<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div><br><br>Sent from my iPhone</div><div><br>Begin forwarded message:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><b>From:</b> "Mark Weisbrot, CEPR" <<a href="mailto:cepr@cepr.net">cepr@cepr.net</a>><br><b>Date:</b> August 30, 2013, 10:55:16 AM CDT<br><b>To:</b> <<a href="mailto:galliher@uiuc.edu">galliher@uiuc.edu</a>><br><b>Subject:</b> <b>Obama Increasingly Isolated on Syria as Opposition Mounts at Home and Abroad</b><br><b>Reply-To:</b> <<a href="mailto:ogrady@cepr.net">ogrady@cepr.net</a>><br><br></div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><title></title>
    
    
        <p></p>
        <table width="100%" border="0" bgcolor="#666666" style="padding-top: 30px; padding-bottom: 30px;">
            <tbody>
                <tr>
                    <td>
                    <table width="90%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" bgcolor="white" align="center" style="border: 2px solid rgb(0, 102, 153);">
                        <tbody>
                            <tr>
                                <td valign="bottom" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(0, 102, 153);" colspan="2"><a href="http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=8XvMGSc0mKdG1HbWHGi3fmzFSLXbNOiU" target="_blank"><img width="445" border="0" height="90" title="Center for Economic and Policy Research" src="http://www.cepr.net/templates/CEPR_subpage/images/header.gif" alt="CEPR logo"></a></td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr>
                                <td valign="top" bgcolor="#f0f0f0">
                                <div style="font-family: arial; font-size: small"><!-- TemplateBeginEditable name="content" -->
                                <h2 style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=0yfjo%2FVbLtrqC87nsRGvHWzFSLXbNOiU"><span style="color: rgb(0, 102, 153);"><span style="font-size: large;">Obama Increasingly Isolated on Syria as Opposition Mounts at Home and Abroad</span></span></a></h2>
                                <p>By Mark Weisbrot</p>
                                <hr>
                                <p></p>
                                <p>This article was published in <i>The                             Guardian</i> (UK) on August 30, 2013. If                           anyone wants to reprint it, please include a                           link to <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=isDiR23qKgUj9WcfIEtSP2zFSLXbNOiU">the                             original</a>.</p>
                                <hr>
                                <p>President Obama’s proposed “humanitarian” bombing of Syria, which  seemed like a done deal just a few days ago, is now running into serious  trouble both at home and abroad.  This is a great thing for those who  care about human life and increases the chances that Washington and its  allies may eventually be forced to support a negotiated solution to  Syria’s bloody civil war.</p>
                                <p>In a major blow to both Prime Minister David Cameron and President  Obama, the U.K. parliament voted on Thursday to reject a military attack  on Syria, and Cameron pledged to respect their decision.</p>
                                <p>Now we can see why the Obama administration has been in such a hurry  to lob cruise missiles at Syria, that it didn’t want to wait even a  couple of days for the U.N. inspectors to do their job.   No one had  put forth any military or security reason for the rush to attack; no one  claimed that speed was essential or even relevant to saving any lives.   Rather, it now seems, the urge to shoot first and ask questions later  was driven by the need to carry out this illegal attack before the  public, and their representatives in national and international bodies,  could weigh in.</p>
                                <p>The U.S. public has been deeply suspicious because of what the <em>New York Times</em> <a class="blank" target="_blank" href="http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=MhDO5UOhil9V3EelruFW8xDnjAr4neBP">politely calls the “botched intelligence”</a> leading up to the Iraq war, which most Americans would more plainly refer to as “lies.”  Then yesterday the Associated Press <a class="blank" target="_blank" href="http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=VK9%2FZIsizPnNOToUbj%2FLX2zFSLXbNOiU">reported</a>  that “the intelligence linking Syrian President Bashar al-Assad or his  inner circle to an alleged chemical weapons attack that killed at least  100 people is no 'slam dunk,'" and that this “uncertainty calls into  question the statements by Kerry and Vice President Joe Biden."</p>
                                <p>Time is not on the side of the “humanitarian” would-be bombers. Here  in Washington, at least 162 members of the U.S. House of Representatives  <a class="blank" target="_blank" href="http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=zJ5Xc2SpxZlbXiG0bUF0i2zFSLXbNOiU">have publicly demanded</a> a congressional debate and vote before the U.S. takes any military action against Syria. This is of course a <a class="blank" target="_blank" href="http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=Yq7WuT5M5qOs5EcxXKL2vGzFSLXbNOiU">legal requirement</a>  in the United States, under our Constitution and the 1973 War Powers  Resolution. The Republicans lost their majority in Congress in 2006 <a class="blank" target="_blank" href="http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=W2OqQACkN6Z8MEUZVnLLCGzFSLXbNOiU">because of the Iraq war</a>, so there are political risks here that will be more noticed as the debate widens.</p>
                                <p>Even before the British parliamentary vote, the Obama team had less  legitimacy and popular support for its proposed bombing than almost any  U.S. military action has had in recent history. There was no U.N. Security  Council resolution, which would be the requirement for legality under  international law;  no support from the Arab League, nor even one Arab  government, which Washington had for the bombing of Libya; not even  NATO, which Washington can generally count on for almost any war. And  now the UK has refused to join Obama’s “coalition of the willing,”  leaving him with an unprecedented level of international isolation if he  chooses to carry out his threat to bomb Syria.</p>
