<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.23543">
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>
<TABLE id=layout border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD id=header colSpan=4>
<TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%; TABLE-LAYOUT: fixed" id=top_section
class=bfa_widget_area border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD id=top_section_1 vAlign=top align=left>
<DIV id=text-8 class="header-widget widget_text">
<DIV class=textwidget>
<DIV id=upper-left-menu-box>
<TABLE>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD
style="FILTER: alpha(opacity=100); PADDING-BOTTOM: 4px; BACKGROUND-COLOR: #53777a; PADDING-LEFT: 8px; PADDING-RIGHT: 8px; PADDING-TOP: 4px; opacity: 1.0"><A
style="COLOR: #ffffff"
href="http://www.popularresistance.org/daily-digest/"></A></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></DIV></DIV></DIV></TD>
<TD id=top_section_2 vAlign=top align=middle>
<DIV id=text-9 class="header-widget widget_text">
<DIV class=textwidget>
<DIV style="POSITION: relative; TOP: 21px; LEFT: -158px"><A
href="http://www.popularresistance.org/"><IMG
src="http://www.popularresistance.org/img/title.png" width=600
height=225></A></DIV>
<DIV style="MARGIN: 0px -345px 0px 0px"><SPAN
style="TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; COLOR: #54777b; FONT-WEIGHT: bold">The
new home of October2011.org </SPAN>
<P></P></DIV></DIV></DIV></TD>
<TD id=top_section_3 vAlign=top align=right>
<DIV id=text-7 class="header-widget widget_text">
<DIV class=textwidget>
<DIV id=topmenu><A
style="FILTER: alpha(opacity=100); PADDING-BOTTOM: 2px; BACKGROUND-COLOR: #53777a; PADDING-LEFT: 8px; PADDING-RIGHT: 8px; COLOR: #ffffff; PADDING-TOP: 2px; opacity: 1.0"
href="http://www.popularresistance.org/aboutus/">About</A> <A
style="FILTER: alpha(opacity=100); PADDING-BOTTOM: 2px; BACKGROUND-COLOR: #542437; PADDING-LEFT: 8px; PADDING-RIGHT: 8px; COLOR: #ffffff; PADDING-TOP: 2px; opacity: 1.0"
href="http://www.popularresistance.org/contact-us/">Contact</A> <A
style="FILTER: alpha(opacity=100); PADDING-BOTTOM: 2px; BACKGROUND-COLOR: #53777a; PADDING-LEFT: 8px; PADDING-RIGHT: 8px; COLOR: #ffffff; PADDING-TOP: 2px; opacity: 1.0"
href="http://www.popularresistance.org/donate/">Donate</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="MARGIN: 30px 70px 0px 0px"><A
href="http://www.popularresistance.org/how-to-use-this-site/"><IMG
src="http://www.popularresistance.org/img/how-to.png" width=140
height=149></A></DIV></DIV></DIV></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<DIV id=menu1 class=menu-main-menu-container>
<UL id=rmenu2 class="clearfix rMenu-hor rMenu">
<LI id=menu-item-3099
class="menu-item menu-item-type-post_type menu-item-object-page menu-item-3099"><A
href="http://www.popularresistance.org/"><SPAN>Home View</SPAN></A></LI>
<LI id=menu-item-3098
class="menu-item menu-item-type-post_type menu-item-object-page current_page_parent menu-item-3098"><A
href="http://www.popularresistance.org/blog/"><SPAN>Blog
View</SPAN></A></LI></UL></DIV></TD></TR>
<TR id=bodyrow>
<TD id=left-inner></TD>
<TD id=middle>
<DIV id=post-24696
class="post-24696 post type-post status-publish format-standard hentry category-educate tag-economy tag-government tag-wars-and-militarism odd">
<DIV class=post-headline>
<H1>Budget Deal: Who Wins? Who Loses?</H1></DIV>
<DIV class=post-byline>
<DIV id=single_post_category_images class=bfa_widget_area>
<DIV id=linkabletitlehtmlandphpwidget-3 class="widget widget_text">
<DIV class=textwidget><IMG class="attachment-580x387 wp-post-image"
alt=1aus
src="http://www.popularresistance.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/1aus.jpg"
width=580 height=375></DIV></DIV></DIV>
<DIV class=cat-date-line><SPAN class=cat-date-line2><A
title="View all posts in Educate!"
