<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">
<h3 class="nomargin" style="margin: 0px; padding: 5px; font-size: 1.1em; line-height: 1em; color: rgb(255, 255, 255); background-color: rgb(59, 89, 152); clear: both; height: 1em; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;">
</h3>
<div id="tools" class="clearfix" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; position: absolute; top: 8px; right: 5px; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12px;">
<ul class="tools" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; font-size: 1em; line-height: 1em; position: relative; float: right; width: auto; list-style-type: none;">
<li class="noborder" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; float: left; width: auto; border-left-style: none;">
<a class="print" href="http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2017/06/21/kass-j21.html?view=print" target="_blank" style="margin: 0px 0px 0px 2px; padding: 2px 3px 3px; color: rgb(68, 86, 137); text-decoration: none; display: block; font-size: 1.1em; line-height: 1em; background-color: rgb(254, 254, 254); background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;">Print</a></li><li style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; float: left; width: auto;" class=""><a class="leaflet" href="http://intsse.com/wswspdf/en/articles/2017/06/21/kass-j21.pdf" target="_blank" style="margin: 0px 0px 0px 2px; padding: 2px 3px 3px; color: rgb(68, 86, 137); text-decoration: none; display: block; font-size: 1.1em; line-height: 1em; background-color: rgb(254, 254, 254); background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;">Leaflet</a></li><li style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; float: left; width: auto;" class=""><a class="feedback" href="http://www.wsws.org/en/special/contact.html?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wsws.org%2Fen%2Farticles%2F2017%2F06%2F21%2Fkass-j21.html&t=A%20spook%20comes%20out%20of%20the%20woodwork%20to%20attack%20Brad%20Pitt%E2%80%99s%20%3Cem%3EWar%20Machine%3C%2Fem%3E" style="margin: 0px 0px 0px 2px; padding: 2px 3px 3px; color: rgb(68, 86, 137); text-decoration: none; display: block; font-size: 1.1em; line-height: 1em; background-color: rgb(254, 254, 254); background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;">Feedback</a></li><li style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; float: left; width: auto;" class=""><a class="share" href="http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2017/06/21/kass-j21.html#" style="margin: 0px 0px 0px 2px; padding: 2px 3px 3px; color: rgb(68, 86, 137); text-decoration: none; display: block; font-size: 1.1em; line-height: 1em; background-color: rgb(254, 254, 254); background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;">Share
»</a></li></ul>
</div>
<h4 style="margin: 20px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; font-size: 1.8em; line-height: 1.3em; font-weight: normal; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif; color: rgb(51, 51, 51);" class="">
Netflix drama strikes a nerve …</h4>
<h2 style="margin: 0.42em 0px 0px; padding: 0px; font-size: 2.6em; line-height: 1.2em; font-weight: normal; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif; color: rgb(51, 51, 51);" class="">
A spook comes out of the woodwork to attack Brad Pitt’s <em style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;" class="">War Machine</em></h2>
<h5 style="margin: 10px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; font-size: 1.1em; line-height: 1.3em; font-weight: normal; font-style: italic; color: rgb(102, 102, 102); font-family: Arial, sans-serif;" class="">
By David Walsh <br style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;" class="">
21 June 2017</h5>
<p style="margin: 10px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; font-size: 1.4em; line-height: 1.36em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial, sans-serif;" class="">
Does art have social consequences? Does it matter which attitude filmmakers or novelists, for example, adopt toward the big events of the day?</p>
<p style="margin: 10px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; font-size: 1.4em; line-height: 1.36em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial, sans-serif;" class="">
Here’s a case that may help settle the argument or at least provides strong circumstantial evidence.</p>
<p style="margin: 10px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; font-size: 1.4em; line-height: 1.36em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial, sans-serif;" class="">
Three weeks ago we reviewed <em style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;" class=""><a href="http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2017/05/30/mach-m30.html" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; color: rgb(68, 86, 137); text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold;" class="">War
Machine</a></em>, the Netflix satire about Gen. Stanley McChrystal and the bloody, neo-colonial American war effort in Afghanistan.</p>
<p style="margin: 10px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; font-size: 1.4em; line-height: 1.36em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial, sans-serif;" class="">
