<div><span><span>* Rosenberg is a corporate attorney who takes poor people to </span><br /><span>* court to collect unpaid hospital bills.</span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div>David -</div>
<div>I keep wondering when Gehrig and Yack'ov are going to show up and start trying to whack you for being anti-cementic.</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><br /> <em><span style="font-family: georgia, palatino;" data-mce-mark="1">"Does that sound anti-Semitic? It probably does. Hey, I'm sure that those Jews were no more crooked than the general run of goyish businessmen. It just so happened that Jews tended to get into the... business. T'was ever thus." </span></em></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><em><span style="font-family: georgia, palatino;"> - R. Crumb</span></em><br /> </div>
<table border="0" cellspacing="7" cellpadding="1">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="width: 1px;" bgcolor="#789BE0"> </td>
<td>-------Original Message-------<br /> From: David Johnson <davidjohnson1451@comcast.net><br /> To: sf-core <sf-core@yahoogroups.com>, Peace-discuss <peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net>, occupycu@lists.chambana.net, C. G. Estabrook <carl@newsfromneptune.com><br /> Subject: Re: [Peace-discuss] [sf-core] Re: [OccupyCU] AMMONS vs. ROSENBERG Debate Results<br /> Sent: Feb 07 '14 10:02<br /> <br /> Carl,<br /> <br /> I am opposed to corporate subsidies unless they provide good paying <br /> full-time jobs or some other direct, quality, verifiable benefit to the <br /> community.<br /> I would prefer no corporate subsidies and instead give subsidies only to <br /> worker owned and operated cooperative, but at this point anyway, that is <br /> probably the best that can happen. For Now anyway.<br /> <br /> I totaly agree with Durl's report and in fact read it on the World Labor <br /> Hour last Saturday. If I was on the city Council I would have opposed ALL of <br />
the recent corporate subsidies given by the city ;<br /> <br /> 1) Worden Martin Car Dealership - pay your own moving expenses. If they want <br /> to move their dealership to Danville or Decatur, go for it !<br /> <br /> 2) Hyatt Hotel in downtown Champaign -<br /> NO ! If you don't build, some other hotel chain will since it is the <br /> downtown Champaign nightlife area that attracts visitors and tourists NOT <br /> your hotel.<br /> <br /> 3) Kraft Foods - That is a current employer with over 1300 jobs. Not such an <br /> easy decision, however, I would have stated that they need to eliminate all <br /> of their part-time temp help at minimum wage and hire full time help at a <br /> minimum starting pay of $ 15.00 per hour with regular annual wage increases <br /> up to $ 25.00 per hour within four years and provide health care for free. <br /> Otherwise go somewhere else. They would probably not move since that is very <br /> expensive, but regardless Kr
aft should have been a negotiated line in the <br /> sand if they wanted the 3.5 million dollars. But of course Gerard and the <br /> other corporate hacks on the council just handed over the money and <br /> propogated Kraft's propoganda that they supposedly in this university city <br /> not find competant employees who are qualified...bullshit !<br /> <br /> So i agree with Carol's technology zone plan because as I posted in the last <br /> e-mail, it has specific conditions that must be met in regards to full time <br /> above living wage employment, BUT, I do agree with you Carl that any such <br /> future program MUST be transparent and open to public scrutinity in each and <br /> every case before any money is handed over.<br /> Also, Carol calls for a progressive income tax ( she had a hand out for that <br /> too last night with specific tax percentages for income levels.) So that <br /> corresponds to your policy suggestions.<br /> <br /> In terms of the Illinoi
s Universal healthcare Act ( H.B. 942 ) and the IL. <br /> House Bill to disolve the Illinois Charter school commission I have yet to <br /> hear Carol's opinion. But I cannot imagine her being opposed.<br /> <br /> So again, we could do a LOT worse with Rosenberg and his proposed policies.<br /> Not to mention, I have known Carol for over ten years, so I do know her <br /> track record. Rosenberg is a corporate attorney who takes poor people to <br /> court to collect unpaid hospital bills.<br /> Not to mention, the News Gazette and the Democratic party establishment ( <br /> Laurel Prussing, Naomi Jackobsen, Steve Becket, JUlia Rietz ) are all <br /> opposing and attacking Carol.<br /> THat alone would be reason enough for me to support her.<br /> <br /> David Johnson<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ----- Original Message ----- <br /> From: "C. G. Estabrook" <<a style="text-decoration: underline;" href="compose.php?to=carl@newsfromneptune.com" target="_top">carl@newsfr
omneptune.com</a>><br /> To: "David Johnson" <<a style="text-decoration: underline;" href="compose.php?to=davidjohnson1451@comcast.net" target="_top">davidjohnson1451@comcast.net</a>><br /> Cc: "sf-core" <<a style="text-decoration: underline;" href="compose.php?to=sf-core@yahoogroups.com" target="_top">sf-core@yahoogroups.com</a>>; "Peace-discuss" <br /> <<a style="text-decoration: underline;" href="compose.php?to=peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net" target="_top">peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net</a>>; <<a style="text-decoration: underline;" href="compose.php?to=occupycu@lists.chambana.net" target="_top">occupycu@lists.chambana.net</a>><br /> Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 9:39 AM<br /> Subject: Re: [sf-core] Re: [OccupyCU] AMMONS vs. ROSENBERG Debate Results<br /> <br /> <br /> David--<br /> <br /> As you know, "enterprise zones" are a neoliberal technique, originally <br /> proposed by 'supply-side' economists. Their current proponents acknowledge <br />
