From naiman at justforeignpolicy.org Thu Sep 1 17:09:44 2016 From: naiman at justforeignpolicy.org (Robert Naiman) Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 12:09:44 -0500 Subject: [Peace] Thursday at 5:30pm: Local Democratic Official to Urge Durbin, Duckworth to Oppose Saudi Arms Deal Message-ID: I just sent this to all Champaign-Urbana media and to Durbin and Duckworth's foreign policy staffers. *MEDIA ADVISORY FOR: *Thursday, September 1, 2016 *CONTACT**: *Robert Naiman: (202) 448-2898 x1; naiman at justforeignpolicy.org *Thursday at 5:30pm: Local Democratic Official to Urge Durbin, Duckworth to Oppose Saudi Arms Deal* *Champaign**, IL — *On Thursday, September 1, local Democratic elected official Robert Naiman will deliver 1100 signatures from Illinois residents to Senator Dick Durbin and Representative Tammy Duckworth urging them to oppose the Administration's proposed arms deal with Saudi Arabia. The MoveOn petitions are online here and here , with 686 and 414 Illinois signers, respectively. Durbin and Duckworth are appearing in *Champaign* at the *I Hotel* on *1900 S. First Ave* at *5:30 pm* at an event in support of Duckworth's candidacy for the U.S. Senate. Naiman is a member of the Champaign County Democratic Central Committee, the Precinct Committeeman for Cunningham 18 (Urbana), and a former member of the Champaign County Board. He is also the Policy Director of Just Foreign Policy , which opposes the proposed Saudi arms deal. The Saudi arms deal is also opposed by Oxfam America, Amnesty International, and Human Rights Watch. Just Foreign Policy recently supported a bipartisan letter led by Rep. Ted Lieu [D-CA], Rep. Ted Yoho [R-FL], Rep. John Conyers [D-MI], and Mick Mulvaney [R-SC], calling for the Saudi arms deal to be postponed. 64 Members of the House signed the letter ; Rep. Tammy Duckworth was not among the signers . "As I told *Foreign Policy* , the Lieu-Yoho letter showed members of Congress are increasingly ready to move from expressing private concerns to the administration to taking public action to reduce U.S. support for Saudi Arabia’s war in Yemen," Naiman said. "Unfortunately, so far Sen. Durbin and Rep. Duckworth are not yet among those ready to speak out. I hope that 1100 signatures from people across Illinois will help Sen. Durbin and Rep. Duckworth find their voice." *WHAT: "*Oppose Saudi arms deal" petition delivery to Sen. Dick Durbin & Rep. Tammy Duckworth. The petitions are online: Congress: Block Arms Transfer to Saudi Arabia to Force Debate on Yemen War (national petition, 15,858 signatures, of whom 686 are Illinois signers.) @SenatorDurbin & @RepDuckworth: Oppose the Saudi arms deal! (Illinois petition, 414 Illinois signers.) *WHERE:* I Hotel – 1900 S. First Ave, Champaign IL *WHEN:* Thursday, September 1st, 5:30-7:30 p.m. *For more information about the petition delivery, please contact Robert Naiman at **(202) 448-2898 x1* *or naiman at justforeignpolicy.org .* *=== * Robert Naiman Policy Director Just Foreign Policy www.justforeignpolicy.org naiman at justforeignpolicy.org (202) 448-2898 x1 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naiman at justforeignpolicy.org Fri Sep 2 20:32:56 2016 From: naiman at justforeignpolicy.org (Robert Naiman) Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 15:32:56 -0500 Subject: [Peace] at change.org: Saudis Must Face Consequences for Promoting Extremism Message-ID: OK, here's a little experiment. Gotta try things. I fear that we might not make much progress on obstructing the Saudi arms deal unless we can "cross over." The opposition can't just be liberal weenies who care about international humanitarian law. We need some help from Republicans who may not care about international humanitarian law that much but don't like Saudi Arabia. So I set up a petition at change.org, which is a "crossover site" - does "Republican" stuff as well as "Democratic" stuff. The petition doesn't mention Yemen at all. It just cites Farah Pandith saying in December that there must be consequences for Saudi Arabia if it doesn't stop supporting extremism, and then notes that eight months later, the New York Times reports that both Clinton and Trump are calling out Saudi Arabia's support of extremism, but neither is talking about consequences. Then it notes that the Obama Administration has just announced a billion dollar weapons deal, and that Senators Paul and Murphy plan to oppose it, and asks people to support that. "Send it up the flagpole and see who salutes." Saudis Must Face Consequences for Promoting Extremism https://www.change.org/p/u-s-senate-saudis-must-face- consequences-for-promoting-extremism === Robert Naiman Policy Director Just Foreign Policy www.justforeignpolicy.org naiman at justforeignpolicy.org (202) 448-2898 x1 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From karenaram at hotmail.com Sat Sep 3 21:26:05 2016 From: karenaram at hotmail.com (Karen Aram) Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2016 21:26:05 +0000 Subject: [Peace] [Peace-discuss] Wedgie for Gitmo Kangaroo Courts at UI Law School In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Professor Boyle, Midge’s article “October Surprise: Harold K”Killer” Koh to Lecture at UI Law School in Election Week” is now available in the Public I. I picked up some extra copies if you like. On Sep 3, 2016, at 12:15, Boyle, Francis A via Peace-discuss > wrote: Akhil Reed Amar Yale Law School The Yale Law Mafia Brother of our current Yale Law Mafia Dean who invited Yale Law Mafia Killer Koh to speak on October 28 to get Yale Law Mafia Mrs Clinton elected President 10 days later. All these Law Professors and Lawyers are just a Gang of Thugs beating up on a handful of law students with the courage, the integrity and the principles to say: NEVER AGAIN! Ditto for the University of Illinois Law Faculty—Just a Gang of Thugs! Fab Francis A. Boyle Law Building 504 E. Pennsylvania Ave. Champaign IL 61820 USA 217-333-7954 (phone) 217-244-1478 (fax) (personal comments only) From: Amanda Bass [mailto:abass10 at gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2016 2:01 PM To: Boyle, Francis A > Cc: Karen Aram >; C. G. Estabrook >; C. G. Estabrook >; Peace Discuss >; David Johnson >; Stuart Levy >; Karen Medina >; Szoke, Ron >; Mildred O'brien >; peace at lists.chambana.net; davegreen84 at yahoo.com; Readel, Karin >; Estabrook, Carl G >; Belden Fields >; jmachota at shout.net; Vietnam Veterans Against the War Mailing List >; Bryan Savage >; Hoffman, Valerie J >; Miller, Joseph Thomas >; sherwoodross10 at gmail.com Subject: Re: Wedgie for Gitmo Kangaroo Courts at UI Law School Thanks FAB, also for your support during that campaign. You all can view the very long list of the liberal hawks who came out in support of Koh: https://sites.google.com/site/haroldkohletter/ Some names will likely surprise you, as they did me. Amanda On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 1:52 PM, Boyle, Francis A > wrote: Thanks Amanda. Remember Amanda had the courage, integrity and principles to organize the NYU Law Students against Killer Koh there and he had overwhelming support from their Law Faculty as well as National Support from Dem Law Professors—just a Gang of Thugs beating up on students. Fab. Francis A. Boyle Law Building 504 E. Pennsylvania Ave. Champaign IL 61820 USA 217-333-7954 (phone) 217-244-1478 (fax) (personal comments only) From: Amanda Bass [mailto:abass10 at gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2016 1:49 PM To: Boyle, Francis A > Cc: Karen Aram >; C. G. Estabrook >; C. G. Estabrook >; Peace Discuss >; David Johnson >; Stuart Levy >; Karen Medina >; Szoke, Ron >; Mildred O'brien >; peace at lists.chambana.net; davegreen84 at yahoo.com; Readel, Karin >; Estabrook, Carl G >; Belden Fields >; jmachota at shout.net; Vietnam Veterans Against the War Mailing List >; Bryan Savage >; Hoffman, Valerie J >; Miller, Joseph Thomas >; sherwoodross10 at gmail.com Subject: Re: Wedgie for Gitmo Kangaroo Courts at UI Law School That's an excellent idea. Apparently, Clinton, as SOS, went through 13 different blackberries... Amanda On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Boyle, Francis A > wrote: At the time my prior calculation was that if I dressed up a guy in a Kangaroo outfit, all of the Media and the Audience would focus on the Kangaroo, thus associating everything she was saying about the Gitmo Kangaroo Courts with the Kangaroo and completely discrediting her. It worked. So maybe someone can show up at Killer Koh’s lecture on October 28 dressed up as a Blackberry, stand in front of the Law Auditorium before the Lecture, and then sit directly in front of him for the entire lecture without saying anything. You won’t have to a word. Just be there. Everyone will get the Message about him and Clinton.fab. Francis A. Boyle Law Building 504 E. Pennsylvania Ave. Champaign IL 61820 USA 217-333-7954 (phone) 217-244-1478 (fax) (personal comments only) From: Boyle, Francis A Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 8:37 AM To: SECTNS.aals at lists.aals.org Subject: FW: Gitmo Kangaroo Courts FAB to Wedgie: “Have you sought independent advice from a competent international criminal lawyer about your own personal criminal accountability for committing war crimes?” Wedgie refused to answer. Ditto for Goldsmith. Fab Francis A. Boyle Law Building 504 E. Pennsylvania Ave. Champaign, IL 61820 USA 217-333-7954 (phone) 217-244-1478 (fax) (personal comments only) "I felt we needed to make a statement," said Boyle. "These kangaroo courts are un-American." ________________________________ Archives | Contacts Friday, March 29, 2002 > News > News Story [ ] [Search] Speaker defends military tribunals Alina Dizik The Daily Illini Brian Lambert The Daily Illini Law professor Francis Boyle (front) and "Wedgie the Kangaroo" listen to a speech on Military Tribunals given by Ruth Wedgewood on Thursday afternoon in the Law Building's Rowe Auditorium. Troubled by the "Kangaroo" courts the President ordered last year, the members of the audience came to voice their opinion, with one protester even going to the extent of wearing a kangaroo costume as a sign of protest. Yale law professor Ruth Wedgewood defended President George W. Bush's military tribunals to protesters who believed these courts violate human rights. Wedgewood helped draft proposals to prosecute about 150 detained, suspected terrorists in military tribunals rather than jury trials. She explained in a Thursday afternoon lecture that tribunals provide more options for submitting evidence. It is easier to build a case, so the process is faster than the traditional trials, Wedgewood said. Detainees cannot appeal the decision. University law professor Francis Boyle gathered students in Amnesty International and the American Civil Liberties Union to protest the lecture. A kangaroo-costumed person stood outside the Max L. Rowe Auditorium in the Law Building. They passed out flyers encouraging audience members to ask Wedgewood questions not addressed in the lecture. "I felt we needed to make a statement," said Boyle. "These kangaroo courts are un-American." Protesters argued the tribunals jump to the conclusion that the detainees are guilty and that President George W. Bush's proposed military courts will aid in the mistreatment of suspects held in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. "They are set up as a conviction conveyor belt; no one has ever been found not guilty," said law student Tony Weiner. But, Wedgewood argued against the assumptions that tribunals lead to predetermined guilt handed down by harsh military personnel. "Military people are engaging, morally concerned people," Wedgewood said. Wedgewood told the skeptical audience that the U.S. court system cannot adapt to the terrorism situation. "September 