[Peace] News notes 2007-02-18
C. G. Estabrook
galliher at uiuc.edu
Mon Feb 19 22:02:04 CST 2007
[These notes on the "Global War on Terror" were prepared for the weekly
meeting of AWARE, the Anti-War Anti-Racism Effort of Champaign-Urbana.
Much of this material was discussed on the Saturday morning radio
program, "News from Neptune," by me and Paul Mueth, with the assistance
of producer J. B. Nicholson-Owens and research director Eric Sizemore.
Archived programs and citations are at <www.newsfromneptune.com>. Other
references will be provided on request. —CGE]
The theme of the week -- as so often in America -- is torture.
[1] THE THREAT OF PEACE. The USG needs wars and rumors of war in order
to feed its economy and to justify its military control of ME energy
resources, as the way to control its economic rivals in a tripolar
world. That's the principal reason for the fraudulent GWOT, so it's a
great threat to ongoing US policy whenever the locals break ranks and
make peace, as for example Saudi Arabia is trying to do by bringing the
Palestinian factions together in a meeting in Mecca (Israel is
desperately afraid that the major powers will cease their economic
strangulation of Palestine); the Saudis are also working with the
Iranians to broker peace among Lebanese factions (also to the great
displeasure of the US and Israel). Even the USG's most dependent
clients aren't always following orders:
SOS Rice this week expressed disappointment over a deal between
Pakistan and pro-Taliban militants. She was referring to the agreement
Pakistan signed with tribal leaders in September in North Waziristan
region. Rice said that the Taliban "is designated as a global terrorist
organisation under an executive order and work is being done to
designate it as a foreign terrorist organisation," in response to a
query from Republican Congressman Mark Steven Kirk. Kirk asked, “I
think 26 other organisations, including Hamas, are designated as foreign
terrorist organisations. Can we go ahead and, sort of, go with the
common sense and designate the Taliban as a terrorist organisation?”
In Iraq, Vice President Tariq al-Hashimi, a Sunni Arab praised the
Sunni Arab guerrillas as "honorable" and "sincere" and said that the
Iraqi government and the US must negotiate with them ... He also lashed
out at the Association of Muslim Scholars, a hard line Sunni religious
group that has been deeply critical of people like al-Hashimi for
serving in a government they see as American puppets.
[2] TORTURERS. In regard to Osama bin Laden, Rice said, “it is not a
one-man show, and we have captured and killed significant — that
significant field generalship leadership of al-Qaeda, people like Khalid
Sheikh Mohammed and Abu Zubayda {and, in fact, in Iraq, Zarqawi}, and
the people who operationally run things, we have made a real dent in
that leadership,” she added.
The US semi-official radio, NPR, reported on June 29, 2006 that "the
United States is using torture" and quotes *The One Percent Doctrine*,
by Ron Suskind to describe the interrogations of Abu Zubaydah and Khalid
Sheik Mohammed, the examples Rice chose. "Suskind says pressure to
generate intelligence came from the top. President Bush took a hands-on
approach to monitoring interrogations after the Sept. 11 attacks. 'He
was interested in a very specific, granular way all the time. He was
constantly asking folks inside of CIA, "What's happening with
interrogations? Are these techniques working? Can we trust what we get?"
The president ... is involved -- some people say too involved -- in the
granular day-to-day grit of this war on terror.'"
"In March 2002, amid criticism over the failure to capture Osama bin
Laden and other al-Qaida leaders, Zubaydah, a suspected member of the
terrorist group, was captured in Pakistan. President Bush touted
Zubaydah as a key player, but U.S. intelligence officials considered him
a lower-level 'recruiter/travel agent,' Suskind says. 'What that
disparity drives is a ferocious interrogation protocol for Abu
Zubaydah,' Suskind says. Zubaydah, who had been shot three times during
his capture, was helped back to health, then tortured, the author says.
'And this man, mentally unbalanced, clearly so, basically begins to talk
about everything under the sun,' Suskind says. Zubaydah's tips that
major U.S. landmarks were targeted for terrorist attacks proved to be
largely unfounded. 'Virtually none of them were targets,' Suskind says.
And regarding what the Bush policy did to Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the
presumed operational director of the 9-11 attacks, on this past Tuesday
night there was a private screening of Rory Kennedy's fim, "Ghosts of
Abu Ghraib" in Washington. The awful Sen. Lindsey Graham offered
remarks, "acknowledging the need for torture and [saying] we did not
even want us to know all of what they did to Khalid Shiekh Mohammed
because it was just so awful, but he assured us Khalid Sheik Mohammed
provided 'really great' information, [and asserted that] "most Americans
think this is an unfortunate necessity in the global war on terrorism."