href="http://www.popularresistance.org/category/educate/"
rel="category tag">Educate!</A></SPAN> <SPAN class=cat-date-line3><A
href="http://www.popularresistance.org/tag/economy/" rel=tag>Finance and
the Economy</A>, <A
href="http://www.popularresistance.org/tag/government/"
rel=tag>Government</A>, <A
href="http://www.popularresistance.org/tag/wars-and-militarism/"
rel=tag>Wars and Militarism</A> </SPAN><BR><SPAN class=cat-date-line4>By
Jack Rasmus, <A
href="http://greenshadowcabinet.us/statements/budget-deal-december-2013-pentagon-military-corps-win-workers-retirees-vets-unemployed"
target=_blank>www.greenshadowcabinet.us</A><BR>December 18th,
2013</SPAN><BR></DIV>
<DIV id=google_translate_element>
<DIV dir=ltr class="skiptranslate goog-te-gadget">
<DIV style="DISPLAY: inline"
id=:0.targetLanguage></DIV> Powered by <SPAN
style="WHITE-SPACE: nowrap"><A class=goog-logo-link
href="https://translate.google.com/" target=_blank><IMG
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 3px"
src="https://www.google.com/images/logos/google_logo_41.png" width=37
height=13>Translate</A></SPAN></DIV></DIV></DIV>
<DIV class="post-bodycopy clearfix">
<DIV class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style "
addthis:title="Budget Deal: Who Wins? Who Loses? "
addthis:url="http://www.popularresistance.org/budget-deal-who-wins-who-loses/"><A
class="addthis_button_facebook_like at300b" fb:like:layout="button_count">
<DIV class="fb-like fb_edge_widget_with_comment fb_iframe_widget"
data-ref="" data-layout="button_count" data-show_faces="false"
data-action="like" data-width="90" data-font="arial"
data-href="http://www.popularresistance.org/budget-deal-who-wins-who-loses/"
data-send="false" fb-xfbml-state="rendered"><SPAN
style="WIDTH: 78px; HEIGHT: 20px"><IFRAME
style="BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; WIDTH: 78px; HEIGHT: 20px; OVERFLOW: hidden; BORDER-TOP: medium none; BORDER-RIGHT: medium none"
id=f34f015d266463c class=fb_ltr title="Like this content on Facebook."
src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?action=like&api_key=172525162793917&channel_url=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.ak.facebook.com%2Fconnect%2Fxd_arbiter.php%3Fversion%3D28%23cb%3Df333b0a22c6c16c%26domain%3Dwww.popularresistance.org%26origin%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.popularresistance.org%252Ff11f3624d426dd2%26relation%3Dparent.parent&colorscheme=light&extended_social_context=false&font=arial&href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.popularresistance.org%2Fbudget-deal-who-wins-who-loses%2F&layout=button_count&locale=en_US&node_type=link&sdk=joey&send=false&show_faces=false&width=90"
name=f2e34da9caf404a scrolling=no></IFRAME></SPAN></DIV></A><A
class="addthis_button_tweet at300b"><IFRAME
style="WIDTH: 109px; HEIGHT: 20px" id=twitter-widget-0
class="twitter-share-button twitter-tweet-button twitter-count-horizontal"
title="Twitter Tweet Button"
src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets/tweet_button.1386967771.html#_=1387461818527&count=horizontal&counturl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.popularresistance.org%2Fbudget-deal-who-wins-who-loses%2F&id=twitter-widget-0&lang=en&original_referer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.popularresistance.org%2Fbudget-deal-who-wins-who-loses%2F&size=m&text=Budget%20Deal%3A%20Who%20Wins%3F%20Who%20Loses%3F%20&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.popularresistance.org%2Fbudget-deal-who-wins-who-loses%2F&via=PopResistance"
frameBorder=0 allowTransparency scrolling=no
data-twttr-rendered="true"></IFRAME></A><A
class="addthis_button_pinterest_pinit at300b"><SPAN
class=at_PinItButton></SPAN></A><A style="DISPLAY: block"
class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style addthis_nonzero"
href="http://www.popularresistance.org/budget-deal-who-wins-who-loses/#"><A
class="atc_s addthis_button_compact"><SPAN></SPAN></A><A
class=addthis_button_expanded title="View more services"
href="http://www.popularresistance.org/budget-deal-who-wins-who-loses/#"
target=_blank>7</A></A>
<DIV class=atclear></DIV></DIV>
<DIV class=pf-content>
<DIV class="printfriendly pf-alignright"><A
onclick="window.print(); return false;"
href="http://www.printfriendly.com/print?url=http://www.popularresistance.org/budget-deal-who-wins-who-loses/"
rel=nofollow><IMG