11 did not have a chance to morph federal district courts," said Wedgewood. "Military commissions give more latitude. It's the traditional way that the law has been enforced." Brian Lambert The Daily Illini Yale law professor Ruth Wedgewood listens to questions Thursday in the Law Building during her speech about military tribunals ordered by President George W. Bush for non-U.S. citizens suspected of involvement with terrorism. She said military tribunals fit the nation's constantly changing view of the conflict with Islamic Fundamentalists. "We did not understand the Islamic World and didn't know the depth of anger until 9-11," said Wedgewood. She explained jurors could be in danger if they are forced to participate in verdicts against detainees because of unpredictable violence. Retired attorney George Brazitis praised Wedgewood's ability as a speaker but disagreed with the content. "She has the best possible case for the Bush administration viewpoint," Brazitis said. "President Bush would need to amend the constitution to carry out all of the wars that he is proposing." Those opposing the "kangaroo courts" say the United States is not in a war and should not try detainees in that fashion. Before Nov. 13, 2001, military tribunals were last implemented during World War II. "(Wedgewood) doesn't address major problems as to whether we even have a war, nor the violation of the constitutional provision that war can only be declared by Congress," Brazitis said. Some audience members did not have definite views, though. "I have problems with both approaches, we need to do something but I do not know the right approach," law student Adam Keser said. Related Links * NPR Polls on Military Tribunals Send letters to letters at dailyillini.com. Printer-friendly version Related Links * Krannert Museum News Stories Monks create mandala in Krannert Art Museum Anti-bioterrorism funding priority for state Speaker defends military tribunals Trustee to bow out for new board New voting system not coming to Champaign Terror warning alerts abroad students in Italy Gov. Ryan freezes pay raises Police Blotter © 2002 Illini Media Company, all rights reserved. Illini Media: Buzz | WPGU | Illio | Technograph Contacts | Staff | Jobs | Ad Rates | DI Alumni | Privacy Policy -- Seek justice. Walk humbly. Love mercy. -- Seek justice. Walk humbly. Love mercy. _______________________________________________ Peace-discuss mailing list Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From briandolinar at gmail.com Sun Sep 4 21:34:15 2016 From: briandolinar at gmail.com (Brian Dolinar) Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2016 16:34:15 -0500 Subject: [Peace] September issue of Public i out now! Message-ID: The Back to School issue of the Public i is out now! It is available at coffee shops and libraries in CU. Articles include: “CU Schools Need to Work Harder to Involve African American Parents” by Deloris P. Henry; “Why Traditional School is a Dangerous Place for Black Boys” by Lori Patterson; “IMC Helps Pass Prison Phone Justice Bill in Illinois” by Brian Dolinar; “We Don't Need a New Jail, We Need Abolition” by Kadeem Fuller; “Statement on the Upcoming Ballot Referendum on ‘Public Facilities;’" by Build Programs, Not Jails; “The World According to the News-Gazette” by David Prochaska; “Activists Among Us: Claire Szoke” by Julie Laut; “October Surprise: Harold "Killer" Koh to Lecture at UI Law School in Election Week;” by Midge O’Brien; “The Syrian Refugee Crisis and the Problem of Categories” by Janice Jayes; and “Myths of Unity” by Ricardo Pierre-Louis. Thanks to all our contributors! Please contact us if you would like to publish in the Public i, our next deadline is April 20. Don't just take the news, make the news! BD -- Brian Dolinar, Ph.D. briandolinar.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From briandolinar at gmail.com Sun Sep 4 21:46:08 2016 From: briandolinar at gmail.com (Brian Dolinar) Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2016 16:46:08 -0500 Subject: [Peace] September issue of Public i out now! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Sorry, meant to say our next deadline is September 20! BD On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Brian Dolinar wrote: > The Back to School issue of the Public i is > out now! It is available at coffee shops and libraries in CU. Articles > include: > > “CU Schools Need to Work Harder to Involve African American Parents” by > Deloris P. Henry; “Why Traditional School is a Dangerous Place for Black > Boys” by Lori Patterson; “IMC Helps Pass Prison Phone Justice Bill in > Illinois” by Brian Dolinar; “We Don't Need a New Jail, We Need Abolition” > by Kadeem Fuller; “Statement on the Upcoming Ballot Referendum on ‘Public > Facilities;’" by Build Programs, Not Jails; “The World According to the > News-Gazette” by David Prochaska; “Activists Among Us: Claire Szoke” by > Julie Laut; “October Surprise: Harold "Killer" Koh to Lecture at UI Law > School in Election Week;” by Midge O’Brien; “The Syrian Refugee Crisis and > the Problem of Categories” by Janice Jayes; and “Myths of Unity” by Ricardo > Pierre-Louis. > > Thanks to all our contributors! Please contact us if you would like to > publish in the Public i, our next deadline is April 20. > > Don't just take the news, make the news! > > BD > -- > Brian Dolinar, Ph.D. > briandolinar.com > -- Brian Dolinar, Ph.D. briandolinar.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From karenaram at hotmail.com Sun Sep 4 21:48:15 2016 From: karenaram at hotmail.com (Karen Aram) Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2016 21:48:15 +0000 Subject: [Peace] September issue of Public i out now! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Brian, has it been uploaded yet, we are waiting for the electronic copy. And, thank you so much for all you do. On Sep 4, 2016, at 14:46, Brian Dolinar via Peace > wrote: Sorry, meant to say our next deadline is September 20! BD On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Brian Dolinar > wrote: The Back to School issue of the Public i is out now! It is available at coffee shops and libraries in CU. Articles include: “CU Schools Need to Work Harder to Involve African American Parents” by Deloris P. Henry; “Why Traditional School is a Dangerous Place for Black Boys” by Lori Patterson; “IMC Helps Pass Prison Phone Justice Bill in Illinois” by Brian Dolinar; “We Don't Need a New Jail, We Need Abolition” by Kadeem Fuller; “Statement on the Upcoming Ballot Referendum on ‘Public Facilities;’" by Build Programs, Not Jails; “The World According to the News-Gazette” by David Prochaska; “Activists Among Us: Claire Szoke” by Julie Laut; “October Surprise: Harold "Killer" Koh to Lecture at UI Law School in Election Week;” by Midge O’Brien; “The Syrian Refugee Crisis and the Problem of Categories” by Janice Jayes; and “Myths of Unity” by Ricardo Pierre-Louis. Thanks to all our contributors! Please contact us if you would like to publish in the Public i, our next deadline is April 20. Don't just take the news, make the news! BD -- Brian Dolinar, Ph.D. briandolinar.com -- Brian Dolinar, Ph.D. briandolinar.com _______________________________________________ Peace mailing list Peace at lists.chambana.net https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From karenaram at hotmail.com Mon Sep 5 01:30:53 2016 From: karenaram at hotmail.com (Karen Aram) Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 01:30:53 +0000 Subject: [Peace] September 2016 Issue Public I and "Killer Koh" article by Midge O'Brien In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: [http://publici.ucimc.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/PiMasthead1.jpeg] Skip to content * About Us * Contributors * Sustainers * In Print (Archives) * UC-IMC * Have a comment, tip, photo or story idea? ← Activists Among Us: Claire Szoke CU Schools Need to Work Harder to Involve African American Parents → October Surprise: Harold “Killer” Koh to Lecture at UI Law School in Election Week Posted on September 2016 by Midge O'Brien [th] Harold Hongju Koh Harold Hongju Koh, Hillary Clinton’s former legal advisor at the State Department has been invited as an ‘endowed speaker’ at the U.I. College of Law, twelve days prior to the November election. Koh, currently a Yale Law School professor and former Dean, is a close friend of Yale Law School graduates Bill and Hillary Clinton. He was appointed by President Bill Clinton as Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy, Human Rights and Labor; and by President Obama, as senior legal advisor to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton: he provided legal advice to her during the 2009 coup in Honduras, the 2011 US/NATO attack on Libya, and Obama’s ongoing drone assassinations – as well as damage-control in her email controversy. He won’t say what that advice was, claiming “attorney-client privilege” – despite the Supreme Court ruling against attorney-client confidences between government lawyers and government officials. An avid advocate of the targeted killing program, “Killer Koh” supports the legality of what he terms “extrajudicial killing” in Pakistan, Yemen and other Middle Eastern countries in the US “war on terror,” saying it complies “with all applicable law, including the laws of war,” and citing the ‘principle of proportionality’ in “taking great care in planning and execution to ensure that only ‘legitimate’ objectives are targeted and that collateral damage is kept to a minimum.” In a feeble attempt at transparency, the Obama administration recently released a modest admission that some “116 civilians” may have been victims of U. S. drone attacks – a figure that is not reconcilable with the accounts of eyewitnesses, journalists and human rights researchers, who have documented many thousands of casualties. President Obama said – in a revealing moment of self-reflection – “Turns out I’m really good at killing people … Didn’t know that was gonna be a strong suit of mine” (from Mark Halperin & John Heilemann, “Double Down: Game Change 2012”). If Hillary Clinton is elected president, with the advice of Tim Kaine and Killer Koh, she may be even more eager to mass-murder than her predecessor: the number of casualties would likely exceed that of Obama’s kill list, just as his toll today greatly outnumbers G. W. Bush’s. Late on Friday 5 August, the White House grudgingly complied with an Federal Court order (from an ACLU suit) and released a redacted “President’s Policy Guidance” (PPG) on Obama’s program of targeted killings. The PPG stipulates that “nothing in this PPG shall be construed to prevent the President from exercising his Constitutional authority … to authorize lethal force against an individual who poses a continuing, imminent threat to another country’s persons.” (Killing US citizens requires specific approval by the President). Death lists are drawn up weekly by the ‘nominating committee’ and are reviewed by lawyers of the nominating agencies (CIA, Pentagon, NSC, officials of the State Department and “deputies and principals of the nominating committee”). Of the seven Middle Eastern countries where drone assassinations take place, “active war zones” – Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan (it’s not clear if Libya is included) – do not require prior approval. With this protocol in place, the White House and the National Security Council are insulated from outside scrutiny, even by Congress. It assumes that the Commander in Chief can do anything s/he wants; it would provide a President Clinton #2, with the approval of hawks Tim Kaine and Harold Koh, immense power and license to kill. Koh as the (former) State Department lawyer has publicly defended extrajudicial killing as “due process under the Constitution