                                <p>Americans are <a class="blank" target="_blank" href="http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=pdqbUsbdctEVjM5rf5%2Bu1GzFSLXbNOiU">against the intervention</a> by a 60 percent majority; similar or larger majorities in <a class="blank" target="_blank" href="http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=DgMZAoMgMpjhAf1BMf6M0GzFSLXbNOiU">Germany</a>, <a class="blank" target="_blank" href="http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=ef4gQKU4jq%2BAuXZZOjclmGzFSLXbNOiU">France</a>, <a class="blank" target="_blank" href="http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=ZXGjceqQ9Z%2BJMGrhE%2FvjV2zFSLXbNOiU">the U.K</a>., <a class="blank" target="_blank" href="http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=y1z5CiDJjrof0BtWYI497mzFSLXbNOiU">Turkey, Egypt</a>, and what looks like most of the world are also against it.</p>
                                <p>Then there is the problem of even defining what the objectives are.   Obama has insisted that his goal is “not regime change,” and that is  probably the most believable part of his story.  Unfortunately the  implications of this pledge turn out to be even uglier than an attempted  overthrow. Much uglier. War advocate Edward Luttwak <a class="blank" target="_blank" href="http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=Ubh%2F8SX%2Flw14fbdaT2oXt2zFSLXbNOiU">described</a> in the <em>New York Times</em>  what is very likely official policy:  bleed both sides indefinitely,  and then maybe pick up the pieces when there is not much left of  either.  This makes “sense” from a ruthless, imperial point of view,  since the strategic objective for years has been to weaken Assad,  but now that Al-Qaida-type forces are the bulk of the military  opposition, their victory is not very appealing.</p>
                                <p>The strategy is reminiscent of (then Senator) Harry Truman’s <a class="blank" target="_blank" href="http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=v1Yn%2F6YJyE8F3xJj1iTqnmzFSLXbNOiU">statement</a> about WWII on June 23, 1941: </p>
                                <blockquote>
                                <p style="margin-left: 40px;"><em>If we see that Germany is winning we ought to help Russia and if  Russia is winning we ought to help Germany, and that way let them kill  as many as possible.</em></p>
                                </blockquote>
                                <p>So there you have it: A government that has long lost the moral high  ground through military interventions that have slaughtered vastly more  civilians than Assad’s forces could ever kill, seeking support for  an effort to prolong a hideous civil war.  No wonder Obama’s PR campaign  is not working. And no wonder there are <a class="blank" target="_blank" href="http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=M0VsynG1Aj7B%2Fy2KGGE5vmzFSLXbNOiU">worries</a> [PDF]  about greater involvement from military officials like U.S. Army Chief  of Staff Martin Dempsey – the military, for its part, likes to have a  clearer objective than trying to prolong a war.</p>
                                <p>And Americans, take note: What does it tell you about our leaders’  real concern about protecting us from terrorism, when they have been  willing to create a situation that has brought fanatical terrorists  (some actually affiliated with Al-Qaida) to the brink of state power,  just to possibly advance Washington’s influence in the Middle East?   Does <a href="http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=VakprTM4pJ3HXk5C7ZzTL2zFSLXbNOiU">anyone still believe</a> that the massive surveillance operations revealed by Edward Snowden were really geared toward protecting us from terrorists?</p>
                                <p>The Russians, who are widely condemned for supplying arms to the  Syrian government, look reasonable by comparison to the U.S.  Unlike  Washington and its allies, who have insisted on Assad’s resignation as a  starting point for talks, the Russians have at least pushed for a  negotiated solution to the civil war.  This could possibly have saved  tens of thousands of lives if Washington and its allies had only been  interested in negotiating.  And despite the ugly mess that Western  intervention has helped create, it is still the only solution to the  conflict going forward.</p>
                                <hr>
                                <p><i>See more of Mark Weisbrot's analysis of the Western Hemisphere at <a href="http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=%2FKe%2Bs68aq8Jc8CbQikm4MWzFSLXbNOiU">The Americas Blog</a>. </i><i>Now you can also subscribe to a monthly roundup of all the articles written by CEPR staff. Update your subscriptions <a href="http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=trtFT7q1ZkawrelphONeQGzFSLXbNOiU">here</a>. </i></p>
                                <!-- TemplateEndEditable --></div>
                                </td>
                                <td width="210" valign="top" bgcolor="#c8c8c8" align="left" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(0, 102, 153);">
                                <p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: 12px;"><img alt="" src="http://org.salsalabs.com/o/967/images/mwbio_small.jpg"><br>
                                </span><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: 12px;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: small;"><a href="http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=0JirtpGa8hXHQTPOeAAzvWzFSLXbNOiU">Mark  Weisbrot</a> is co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy  Research, in Washington, D.C. He is also president of </span></span><a target="new" href="http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=OdIB40yKLJNdyaIj40lqr2zFSLXbNOiU"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: small;">Just Foreign  Policy</span></span></a><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: small;">. </span></span></span></p>
