to try and enhance
understanding of who Syriza and its leader Alexis Tsipras actually are, and how
they might behave if, as polls suggest, they become the winning party in a
second Greek general election. I've been troubled by the lack of historical
depth; and of course my own knowledge is limited to English sources. Get ready
to hear about parties and political currents that most commentators believed
were insignificant just a few years ago.</P>
<DIV class="caption body-width"><IMG alt="Woman walking past Syriza posters"
src="http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/60214000/jpg/_60214383_syriza_posters_afp.jpg"
width=464 height=261> <SPAN style="WIDTH: 464px">Syriza election posters read:
"They decide without us. We go ahead without them"</SPAN> </DIV>
<P>1. Syriza is an acronym signifying "Coalition of the Radical Left". It's key
component is a party called Synaspismos, itself an umbrella group of the far
left in Greece. </P>
<P>2. Alexis Tsipras is the 38-year-old leader of the Synaspismos party, and
rose to prominence as its candidate for the mayor of Athens in 2006. Tsipras
originated from the youth wing of the Communist Party, the KKE.</P>
<P>3. Greek communism, like most of Western communism after the 1970s, was split
into two hostile parties: the KKE of the "interior" and that of the "exterior" -
the latter denoting a Moscow-oriented party - the former denoting a
Euro-communist, more parliamentary and socially liberal agenda.</P>
<P>4. Initially Synaspismos was the electoral alliance between the two KKEs. But
in the early 1990s the main Moscow-oriented KKE quit the alliance, purging about
45% of its members, who then stayed inside Synaspismos with the Eurocommunists.
These included Tsipras.</P>
<P>5. Synaspismos then evolved in an interesting direction. Reacting to the rise
of the anti-globalisation movement, first of all the party itself became a
highly diverse left umbrella group: of Eurocommunists, left-social Democrats,
far leftists, and ecologists. It played a significant role in mobilisations
against summits, beginning in Genoa 2001 and beyond. Meanwhile the main KKE
remained a traditional Communist party, rooted in public sector and manual trade
unions.</P>
<P>6. Then, in the 2004 election, Synaspismos came together with other small
parties to form Syriza. These included a split-off from the British SWP, a split
off from the main Communist Party and another group of eco-leftists.</P>
<P>7. Under Tsipras' leadership, and invigorated by now including the entire
left, except the traditionalist KKE, Syriza grew the far left's vote from 3.3%
to 5.6% in the 2007 election - giving it 14 MPs. </P>
<P>8. The crisis which broke out in December 2008, after the police shooting of
a 15-year-old schoolboy, led to two weeks of rioting by the youth and poor of
Athens, and further strengthened Syriza as a left pole of attraction. Though the
parties inside Syriza remained in the low thousands of members, many young
people began to identify with them - above all in a country where Marxism has
massive prestige due to its role in both the anti-fascist resistance and in the
1946-49 Civil War. In addition, those migrants with the right to vote, hearing a
rising chorus of anti-migrant rhetoric from the centre as well as the right,
have flocked to vote Syriza.</P>
<P>9. Once George Papandreou's Pasok party committed itself to supporting
EU-designed austerity programmes, after January 2010, a huge political gap
opened up on the left of Greek politics - which arguably forms a natural
majority. Only the KKE and Syriza were opposed to austerity and of the two,
Syriza had a political leadership of youth, resilience and global vision. </P>
<P>10. (It is worth noting here the character of Pasok. It emerged in the
inter-war years as a split from republican liberalism, and while it became a
traditional social democratic party after the fall of the Colonels regime in
1974, its forms of organisation, and mass base among civil servants and small
business people, lead some to compare it to Argentine "Peronism" - that is left
nationalism with a working class base. This affects the political dynamics the
moment the Pasok leadership loses its claim to represent "the nation" in
conflict with the EU.)</P>
<P>11. As events pulled Syriza leftward and swelled its support, one final split
took place that may prove highly significant. Veteran leaders of the old
KKE-interior - that is, the Eurocommunists - split from Synaspismos and formed
the Democratic Left, led by Fotis Kouvelis - in March 2010. They formed a
separate parliamentary group of four until the recent election massively swelled
their numbers to 19. At the first congress of the Democratic Left, in March
2011, in an extraordinary move, the then serving Pasok prime minister, George
Papandreou, attended. He sat in the front row of the audience and applauded.</P>
<P>12. Now, how to make sense of this, and why does it matter? </P>
<P>13. The mainstream Pasok party split before the May 2012 election. Six
sitting MPs joined the Democratic Left, while others tried to form an
anti-austerity left social democratic party, led by charismatic female MP Louka
Katseli. The latter disappeared without trace. But the Pasok left and its voters
now co-exist with the former Eurocommunists in a fairly moderate, anti-austerity
but essentially left social democratic, pro-Euro party - the Dem Left - which
now has 19 seats.</P>
<P>14. Syriza massively scooped up the votes of leftist, progressive, socially
liberal young people, as well as the trade union voters, not specifically
aligned with the Communist Party, to gain 52 seats.</P>
<P>15. The Communist Party itself, while growing its vote, did not break out of
its traditional demographic base - manual workers, older lifelong Communists
with family loyalty traced back to the pre-war workers' movement. The KKE gained
26 seats.</P>
<P>16. In the negotiations to form a government this week the Pasok leader,
Venizelos, got the Democratic Left as far as agreeing to a programme to
"progressively disengage" from the Troika-imposed austerity. But they could not
persuade Syriza to join, and without Syriza, the Dem Left knew it would be the
captive of a Pasok/ND coalition.</P>