in the age of moral and political degeneration.” In a speech at the Oxford Political Union in 2013 he said, “This Administration has not done enough to be transparent about the legal standards and decision making process … fostering a growing perception that the program [extrajudicial killing] is not lawful and necessary…,” adding that this lack of transparency is counterproductive and has led to the “negative public image” of targeted killing. Does Prof. Koh think the recent exposure of the (heavily redacted) PPG ordered by the Court provides the “transparency” to satisfy critics of the legality of targeted killing? Although Koh has been described as a prominent advocate of human and civil rights (apparently exclusively of US citizens), he has been an “equal opportunist” as a legal advisor to Reagan, Clinton and Obama administrations – all of whom have violated the human rights of foreign nationals. He hardly represented human and civil rights as a member of the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel to the President in the Reagan administration, when that office justified violations of international law, the Charter of United Nations and the US Constitution, in grievous violation of human rights and attempts to destabilize the countries of Grenada, El Salvador, Nicaragua (attempting to withdraw from the International Court of Justice, which denounced the US for bombing Nicaraguan harbors), Guatemala, Libya, Angola and elsewhere in southern Africa; and when it supported the South African apartheid government against its black population, supported Israel’s invasion and massacres of Palestinian refugee camps in Lebanon, and supported illegal Israeli settlements in the Palestinian Occupied Territories – for which the US exercised its veto in the U.N. Security Council, in opposition to sanctions against US. In addition, the Reagan administration and its legal advisors refused to support nuclear test ban treaties, instead proliferating first-strike nuclear weapons, SDI (“star wars”) and MX missiles. Not a record to be proud of for someone serving as legal counsel to the president. The opportunity extended Harold Koh to lecture potential scholars of political and international law poses the question, Is the University of Illinois College of Law – with its record of sanctions – qualified to educate future lawyers, when it sponsors a person of Harold H. Koh’s character in these politically charged times? The Nuremberg Military Tribunal in 1947 stated unequivocally that the crimes of the ten civilian Nazi defendants who were convicted of murder and other atrocities, conspiracy to commit war crimes and crimes against humanity of civilians and nationals of occupied territories, were liable to severe penalty whether or not they had engaged in military action. The Nuremberg judgment still stands in international law. A reception to protest Professor Koh’s appearance is planned at the north courtyard of the College of Law before the lecture on the afternoon of October 28. (Midge O’Brien was an academic professional in U. of I. life science laborotories over twenty years and secretary in the Union of Professional Employees; was an election judge twelve years; a member of Nuclear Freeze, and Prairie Alliance against nuclear power; and an anti-war activist since 1965. She is a member of the Green Party.) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From karenaram at hotmail.com Tue Sep 6 01:00:39 2016 From: karenaram at hotmail.com (Karen Aram) Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 01:00:39 +0000 Subject: [Peace] October Surprise: Harold In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Fabulous idea. Welcome “chicago at worldcantwait.net. A Facebook Page is a good idea.., we can use all the help we can get. > On Sep 5, 2016, at 16:42, Boyle, Francis A wrote: > > And since I circulated our little package with the picture to hundreds of law profs I am sure we will be seeing yet another Petition in favor of Killer Koh by the same group of Law Prof Thugs who beat up on the courageous NYU Law Students including Amanda Bass above directed to our Yale Law Mafia Dean whose Yale Law Faculty Mafia Brother already signed that first Petition in favor of Yale Law Mafia Killer Koh beating up on the NYU Law Students. All Just a Gang of Thugs. They get no respect from me. A Gang of Law Professors beating up on a handful of law students with the courage,integrity and principles to say: Never again! We will give them all a run for their money! > > Fab > > > Francis A. Boyle > Law Building > 504 E. Pennsylvania Ave. > Champaign IL 61820 USA > 217-333-7954 (phone) > 217-244-1478 (fax) > (personal comments only) > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Boyle, Francis A > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2016 6:34 PM > To: 'chicago at worldcantwait.net' ; Amanda Bass ; C. G. Estabrook ; C. G. Estabrook ; Peace Discuss ; David Johnson ; Stuart Levy ; Karen Medina ; Szoke, Ron ; Mildred O'brien ; peace at lists.chambana.net; davegreen84 at yahoo.com; Readel, Karin ; Estabrook, Carl G ; Belden Fields ; jmachota at shout.net; Vietnam Veterans Against the War Mailing List ; Bryan Savage ; Hoffman, Valerie J ; Miller, Joseph Thomas ; sherwoodross10 at gmail.com; David Swanson ; Karen Aram > Subject: RE: FW: October Surprise: Harold > > I am adding Chicago World Can't Wait to my Killer Koh List. They have offered to help us out down here and I have worked with them up there and they do good work. I think their suggestion of Facebook on our Reception for Killer Koh is a good idea. Fab. > > Fab > > > Francis A. Boyle > Law Building > 504 E. Pennsylvania Ave. > Champaign IL 61820 USA > 217-333-7954 (phone) > 217-244-1478 (fax) > (personal comments only) > > > -----Original Message----- > From: chicago at worldcantwait.net [mailto:chicago at worldcantwait.net] > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2016 5:51 PM > To: Boyle, Francis A > Subject: Re: FW: October Surprise: Harold > > Thanks for the piece on Killer Koh, very helpful. We will circulate this among anti-war activists, pro-Palestinian groups, people active in opposing the coup in Honduras and others. I think a Facebook event to publicize the "reception for Killer Koh at 11:30 am on Friday, Oct. 28" > would be another effective tool to get the word out in Chicago, if you have no objection. Of course, I have to consult with the World Can't Wait chapter first, and we have over a month. > > Please forward other materials you think would be helpful too. > > Thanks! > > Jay > > >> Good to hear from you. Thanks. Our reception for Killer Koh begins >> around >> 1130 am in the North Courtyard of the Law Building Complex on Peabody >> Drive. Be there or be square. Fab. >> >> Francis A. Boyle >> Law Building >> 504 E. Pennsylvania Ave. >> Champaign IL 61820 USA >> 217-333-7954 (phone) >> 217-244-1478 (fax) >> (personal comments only) >> >> From: Boyle, Francis A >> Sent: Monday, September 05, 2016 7:47 AM >> To: 'SECTNS.aals at lists.aals.org' >> Subject: October Surprise: Harold “Killer” Koh to >> Lecture at UI Law School in Election Week | >> >> Killary and Killer Koh. Fab. >> [http://media.breitbart.com/media/2015/03/hillary-clinton-sunglasses-b >> lackberrry-Kevin-Lamarque-AP.jpg] >> >> [http://publici.ucimc.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/PiMasthead1.jpeg] >> Skip to >> content> -lecture-at-ui-law-school-in-election-week/#content> >> § About Us >> § Contributors >> § Sustainers >> § In Print (Archives) >> § UC-IMC >> § Have a comment, tip, photo or story >> idea?>> >> ← Activists Among Us: Claire >> Szoke >> CU Schools Need to Work Harder to Involve African American Parents >> →> volve-african-american-parents/> October Surprise: Harold >> “Killer” Koh to Lecture at UI Law School in Election >> Week Posted on September >> 2016> cture-at-ui-law-school-in-election-week/> >> by Midge O'Brien >> 0 Flares Filament.io Made with Flare More >> Info> dium=deployment&utm_content=flarebar&utm_campaign=filament> >> 0 Flares >> ×> o-lecture-at-ui-law-school-in-election-week/#close> >> [th] >> Harold Hongju Koh >> Harold Hongju Koh, Hillary Clinton’s former legal advisor at >> the State Department has been invited as an ‘endowed >> speaker’ at the U.I. College of Law, twelve days prior to the November election. >> Koh, currently a Yale Law School professor and former Dean, is a close >> friend of Yale Law School graduates Bill and Hillary Clinton. He was >> appointed by President Bill Clinton as Assistant Secretary of State >> for Democracy, Human Rights and Labor; and by President Obama, as >> senior legal advisor to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton: he >> provided legal advice to her during the 2009 coup in Honduras, the >> 2011 US/NATO attack on Libya, and Obama’s ongoing drone >> assassinations - as well as damage-control in her email controversy. >> He won’t say what that advice was, claiming >> “attorney-client privilege” - despite the Supreme Court >> ruling against attorney-client confidences between government lawyers and government officials. >> An avid advocate of the targeted killing program, “Killer >> Koh” supports the legality of what he terms >> “extrajudicial killing” in Pakistan, Yemen and other >> Middle Eastern countries in the US “war on terror,” >> saying it complies “with all applicable law, including the laws >> of war,” and citing the ‘principle of >> proportionality’ in “taking great care in planning and >> execution to ensure that only ‘legitimate’ objectives >> are targeted and that collateral damage is kept to a minimum.” >> In a feeble attempt at transparency, the Obama administration recently >> released a modest admission that some “116 civilians” >> may have been victims of U. S. drone attacks - a figure that is not >> reconcilable with the accounts of eyewitnesses, journalists and human >> rights researchers, who have documented many thousands of casualties. >> President Obama said - in a revealing moment of self-reflection - >> “Turns out I’m really good at killing people … >> Didn’t know that was gonna be a strong suit of mine” (from Mark Halperin & John Heilemann, “Double Down: >> Game Change 2012”). >> If Hillary Clinton is elected president, with the advice of Tim Kaine >> and Killer Koh, she may be even more eager to mass-murder than her >> predecessor: the number of casualties would likely exceed that of >> Obama’s kill list, just as his toll today greatly outnumbers G. W. >> Bush’s. >> Late on Friday 5 August, the White House grudgingly complied with an >> Federal Court order (from an ACLU suit) and released a redacted >> “President’s Policy Guidance” (PPG) on >> Obama’s program of targeted killings. The PPG stipulates that >> “nothing in this PPG shall be construed to prevent the >> President from exercising his Constitutional authority … to >> authorize lethal force against an individual who poses a continuing, >> imminent threat to another country’s persons.” (Killing >> US citizens requires specific approval by the President). Death lists >> are drawn up weekly by the ‘nominating committee’ and >> are reviewed by lawyers of the nominating agencies (CIA, Pentagon, >> NSC, officials of the State Department and “deputies and principals of the nominating committee”). >> Of the seven Middle Eastern countries where drone assassinations take >> place, “active war zones” - Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan >> (it’s not clear if Libya is included) - do not require prior >> approval. With this protocol in place, the White House and the >> National Security Council are insulated from outside scrutiny, even by >> Congress. It assumes that the Commander in Chief can do anything s/he >> wants; it would provide a President Clinton #2, with the approval of >> hawks Tim