                                <p><span style="font-family: arial;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold;">More from CEPR</span><br>
                                <span style="font-size: 12px;"><a href="http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=SQWS83PH23OKkZySZYQWPWzFSLXbNOiU">Reports</a><br>
                                <a href="http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=QjSX9Y40N14%2B1EQX97cFA2zFSLXbNOiU">Op-eds & Columns</a><br>
                                <a href="http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=1WifOHGxexS%2FTC%2FbYgnQUWzFSLXbNOiU">Data Bytes</a><br>
                                <a href="http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=C55YQqR2LL9nLoL5KZt3ThDnjAr4neBP">Beat the Press</a><br>
                                <a href="http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=Kq9ZmX4OLAunI5vbHCk3PmzFSLXbNOiU">CEPR Blog</a><br>
                                <a href="http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=K2YRhGYhzDuE%2BgL8gQWE52zFSLXbNOiU">The Americas Blog </a><br>
                                <a href="http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=e05rYG21wS968LsANhCrxmzFSLXbNOiU">Haiti Relief and Reconstruction Watch</a><br>
                                <a href="http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=HTzwgWv0VYlJG07ZiGGnTWzFSLXbNOiU">Events</a></span><br>
                                <br>
                                <span style="font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold;">Donate</span><br>
                                <span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: small;">Please consider </span></span><a href="http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=hlr9xkAY0uIh8PMMxaXtk2zFSLXbNOiU"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: small;">making a donation</span></span></a><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: small;"> to CEPR. In addition to foundations, we rely on people like you to support our work. </span></span></span></p>
                                <p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: arial;">Federal employees can support CEPR through the Combined Federal Campaign, CFC #79613.</span></span></p>
                                <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: 12px;"><img width="115" height="29" src="http://org.salsalabs.com/o/967/images/CFC_badge.jpg" alt="CFC Badge"> </span><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: small;">  </span></span></p>
                                <p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: 12px;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold;">About</span><br>
                                <span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-style: italic;">The Center for Economic and Policy Research is an independent, nonpartisan think tank that was established to promote democratic debate on the most important economic and social issues that affect people's lives. CEPR's Advisory Board includes Nobel Laureate economists Robert Solow and Joseph Stiglitz; Janet Gornick, Professor at the CUNY Graduate Center and Director of the Luxembourg Income Study; and Richard Freeman, Professor of Economics at Harvard University.</span></span></span><br>
                                <br>
                                </span>                                 <span style="text-align: center; display: block;"><a href="http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=75YtXch3mhAJqduZ5ekFgGzFSLXbNOiU"><img width="133" border="0" height="53" alt="" src="http://org.salsalabs.com/o/967/images/facebook_fan.gif"></a><br>
                                <br>
                                <a href="http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=Xhko33MqKS8p3yRt%2FPT6OBDnjAr4neBP"><img width="134" border="0" height="53" src="http://org.salsalabs.com/o/967/images/twitter_fan.gif" alt=""></a><br>
                                <br>
                                <a href="http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=igf7eI4LLXGn8QkkMsNSJmzFSLXbNOiU"><img width="134" border="0" height="52" title="CEPR RSS Feed" alt="CEPR RSS Feed" src="http://org.salsalabs.com/o/967/images/cpr-rss.gif"></a></span></p>
                                </td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr>
                                <td style="border-top: 1px solid rgb(0, 102, 153);" colspan="2"><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: 12px;">
                                <p align="center">Center for Economic and Policy Research, 1611 Connecticut Ave, NW, Suite 400, Washington, DC 20009<br>
                                Phone: (202) 293-5380, Fax: (202) 588-1356</p>
                                <p align="center"><a href="http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=Tr9zCK%2B49vxao3NrujJb42zFSLXbNOiU">Subscribe</a> • <a href="http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=BPw5gs5WtTpa72H0JNtuwRDnjAr4neBP">Update Subscriptions</a><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: 12px;"> <span style="font-family: arial; font-size: 12px;">• <a href="http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=pE8JR%2FUztTSoMmoAQl6fVmzFSLXbNOiU">Unsubscribe</a> </span></span></p>
                                </span></td>
                            </tr>
                        </tbody>
                    </table>
                    </td>
                </tr>
            </tbody>
        </table>
    <div style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.salsalabs.com/?email"><img alt="empowered by Salsa" src="https://hq.salsalabs.com/salsa/images/Salsa-empowered-bug_RGB45px.png" border="0"></a></div>
<img width="1" height="1" src="http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/TrackImage?key=2651769871"><diaemailid='2651769871' thread="10660"></diaemailid='2651769871'></div></blockquote></body></html>