If so, we might wonder why the USG finds it so important to keep secret
what is being done in our name. The US outraged Spain this week by
refusing to make available another of its ghost prisoners, the man
supposed to be in overall charge of the rail bombings in Spain, as the
trial of suspects opened in Madrid.
We also might wonder why the USG passed a law, the Military Commissions
Act 0f 2006, saying that American officials who torture can't be
punished. We know they are using their immunity. Mohammad's children,
aged nine and seven, were taken into custody in September 2003,
apparently in an attempt to force their father to give himself up as a
member of Al-Qaeda or the Taliban. Reports emerged that they were flown
to the US in March 2003, though the CIA and the Pakistan government
denied it. The whereabouts of the children is still unknown.
The US Department of Justice has implemented a secretive new prison
program segregating "high-security-risk" Muslim and Middle Eastern
prisoners and tightly restricting their communications with the outside
world in apparent violation of federal law. Quietly implemented in
December, the special "Communications Management Unit" (CMU) targeting
Muslim and Middle-Eastern inmates was not implemented through the
process required by federal law, which stipulates the public be notified
of any new changes to prison programs and be given the opportunity to
voice objections. Instead, the program appears to have been ordered and
implemented by a senior official at the Department of Justice ...the CMU
program, instituted Dec. 11, 2006 -- shortly after the mid-term
elections in which Democrats won both chambers of Congress -- is being
implemented at Terre Haute Federal Correctional Institution in Indiana.
[3] PROVOCATIONS. The USG has sent another aircraft carrier, the John C.
Stennis, to the Persian Gulf, this one named for a US senator who as a
young prosecutor, ought the conviction and execution of three black men
whose murder confessions had been extracted by torture. The convictions
were overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court in the landmark case of Brown
v. Mississippi (1936) that banned the use of evidence obtained by
torture. (A principle reversed by the Military Commissions Act.)
Meanwhile, Iran's Revolutionary Guards has engraved the military
organization's emblem into the side panel of an American warship
stationed in the Persian Gulf. The symbol was etched onto the ship by
the crew of a submarine that had managed to reach the U.S. vessel
without detection. [Haaretz]
[4] The House of Representatives passed a pusillanimous resolution*
against the surge by a smaller margin than expected, including 17
Republicans, among them our own congressman, illustrating the importance
of pressure on our federal representatives. The Administration
responded accurately that the resolution had no legal force.
The Senate failed to consider the same resolution because the Democrats
refused to do it without 60 votes; they did have seven Republicans
voting with them.
One of the legal architects of the American torture program, John Yoo,
repeated in the NYT this week the Republicans' accurate observation that
the constitutional way for Congress to limit the war was not by
resolution but by limiting funding, which Senate Democrats could do with
41 votes (by filibustering the funding bills), or approve in an
acceptable form with 51 votes (as the Republicans taught them how to do
in the last Congress, in regard to judgeships).
[5] An EU report on US torture flights in Europe documents 1,245 in the
period 2001-05. The German government responded by saying that they
wanted to make it a crime throughout the EU to say that genocide did not
occur in Germany, Turkey, or Yugoslavia.
[6] Russia threatens to withdraw from the 1987 Intermediate-Range
Nuclear Forces Treaty (as the US withdrew from tht 1972 ABM treaty), if
the US installs missile components in Poland and the Czech Republic.
[7] The NK nuclear deal is attacked by outraged neocons John Bolton and
Eliot Abrams. One of the craziest of the neocons, Frank Gaffney, says
opponents of the war in the Congress should be charged with treason.
[8] Times (UK): Giants Meet to Counter US Power. India, China and
Russia account for 40 per cent of the world’s population, a fifth of its
economy and more than half of its nuclear warheads. Now they appear to
be forming a partnership to challenge the US-dominated world order that
has prevailed since the end of the Cold War. Foreign ministers from the
three emerging giants met in Delhi yesterday [Valentine's Day] to
discuss ways to build a more democratic “multipolar world”. It was the
second such meeting in the past two years and came after an
unprecedented meeting between their respective leaders, Manmohan Singh,
Hu Jintao and Vladimir Putin, during the G8 summit in St Petersburg in
July. It also came only four days after Mr Putin stunned Western
officials by railing against American foreign policy at a security
conference in Munich.
The trilateral relationship between India, China and Russia was first
proposed by Yevgeny Primakov, the former Russian prime minister, during
a visit to New Delhi in 1998.
___________________________________
* "Resolution of the Spineless." Text of the Democratic resolution
expressing disapproval of President Bush's troop increase in Iraq that
the House passed this week:
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), that -
(1) Congress and the American people will continue to support and
protect the members of the United States Armed Forces who are serving or
who have served bravely and honorably in Iraq; and
(2) Congress disapproves of the decision of President George W. Bush
announced on January 10, 2007, to deploy more than 20,000 additional
United States combat troops to Iraq. [AP]
###
More information about the Peace
mailing list