Kaine and Harold Koh, immense power and license to kill. >> Koh as the (former) State Department lawyer has publicly defended >> extrajudicial killing as “due process under the Constitution in >> the age of moral and political degeneration.” In a speech at >> the Oxford Political Union in 2013 he said, “This >> Administration has not done enough to be transparent about the legal >> standards and decision making process … fostering a growing >> perception that the program [extrajudicial killing] is not lawful and >> necessary…,” adding that this lack of transparency is >> counterproductive and has led to the “negative public image” of targeted killing. Does Prof. >> Koh think the recent exposure of the (heavily redacted) PPG ordered by >> the Court provides the “transparency” to satisfy critics >> of the legality of targeted killing? >> Although Koh has been described as a prominent advocate of human and >> civil rights (apparently exclusively of US citizens), he has been an >> “equal opportunist” as a legal advisor to Reagan, >> Clinton and Obama administrations - all of whom have violated the >> human rights of foreign nationals. He hardly represented human and >> civil rights as a member of the Department of Justice’s Office >> of Legal Counsel to the President in the Reagan administration, when >> that office justified violations of international law, the Charter of >> United Nations and the US Constitution, in grievous violation of human >> rights and attempts to destabilize the countries of Grenada, El >> Salvador, Nicaragua (attempting to withdraw from the International >> Court of Justice, which denounced the US for bombing Nicaraguan >> harbors), Guatemala, Libya, Angola and elsewhere in southern Africa; >> and when it supported the South African apartheid government against >> its black population, supported Israel’s invasion and massacres >> of Palestinian refugee camps in Lebanon, and supported illegal Israeli >> settlements in the Palestinian Occupied Territories - for which the US >> exercised its veto in the U.N. Security Council, in opposition to >> sanctions against US. In addition, the Reagan administration and its >> legal advisors refused to support nuclear test ban treaties, instead >> proliferating first-strike nuclear weapons, SDI (“star >> wars”) and MX missiles. Not a record to be proud of for someone serving as legal counsel to the president. >> The opportunity extended Harold Koh to lecture potential scholars of >> political and international law poses the question, Is the University >> of Illinois College of Law - with its record of sanctions - qualified >> to educate future lawyers, when it sponsors a person of Harold H. >> Koh’s character in these politically charged times? >> The Nuremberg Military Tribunal in 1947 stated unequivocally that the >> crimes of the ten civilian Nazi defendants who were convicted of >> murder and other atrocities, conspiracy to commit war crimes and >> crimes against humanity of civilians and nationals of occupied >> territories, were liable to severe penalty whether or not they had >> engaged in military action. The Nuremberg judgment still stands in international law. >> A reception to protest Professor Koh’s appearance is planned at >> the north courtyard of the College of Law before the lecture on the >> afternoon of October 28. >> (Midge O’Brien was an academic professional in U. of I. life >> science laborotories over twenty years and secretary in the Union of >> Professional Employees; was an election judge twelve years; a member >> of Nuclear Freeze, and Prairie Alliance against nuclear power; and an >> anti-war activist since 1965. She is a member of the Green Party.) >> This entry was posted in Human >> Rights, >> International>> , Justice. Bookmark the >> permalink. >> ← Activists Among Us: Claire >> Szoke >> CU Schools Need to Work Harder to Involve African American Parents >> →> volve-african-american-parents/> >> § Get Connected >> § Print Admins >> § Log in >> § >> Register >> § Lost >> Password? >> § Log >> out> 54be8> § RSS Feed >> § Public i >> § Search Public i >> Top of Form >> Search for: >> Bottom of Form >> § Categories >> § Africa >> § African Americans >> § Arab Spring >> § Arts >> § Brazil >> § Communication >> Technologies> ies/> >> § Community >> Forum >> § Cuba >> § DNA Testing >> § >> Education >> § >> Environment >> § Food >> § Free Speech >> § Ghana >> § >> Healthcare >> § Homelessness >> § Human >> Rights >> § IMC >> § >> Immigration >> § Indigenous >> § >> International>> >> § >> Israel/Palestine >> § Justice >> § >> Labor/Economics> cs/> § Land >> § Latino/a >> § LGBTQA >> § Media >> § Middle East >> § military >> § >> National >> § News >> § >> News-Gazette >> § Olympics >> § Police >> § >> Policing >> § Politics >> § >> Politics >> § Prisoners >> § Refugees >> § Section >> § socialism >> § Syria >> § Technology >> § >> Transgenders>> § UC-IMC >> § >> Uncategorized >> § University of Illinois at >> Urbana-Champaign> of-illinois-at-urbana-champaign/> § >> Veterans >> § Voices >> § Voices of >> Color >> § Women >> § Youth >> § Archives >> § September 2016 >> § August 2016 >> § July 2016 >> § June 2016 >> § May 2016 >> § April 2016 >> § March 2016 >> § January 2016 >> § November 2015 >> § October 2015 >> § September 2015 >> § August 2015 >> § July 2015 >> § May 2015 >> § April 2015 >> § March 2015 >> § February 2015 >> § January 2015 >> § November 2014 >> § October 2014 >> § September 2014 >> § August 2014 >> § July 2014 >> § June 2014 >> § May 2014 >> § March 2014 >> § February 2014 >> § January 2014 >> § December 2013 >> § November 2013 >> § October 2013 >> § September 2013 >> § August 2013 >> § July 2013 >> § May 2013 >> § April 2013 >> § March 2013 >> § February 2013 >> § January 2013 >> § November 2012 >> § October 2012 >> § September 2012 >> § August 2012 >> § July 2012 >> § June 2012 >> § May 2012 >> § April 2012 >> § March 2012 >> § February 2012 >> § January 2012 >> § December 2011 >> § November 2011 >> § October 2011 >> § September 2011 >> § August 2011 >> § July 2011 >> § June 2011 >> § May 2011 >> § April 2011 >> § March 2011 >> § February 2011 >> § January 2011 >> § November 2010 >> § October 2010 >> § September 2010 >> § July 2010 >> § May 2010 >> § April 2010 >> § March 2010 >> § February 2010 >> § January 2010 >> § November 2009 >> § October 2009 >> § September 2009 >> § August 2009 >> § June 2009 >> § May 2009 >> § April 2009 >> § March 2009 >> § February 2009 >> § November 2008 >> § October 2008 >> § August 2008 >> § June 2008 >> § May 2008 >> § April 2008 >> § March 2008 >> § February 2008 >> § January 2008 >> § November 2007 >> § October 2007 >> § September 2007 >> § August 2007 >> § June 2007 >> § May 2007 >> § April 2007 >> § March 2007 >> § February 2007 >> § January 2007 >> § December 2006 >> § November 2006 >> § October 2006 >> § September 2006 >> § July 2006 >> § June 2006 >> § June 2005 >> § November 2004 >> § October 2004 >> § September 2004 >> § March 2004 >> § February 2004 >> § December 2003 >> § November 2003 >> § October 2003 >> § September 2003 >> § August 2003 >> § June 2003 >> § May 2003 >> § November 2002 >> § October 2002 >> § April 2002 >> § March 2002 >> § February 2002 >> § December 2001 >> § November 2001 >> § October 2001 >> § September 2001 >> § August 2001 >> § July 2001 >> Proudly powered by WordPress. >> 0 Flares Twitter0 Facebook0 Google+0 >> Email-- Email to a >> friend> A%0D%0A%0D%0AOctober%20Surprise%3A%20Harold%20%26%238220%3BKiller%26%2 >> 38221%3B%20Koh%20to%20Lecture%20at%20UI%20Law%20School%20in%20Election >> %20Week%0D%0Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fpublici.ucimc.org%2Foctober-surprise-harold- >> killer-koh-to-lecture-at-ui-law-school-in-election-week%2F&subject=Che >> ck%20out%20this%20article%20I%20found%20on%20> >> Filament.io Made with Flare More >> Info> dium=deployment&utm_content=flarebar&utm_campaign=filament> >> 0 Flares >> ×> o-lecture-at-ui-law-school-in-election-week/#close> >> >> >> Francis A. Boyle >> Law Building >> 504 E. Pennsylvania Ave. >> Champaign IL 61820 USA >> 217-333-7954 (phone) >> 217-244-1478 (fax) >> (personal comments only) >> >> From: >> outlook_1ac00f3818fbe52d at outlook.com> utlook.com> [mailto:outlook_1ac00f3818fbe52d at outlook.com] On Behalf Of >> Francis Boyle >> Sent: Monday, September 05, 2016 7:39 AM >> To: Boyle, Francis A > >> Subject: October Surprise: Harold “Killer” Koh to >> Lecture at UI Law School in Election Week | >> >> http://publici.ucimc.org/october-surprise-harold-killer-koh-to-lecture >> -at-ui-law-school-in-election-week/ >> > > From naiman at justforeignpolicy.org Tue Sep 6 20:09:53 2016 From: naiman at justforeignpolicy.org (Robert Naiman) Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 15:09:53 -0500 Subject: [Peace] Oxfam: $1.15 billion arms sale threatens countless lives in war-torn Yemen Message-ID: https://www.oxfamamerica.org/explore/stories/115-billion- arms-sale-threatens-countless-lives-in-war-torn-yemen/ === Robert Naiman Policy Director Just Foreign Policy www.justforeignpolicy.org naiman at justforeignpolicy.org (202) 448-2898 x1 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naiman at justforeignpolicy.org Wed Sep 7 15:18:46 2016 From: naiman at justforeignpolicy.org (Robert Naiman) Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 10:18:46 -0500 Subject: [Peace] Oxfam: Urgent: Calls needed to Durbin to stop massive sale of arms to Saudi Arabia Message-ID: ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Scott Paul, Oxfam America Action Fund Date: Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 9:19 AM Subject: Urgent: Calls needed to stop massive sale of arms to Saudi Arabia To: Robert Naiman In the next 10 days, we have a critical opportunity to convince Congress to stop the sale of arms to Saudi Arabia. Call Congress now! 1-855-637-2383. [image: masthead] [image: Oxfam America] *Urgent: Calls needed to stop the sale of weapons to Saudi Arabia and help the Yemeni people* Yemen is enduring a massive humanitarian catastrophe made worse by over a year of fighting. In the next 10 days, we have a crucial opportunity to convince Congress to stop the sale of weapons to Saudi Arabia. *Text "YEMEN" to 97779 so we can route your call. * Dear Robert, * In the next 10 days, we have a critical opportunity to convince Congress to stop the sale of $1.15 BILLION in weapons to Saudi Arabia that will be used to fuel the war in Yemen.* If Congress doesn't stop the sale, that means even more tanks, machine guns, and weapons of war in a country already struggling through daily violence. *We won't just sit by and let this happen.* You already took the first step by sending your letter to Congress. But today we're mobilizing thousands of our best activists in key states to call their senators – *and we need you to raise your voice once again Robert!* Calling the Senate only takes a couple of minutes. *All you have to do is text "YEMEN" to 97779 so that we can route your call.* Once you're connected, you'll hear some quick tips about what to say during your call. We've also included these tips below in case you prefer to read off your screen: - Hi, I am a constituent in your state and I am calling to ask you to do more to stop the violence in Yemen. - The war in Yemen has killed thousands of people and more than four out of five Yemenis are in need of immediate, life-saving humanitarian aid. - The US's support of the Saudi-led coalition is enabling the war in Yemen and fueling its humanitarian crisis. - Please support all measures to BLOCK the sale of weapons to Saudi Arabia until a political settlement to the conflict is reached. Last winter when Congress was considering blocking Syrian refugees from the US, Members of Congress told us directly that they would have voted NO if more constituents had called their office. These calls matter. *Please, text "YEMEN" to 97779 to kick off your call to the Senate.