<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:inherit;
panose-1:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
span.m-2072626042405318145m6648434432035540592m3402354510405970267textexposedshow
{mso-style-name:m_-2072626042405318145m6648434432035540592m3402354510405970267textexposedshow;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
.MsoPapDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
text-align:justify;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>I don’t bet Bob,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Just explain your evidence that would support your belief that she would go against her DNC handlers.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>David Johnson<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> Robert Naiman [mailto:naiman@justforeignpolicy.org] <br><b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, October 09, 2018 1:56 PM<br><b>To:</b> David Johnson<br><b>Cc:</b> Peace-discuss List<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [Peace-discuss] [Peace] Letter to the News-Gazette, on the coming election<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal style='text-align:justify'>OK, let's bet. <o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal style='text-align:justify'><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='text-align:justify'>I bet you dinner that if Betsy wins, she will support legislation to end unconstitutional U.S. participation in the Saudi war in Yemen. <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='text-align:justify'><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='text-align:justify'>Do we have a bet?<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='text-align:justify'><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='text-align:justify'>===<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='text-align:justify'> <br clear=all><o:p></o:p></p><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='text-align:justify'>Robert Naiman<br>Policy Director<br>Just Foreign Policy<br><a href="http://www.justforeignpolicy.org" target="_blank">www.justforeignpolicy.org</a><br><a href="mailto:naiman@justforeignpolicy.org" target="_blank">naiman@justforeignpolicy.org</a><o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal style='text-align:justify'>(202) 448-2898 x1<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='text-align:justify'><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt;text-align:justify'><span style='font-size:9.5pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div><p class=MsoNormal style='text-align:justify'><o:p> </o:p></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal style='text-align:justify'><o:p> </o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='text-align:justify'>On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 1:53 PM David Johnson via Peace-discuss <<a href="mailto:peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net">peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p></div><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in'><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Bob,</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>We are 4-weeks away from election day and a lot can happen between now and then.</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>I said a “ minor miracle “ would be the only way she will win, and that could happen. But I seriously doubt she will win.</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>My point was that it will make no difference if Davis or Londrigan are elected. Both will continue the same pro-war policies of their corporate masters and neither will be persuaded otherwise by their constituents.</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>David johnson</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> Robert Naiman [mailto:<a href="mailto:naiman@justforeignpolicy.org" target="_blank">naiman@justforeignpolicy.org</a>] <br><b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, October 09, 2018 1:44 PM<br><b>To:</b> David Johnson<br><b>Cc:</b> Peace-discuss List<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [Peace] [Peace-discuss] Letter to the News-Gazette, on the coming election</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'> <o:p></o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;text-align:justify'>I wouldn't be so sure that Betsy will not beat Rodney. A recent poll has her down by one point, within the poll's margin of error. My point was, if Betsy is coming close to beating Rodney, then Dems already have the House. Therefore, keeping Dems from taking the House is not a reason to vote for Rodney. It will not have that effect. <o:p></o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;text-align:justify'><br clear=all><o:p></o:p></p><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;text-align:justify'>Robert Naiman<br>Policy Director<br>Just Foreign Policy<br><a href="http://www.justforeignpolicy.org" target="_blank">www.justforeignpolicy.org</a><br><a href="mailto:naiman@justforeignpolicy.org" target="_blank">naiman@justforeignpolicy.org</a><o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;text-align:justify'>(202) 448-2898 x1<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;text-align:justify'> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;margin-bottom:12.0pt;text-align:justify'><span style='font-size:9.5pt'> </span><o:p></o:p></p></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;text-align:justify'> <o:p></o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;text-align:justify'> <o:p></o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;text-align:justify'>On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 1:35 PM David Johnson <<a href="mailto:davidjohnson1451@comcast.net" target="_blank">davidjohnson1451@comcast.net</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p></div><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Thanks to Bob Naiman and Carl for their views and analysis.</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Here is my take on the subject for what it is worth –</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>I do NOT think it would be better if the Republicans maintain control of the House and / or Senate, but at the same time I see no evidence that if the Democrats would take control that things would improve.</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>A recent military expenditure increase bill in the Senate was supported by ALL of the Democrats.</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>The only ones to vote against it were six Republicans and Bernie Sanders ( who is an independent ).</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>In the House 91 % of Democrats supported it.