successful criticism by looking for newer, more marketable names - e.g., <br /> "technology zones."<br /> <br /> It's not clear that states and municipalities should be competing to give <br /> breaks to corporate entities on the threat that they might move away and <br /> take jobs - or on the promise to bring them. See e.g., Durl Kruse' letter <br /> (attached) regarding the Champaign City Council's "Tax Increment Financing <br /> District" that will give Kraft "a $3.6 million tax subsidy to build a new <br /> warehouse."<br /> <br /> Durl writes, "One must wonder if this TIF project represents the flexing of <br /> corporate muscle by threatening the community 'not to build if not <br /> approved,' and when given the opportunity, to directly manipulate TIF laws <br /> for corporate gain at taxpayers' expense."<br /> <br /> Clearly, the supposed benefits of such a program should generalize. You can <br /> make an argument for "an across the board corporate tax cut" to promote <br
/> trade and employment. Such business taxes should be replaced with taxes on <br /> concentrated wealth and speculation - i.e., taxes on investable assets, and <br /> Tobin taxes.<br /> <br /> Given the entrenched (non-democratic) political power of capital, wealth <br /> taxes and Tobin taxes are not on the horizon in Illinois, unfortunately. <br /> (The Democrats should of course be opposed on this point.) The best we can <br /> do in the near future seems to be a progressive income tax and social <br /> subsidies, including perhaps the state single-payer system that you've been <br /> working for.<br /> <br /> Regards, CGE<br /> <br /> <br /> On Feb 5, 2014, at 10:21 PM, David Johnson <<a style="text-decoration: underline;" href="compose.php?to=davidjohnson1451@comcast.net" target="_top">davidjohnson1451@comcast.net</a>> <br /> wrote:<br /> <br /> ><br /> > The differnce is that Rosenberg supports an across the board corporate tax <br /> > cut with no
conditions.<br /> ><br /> > Carol Ammons " Technology Zone Program " gives a tax break to a company <br /> > ONLY if a company ;<br /> ><br /> > 1) increases employment by the greater of 10 % of its current workforce or <br /> > a minimum of 3 new full-time employees<br /> ><br /> > 2) Pays wages of 20 % or more above the median income of Champaign County<br /> ><br /> > 3) Employ a minimum of 5 full-time employees<br /> ><br /> > Not to mention that Rosenberg is an attorney who works for Carle Clinic <br /> > and takes poor and elderly people to court for not paying hospital bills.<br /> ><br /> > Carol has been a community activist for over a decade, opposing the : <br /> > Police, States Attorney and other local officials / vested interests at <br /> > times when necessary in the pursuit of social justice.<br /> ><br /> > Again, the choice is clear to me who would be the better advocate for <br /> > Working pe
ople in the 103rd District<br /> ><br /> > David Johnson<br /> > ----- Original Message -----<br /> > From: C. G. Estabrook<br /> > To: David Johnson<br /> > Cc: <"Undisclosed-Recipient:;"<a style="text-decoration: underline;" href="compose.php?to=@mail0.frost.chambana.net" target="_top">@mail0.frost.chambana.net</a>><br /> > Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 9:29 PM<br /> > Subject: Re: [OccupyCU] AMMONS vs. ROSENBERG Debate Results<br /> ><br /> > Didn't Carol support 'enterprise zones' (under another name), which are <br /> > even more substantial corporate tax cats - for favored corporations?<br /> ><br /> ><br /> > On Feb 5, 2014, at 9:24 PM, David Johnson <<a style="text-decoration: underline;" href="compose.php?to=davidjohnson1451@comcast.net" target="_top">davidjohnson1451@comcast.net</a>> <br /> > wrote:<br /> ><br /> >> I just returned from the Ammons vs. Rosenberg debate, for the Illinois <br /
> >> 103rd State Rep Democratic Primary race.<br /> >><br /> >> The major differences between the two candidates were ;<br /> >><br /> >> Rosenberg SUPPORTS cutting corporate taxes and OPPOSES the $ 15.00 per <br /> >> hour minimum wage.<br /> >><br /> >> Carol Ammons in contrast OPPOSES cutting corporate taxes and SUPPORTS the <br /> >> $ 15.00 per hour minimum wage.<br /> >><br /> >> Rosenberg also stated that Carol Ammons experience in local government on <br /> >> the County Board and the Urbana City Council does NOT make her more <br /> >> qualified than him in terms of experience.<br /> >> He stated that ;<br /> >> " Springfield is a different BEAST than local government and I am more <br /> >> qualified to deal with that."<br /> >><br /> >> The difference could not be any clearer to me.<br /> >><br /> >> What was also interesting was that I submit
ted TWO questions for the <br /> >> candidates, first via e-mail several days before the debate and early on <br /> >> at the debate.<br /> >> Neither question was asked !<br /> >><br /> >> The questions were ;<br /> >><br /> >> 1) Would you be willing to co-sponsor the current House Bill to enact a <br /> >> universal health care system in Illinois ( H.B. 942 ).<br /> >><br /> >> and<br /> >><br /> >> 2) Would you co-sponsor House Bill H.B. 3754 that would dissolve the <br /> >> Illinois Charter School Commision<br /> >><br /> >> I wonder why the Moderators avoided asking these questions ?<br /> >><br /> >> David Johnson<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br /> <br /> <br /> ><br /> ><br /> > <br /> <br /> <br /> _______________________________________________<br /> Peace-discuss mailing list<b
r /> <a style="text-decoration: underline;" href="compose.php?to=Peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net" target="_top">Peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net</a><br /> <a style="text-decoration: underline;" href="https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss" target="_blank">https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss</a><br /> </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>