* Thank you for raising your voice on behalf of those caught up in this terrible violence. Sincerely, Scott Paul Senior Humanitarian Policy Advisor -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naiman at justforeignpolicy.org Thu Sep 8 14:16:32 2016 From: naiman at justforeignpolicy.org (Robert Naiman) Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 09:16:32 -0500 Subject: [Peace] Foreign Policy: Senators to Introduce Measure Opposing $1B Arms Sale to Saudis Message-ID: http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/09/07/senators-to-introduce-me asure-opposing-1b-arms-sale-to-saudis/ Senators to Introduce Measure Opposing $1B Arms Sale to Saudis BY JOHN HUDSON SEPTEMBER 7, 2016 - 4:54 PM A bipartisan push against a $1.15 billion arms deal to Saudi Arabia is gaining steam in protest of Riyadh’s bombing campaign in Yemen — but remains split on whether to oppose the sale or block it outright. Multiple congressional aides tell Foreign Policy that Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky and Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut are preparing legislation, to be filed this week, opposing the U.S. package of tanks, ammunition, and machine guns to Saudi Arabia. It follows a letter last week from more than 60 House lawmakers who sought to delay the arms sale after a series of Saudi-led airstrikes reportedly killed civilian targets in August. Democratic Rep. Ted Lieu of California, who helped lead the House’s letter campaign, praised his Senate colleagues for “taking action” against the arms sale. “Once the public learns the facts of the Saudi military’s atrocities in Yemen, they will call for this arms sale to be rejected and for the U.S. to withdraw its support of the Saudis in this conflict,” he told FP on Wednesday. Spokespeople for Paul and Murphy declined comment. The measure is expected to take the form of a non-binding resolution of disapproval that would receive a floor vote in about two weeks. But the two senators are also considering binding legislation that would block the proposed sale if they sense that the measure would pass, according to congressional aides. The 18-month conflict in Yemen has killed at least 6,000 people and displaced 2.5 million more as Saudi Arabia and its Sunni-majority allies battle Houthi rebels for control of the country. The chaotic fighting has also allowed Islamist militants to deepen their foothold in Yemen; meanwhile, Houthi rebels have fired missiles into Saudi Arabia. The White House did not respond to multiple requests for comment. A State Department official declined to say if the Obama administration would cede to congressional demands and delay the proposed sale. However, the official said State is reviewing last week’s letter, which cited August reports of a Saudi airstrike on a school in Yemen that killed 10 children and another strike that hit a Médecins Sans Frontières hospital and killed 11 people. Generally, Congress has 30 days to block the sale of similar military packages of this type, meaning the clock technically could run out as soon as Thursday, as House parliamentarians believe. But Senate experts say the 30 calendar-day deadline does not apply to the upper chamber because it was adjourned for the summer recess. The House letter sent to the White House earlier this month explicitly complained about the timing issue and congressional staff in both parties remain incensed. “Whether or not it was done intentionally, the administration is setting a dangerous precedent by starting the 30-day review clock while Congress is adjourned for the summer recess,” a Democratic congressional aide told FP. The U.S. officially backs the Saudi-led coalition against the Shiite Houthi forces in Yemen. U.N.-sponsored talks aimed at finding a political resolution to the conflict imploded last month and Saudi-led forces resumed their bombing campaign. The relief group Médecins Sans Frontières announced last month they were pulling out of six hospitals in northern Yemen because of the “indiscriminate bombings and unreliable reassurances” from Riyadh and its Arab allies. === Robert Naiman Policy Director Just Foreign Policy www.justforeignpolicy.org naiman at justforeignpolicy.org (202) 448-2898 x1 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naiman at justforeignpolicy.org Thu Sep 8 16:59:54 2016 From: naiman at justforeignpolicy.org (Robert Naiman) Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 11:59:54 -0500 Subject: [Peace] Historians/anthro/arch letter re: destruction of Indian burial ground at Standing Rock Message-ID: "Museum directors and staff, archaeologists, anthropologists and historians: please sign on to an open letter decrying the destruction of Native American burial grounds and sacred sites by the Dakota Access Pipeline company. http://bit.ly/2c15O9F" === Robert Naiman Policy Director Just Foreign Policy www.justforeignpolicy.org naiman at justforeignpolicy.org (202) 448-2898 x1 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naiman at justforeignpolicy.org Thu Sep 8 18:24:02 2016 From: naiman at justforeignpolicy.org (Robert Naiman) Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 13:24:02 -0500 Subject: [Peace] Murphy-Paul res. introduced! Call Durbin against Saudi arms deal Message-ID: Took me 15 seconds. Please (at least) give them your zip code, even if they don't ask for it. I want Durbin to know that people are calling from places in Illinois that are not Chicago. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Just Foreign Policy Date: Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 1:13 PM Subject: Murphy-Paul res. introduced! Call yr Sen. on Saudi arms deal To: naiman.uiuc at gmail.com [image: Just Foreign Policy] Dear Robert, Today, Senators *Chris Murphy* [D-CT], *Rand Paul* [R-KY], *Al Franken* [D-MN], and *Mike Lee* [R-UT] introduced a bipartisan resolution - *SJ Res 39 *- to stop the sale of $1.15 billion in weapons to Saudi Arabia that would be used to fuel the war in Yemen. Call Sen. Dick Durbin now at (202) 224-2152. (You can also use FCNL's toll-free number to reach the Capitol switchboard and be transferred to Sen. Dick Durbin's office: 1-855-68 NO WAR/1-855-686-6927.) When you reach a staffer or leave a message, you can say something like: "Please support *SJ Res 39*, the Murphy-Paul-Franken-Lee resolution to BLOCK the sale of weapons to Saudi Arabia." When you've made your call, *please report it here .* And if you haven't signed our petition to Congress yet urging them to block the sale, *you can do that here .* Thanks for all you do to help make U.S. foreign policy more just, Robert Naiman, Avram Reisman, and Sarah Burns Just Foreign Policy *Help support our work!* If you think our work is important, support us with a $15 donation. http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/donate [image: Please support our work. Donate for a Just Foreign Policy] © 2016 Just Foreign Policy -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naiman at justforeignpolicy.org Thu Sep 8 19:30:05 2016 From: naiman at justforeignpolicy.org (Robert Naiman) Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 14:30:05 -0500 Subject: [Peace] FCNL: Block Bombs to Saudi Arabia Message-ID: ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Kate Gould, FCNL Date: Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:08 PM Subject: Block Bombs to Saudi Arabia To: Robert Naiman Dear Robert Naiman, I’m writing because your senators are particularly crucial in the vote later this month to block the $1.15 billion arms sale to Saudi Arabia. Just today, Senators Chris Murphy (CT) and Rand Paul (KY) have introduced a bill to block the arms sale. FCNL is teaming up with other organizations across the country for a national call-in day to generate cosponsors for this bipartisan initiative. *Will you call your senators and urge them to block the arms sale to Saudi Arabia? * If you haven’t heard about this bomb sale, you’re not alone. There hasn’t been much attention to this massive bomb sale the Obama administration has planned, even though the announcement comes in the midst of news of the Saudi-led coalition bombing another school, and a fourth Doctors Without Borders hospital in Yemen. While Saudi Arabia is dropping the bombs, the U.S. is often supplying the bombs and providing other support for the war. As Senator Chris Murphy pointed out, “there’s an American imprint on every civilian life lost in Yemen.” *Please call the Capitol Switchboard at 1-855-86-NO WAR (1-855-686-6927 <%281-855-686-6927>) to urge both of your senators to join Murphy and Paul in blocking bombs to Saudi Arabia. *Here are some talking points to help you make your call: - Hello, my name is [NAME] and I’m a voting constituent calling from [CITY, STATE]. - I’m calling to urge the senator to join the bipartisan Murphy-Paul bill to block the $1.15 billion arms deal to Saudi Arabia. - Saudi’s war in Yemen is a humanitarian catastrophe and the U.S. shouldn’t be rewarding the killing of civilians by sending more bombs. Once you're done with your call, make sure to follow up with a message to your senators and representative urging them to block the deal. Thanks for all you do for peace, Kate Gould Legislative Representative Middle East Policy P.S. For more background on the U.S. supported Saudi-led war in Yemen, see the *New York* *Times* editorial calling on Congress to block the arms deal. You can also check out the bipartisan House letter that FCNL supported, which calls on President Obama to delay the arms sale to Saudi Arabia. You can also join a webinar on the war in Yemen hosted on Mon Sept 12 featuring Yemeni journalist Nawal al-Maghafi and our partners at Oxfam, Human Rights Watch, Oxfam and Win Without War. About Contact Us Donate Find us on: [image: Twitter] [image: Facebook] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naiman at justforeignpolicy.org Fri Sep 9 16:09:29 2016 From: naiman at justforeignpolicy.org (Robert Naiman) Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 11:09:29 -0500 Subject: [Peace] challenge Durbin, Kirk tomorrow in C-U on Saudi arms deal? Message-ID: According to today's News-Gazette, Durbin and Kirk are going to be in Champaign tomorrow for the CU Pride Parade. Durbin will be the Grand Marshall. The parade starts at 3pm in downtown Champaign. I was wondering who might be interested in holding signs such as: "Durbin, Kirk: Oppose the Saudi Arms Deal" "Durbin, Kirk: 'Proud' to Support Homophobic Saudi Arabia?" "Durbin, Kirk: Stop Helping Saudi Arabia Bomb Civilians in Yemen" "Durbin, Kirk: Support Murphy-Paul to Block Saudi Arms Deal" I realize that's a lot of words on those signs. But I will print them up if there are people to hold them. Of course, other suggestions welcome, so long as they are on theme of Durbin, Kirk, Saudi arms deal, I am open to printing them up. === Robert Naiman Policy Director Just Foreign Policy www.justforeignpolicy.org naiman at justforeignpolicy.org (202) 448-2898 x1 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naiman at justforeignpolicy.org Fri Sep 9 21:27:14 2016 From: naiman at justforeignpolicy.org (Robert Naiman) Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 16:27:14 -0500 Subject: [Peace] Sat. 2:30pm: CU Residents Challenge Durbin to Oppose Saudi Arms Deal at CU Pride Parade Message-ID: *MEDIA ADVISORY FOR: *Saturday, September 10, 2016 *CONTACT: *Robert Naiman: 202-448-2898 x1; naiman at justforeignpolicy.org *Saturday at 2:30pm: CU Residents Challenge Durbin to Oppose Saudi Arms Deal at CU Pride Parade* *Champaign, IL — *On Saturday, September 10, Champaign-Urbana residents will challenge Illinois Senator Dick Durbin at the CU Pride Parade in downtown