</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>The assumption that Democrats will automatically be better than Republicans on the issues of war and foreign policy has no basis in fact. Especially when you consider that there are an unprecedented number of Democratic candidates running for election ( all backed by the DNC during the primaries ) who are former military and / or intelligence operatives from various agencies. In addition the DNC has done everything in their power ( very successfully so with only a few exceptions ) to prevent any and all anti-war / anti-corporate Dem primary candidates from winning. In addition refusing to budge on more ; democracy, transparency, and accountability within the Democratic party. Which means DNC backed candidates will NOT listen to their constituent’s wishes ( especially in regards to foreign policy and corporate power ) and instead will toe the DNC party line because the DNC wants to keep their corporate donors happy. The corporate donor class is the constituency ( special interest ) who the DNC fears, NOT the voters. Who they perceive to be sheep who will continue to vote for Democratic candidates no matter what, in the tried and true tactic of “ triangulation “ that was perfected by the Clintons. However people are catching on to this and are angry, which is why close to 48 % of eligible voters chose neither Clinton or Trump either by not voting at all or voting for 3<sup>rd</sup> party candidates in the last Presidential election. And why many voters selected Trump as a way of “ sending a message “and “disrupting the system “. As fucked up as that strategy was, it is understandable to a certain degree why some people did that considering the betrayal they experienced from 2008 t0 2016 by the Democrats and the lack of other options. </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>This reality is especially relevant in regards to issues of war and peace. The war profiteer industry in the U.S. is along with the financial sector the largest and most powerful special interest in the country that not only has it’s own industry lobbyists but also the support of very wealthy and influential lobbyists who represent AIPAC and the kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Both of whom have not only interfered in our political / election process for decades, but also have used their vast financial resources to buy the good graces of the corporate media.</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>This dynamic will only change when we begin to understand and act accordingly that it doesn’t matter the political party but the individual candidate who is running, rather an anti-war / anti corporate Dem, or an anti-war Republican, or ant-war / anti-corporate ; Green, Independent, Socialist, etc..</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>The “ Any Blue Will Do “ mindset is WHY we are in the horrible condition we are in. And Rodney Davis is DEFINTELY no Tim Johnson, as Bob accurately stated, and he will continue the pro-war policies of the majority in the Republican party.</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>In terms of the Illinois 13<sup>th</sup> Congressional district – Betsy Londrigan will NOT win against Davis ( as Bob pointed out the odds to attest to that fact ). The candidate that could of beat Davis ( who came within .05 % of beating Davis in the one time he ran as Dem in the 13<sup>th</sup> in a three way race ) and who also had the best platform all around including an anti-war platform was Dr. David Gill. Who the Unions and the academic “ intelligentsia “ in Urbana and elsewhere in the 13<sup>th</sup> refused to support, and when asked why individually had no clear answer except that they wanted someone “ fresh and new “. ???</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Wow ! … Did they think they were buying the latest fashion trend clothing instead of voting for someone who supported 95 % of the issues they claim they support ?</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Betsy Londrigan if by some minor miracle would win would follow the instructions and orders of Durbin and the DNC to a tee, if for no other reason because those were her backers / sponsors in the Dem primary.</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>I saw her twice during the debates and she is a hard core neo-liberal, ESPECIALLY in regards to foreign policy. </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>So with these facts in mind I am voting for ; “ None of the Above “ in the 13<sup>th</sup> Congressional race.</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>We should NOT vote for anyone who will not only NOT represent our interests, but will actively work against our interests. To do otherwise makes no logical sense.</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Nor does it make any logical sense to vote for Davis as a means of punishing the Democrats when Rodney Davis has a clear track record of voting in favor of war.</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>David Johnson</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> Peace [mailto:<a href="mailto:peace-bounces@lists.chambana.net" target="_blank">peace-bounces@lists.chambana.net</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Robert Naiman via Peace<br><b>Sent:</b> Monday, October 08, 2018 10:05 PM<br><b>To:</b> C. G. Estabrook<br><b>Cc:</b> Peace Discuss; peace<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [Peace] [Peace-discuss] Letter to the News-Gazette, on the coming election</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'> <o:p></o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;text-align:justify'>Here's another way of looking at it. <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;text-align:justify'> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;text-align:justify'>I disagree that the world would be worse off on net if Democrats take the House. I think the world would be better off on net. I think that it would help us end the Saudi war in Yemen, which is pushing millions of human beings to the edge of starvation. I think we can end the war if we can get a vote in the House. So far the House Republican leadership has blocked a vote in the House. We're trying to get a vote as soon as possible, but if Dems win the House, then I'm confident that we'll get a vote in January if not before. I think that outweighs the anti-Russia issue. I don't contest at all that the anti-Russia thing embraced by many Democrats is quite bothersome. But, Russia has nuclear weapons and a big army and a seat on the UN Security Council and while the U.S. may pursue destructive policies towards Russia and we should oppose those policies, the U.S. is not about to invade Russia or start bombing it, while Russia has those means to defend itself, which it will continue to do. Yemeni children have none of these things to defend themselves from U.S. bombs. So I think the Yemeni children should be a higher priority for our defense. Plus, while Trump has advocated, justly in my view, for better relations with Russia, his actual policies have in some respects been more aggressive than Obama. Obama rebuffed neocon pressure to arm Ukraine. Trump acceded to it. This is not to gainsay that Obama did bad things in this regard and Trump did good things. Just that it's not one-zero.