We noted its unusually biting character. This is not a film that makes obeisance to the greatness of the US military. It presents the war in Afghanistan as “a debacle, presided over by lunatics and egomaniacs,” the WSWS review noted.</p>
<div class="imageFull" style="margin: 15px 0px 10px; padding: 0px; float: none; width: 480px; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12px;">
<img src="http://www.wsws.org/asset/0d10a9b5-34dd-4ed3-87ac-aae32b406d7K/image.jpg?rendition=image480" style="margin: 0px 10px 10px 0px; padding: 0px; float: left; width: 480px; max-width: 100%; border: 0px solid rgb(255, 255, 255);" class=""><span style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 2px; display: block; font-weight: bold; font-size: 1.2em; line-height: 1.1em;" class="">Brad
Pitt and Ben Kingsley in <em style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;" class="">War Machine</em></span></div>
<p style="margin: 10px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; font-size: 1.4em; line-height: 1.36em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial, sans-serif;" class="">
Written and directed by Australian David Michôd, and based on the 2012 non-fiction book, <em style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;" class="">The Operators: The Wild and Terrifying Inside Story of America’s War in Afghanistan</em>, by the late American journalist
Michael Hastings, <em style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;" class="">War Machine</em>sarcastically hails the US in its opening moments, “Ah, America. You beacon of composure and proportionate response. You bringer of calm and goodness to the world.”</p>
<p style="margin: 10px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; font-size: 1.4em; line-height: 1.36em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial, sans-serif;" class="">
The WSWS noted that for once a film reflected some of the widespread hostility toward a quarter century of brutal war and toward the politicians and generals who have conducted it.</p>
<p style="margin: 10px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; font-size: 1.4em; line-height: 1.36em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial, sans-serif;" class="">
It was only fitting that a spokesperson for those war criminals would respond.</p>
<p style="margin: 10px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; font-size: 1.4em; line-height: 1.36em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial, sans-serif;" class="">
Whitney Kassel, late of the Defense Department, Special Operations in Afghanistan and Pakistan, a former member of McChrystal’s “team,” and an associate in private business of a long-time leading figure in the CIA, has written a denunciation of <em style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;" class="">War
Machine</em> in <em style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;" class="">Foreign Policy</em> magazine, “Screw Brad Pitt and the ‘War Machine’ he rode in on.”</p>
<p style="margin: 10px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; font-size: 1.4em; line-height: 1.36em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial, sans-serif;" class="">
The unusually frank language of the headline presumably provides some sense of Kassel’s disapproval. Indeed, she acknowledges that her initial “eye-rolling quickly gave way to expletives.”</p>
<p style="margin: 10px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; font-size: 1.4em; line-height: 1.36em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial, sans-serif;" class="">
The character of Kassel’s objectivity in regard to Gen. McChrystal makes itself evident early on when she notes that Hastings (whose <em style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;" class="">Rolling Stone</em> article, later expanded into the book on which <em style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;" class="">War
Machine</em> is based, essentially ended the general’s career) “took down a man I worked with during the time in question and deeply respected<span style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;" class="">—</span>one near-universally viewed as an American hero of integrity
and intelligence.”</p>
<p style="margin: 10px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; font-size: 1.4em; line-height: 1.36em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial, sans-serif;" class="">
McChrystal was a ruthless practitioner of counterinsurgency warfare, responsible for the killing of thousands of Iraqis. His entourage in Afghanistan, according to Hastings, was “a handpicked collection of killers, spies, geniuses, patriots, political operators
and outright maniacs.” A staffer neatly describes in Hasting’s book the now infamous Gen. Michael Flynn, one of McChrystal’s toadies, as a “rat on acid.”</p>
<p style="margin: 10px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; font-size: 1.4em; line-height: 1.36em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial, sans-serif;" class="">
Kassel presents the 16-year US-led intervention in Afghanistan as “a war effort that, while certainly replete with absurdities and mistakes, was and continues to be fought by men and women who are dedicated to improving the security of the United States and
its allies by helping to build an Afghanistan that will not provide safe haven for al Qaeda or, more recently, the Islamic State.”</p>
