<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:garamond, new york, times, serif;font-size:14px"><div><span>Dey provides plenty of evidence to discount his thesis that those defending Salaita display a "paranoid style." </span>It would seem that the shoe is on the other foot, given the McCarthyite nature of the proceedings. Hofstadter's PS thesis was a way of discounting the centrality of class conflict with the red herring of "status anxiety" from Populism to McCarthy. Liberal arts faculty may suffer from some of that, but they need to realize the valid class/neoliberal roots of their affliction. </div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: garamond, new york, times, serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; background-color: transparent;"><br></div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: garamond, new york, times, serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; background-color: transparent;">DG</div> <div
class="qtdSeparateBR"><br><br></div><div class="yahoo_quoted" style="display: block;"> <div style="font-family: garamond, new york, times, serif; font-size: 14px;"> <div style="font-family: HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;"> <div dir="ltr"> <font face="Arial" size="2"> On Sunday, September 21, 2014 1:39 PM, C. G. Estabrook via Peace-discuss <peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net> wrote:<br> </font> </div> <blockquote style="padding-left: 5px; margin-top: 5px; margin-left: 5px; border-left-color: rgb(16, 16, 255); border-left-width: 2px; border-left-style: solid;"> <br><br> <div class="y_msg_container"><a href="http://www.news-gazette.com/opinion/columns/2014-09-21/jim-dey-salaita-fight-generating-wild-theories.html" target="_blank">http://www.news-gazette.com/opinion/columns/2014-09-21/jim-dey-salaita-fight-generating-wild-theories.html</a><br><br><br>What Jim Dey actually exposes is the
neoliberal panic at the weakening of its Zionist prop. That's what's revealed by the Salaita affair. <br><br>Suppose Salaita had 'tweeted' what he did about Hamas, instead of Israel? Would we ever have heard a peep (or a tweet) about it?<br><br>Of course for the last 40 years - since the establishment of post-Vietnam Gleichschaltung in the universities - no careful faculty member would have said such things (about Israel - attacking official US enemies is OK). The fact that the academy has to move to suppress something that would not have occurred antecedently is a sign of panic. The lid is coming off.<br><br>Dey's fevered assertion that "There's nothing there!" is a clear admission that there is. We should to point out the interests being served by the contemporary university. They're not just Zionist. We should talk more about neoliberalism as the real enemy - that's the talk Dey is trying to scotch (so to
speak).<br><br>--CGE<br>_______________________________________________<br>Peace-discuss mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net" ymailto="mailto:Peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net">Peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net</a><br><a href="https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss" target="_blank">https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss</a><br><br><br></div> </blockquote> </div> </div> </div> </div></body></html>