style="BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; BORDER-TOP: medium none; BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; -webkit-box-shadow: none; box-shadow: none"
alt="Print Friendly"
src="http://cdn.printfriendly.com/pf-button.gif"></A></DIV>
<H2><B>The Budget Deal of December 2013: Pentagon & Military Corps
Win; Workers, Retirees, Vets, & Unemployed Lose </B></H2>
<P>This past week the U.S. House of Representatives voted 332 to 94 in
favor of changes to the federal budget for 2014. The House vote in effect
adopted the proposals of the ‘Joint Congressional Committee’, chaired by
Teaparty House leader, Paul Ryan, and Senate Democrat, Patty Murray, set
up in October as part of the interim agreement between the two parties to
end the more than two week shutdown of the federal government that
month.</P>
<P>The October interim agreement called for the Ryan-Murray committee to
provide budget change proposals by December 2013 for a Congressional vote
by December 13, 2013. Last week 169 Republicans and 163 Democrats in the
House voted for the Ryan-Murray proposed changes to the 2014 budget; 62
Republicans voted no, as did 32 Democrats. The measure now goes to the
Senate for what will likely be a formal vote of adoption, and then in
January to a Congressional Appropriations committee in time for meeting
the mid-January 2014 deadline date agreed to last October for changes to
the federal budget.</P>
<P><B>The Official ‘Spin’ </B></P>
<P>The deal agreed to this past week by both wings of the single Party of
Corporate America (POCA)—aka Democrats and Republicans—has been hailed as
a pragmatic, albeit ‘narrow’ agreement that shows the two wings can once
again agree on fiscal changes and deficit cut matters, thus ending an era
of dysfunction that has characterized U.S. government since 2010. The
narrow budget deal, amounting to only $85 billion over the next two fiscal
years, 2014-2015, is also being defined as the end of efforts to reach a
‘grand bargain’ on taxes and deficit cutting, as well as the end of the
Republican wing Teaparty faction’s ability to disrupt government to
promote its own interests and Teaparty candidates in Republican primaries.
However, none of these arguments ‘spinning’ the budget deal are
accurate.</P>
<P>The dysfunctionality may have ended for the interests of corporations,
investors, and wealthy Americans, i.e. the 1%, but it hasn’t for the
remainder of households, as the details of the recent deal below clearly
illustrate. Last week’s Ryan-Murray deal clearly promotes the interests of
defense corporations, the Pentagon, and the wealthy—at the direct expense
of millions of U.S. government workers, millions more unemployed,
veterans, retirees, and tens of millions of Americans on food stamps.</P>
<P>The deal furthermore represents not the reversal of ‘austerity’, as is
claimed, but rather a clever restructuring and continuing of austerity in
new forms. It reflects a ‘grand bargain’, but a bargain achieved in
stages, piecemeal, rather than in an ‘all in’ form that might generate
more severe and resentful public political reaction.</P>
<P>Not least, the deal just concluded represents not the ‘taming’ of the
Teaparty faction in the Republican wing, but instead the realization by
the rest of the two traditional wings of POCA that, in the 2014 midterm
Congressional election year about to begin, they had better go slower on
austerity in 2014—as they had previously during the 2012 national
elections year. The deal is thus a ‘politicians deal’, and neither a
fiscal stimulus nor a deficit cutting exercise.</P>
<P><B>Restoring the Sequester Defense Cuts</B></P>
<P>In 2011 House Republicans and the Obama Administration agreed to cut $1
trillion in discretionary social spending programs, mostly education, plus
another $1.2 trillion of discretionary cuts deferred until 2013 called the
‘sequester’, about half of which represented defense spending cuts.</P>
<P>The 2012 election year that followed was a hiatus in terms of austerity
and new deficit cutting. However, once the November 2012 elections were
over, both wings of the POCA immediately proceeded to the ‘fiscal cliff’
deal of January 2, 2013, which raised taxes on wage earners while allowing
$4 trillion in Bush tax cuts to continue for another decade. However, the
fiscal cliff deal of January 2013 conveniently left the matter of the
‘sequester’ spending cuts for a later date, including the $600 billion in