Champaign to co-sponsor the recently introduced Murphy-Paul-Franken-Lee resolution to disapprove the Administration's proposed arms deal with Saudi Arabia. As the *News-Gazette* reported Friday , Durbin will be the Grand Marshal of the parade. The parade begins at 3pm; CU residents urging Durbin to oppose the Saudi arms deal will meet at 2:30 pm in the parade staging area . A Facebook event for the protest is here . On September 1, Urbana resident Robert Naiman of Just Foreign Policy delivered 1100 Illinois signatures on MoveOn petitions to Durbin at an event in Champaign urging him to co-sponsor the bill. Durbin promised Naiman that he would consider doing so. But when the bill was introduced on Thursday, Durbin's name wasn't on it . The MoveOn petitions are online here and here , with 686 and 414 Illinois signers as of September 1, respectively. The Saudi arms deal is also opposed by Oxfam America, Amnesty International, and Human Rights Watch, on the grounds that the weapons are likely to be used to target civilians in Yemen in violation of the Arms Control Export Act and international humanitarian law. Just Foreign Policy recently supported a bipartisan letter led by Rep. Ted Lieu [D-CA], Rep. Ted Yoho [R-FL], Rep. John Conyers [D-MI], and Mick Mulvaney [R-SC], calling for the Saudi arms deal to be postponed so Congress could fully consider it. 64 Members of the House signed the letter . On Friday, the House voted unanimously - as the Senate had before it - to remove the immunity of Saudi Arabia from lawsuits brought by family members of victims of the 9/11 attacks. Naiman said: "Senator Durbin should apply the same principles of the unanimous Congressional votes to lift Saudi immunity from 9/11 lawsuits to the Saudi arms deal. Saudi Arabia should no longer be exempt from U.S. laws such as the protections against the targeting of civilians in the Arms Control Export Act." *WHAT: Protest urging Senator Durbin to co-sponsor the **Murphy-Paul-Franken-Lee resolution to block the Saudi arms deal.* *WHERE:* Parade Staging Area , CU Pride Parade, Downtown Champaign. *WHEN:* Saturday, September 10, 2:30 p.m. *For more information about this action, please contact Robert Naiman at 202-448-2898 x1 or naiman at justforeignpolicy.org .* === Robert Naiman Policy Director Just Foreign Policy www.justforeignpolicy.org naiman at justforeignpolicy.org (202) 448-2898 x1 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From deb.pdamerica at gmail.com Sat Sep 10 11:30:55 2016 From: deb.pdamerica at gmail.com (Debra Schrishuhn) Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 06:30:55 -0500 Subject: [Peace] endorse voting rights legislation Message-ID: Progressive Democrats of America and People Demanding Action have just signed on to endorse this critical piece of legislation. Please add your name as an individual or organization. Deb Schrishuhn On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Joel Segal wrote: Dear Friends: Representative Hank Johnson, D-Ga, along with other Members of Congress, will soon introduce one of the most progressive anti-voter suppression/election defense bills ever introduced in the U.S. Congress-- the "Election Integrity Act." We are respectfully asking your organization, or you as an individual, to be an official endorser of the bill. Common Cause, the Transformative Justice Coalition, lead by legendary civil rights lawyer Barbara Arnwine have endorsed the bill. Attached below is a short summary and full text of the "Election Integrity Act." This is a "gold standard" anti-voter suppression/election defense bill. The "Election Integrity Act," will give the anti-voter suppression/election defense movement one of the single most powerful tools to organize, educate, and mobilize against onerous and intentionally racist state voter suppression laws and actions. And, be used by the social justice community and Members of Congress to push back against local voter intimidation tactics We in good conscience, all of us, can not allow our democracy to be stolen by far right wing Republicans who intentionally are suppressing the vote of African-Americans, Hispanics, senior citizens, the physically challenged, students, and low income workers just to stay in power. Let's not forget those who marched, struggled, and died for the right to vote! Now is the time to go on the offensive! The Election integrity Act will be launched in a press conference in Washington D.C. on September 21st, 10:00am, at the House Triangle, in front of the Nation's Capitol. If you have any questions, please contact Joel Segal, at Joel.R. Segal at gmail.com, or contact me at 571 344-1518. Sincerely, Joel Segal National Election Defense Coalition, Government Affairs Director Former Senior Legislative Assistant, Rep. John Conyers, 1999-2013 From karenaram at hotmail.com Sat Sep 10 13:43:03 2016 From: karenaram at hotmail.com (Karen Aram) Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 13:43:03 +0000 Subject: [Peace] September 22, 6pm at the Graduate School of Library Science. Message-ID: The Uiuc students greens are hosting a panel event. Included will be speakers from the Prairie Greens, Scott Summers, GP candidate for Illinois senator, and music by Harry Mackilade. All will be followed by a Q&A, so come with questions or discussion points! About UIUC Student Greens [https://scontent.ford1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/c74.0.100.100/p100x100/14183726_605821299598667_2992080495996986385_n.png?oh=0db20ec4cbf657617c176e247895b62a&oe=588183A2] UIUC Student Greens Political Organization This is the student organization at the U of Illinois supporting the Green Party of the United States. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From karenaram at hotmail.com Sat Sep 10 14:10:17 2016 From: karenaram at hotmail.com (Karen Aram) Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 14:10:17 +0000 Subject: [Peace] "Russia and the US have agreed on a "Peace Agreement for Syria". !!! Message-ID: "Russia and the US have agreed on a "Peace Agreement for Syria". The plan requires a ban on a "no-fly zone" A cease fire begins on Monday. The two nations will jointly target terrorist groups in Syria." See: RT.com No mention of the US requirement of "Assad must go." And, Hillary's call for a "no fly zone", put to rest. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naiman at justforeignpolicy.org Sat Sep 10 16:55:17 2016 From: naiman at justforeignpolicy.org (Robert Naiman) Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 11:55:17 -0500 Subject: [Peace] News-Gazette: Activists plan to confront Durbin today Message-ID: http://www.news-gazette.com/news/local/2016-09-10/activists-plan-confront-durbin-today.html Activists plan to confront Durbin today Sat, 09/10/2016 - 7:00am | Melissa Merli CHAMPAIGN — Champaign-Urbana activists will challenge U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin at the C-U Pride Parade today in Champaign over his failure to co-sign a bipartisan U.S. House resolution disapproving the Obama administration's proposed arms deal with Saudi Arabia. The Saudi arms deal is opposed by Oxfam America, Amnesty International, and Human Rights Watch on the grounds that the weapons are likely to be used to target civilians in Yemen, in violation of the Arms Control Export Act and international humanitarian law. The activists who will urge Durbin to oppose the Saudi arms deal will meet at 2:30 p.m. in the parade staging area in downtown Champaign. Durbin will be the grand marshal of the parade, which begins at 3 p.m. Just Foreign Policy recently supported a bipartisan letter signed by 64 U.S. representatives calling for the Saudi arms deal to be postponed so Congress could fully consider it. On Friday, the House voted unanimously — as the Senate had before it — to remove the immunity of Saudi Arabia from lawsuits brought by family members of victims of the 9/11 attacks. "Senator Durbin should apply the same principles to the Saudi arms deal of the unanimous congressional votes to lift Saudi immunity from 9/11 lawsuits," said Robert Naiman, policy director of Just Foreign Policy. "Saudi Arabia should no longer be exempt from U.S. laws such as the protections against the targeting of civilians in the Arms Control Export Act." When Durbin was in Champaign on Sept. 1, Naiman, of Urbana, gave him two MoveOn petitions, with a total of 1,100 signatures of Illinois residents, urging Durbin to co-sponsor the resolution disapproving the proposed military sale to Saudi Arabia tanks and other major defense equipment. Durbin promised Naiman he would consider doing so, Naiman said. The bill was introduced Thursday, though, and Durbin's name wasn't on it. === === Robert Naiman Policy Director Just Foreign Policy www.justforeignpolicy.org naiman at justforeignpolicy.org (202) 448-2898 x1 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naiman at justforeignpolicy.org Sun Sep 11 20:57:47 2016 From: naiman at justforeignpolicy.org (Robert Naiman) Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2016 15:57:47 -0500 Subject: [Peace] No to Dakota Access Pipeline at Urbana City Council Monday 6:30 pm Message-ID: https://actionnetwork.org/events/nodapl-action-at-urbana-city-council-meeting http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/cityofurbana-join-cityminnea?r_by=1135580 === Robert Naiman Policy Director Just Foreign Policy www.justforeignpolicy.org naiman at justforeignpolicy.org (202) 448-2898 x1 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stuartnlevy at gmail.com Mon Sep 12 04:54:22 2016 From: stuartnlevy at gmail.com (Stuart Levy) Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2016 23:54:22 -0500 Subject: [Peace] Events this week - two re #NoDAPL opposing Dakota Access oil pipeline (#NoDAPL) Message-ID: <7578850b-1754-0de3-38b3-b1fb28abb045@gmail.com> Upcoming events - including **two** related to the Dakota Access Oil Pipeline, on Mon 9/12 (6:30 Urbana), and on Fri 9/16 (5pm Champaign). The Friday 5pm Scott Park (Champaign) event is Native-led and organized, in solidarity with the Standing Rock water protectors in North Dakota, where thousands of Native people are assembled in peaceful opposition to the Dakota Access Pipeline. Hope you can attend, and please let others know. Hope too: at 6:30pm Wednesday 9/14, please come watch Naomi Klein's film "This Changes Everything", on climate change and citizen action. Discussion to follow, including brief popup talks by several groups you can get involved with. Though not strictly anti-war events, they lie at the intersection of anticolonialism, the global geopolitics of energy, and the importance of popular resistance. Summary: Mon 9/12, 6:30pm, Urbana City Council Chambers, 400 S. Vine St, Urbana Urge Urbana City Council to *oppose **Dakota Access Pipeline (#NoDAPL)* Gather at City building at 6:30; Council meeting begins at 7. Organized by Robert Naiman. https://actionnetwork.org/events/nodapl-action-at-urbana-city-council-meeting?referrer=sierra-club Wed 9/14, 6:30pm-9pm, Channing-Murray Foundation, 1209 W. Oregon, Urbana "This Changes Everything" film & discussion, with popup talks by *groups you can get involved with* Film by Naomi Klein, on climate change and citizen action https://www.facebook.com/events/329641967375716/ Fri 9/16, noon-1pm, University YMCA (Friday Forum), 1001 S. Wright St., Champaign "Politics of Climate Change in Illinois", talk by Jen Walling, IL Environmental Council https://www.facebook.com/events/1047884435309318/ Fri 9/16, 5-7pm, Scott Park, Champaign (between 2nd & 3rd Sts, between Springfield and Healey) "In Solidarity with Standing Rock, the Earth, and all People, we will gather as Protectors in Peace at Scott Park in Champaign, IL" Vigil/rally solidarity with the Standing Rock water protectors, peacefully opposing