<div class="imageFull" style="margin: 15px 0px 10px; padding: 0px; float: none; width: 480px; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12px;">
<img src="http://www.wsws.org/asset/34ae1d87-bd41-4144-b966-e6d4b5d1415L/image.jpg?rendition=image480" style="margin: 0px 10px 10px 0px; padding: 0px; float: left; width: 480px; max-width: 100%; border: 0px solid rgb(255, 255, 255);" class=""><span style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 2px; display: block; font-weight: bold; font-size: 1.2em; line-height: 1.1em;" class=""><em style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;" class="">War
Machine</em></span></div>
<p style="margin: 10px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; font-size: 1.4em; line-height: 1.36em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial, sans-serif;" class="">
This is a pack of lies. The US is not in Afghanistan to protect American lives, but to advance its interests in a geopolitically strategic area. The war has led to nothing but death, destruction and misery on a vast scale.</p>
<p style="margin: 10px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; font-size: 1.4em; line-height: 1.36em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial, sans-serif;" class="">
Kassel is particularly concerned that <em style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;" class="">War Machine</em> casts doubt on the legitimacy of the entire “war on terror,” the code phrase with which American imperialism has justified its drive for global hegemony since
2001.</p>
<p style="margin: 10px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; font-size: 1.4em; line-height: 1.36em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial, sans-serif;" class="">
She goes on: “Likewise<span style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;" class="">—</span>and this is the part that matters today<span style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;" class="">—</span>the portrayal of the U.S. and NATO’s very presence in the country since 2001 as
rooted in fantasy and an inflated sense of American prowess is disingenuous and dangerous in its mischaracterization of a war that remains, particularly in the face of escalating violence and instability, an important part of reducing global terrorism.”</p>
<p style="margin: 10px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; font-size: 1.4em; line-height: 1.36em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial, sans-serif;" class="">
Kassel seems unaware that this last sentence contains an obvious contradiction. The longest war in US history has ostensibly been carried out in the name of “reducing global terrorism,” yet there is “escalating violence and instability.”</p>
<p style="margin: 10px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; font-size: 1.4em; line-height: 1.36em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial, sans-serif;" class="">
<em style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;" class="">War Machine</em> is not a primer in anti-imperialist politics, but it does make clear that the war in Afghanistan is a doomed project. The film’s narrator asks in the opening moments, “What do you do when the
war you're fighting just can't possibly be won in any meaningful sense?”</p>
<p style="margin: 10px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; font-size: 1.4em; line-height: 1.36em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial, sans-serif;" class="">
The narrator further explains that the US military’s “counterinsurgency” strategy runs up against basic political realities: “When … you’ve just gone and invaded a place that you probably shouldn’t have, you end up fighting against just regular people in regular-people
clothes. These guys are what are called insurgents. Basically, they’re just guys who picked up weapons ’cause ... so would you, if someone invaded your country. Funnily enough ... insurgencies are next to impossible to defeat.”</p>
<div class="imageFull" style="margin: 15px 0px 10px; padding: 0px; float: none; width: 480px; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12px;">
<img src="http://www.wsws.org/asset/4e7833ee-f38b-4a76-a68a-360b9470ed7O/image.jpg?rendition=image480" style="margin: 0px 10px 10px 0px; padding: 0px; float: left; width: 480px; max-width: 100%; border: 0px solid rgb(255, 255, 255);" class=""><span style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 2px; display: block; font-weight: bold; font-size: 1.2em; line-height: 1.1em;" class=""><em style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;" class="">War
Machine</em></span></div>
<p style="margin: 10px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; font-size: 1.4em; line-height: 1.36em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial, sans-serif;" class="">
But Kassel inhabits a different political and moral universe. Her writing has the ghastly quality of the “democratic” military bureaucrat or intelligence agent, the muffled, perpetually disingenuous tone of the individual who plots bombings and murders and
mass repression, but refers to such activities as “strategic options” and “the tools available for trying to turn around what was considered an urgent national security priority,” and half-believes her own obscurantism.</p>