defense cuts. That segmenting of tax issues from spending issues, and
especially defense spending, was necessary to enable the full passage of
the $4 trillion in tax cuts for the rich. A more complicated deal,
including spending reductions, would have risked the passage of the tax
cuts.</P>
<P>Beginning March 1, 2013, the $1.2 trillion ‘sequester’ spending cuts
were allowed in 2013 to take full effect for non-defense spending, while
defense spending cuts called for in the sequester were shielded and offset
in various ways by the Obama administration, with the concurrence of
Congress, during 2013. Pentagon spending this past year continued at the
$518 billion level (not counting another $100 billion or so for ‘overseas
contingency operations’—i.e. direct war spending). That both the House
Republicans and Senate controlled Democrats had every intention throughout
the past year to restore the Defense spending cuts called for in the
sequester, was evident in the House Budget and Senate budget proposals,
both of which called for increasing Pentagon spending to $552 billion in
2014, according to a New York Times front page article of December 11,
2013.</P>
<P>The just concluded Ryan-Murray budget deal is also primarily about
addressing (and reversing) those defense spending cuts and continuing to
shield defense from current and future spending reductions. Were the
sequester defense spending cuts allowed to go into effect in 2014,
Pentagon spending would have declined from current $518 billion in 2013 to
$498 billion in 2014. The Ryan-Murray budget deal sets Pentagon spending
for the coming year at $520.5 billion.</P>
<P>As the Washington Post indicated in a lead article on December 12, with
the recent budget deal the U.S. House has temporarily retreated from
deficit cutting “in favor of Republican concerns about the Pentagon
budget”, with the Wall St. Journal adding on December 13 that the budget
deal is “nearly erasing the impact of sequestration on the military”.</P>
<P>That the budget deal is primarily about restoring defense cuts was
further evident in that the same day the budget deal was passed by the
House, it immediately voted to pass the National Defense Authorization
Act, NDAA, thus locking in the restoration of Pentagon spending in 2014 at
a level above 2013.</P>
<P><B>Domestic Non-Defense Spending: Smoke & Mirrors</B></P>
<P>While the proposed sequester defense cuts have been essentially
restored for 2014-15, and effectively removed from further deficit
spending cuts in the future (as had tax hikes on the rich with last year’s
fiscal cliff deal), the cuts to discretionary non-military spending
programs have not fared as well.</P>
<P>The budget deal calls for restoring $63 billion in total scheduled
sequester cuts for the two years, 2014-15. Non-defense program spending
restoration is reportedly $31 billion of that. It thus appears that a $31
billion increase in non-defense spending is part of the deal. But domestic
spending the past two years, 2011-2013, has declined from a total of $514
billion to $469 billion, or $45 billion. The budget deal raises that to
$492 billion. That’s $23 billion, not the reported $31 billion.</P>
<P>Moreover, the $31 billion restoration is predicated on the continuation
in the budget of the reductions in payments to Medicare doctors and health
providers. If the reductions in payments are rescinded, as they have been
every consecutive year thus far for more than a decade, then the $31
billion non-defense spending restoration might very well also be taken
away or significantly reduced. $31 billion may not in fact, in other
words, actually occur.</P>
<P>Apart from the possible $31 billion reduction, what Congress and Obama
appear to restore in in the $31 billion discretionary social spending on
the one hand, they are taking away—plus more—with the other. This will
occur two ways: first by raising $26 billion in fees (i.e. de facto taxes)
on consumers and by taking money from federal workers and veterans
pensions; second, by taking $25 billion from the unemployed. So the net
effect is a reduction of -$20 billion, not a restoration of $31
billion.</P>
<P>The budget deal directly includes increasing ‘fees’ by $26 billion. $6
billion of that comes in the form of raising federal employees’ pension
contributions and another $6 billion by cutting military cost of living