the Dakota Access Pipeline. Organized by local Native people. Everyone is welcome. https://www.facebook.com/events/1787572761459012/ ================================================== ================================================== More details on the above --> Mon 9/12, 6:30pm, Urbana City Council Chambers, 400 S. Vine St, Urbana #NoDAPL -- Come urge the Urbana City Council to adopt a resolution saying that they oppose the Dakota Access Oil Pipeline, and calling on the Obama Administration to ask the Corps of Engineers to revoke its construction permit. This pipeline, running through the Dakotas, Iowa and into Illinois, would carry over a half million barrels per day of North Dakota Bakken crude oil - running through Native American lands, and putting major waterways at risk. More below, or sign up to say you're coming: https://actionnetwork.org/events/nodapl-action-at-urbana-city-council-meeting?referrer=sierra-club Wed 9/14, 6:30pm-9pm, Channing-Murray Foundation, 1209 W. Oregon, Urbana Free and open to the public - Refreshments will be served. Followed by discussion & avenues for action. https://www.facebook.com/events/329641967375716/ Inspired by Naomi Klein’s book, "This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the Climate," this film presents seven powerful portraits of communities on the front lines of the climate crisis, and Klein contends that "we can seize the existential crisis of climate change to transform our failed economic system into something radically better." Please join us to call attention to the most important environmental issue of our time. A short trailer and more information about the film is here: http://thefilm.thischangeseverything.org/about Thanks to our cosponsors! Channing-Murray Foundation, Students for Environmental Concerns (SECS), Eco-Justice Collaborative, Faith In Place, Social Action Committee/Green UUs of the Unitarian-Universalist Church of Urbana-Champaign, IL Environmental Council, WATCH (We’re Against Toxic Chemicals), Just Foreign Policy, AWARE, C-U Friends Meeting, University YMCA, Wesley Methodist Church Green Team, Central IL Chapter of Jobs with Justice, Prairie Rivers Network, Champaign County Health Care Consumers. Fri 9/16, 5-7pm, Scott Park, Champaign (between 2nd & 3rd Sts, between Springfield and Healey) https://www.facebook.com/events/1787572761459012/ In Solidarity with Standing Rock, the Earth, and all People, we will gather as Protectors in Peace at Scott Park in Champaign, IL on Friday, September 16th from 5:00pm-7:00pm. This event is Native-organized. We ask our entire community to join us, but honor our request for this to be a Native-led and Indigenous-centered space. To that end, we’ll begin with a schedule of Indigenous speakers, followed by an open mic for all those joining us in solidarity. Community, please join us. In our tradition, all our children are our children. Everyone belongs here. OVERVIEW OF WHAT IS HAPPENING and OUR CALL TO ACTION: Thousands of Native Americans from over 100 tribes are campedon the banks of the Cannonball River in North Dakota near the Standing Rock Sioux (Dakota/Lakota) Reservation in a peaceful attempt to halt construction of the Dakota Access oil pipeline, a 1200 mile long pipeline running from the Bakken oil fields in North Dakota to southern Illinois. The protesters tell us that the pipeline is desecrating land sacred to the Standing Rock Sioux and putting critical water supplies at risk of contamination. Over Labor Day weekend, security guards for the pipeline’s owners used attack dogs and pepper spray against protesters in a manner reminiscent of civil rights protests in the 1960s. On September 8, the governor of North Dakota called in the National Guard to provide backup to local law enforcement against the protesters. Mainstream media coverage of these events has been extremely sparse to date, and most news is being transmitted via social media. This situation lends clarity to a remarkable array of issues we need to be able to think about, including caring for our beautiful planet Earth and all of the people and other creatures who share it. The events in North Dakota are an extraordinary example both of capitalist institutions aligned against pro-human, pro-environmental interests, and the 21st century model of how genocide is aimed at Indigenous peoples. This is not a time to stay silent or passive to determine what we do. Come and join the movement instead! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naiman at justforeignpolicy.org Mon Sep 12 13:43:10 2016 From: naiman at justforeignpolicy.org (Robert Naiman) Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 08:43:10 -0500 Subject: [Peace] 6:30 tonight: #NoDAPL at Urbana City Council Message-ID: I'm looking forward to seeing folks tonight at 6:30 pm at the Urbana City Building on 400 S Vine Street, across from Lincoln Square on the east side of Vine, to help urge the Urbana City Council to say no to the Dakota Access Pipeline - #NoDAPL! The Council meeting starts at 7pm; public participation is usually allowed at the beginning of the meeting. Hopefully, by gathering at 6:30, we'll be able to greet people as they come in to the meeting, and then we'll also be able to speak during the public participation, and present our MoveOn petition urging the Urbana City Council to join Minneapolis in passing a resolution against the Dakota Access Pipeline. Please sign and share our petition to the Council here. - Please let me know by replying to this email if: - you can bring a #NoDAPL sign - you're planning or willing to address the Urbana City Council during public participation before the council meeting - you are willing to talk to press and/or be a press contact - you want to be quoted in a press release sent to local media - you want to speak to other protesters gathered outside at 6:30 - you have other ideas for this evening or beyond that you want to share My understanding is that a gathering is planned at Scott Park on Friday and that there will be folks tonight with flyers and info about that. See you this evening! Robert Naiman Policy Director Just Foreign Policy www.justforeignpolicy.org naiman at justforeignpolicy.org (202) 448-2898 x1 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From geo8arche at gmail.com Mon Sep 12 14:34:35 2016 From: geo8arche at gmail.com (George Hardebeck) Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 09:34:35 -0500 Subject: [Peace] 6:30 tonight: #NoDAPL at Urbana City Council In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Great Robert, I don't think we will make it back from Ohio by the meeting tonight, as much as I wish we could. I believe we should be working on other ways, too, to state our appreciation for our Indigenous standing on the front lines in such concerns, globally due to their continued relatedness to the sacredness of lands, holiness of waters, wondrousness of Life... all being more than we can assess... through any monetary symbol. Our reconnecting with such mutual relatedness through their maintained connection, their deeply rooted relatedness as we all knew for vast generations, returning from the disconnect of socio-economic imperial systems, in return to mutual systems can be a major turning point in how we deal with much to most all the oppression we face today, largely motivated by the addictive desires and processes of those who seek money and status more than any need, and thereby consuming, contaminating and degrading more Life than any need, and promoting and enforcing sexism, racism, agism, classism by culture, and religion, and speciesism... resulting in related violence, globally, including our mass extinction. I hope we will also look at the work of Thomas Linzey and the CELDF as so related to this work, reforming constitutions from local to nationally, along with their global work. Thanks so much for moving this action. George Hardebeck 330-354-1103 https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10209547503591832&set=a.2183911764711.2126431.1454505022&type=3&theater On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 8:43 AM, Robert Naiman via Peace < peace at lists.chambana.net> wrote: > I'm looking forward to seeing folks tonight at 6:30 pm at the Urbana City > Building on 400 S Vine Street, across from Lincoln Square on the east > side of Vine, to help urge the Urbana City Council to say no to the Dakota > Access Pipeline - #NoDAPL! > > The Council meeting starts at 7pm; public participation is usually allowed > at the beginning of the meeting. Hopefully, by gathering at 6:30, we'll be > able to greet people as they come in to the meeting, and then we'll also be > able to speak during the public participation, and present our MoveOn > petition > urging > the Urbana City Council to join Minneapolis in passing a resolution against > the Dakota Access Pipeline. > > Please sign and share our petition to the Council here. > > > - Please let me know by replying to this email if: > > > - you can bring a #NoDAPL sign > - you're planning or willing to address the Urbana City Council during > public participation before the council meeting > - you are willing to talk to press and/or be a press contact > - you want to be quoted in a press release sent to local media > - you want to speak to other protesters gathered outside at 6:30 > - you have other ideas for this evening or beyond that you want to > share > > My understanding is that a gathering is planned at Scott Park on > Friday and that there will be folks tonight with flyers and info about that. > > See you this evening! > > > Robert Naiman > Policy Director > Just Foreign Policy > www.justforeignpolicy.org > naiman at justforeignpolicy.org > (202) 448-2898 x1 > > > _______________________________________________ > Peace mailing list > Peace at lists.chambana.net > https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From karenaram at hotmail.com Tue Sep 13 01:48:50 2016 From: karenaram at hotmail.com (Karen Aram) Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 01:48:50 +0000 Subject: [Peace] Worthwhile lecture to attend this week at U of I Message-ID: IS | LAW INTRANET * Admissions * Faculty * Academics * Careers Services * Library * Alumni Relations * Giving * CALENDAR * Upcoming Featured Events * Upcoming Lectures and Conferences * Academic Calendar * Schedule an Event "The Constitution at a Crossroads" by Akhil Reed Amar (Yale) Thursday, September 15, 2016 Room A, College of Law Building 11:00 AM–11:45 AM For the first time in our lifetime—and for one of the few times in modern history—all four major federal institutions of power are in play, electorally speaking. Come January, the Democrats could control the House, Senate, Presidency, and Supreme Court. Or the Republicans could control all four. Or we could continue with divided government. We are guaranteed to have a new president—a guarantee that arises only every eighth year—and the Supreme Court could shift away from Republican control for the first time in nearly half a century. In this talk, Yale Law Professor Akhil Reed Amar will discuss the constitutional significance of all this. Akhil Reed Amar is Sterling Professor of Law and Political Science at Yale University, where he teaches constitutional law in both Yale College and Yale Law School. After graduating from Yale College, summa cum laude, in 1980 and from Yale Law School in 1984, and clerking for then Judge (now Justice) Stephen Breyer, Amar joined the Yale faculty in 1985 at the age of 26. His work has won awards from both the American Bar Association and the Federalist Society, and he has been favorably cited by Supreme Court justices across the spectrum in more than 30 cases—tops in his generation. In various comprehensive surveys of judicial citations and/or scholarly citations, he invariably ranks among America’s five most-cited legal scholars under age sixty. He is a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and in 2008 he received the DeVane Medal—Yale’s highest award for teaching excellence. He has written widely for popular publications such as The New York Times, The Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal, the Los Angeles Times, The Atlantic, and Slate. He was an informal consultant to the popular TV show, The West Wing, and his work has been showcased on more recent TV shows such as The Colbert Report, Charlie Rose, and The MHP Show. Professor Amar is the author of dozens of law review articles and several books, including The Constitution and Criminal Procedure: First Principles(Yale Univ. Press, 1997), The Bill of Rights: Creation and Reconstruction (Yale Univ. Press, 1998), America’s Constitution: A Biography (Random House, 2005), America’s Unwritten Constitution: The Precedents and Principles We Live By (Basic Books, 2012), and The Law of the Land: A Grand Tour of our Constitutional Republic (Basic Books, 2015). His newest book, The Constitution Today: Timeless Lessons for the Issues of Our Era, is being published in September 2016—just in time for what promises to be a momentous election. Free and open to the public. Following the lecture, consider attending the "Free Speech on Campus" panel discussion at the Illini Union, Room A. