<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    Grayson rocks.<br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 02/27/2015 03:01 AM, C. G. Estabrook
      via Peace-discuss wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:77436016-7F3F-4AEF-AF31-769B26EDF239@newsfromneptune.com"
      type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
      <br>
      <div>
        <blockquote type="cite">
          <div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom:
            0px; margin-left: 0px;"><span
              style="font-family:'Helvetica'; color:rgba(0, 0, 0, 1.0);"><b>From:
              </b></span><span style="font-family:'Helvetica';">"Rep.
              Alan Grayson" <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:alangrayson@graysonforcongress.com">alangrayson@graysonforcongress.com</a>><br>
            </span></div>
          <div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom:
            0px; margin-left: 0px;"><span
              style="font-family:'Helvetica'; color:rgba(0, 0, 0, 1.0);"><b>Subject:
              </b></span><span style="font-family:'Helvetica';"><b>The
                ISIS War Authorization: A Blank Check</b><br>
            </span></div>
          <div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom:
            0px; margin-left: 0px;"><span
              style="font-family:'Helvetica'; color:rgba(0, 0, 0, 1.0);"><b>Date:
              </b></span><span style="font-family:'Helvetica';">February
              26, 2015 at 10:29:16 AM CST<br>
            </span></div>
          <div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom:
            0px; margin-left: 0px;"><span
              style="font-family:'Helvetica'; color:rgba(0, 0, 0, 1.0);"><b>To:
              </b></span><span style="font-family:'Helvetica';"><<a
                moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:cge@shout.net">cge@shout.net</a>><br>
            </span></div>
          <br>
          <div>
            <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
              charset=utf-8">
            <title>The ISIS War Authorization: A Blank Check</title>
            <div>
              <!-- RegionStart[socialslot:"SharePasteHTML"The ISIS War Authorization: A Blank Check"] -->
              <img moz-do-not-send="true"
                src="http://cdn.mailscanner.info/1x1spacer.gif" alt="Web
                Bug from
http://cl.exct.net/open.aspx?ffcb10-fe51137673600c7e7013-fdf111757d60017d771c7777-fe5f157071610178711c-fe6411727667007d7c15-fe2b1d7575660475771579-ffcf14"
                width="1" height="1">
              <table style="position: static; z-index: auto;"
                width="600" align="center">
                <tbody>
                  <tr>
                    <td>
                      <table style="position: static; z-index: auto;"
                        width="600" align="center">
                        <tbody>
                          <tr>
                            <td valign="top">
                              <table style="margin: 0.5em;" width="250"
                                cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1"
                                align="right" border="1">
                                <tbody>
                                  <tr>
                                    <td style="margin: 0px; font-family:
                                      arial,sans-serif;">
                                      <div style="margin: 0.5em;
                                        text-align: center;"><a
                                          moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://cl.exct.net/?qs=41eecffb5c32f009e85bbeb001486a418283348879ac3dfdcb5320d62bcb73cc"><img
                                            moz-do-not-send="true"
src="http://image.exct.net/lib/fe5f157071610178711c/m/1/022615blankcheck.jpg"></a><b><br>
                                        </b></div>
                                      <div style="margin: 0.5em;
                                        text-align: center;"><b><a
                                            moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://cl.exct.net/?qs=41eecffb5c32f009e85bbeb001486a418283348879ac3dfdcb5320d62bcb73cc">Payable
                                            in Dollars, and in Lives.</a></b></div>
                                    </td>
                                  </tr>
                                </tbody>
                              </table>
                              Dear C. G.:
                              <br>
                              <br>
                              So we had a hearing a week ago on ISIS
                              ("we" being the House Foreign Affairs
                              Committee), and the witnesses were three
                              experts on U.S. policy in the Middle East,
                              all dues-paying members of the
                              Military-Industrial Complex. They were
                              James Jeffrey, who was Deputy Chief of
                              Mission at our embassy in Iraq; Rick
                              Brennan, a political scientist at the Rand
                              Corp.; and Dafna Rand, who was on the
                              National Security Council staff. The White
                              House had just released the President's
                              draft Authorization for the Use of
                              Military Force (AUMF) against ISIS, and I
                              felt that I needed a good translator, so I
                              asked them what the ISIS war authorization
                              meant. Their answers were chilling: the
                              ISIS war authorization means whatever the
                              President wants it to mean. If you don't
                              believe me, just listen to them: <br>
                              <br>
                              <b>GRAYSON:</b> Section 2(c) of the
                              President's draft Authorization for the
                              Use of Military Force reads as follows:
                              "The authority granted in subsection A [to
                              make war on ISIS and forces 'alongside'
                              ISIS] does not authorize the use of US
                              armed forces in enduring offensive ground
                              combat operations." Ambassador Jeffrey, <b><a
                                  moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://cl.exct.net/?qs=41eecffb5c32f009e85bbeb001486a418283348879ac3dfdcb5320d62bcb73cc">what
                                  does 'enduring' mean?</a></b> <br>
                              <br>
                              <b>JEFFREY:</b> My answer would be a
                              somewhat sarcastic one: <b><a
                                  moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://cl.exct.net/?qs=41eecffb5c32f009e85bbeb001486a418283348879ac3dfdcb5320d62bcb73cc">"Whatever
                                  the Executive at the time defines
                                  'enduring' as."</a></b> And I have a