<p style="margin: 10px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; font-size: 1.4em; line-height: 1.36em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial, sans-serif;" class="">
She presents a glowing picture of the same crowd among whom Hastings placed “killers … and outright maniacs.” Kassel writes: “I found McChrystal and his team to be respectful, thoughtful … McChrystal spent endless hours with the members of the assessment team
[which included Kassel<span style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;" class="">—</span>very few of whom had direct military experience<span style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;" class="">—</span>exploring the strategic options available to the United States and NATO.”</p>
<p style="margin: 10px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; font-size: 1.4em; line-height: 1.36em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial, sans-serif;" class="">
Toward the end of her tirade, Kassel once again expresses anxiety about the impact of <em style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;" class="">War Machine</em> and points to “a particular hazard,” that the film will reinforce “a view of the war in Afghanistan as this
generation’s Vietnam, led by men … who care only about protecting their own egos and reputations, with no sense of the sacrifices inherent in war and no strategic vision or logic behind their decisions.”</p>
<p style="margin: 10px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; font-size: 1.4em; line-height: 1.36em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial, sans-serif;" class="">
She expresses nervousness about the “reworking” of the US approach to Afghanistan that Trump administration officials may be considering and asserts that “it is critical that they, and the American public to whom they report, understand how we got here, and
the reasons why some elements of a counterinsurgency strategy may remain valid moving forward.”</p>
<p style="margin: 10px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; font-size: 1.4em; line-height: 1.36em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial, sans-serif;" class="">
Kassel, according to the Huffington Post, for whom she writes occasionally, “spent four years at the Office of the Secretary of Defense where she focused on Special Operations, Counterterrorism, and Pakistan policy. During this time she spent a year in Pakistan
working for the Office of the Defense Representative and Special Operations Command Forward. She also served as the representative of the Secretary of Defense to General Stanley McChrystal's Strategic Assessment Team in Afghanistan in 2009.”</p>
<p style="margin: 10px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; font-size: 1.4em; line-height: 1.36em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial, sans-serif;" class="">
This is someone up to her neck in imperialist violence and intrigue. At one point, Kassel served “as Assistant for Counterterrorism Policy in the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations, Low Intensity Conflict, and Interdependent
Capabilities (ASD SO/LIC&IC) within the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy (OSD-Policy).”</p>
<p style="margin: 10px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; font-size: 1.4em; line-height: 1.36em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial, sans-serif;" class="">
Kassel, a Democratic Party supporter apparently, often tweets about women’s rights and racism<span style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;" class="">—</span>and Russian aggression! Of course, how could it be otherwise?</p>
<p style="margin: 10px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; font-size: 1.4em; line-height: 1.36em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial, sans-serif;" class="">
A special mention must be made of her association with the Arkin Group, the private intelligence firm, where she “served as a senior director focused on strategic analysis and risk management.”</p>
<p style="margin: 10px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; font-size: 1.4em; line-height: 1.36em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial, sans-serif;" class="">
A founding partner of the Arkin Group is Jack Devine, according to the company’s website, “a 32-year veteran of the Central Intelligence Agency (‘CIA’). Mr. Devine served as both Acting Director and Associate Director of CIA’s operations outside the United
States from 1993-1995, where he had supervisory authority over thousands of CIA employees involved in sensitive missions throughout the world. In addition, he served as Chief of the Latin American Division from 1992-1993 and was the principal manager of the
CIA’s sensitive projects in Latin America.”</p>
<p style="margin: 10px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; font-size: 1.4em; line-height: 1.36em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial, sans-serif;" class="">
In fact, Devine’s first foreign assignment was in Chile, where he arrived in August 1970. Even before being physically assigned there, he writes, “I had worked the night shift for the Chile Task Force in Langley, synthesizing cables from Santiago into a morning