<P>17. As new elections loom, obviously one possible outcome is the return of
voters to ND and Pasok. But the latest polls do not signal this. They signal a
growth in support for Syriza, which is seen as a consistent opponent of
austerity on the left, and which has narrative and momentum among the
traditional base of all other leftist parties.</P>
<P>18. If we look at the demographics of the left, there are the following: </P>
<UL>
<LI>Anarchist-minded youth, living alternative lifestyles among the poor, who
will only vote for Syriza or not at all. (Anecdotally, even some members of
the "black bloc" were reported to have joined Syriza, after accepting the
futility of constant rioting/counterculture.)</LI></UL>
<UL>
<LI>Middle-class and professional workers, including many public servants
who've been hit by tax rises, wage cuts, arbitrary deductions, loss of
entitlements and job losses</LI></UL>
<UL>
<LI>Private sector trade unionists ranging from centre-left social democrats
through to communists and Trotskyists </LI></UL>
<UL>
<LI>Migrants and the urban poor </LI></UL>
<UL>
<LI>Small businesspeople who were formerly the base of Pasok but who have been
radicalised by the tax rises, tax clampdowns and repeated heavy policing of
demonstrations, and who are the most likely to be ruined by any long-term
structural reform in Greece.</LI></UL>
<P>19. The success of Syriza then seems down to its ability to attract voters
and activists from all these groups, eating into almost every part of the left
including the old Moscow-style KKE.</P>
<P>20. In the process of negotiations over the past seven days, Tsipras and his
close advisers have further upped their own credibility by being seen to play
the game of constitutional negotiations; sticking to their economic rejection of
austerity stance, but in general not going out of their way to alienate,
rhetorically, natural Pasok, Dem Left or KKE voters.</P>
<P>21. In the NET poll, taken while Tsipras was making his doomed attempt to
form an anti-austerity government of the left, Syriza scored 27% - compared to
its election showing of 17% - clearly demonstrating that it had created momentum
as the pole of attraction for left voters wanting a showdown with the EU. Pasok
was losing ground to both Syriza and the Dem Left. Some KKE voters were saying
they would switch votes to Syriza in a second election.</P>
<P>22. When I spoke to leading members of Syriza in summer 2011, they were
privately very pessimistic about the possibility of forming a government - even
an alliance of all the left including splits from Pasok. At that time they said
the most obvious solution would be an above-politics left-nationalist figure, a
"Greek Kirchner" or "Greek Morales", and that the absence of such a figure would
make it impossible to form what Marxists refer to as a "workers government" - ie
a radical reforming government with the participation of the far left, but
limited to parliamentary means.</P>
<P>23. Now however, the charisma of Mr Tsipras, the fear of a far-right
backlash, the depth of the crisis and the seeming inability of Pasok to recover,
may thrust Tsipras himself into the Morales role. Of all the left party leaders
he is the least encumbered by a rigid ideology, because Syriza remains highly
diverse and internally democratic as a party. And he is tangibly a generation
younger than the other leaders. (Pasok's further problem is that its younger
politicians tend to be on the technocratic right of social democracy).</P>
<P>24. When I interviewed a Syriza spokesman earlier this year I explored the
problem of a far-left party, which is anti-Nato etc, taking power in a country
whose riot police have been regularly clashing with that party's youth since
2008. The message was that they would be purposefully limited in aim, and that
the core of any programme would be a debtor-led partial default - that is, the
suspension of interest payments on the remaining debt and a repudiation of the
terms of both Troika-brokered bailouts. What Syriza shares with the Dem Left and
Pasok is its commitment to the EU social model: they are left globalists. Hence
they could make any attempt to force Greece out of the Euro look, to the Greek
population, like a Brussels/Berlin inititative, no matter how it looks to the
rest of the world.</P>
<P>25. If, in the next election, Syriza scores 26% it would get about the same
number of seats, under the vote redistribution rule, as ND got this time - say
just over 100. If, on top of that the Dem Left vote holds up, with about 20
seats, and the Communists retain their 26 seats, that is very close to the 150
they would need for a majority. </P>
<P>26. It is being rumoured that Syriza may soon transform itself into a single
party and extend membership to a far left group called Antarsia (which gained
1%) and the Louka Katseli group from Pasok which failed to gain seats, and the
Eco-Greens, who polled below 3%. That would extend its reach even further, both
to its right and left.</P>
<P>27. Even without a majority, a Syriza-DL minority could attempt a legislative
programme that relied on the abstention of some of Pasok's remaining MPs, tacit
"non-opposition" form the KKE, and, paradoxically, the non-opposition of the
right-wing anti-austerity partiy Independent Greeks (conservative nationalist).
One current obstacle to this is the KKE's historic enmity to Syriza and indeed
the entire rest of the Greek left.</P>
<P>Whatever the outcome, the above explains how a combination of historical
factors, the position of the EU and a demographic radicalisation of young people
propelled one of the furthest left parties in any European parliament to within
a few steps of forming a government; and provoking a showdown with the EU that
would doubtless see Greece's suspension or exit from the Euro. </P>
<P>At the same time it explains that the resulting government may, in effect, be
little more than a left-social democratic government, despite its symbology and
the radicalism of some of its voters. By forcing the mainstream parties into
positions where they could not express the will of the majority of centrist
voters, the EU may end up destroying the Greek party system as it has been
shaped since 1974.</P></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>