                              real problem with that. <br>
                              <br>
                              <b>GRAYSON:</b> Dr. Brennan? <br>
                              <br>
                              <b>BRENNAN:</b> <b><a
                                  moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://cl.exct.net/?qs=41eecffb5c32f009e85bbeb001486a418283348879ac3dfdcb5320d62bcb73cc">I
                                  have real problems with that also. I
                                  don't know what it means.</a></b> I
                              can just see the lawyers fighting over the
                              meaning of this. But more importantly, if
                              you're looking at committing forces for
                              something that you are saying is either
                              [a] vital or important interest of the
                              United States, and you get in the middle
                              of a battle, and all of a sudden, are you
                              on offense, or are you on defense? What
                              happens if neighbors cause problems? Wars
                              never end the way that they were
                              envisioned. And so I think that that's
                              maybe a terrible mistake to put in the
                              AUMF. <br>
                              <br>
                              <b>GRAYSON:</b> Dr. Rand? <br>
                              <br>
                              <b>RAND:</b> Enduring, in my mind,
                              specifies an open-endedness, <b><a
                                  moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://cl.exct.net/?qs=41eecffb5c32f009e85bbeb001486a418283348879ac3dfdcb5320d62bcb73cc">it
                                  specifies lack of clarity on the
                                  particular objective at hand.</a></b>
                              <br>
                              <br>
                              <b>GRAYSON:</b> Dr. Rand, is two weeks
                              'enduring'? <br>
                              <br>
                              <b>RAND:</b> I would leave that to the
                              lawyers to determine exactly. <br>
                              <br>
                              <b>GRAYSON:</b> So your answer is [that]
                              you don't know, right? How about two
                              months? <br>
                              <br>
                              <b>RAND:</b> <b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://cl.exct.net/?qs=41eecffb5c32f009e85bbeb001486a418283348879ac3dfdcb5320d62bcb73cc">I
                                  don't know.</a></b> Again, I think it
                              would depend on the particular objective,
                              'enduring' in my mind is not having a
                              particular military objective in mind. <br>
                              <br>
                              <b>GRAYSON:</b> So you don't really know
                              what it means. Is that a fair statement? <br>
                              <br>
                              <b>RAND:</b> 'Enduring,' in my mind, means
                              open-ended. <br>
                              <br>
                              <b>GRAYSON:</b> All right -- Section Five
                              of the draft of the Authorization of the
                              Use of Military Force reads as follows:
                              "In this resolution, the term 'associated
                              persons or forces' means individuals and
                              organizations fighting for, on behalf of,
                              or alongside ISIL or any closely-related
                              successor entity in hostilities against
                              the United States or its coalition
                              partners." Ambassador Jeffrey, <b><a
                                  moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://cl.exct.net/?qs=41eecffb5c32f009e85bbeb001486a418283348879ac3dfdcb5320d62bcb73cc">what
                                  does "alongside ISIL" mean?</a></b> <br>
                              <br>
                              <b>JEFFREY:</b> I didn't draft this thing.
                              <br>
                              <br>
                              <b>GRAYSON:</b> Nor did I. <br>
                              <br>
                              <b>JEFFREY:</b> Nor did you, but I would
                              have put that in there if I had been
                              drafting it, and the reason is, I think
                              they went back to 2001, of course this is
                              the authorization we're still using, along
                              with the 2002 one for this campaign, and
                              these things morph. For example, we've had
                              a debate over whether ISIS is really an
                              element of Al Qaeda; it certainly was when
                              I knew it as Al Qaeda in Iraq in 2010 to
                              2012, and these semantic arguments confuse
                              us and confuse our people on the ground,
                              in trying to deal with these folks. <b><a
                                  moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://cl.exct.net/?qs=41eecffb5c32f009e85bbeb001486a418283348879ac3dfdcb5320d62bcb73cc">You'll
                                  know it when you see it</a></b>, if
                              it's ISIS or it's an ally of ISIS. <br>
                              <br>
                              <b>GRAYSON:</b> How about the Free Syrian
                              Army, are they fighting alongside ISIL in
                              Syria? <br>
                              <br>
                              <b>JEFFREY:</b> No, they're not fighting
                              alongside ISIL, in fact often they're
                              fighting against ISIL, and ISIL against
                              them in particular. <br>
                              <br>
                              <b>GRAYSON:</b> What about Assad, is he
                              fighting "alongside" or against? <b><a
                                  moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://cl.exct.net/?qs=41eecffb5c32f009e85bbeb001486a418283348879ac3dfdcb5320d62bcb73cc">It's
                                  kind of hard to tell without a
                                  scorecard, isn't it?</a></b> <br>
                              <br>
                              <b>JEFFREY:</b> <b><a
                                  moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://cl.exct.net/?qs=41eecffb5c32f009e85bbeb001486a418283348879ac3dfdcb5320d62bcb73cc">It
                                  sure is.</a></b> <br>
                              <br>
                              <b>GRAYSON:</b> Yes. What about you, Dr.