intelligence report for the bosses.” Devine was present in Santiago in September 1973 when the Nixon administration and the CIA organized a coup, along with the Chilean military, that brought the brutal Pinochet dictatorship to power, which tortured and murdered
tens of thousands of political opponents, trade unionists and young people.</p>
<p style="margin: 10px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; font-size: 1.4em; line-height: 1.36em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial, sans-serif;" class="">
The Arkin website also notes, “From 1985-1987, Mr. Devine headed the CIA’s Afghan Task Force, which successfully countered Soviet aggression in the region. In 1987, he was awarded the CIA’s Meritorious Officer Award for this accomplishment.”</p>
<p style="margin: 10px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; font-size: 1.4em; line-height: 1.36em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial, sans-serif;" class="">
In other words, Devine is one of the figures criminally responsible for arming and fomenting Islamic fundamentalism in Afghanistan as part of the effort to undermine the Soviet Union. In his own words, in his autobiography, <em style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;" class="">Good
Hunting: An American Spymaster's Story,</em> Devine moved “guns and ammunition across the border into Afghanistan,” aiding “the Afghan mujahideen and their determined opposition to the Soviet Union’s occupation of their country in the 1980s. I ran the last,
and largest, cover operation of the Cold War.” The career of Osama bin Laden, Al Qaeda, the 9/11 terrorist attacks and ISIS itself all emerge, directly or indirectly, from this operation.</p>
<p style="margin: 10px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; font-size: 1.4em; line-height: 1.36em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial, sans-serif;" class="">
Devine and Kassel have co-authored numerous articles, including “Afghanistan: Withdrawal Lessons,” in the <em style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;" class="">World Policy Journal</em>, 2013. This cynical morsel of <em style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;" class="">realpolitik</em> offered
advice to the Obama administration on the best policy to pursue “in protecting U.S. interests” in the region. “Robust covert action” remained high on the list. Should the Pakistani government, for example, turn down US aid, “we should respond with appropriate
covert action. This would include paramilitary activities as well as psychological operations, propaganda, and political and economic influence.”</p>
<p style="margin: 10px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; font-size: 1.4em; line-height: 1.36em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial, sans-serif;" class="">
Devine also acknowledges Kassel’s assistance in the preparation of his autobiography.</p>
<p style="margin: 10px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; font-size: 1.4em; line-height: 1.36em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial, sans-serif;" class="">
Devine and Kassel continued to do at Arkin what they did at the CIA and the Defense Department, respectively, defend the interests of American corporate and financial interests.</p>
<p style="margin: 10px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; font-size: 1.4em; line-height: 1.36em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial, sans-serif;" class="">
The Arkin website, in its “Case Studies” section, offers the example of the work it did for an investor, “concerned about instability and uncertain about prospects for South African agriculture.” The firm “initiated a political risk analysis and market intelligence
project, and also completed an investigation of political, legal, and regulatory events that could impact foreign investors, agriculture operations, and the industry of interest.” Arkin “uncovered no evidence indicating that South Africa’s leaders would reverse
foreign investment-friendly policies.”</p>
<p style="margin: 10px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; font-size: 1.4em; line-height: 1.36em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial, sans-serif;" class="">
In Vietnam, Arkin assessed “the future of pro-privatization initiatives” and also laid out “incentives and road blocks associated with privatization and elucidated the process by which entities become eligible for consideration.”</p>
<p style="margin: 10px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; font-size: 1.4em; line-height: 1.36em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial, sans-serif;" class="">
This background has provided Ms. Kassel with the moral and intellectual high ground from which to criticize the anti-war satire, <em style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;" class="">War Machine</em>, which lifts the lid on the lethal madness of the US military and
dares to call into question American foreign policy.</p>
<p style="margin: 10px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; font-size: 1.4em; line-height: 1.36em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial, sans-serif;" class="">
It is entirely to the film’s credit that it has provoked an angry response from this trusted agent of American imperialism.</p>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class=""><a href="http://wsws.org" class="">WSWS.ORG</a></div>
</body>
</html>