increases for military pensions. Another $12.6 billion comes from raising
government taxes on airline travel. Thus retirees, government workers, and
middle class households will pay $26 billion more as part of the budget
deal. But that’s not all.</P>
<P>The budget deal cleverly does not include the $25 billion in cuts to
unemployment benefits in its calculation of spending $31 billion more in
domestic spending. When deducted from the $31 billion, it’s only a net $6
billion in domestic spending. And when the $26 billion in fees (taxes) are
added in, that’s a total of -$20 billion in domestic spending.</P>
<P>Another way of looking at it is that $25 billion in cuts to
unemployment benefits is that the amount is just about the same amount of
restored defense spending cuts. The unemployed are effectively paying for
the defense corporations’ continuation of defense contracts at prior
levels</P>
<P>More than 1.3 million workers will immediately lose their unemployment
benefits on December 28, 2013. Another 1.9 million who were projected to
continue benefits in 2014 will also now lose them. Emergency benefits that
up to now included extended benefits from 40-73 weeks, will now revert
back to only 26 weeks. This occurs at a time when 4.1 million workers are
considered long term unemployed, jobless for more than 26 weeks. Knocking
millions off of benefits will likely result in 2014 in even more millions
of workers leaving the labor force, which will technically also reduce the
unemployment rate. That’s one way to manipulate statistics to formally
reduce unemployment, but it’s not a true reduction of unemployment by
actual jobs creation, the latter of which is increasingly a problem of the
U.S. economy for more than a decade now.</P>
<P>The budget deal conveniently disregards in its calculations the refusal
to extend unemployment benefits. But it’s clearly part of the deal. The
failure of the budget deal to extend unemployment benefits, and the net
-$20 billion in unemployment benefit cuts plus fee hikes, is an indication
of the budget deal’s continuing ‘austerity’ focus. But that’s not all.</P>
<P>Another ‘off track’ discretionary spending cuts about to occur involve
cuts to food stamps for millions of recipients, scheduled to occur by
February 2014. Today one in eight households now receive food stamps, the
result of the deep decline in jobs since 2008, the failure to create jobs
at a normal rate since then, and the fact that jobs that have been created
since 2008 are predominantly low paid. The cost of the food stamp program,
SNAP, has doubled to $80 billion during the so-called Obama economic
recovery and the abysmal record of job creation the past five years. Both
wings of the POCA are concurrently proposing cuts to SNAP, ranging from
$24 billion for the Demo wing and $52 billion for the Teapublican
(traditional republicans + Teaparty faction) wing. An increase in food
stamps that was scheduled for November 1, 2013 has already been put aside.
Further reductions are being negotiated that will conclude by February
2014 that will likely reduce food stamp spending by $8-$10 billion over
the two year period, 2014-2015 of the recent budget deal period. As in the
case of the $25 billion in cuts to unemployment benefits, the $8 billion
more in food stamps spending cuts are conveniently ignored in the budget
deal calculations.</P>
<P>The real budget deal thus amounts to $31 billion in domestic spending
cuts restored from the sequester—offset by $26 billion paid for by
government workers, retirees and vets, by another $25 billion paid for by
the unemployed, and still another $8 billion by the poor and working poor
in food stamp cuts. What the budget deal gives (+$31 billion) with one
hand, it takes away double (-$59 billion) with the other. The net result
is a -$28 billion reduction for workers, retirees, vets, and the
unemployed, while the Pentagon and defense corporations get off free.</P>
<P><B>Strategic Significance of the 2013 Budget Deal</B></P>
<P>The budget deal just concluded fundamentally represents a continuation
of deficit cutting for the rest of us, while letting defense corporations
and spending off the sequester hook. The budget deal ‘narrowly defined’,
at $63 billion restoration of sequester cuts, is misleading at best. While
defense spending is restored in the budget deal, Republican and Democrat
claims that domestic program spending is also restored is a cynical lie.