                              Brennan, <b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://cl.exct.net/?qs=41eecffb5c32f009e85bbeb001486a418283348879ac3dfdcb5320d62bcb73cc">can
                                  you tell me what "alongside ISIL"
                                  means?</a></b> <br>
                              <br>
                              <b>BRENNAN:</b> <b><a
                                  moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://cl.exct.net/?qs=41eecffb5c32f009e85bbeb001486a418283348879ac3dfdcb5320d62bcb73cc">No,
                                  I really couldn't.</a></b> I think
                              that, what, you know, it might be. The
                              9/11 Commission uses the phrase "radical
                              islamist organizations." I think maybe if
                              we went to a wording like that, it
                              includes all those 52 groups that adhere
                              to this type of ideology, that threaten
                              the United States. But we're putting
                              ourselves in boxes and as you said Senator
                              - Congressman -- I'm trying to understand
                              what that means, what the limits are ...
                              who we're dealing with, and <b><a
                                  moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://cl.exct.net/?qs=41eecffb5c32f009e85bbeb001486a418283348879ac3dfdcb5320d62bcb73cc">it's
                                  very confusing.</a></b> <br>
                              <br>
                              <b>GRAYSON:</b> Dr. Rand? <br>
                              <br>
                              <b>RAND:</b> Well, first of all, I believe
                              that the confusion is probably a function
                              of the fact that this is an unclassified
                              document, so it's not going to specify
                              exactly which groups are considered
                              associates; that would be for a classified
                              setting. But second, as I said in the
                              testimony, the nature of the alliances
                              within ISIL are changing and are fluid,
                              and those who are targeting, the military
                              experts, know exactly who is a derivative
                              or an associate or an ally of ISIS, at any
                              given moment. <br>
                              <br>
                              <b>GRAYSON:</b> Why are you so confident
                              of that? It seems to me that it's a matter
                              of terminology, not a matter of
                              ascertainable fact. <br>
                              <br>
                              <b>RAND:</b> Based on my public service,
                              I've seen some of the lawyers, and some of
                              the methodologies, and . . . . <br>
                              <br>
                              <b>GRAYSON:</b> Okay. Here's the $64
                              billion question for you, Ambassador
                              Jeffrey, and if we have time, for you
                              others. <b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://cl.exct.net/?qs=41eecffb5c32f009e85bbeb001486a418283348879ac3dfdcb5320d62bcb73cc">If
                                  you can't tell us -- you three experts
                                  can't tell us -- what these words
                                  mean, what does that tell us?</a></b>
                              Ambassador Jeffrey? <br>
                              <br>
                              <b>JEFFREY:</b> That it's very difficult
                              to be using a tool basically designed to
                              declare war or something like war on a
                              nation-state, which has a fixed
                              definition, against a group that morphs,
                              that changes its name, that has allies,
                              and other things. Do we not fight it? We
                              have to fight it. Are we having a hard
                              time defining it? You bet. <br>
                              <br>
                              <b>GRAYSON:</b> Dr. Brennan? <br>
                              <br>
                              <b>BRENNAN:</b> I'd agree with the
                              ambassador. I think the issue we that need
                              to be looking at is trying to broaden
                              terminology and understand that it is a
                              tenet, or organizations and groups that
                              adhere to this ideology, and make it broad
                              enough that if one pops up in a different
                              country that is doing the same thing, that
                              is a sister of this organization, the
                              President has the authority to act. <br>
                              <br>
                              <b>GRAYSON:</b> Dr. Brennan, <b><a
                                  moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://cl.exct.net/?qs=41eecffb5c32f009e85bbeb001486a418283348879ac3dfdcb5320d62bcb73cc">I
                                  think that you just described a blank
                                  check, which I'm not willing to give
                                  to the President or anybody else.</a></b>
                              But thank you for your time...   <br>
                              <br>
                            </td>
                          </tr>
                        </tbody>
                      </table>
                    </td>
                  </tr>
                </tbody>
              </table>
            </div>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
      <br>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Peace-discuss mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net">Peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss">https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>