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;text-align:justify'> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;text-align:justify'>But regardless of all that, the overwhelming likelihood is that whatever happens with Betsy vs. Rodney will not determine control of the House. It's a competitive district, and Betsy could win. But it's not a district Democrats need to win in order to take the House. According to 538, Dems have a 5 in 7 or 3 in 4 chance of winning the House, depending how you count, while the chances of Betsy beating Rodney are 3 in 10 or 2 in 7 or 1 in 4, depending on how you count. These are estimates, of course, but it shows where an educated reasonable guess lies: it's more likely that Dems will take the House than it is that Betsy will beat Rodney. If Betsy vs Rodney is close - if our votes matter - Dems are very likely taking the House anyway. If the contest for the House is close, then Rodney is probably beating Betsy anyway. There's a good chance that Dems will take the House but we'll still be stuck with Rodney. We have far greater potential to influence whether we're stuck with Rodney than whether Dems take the House. <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;text-align:justify'> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;text-align:justify'>So I think there's a strong case that we should focus more on whether we're represented by Betsy or Rodney, over which we have more control, than over whether Dems or Rs control the House, over which we have much less influence, and which is not likely to be influenced by Betsy vs. Rodney. <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;text-align:justify'> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;text-align:justify'>And there I think it's very much a slam dunk that we'd be much better off, from an anti-war point of view, being represented by Betsy than by Rodney. Not because Betsy would be perfect on all imaginable anti-war things; she wouldn't be. But she'd be good on some important things which are in contest. She'd be good on Yemen. Whereas Rodney is a big fat zero on all war and peace issues, including Yemen, and also Iran. I've tried ever since Rodney was our Rep. to get Rodney to do things, even bipartisan things, simple things, defend-our-Constitution things, for less war. Zero, nothing, zip, nada, he never did anything. He's completely hopeless on war and peace issues, as far as I can tell, a robot of the pro-war Republican leadership in the House. Tim Johnson was much better, night and day, reachable, we brought him around. Rodney Davis is a brick wall on war and peace. With Betsy she will be good on some things and we have a chance to move her on other things, to participate in national efforts to move Congress by moving our Rep. With Rodney Davis our chances are zero. He just doesn't give a damn what people in Champaign-Urbana think about anything, he's made that perfectly clear many times, we are not his base, he does not care at all what we think about anything and doesn't pretend to. <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;text-align:justify'> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;text-align:justify'>So I would urge people to think most about what we an do with respect to the matter at hand that will contribute the most to allowing us to participate meaningfully in national efforts to move Congress towards less war in the future. And I think it's pretty clear that means focusing on whether we want to be represented by Betsy or Rodney, rather on whether we want Dems or Rs to control the House. <o:p></o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;text-align:justify'> <o:p></o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;text-align:justify'>On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 9:24 PM Carl G. Estabrook via Peace-discuss <<a href="mailto:peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net" target="_blank">peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p></div><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><div><p style='margin-bottom:4.5pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#1D2129'>How should those of us opposed to America’s eight wars and war provocations vote? We have one vote to influence US government policy in the next two years: that comes in next month’s election of a representative to the US House, in the seat held by Republican Rodney Davis.</span><o:p></o:p></p><p style='margin-bottom:4.5pt;background:white;font-variant-ligatures:normal'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#1D2129'>Davis’ opponent is a conventional Democrat, Betsy Dirksen Londrigan. They generally agree on the neoliberal and neoconservative policies followed by all </span><span class=m-2072626042405318145m6648434432035540592m3402354510405970267textexposedshow><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"inherit","serif";color:#1D2129'>recent US governments, Republican and Democrat alike - policies that have produced more war and accelerating inequality.</span></span><o:p></o:p></p><div><p style='margin-bottom:4.5pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"inherit","serif";color:#1D2129'>Given a choice between two bad candidates, one should of course vote for the less bad. Here party affiliation makes the important difference, because the House is organized by parties, not the views of individual members. Of the two major political parties in America, the Democrats are the more pro-war today:</span><o:p></o:p></p><p style='margin-bottom:4.5pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"inherit","serif";color:#1D2129'>(1) their challengers for House seats include a large number of pro-war CIA and 'military intelligence' veterans;<br>(2) 'Russiagate' is their fantastical attempt to insure that Trump doesn't depart from the belligerence against Russia and China that characterized the Obama-Clinton administrations; and <br>(3) they are employing identity politics to defeat those few anti-war votes in Congress (cf. Rep. Michael Capuano in Massachusetts).</span><o:p></o:p></p><p style='margin-bottom:4.5pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"inherit","serif";color:#1D2129'>The Democrats should not be given control of Congress. They are the greater evil - the greater threat of war - at the moment.</span><o:p></o:p></p><p style='margin-bottom:4.5pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"inherit","serif";color:#1D2129'>I’ll reluctantly vote for our feckless Republican Congressman, Rodney Davis, in order to forestall the Democrats’ gaining control of the House of Representatives.</span><o:p></o:p></p><p style='margin-bottom:4.5pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"inherit","serif";color:#1D2129'>—CGE</span><o:p></o:p></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;text-align:justify'>_______________________________________________<br>Peace-discuss mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net" target="_blank">Peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net</a><br><a href="https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss" target="_blank">https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss</a><o:p></o:p></p></blockquote></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div></div></div><p class=MsoNormal style='text-align:justify'>_______________________________________________<br>Peace-discuss mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net" target="_blank">Peace-discuss@lists.chambana.net</a><br><a href="https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss" target="_blank">https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss</a><o:p></o:p></p></blockquote></div></div></body></html>