The $31 billion in domestic spending does not include parallel cuts of $25
billion to unemployment benefits and an additional minimum of $8 billion
to food stamps. And when the $26 billion in ‘fees’ are factored
in—impacting retirees, vets, government workers, and consumers—the net
effect is further spending reductions and continued austerity for the
rest, while the Pentagon and corporate military contractors are now
exempt.</P>
<P>Contrary to the media spin, there is a grand bargain in progress. It’s
just dispersed, implemented over the course of several years since 2011
and in stages. It is being rolled out in segments and in phases. The
August 2011 deal. The phony Fiscal Cliff deal. Now the budget deal of
2013, in which defense spending cuts area fully restored while a ‘smoke
and mirrors’ game is being played with domestic discretionary
spending.</P>
<P>With regard to the ‘smoke and mirrors’, politicians are using the
‘playbook’ of corporate management in union negotiations. They are simply
‘moving the money around’—i.e. restoring $31 billion, which is then taken
away in other ways at the expense of government workers, vets, and
unemployed.</P>
<P>In a broader strategic sense, what the recent December 2013 budget deal
represents is that both wings of the single Party of Corporate America
(POCA) in the U.S. have been pursuing a piecemeal grand bargain strategy.
First $2.2 trillion in spending only cuts are enacted in 2011, leaving the
issue of $4.6 trillion in Bush tax cuts to the ‘fiscal cliff’ tax deal of
December 2012. Once the tax hikes on the rich were moved off the table
with the fiscal cliff deal, the focus shifted to getting the defense
spending cuts also ‘off the table’ and minimized. The rich got to keep $4
trillion of the $4.6 trillion with the fiscal cliff deal; the defense
corporations and Pentagon now can avoid the $600 billion in previously
scheduled defense spending cuts. In the meantime, $1 trillion in 2011
social program spending cuts went into effect and continue, the $500
billion in sequester defined social spending cuts also largely continue,
and unemployment and food stamp cuts of hundreds of billions over the
coming decade are also implemented. That all amounts to austerity
continued via implementation of a grand bargain in stages.</P>
<P>And the game of smoke and mirrors is not over. More phases of the grand
bargain in stages are yet to come. What remains is passage of a new tax
code, which will include hundreds of billions more in corporate tax cuts.
The fiscal cliff addressed tax cuts for wealthy individuals, not their
corporations. Now the latter want their tax cuts as well. That potentially
is on the agenda in 2014.</P>
<P>Then there’s the matter of ‘entitlements’ spending—i.e. social security
and medicare. The official ‘spin’ of the current budget deal is that
entitlements are not being touched and aren’t part of the deal.
Republicans and the Teaparty faction have not demanded additional
entitlement cuts in the current deal. That does not mean social security
and medicare won’t be cut in 2014, however. Obama’s 2014 budget calls for
no less than $620 billion in social security and medicare cuts over the
coming decade. Apparently Republicans and Teapartyers considered that
sufficient for a ‘first bite of the apple’. But they’ll be back for more
in the final stage of the grand bargain by increments. But entitlement
cuts will not be addressed during an election year of 2014. That comes
later, and after corporate tax cuts in 2014—which both Obama and the
Republicans have been both on record proposing for some time.</P>
<P>~ <A href="http://greenshadowcabinet.us/member-profile/7569"><I>Jack
Rasmus</I></A><I> serves as the Chairman of the Federal Reserve System in
the Economy Branch of the Green Shadow Cabinet of the United States. He
hosts the weekly radio show, Alternative Visions, on the Progressive Radio
Network, online at PRN.FM every Wednesday from New York. His website is:
</I><A
href="http://www.kyklosproductions.com/"><I>www.kyklosproductions.com</I></A><I>,
his blog, jackrasmus.com and twitter handle,
@drjackrasmus.</I></P></DIV></DIV></DIV></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>