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naiman at justforeignpolicy.org Tue Sep 13 14:23:31 2016 From: naiman at justforeignpolicy.org (Robert Naiman) Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 09:23:31 -0500 Subject: [Peace] recap: Urbana council meeting re: Dakota Access Pipeline; coming events... Message-ID: 1. Last night the Urbana City Council agreed to put a resolution against the Dakota Access Pipeline on their agenda for next week. Please come out to the meeting Monday at 7pm if you can. Remember that 1) public participation is at the beginning of the meeting, you don't have to stay for the whole meeting if you don't want to/can't; and 2) if you don't particularly feel called to speak, you can fill out the yellow public participation paper and mark the boxes to say "I don't want to speak, but I want to be recorded in support." And that gets recorded and announced and reported in the media. So, for example, it says in the News-Gazette today that "The council was also asked by eight members of the public to formally oppose the Dakota Access Pipeline," and that's because eight people filled out the yellow slip of paper: [...] The council was also asked by eight members of the public to formally oppose the Dakota Access Pipeline, citing environmental concerns and disturbance to Native American communities. Mayor Laurel Prussing and Aldermen Charlie Smyth and [Alderman Eric] Jakobsson said they will draft a resolution regarding pipeline opposition, Native Americans and sustainability issues for the council to consider next week. [...] http://www.news-gazette.com/news/local/2016-09-13/urbana-council-approves-tif-district-downtown-redevelopment.html Also: Some Urbana Residents Want a Resolution Passed in Opposition to the Dakota Access Pipeline http://www.wandtv.com/story/33077626/some-urbana-residents-want-a-resolution-passed-in-opposition-to-the-dakota-access-pipeline There was also a WILL-AM story this morning but I haven't been able to find it online. You can still sign and share our MoveOn petition to the Council, we'll re-deliver it next week: . at cityofurbana: Join @CityMinneapolis To Say #NoDAPL http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/cityofurbana-join-cityminnea?r_by=1135580 2. Lois Kain and others will be outside Strawberry Fields in Urbana over the lunch hour today, starting at 10:30, circulating the Food & Water Watch petition to President Obama against the pipeline. https://actionnetwork.org/events/food-and-water-watch-at-strawberry-fields 3. Tomorrow evening at Channing-Murray: A Film Screening of “This Changes Everything”, Naomi Klein’s film about communities taking action on climate change Wednesday, September 14th 6:30pm Channing-Murray Foundation, 1209 W. Oregon Free and open to the public/Refreshments will be served Followed by discussion & avenues for action https://www.facebook.com/events/329641967375716/ http://thefilm.thischangeseverything.org/about/ 4. Fri 9/16, 5-7pm, Scott Park, Champaign (between 2nd & 3rd Sts, between Springfield and Healey) " In Solidarity with Standing Rock, the Earth, and all People, we will gather as Protectors in Peace at Scott Park in Champaign, IL" Vigil/rally solidarity with the Standing Rock water protectors, peacefully opposing the Dakota Access Pipeline. Organized by local Native people. Everyone is welcome. https://www.facebook.com/events/1787572761459012/ === Robert Naiman Policy Director Just Foreign Policy www.justforeignpolicy.org naiman at justforeignpolicy.org (202) 448-2898 x1 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rachelstrm at gmail.com Wed Sep 14 02:13:18 2016 From: rachelstrm at gmail.com (Rachel Storm) Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 21:13:18 -0500 Subject: [Peace] Fwd: Stand in Solidarity with Standing Rock In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Rachel Storm Date: Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 8:18 PM Subject: Stand in Solidarity with Standing Rock To: "secs.uiuc" Cc: Kate Insolia ​​ Chaŋtémawašte hípi! Glad you are here! I'm writing to ask if your organization will join local Native-American/Indigenous organizers to protect our water this upcoming Friday, Sept. 16th from 5pm-7pm. The rally is being organized by local Native-American groups, who will speak at the beginning of the rally, followed by organizations and allies. Will your organization plan to attend and speak out? We'd love to have you! Read on for the details sent out in a press release. *To get on the speaker schedule, contact Kate Insolia (cc'd), at kjinsolia at gmail.com . *There will also be an opportunity on Friday at the rally to sign up to speak. Additionally, if your organization would like to add it's name to those supporting the rally, please add your name here: https://docs.google.com/ document/d/1QCYfhF6QNc2w6ldBUh0ns6trJdcKFqyjuSTaNEtf3MI/edit?usp=sharing We hope you can join us in protecting our water! Kate Insolia *Rally in Solidarity with Standing Rock* *Scott Park* *207 E. Springfield Ave* *Champaign, IL 61821* *Friday, September 16th from 5:00pm-7:00pm.* *https://www.facebook.com/events/1787572761459012/ * *Champaign, IL-* “Chaŋtémawašte hípi! Glad you are here!” On Friday, Sept. 16th, Native American/indigenous organizers and their allies will gather for a peaceful rally in Scott Park beginning at 5pm in solidarity with the Camp of the Sacred Stone at Standing Rock in North Dakota. The Camp of the Sacred Stone has become the site of one of the largest examples of Native-American peaceful protest in history led by the activism of the Standing Rock Sioux Nation to protect our water and resist construction of a controversial oil pipeline that would cut across the American Midwest and end in Illinois. Community members in Champaign-Urbana—joining the efforts of over 200 Native-American tribes to protect our water and our environment—call upon their neighbors, friends, and colleagues to join them in standing in solidarity with those protecting our earth. Over the Labor Day weekend, security guards for pipeline used attack dogs and pepper spray against the protectors in a manner reminiscent of civil rights protests in the 1960s. Last Friday, a federal judge denied the Standing Rock Sioux's request to stop construction of the 1,172-mile pipeline, but the Justice Department, the Department of the Army, and the Interior Department then blocked construction, pending further discussion. The pipeline is desecrating land sacred to the Standing Rock Sioux and putting critical water supplies at risk of contamination. One of the protectors, Barbara Boring (Cherokee) explained, “this situation lends clarity to a remarkable array of issues surrounding care for our beautiful planet Earth and all of the people and other creatures who share it,” adding “The events in North Dakota are an extraordinary example both of capitalist institutions aligned against pro-human, pro-environmental interests, and the 21st century model of how genocide is aimed at Indigenous peoples. This is not a time to stay silent or passive to determine what we do. Come and join the movement instead!” Nonetheless, mainstream media coverage of these events has been largely absent to date, and most news is being transmitted via social media. Those gathering at Scott Park aim to stand in solidarity with #NODAPL aim to lend their voices to the cause. Local Native-American and Indigenous organizers emphasize that this event is Native-organized, requesting “our entire community to join us, but honor our request for this to be a Native-led and Indigenous-centered space.” They plan to begin with a schedule of Indigenous speakers, followed by an open mic for all in attendance. “Community, please join us. In our tradition, all our children are our children. Everyone belongs here!” *#####* -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: SolidarityRallyFlyer.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 174089 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PressReleaseStandingRock.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 16413 bytes Desc: not available URL: From stuartnlevy at gmail.com Wed Sep 14 15:19:50 2016 From: stuartnlevy at gmail.com (Stuart Levy) Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 10:19:50 -0500 Subject: [Peace] 8pm CDT tonight- The Many Wars of Syria - conf. call with Phyllis Bennis In-Reply-To: <57d964a15e642_11738d30ec0122257@asgworker-qmb2-i-c7e28bf6.nbuild.prd.useast1.3dna.io.mail> References: <57d964a15e642_11738d30ec0122257@asgworker-qmb2-i-c7e28bf6.nbuild.prd.useast1.3dna.io.mail> Message-ID: <81b5a28e-2a3d-cddb-11a1-c66c87ee04b0@gmail.com> PDA conference call on Syria, with Phyllis Bennis -- tonight (Wed 9/14) at 8pm Central time. e.g. "What would diplomacy look like in such a complex set of wars? What are solutions that the US Peace Movement could be pushing? For one, we should be extending the good efforts against arms sales to Saudi Arabia -- always promoting the goal of a Weapons-of-Mass-Destruction Free Zone in the Middle East (and why stop there?)." Details below. -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: REMINDER: The Many Wars of Syria with Phyllis Bennis - Tonight at 9pm Eastern Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 14:54:25 +0000 From: Progressive Democrats of America - End Wars and Occupations To: Stuart Levy The Many Wars of Syria with Phyllis Bennis Wednesday, September 14, 2016 9:00pm Eastern, 8:00pm Central, 7:00pm Mountain, 6:00pm Pacific 605-562-3140 PIN: 952870# Let's start out the fall with a new commitment to follow more closely the carnage in Syria. Is it a civil war? Is it a proxy war between the nuclear powers ? Is it also a proxy war between Middle Eastern governments? Can ISIS be reined in? Should Assad go? Or stay? What is the USA doing as an actor in the situation? We as anti-war activists should be constantly questioning that. What about congressional moves to demand a new AUMF? Is that wise? Syria2.jpg What would diplomacy look like in such a complex set of wars? What are solutions that the US Peace Movement could be pushing? For one, we should be extending the good efforts against arms sales to Saudi Arabia -- always promoting the goal of a Weapons-of-Mass-Destruction Free Zone in the Middle East (and why stop there?). We in the Peace Movement have a deep belief that the American invasion of Iraq started this whole change of events. Syrian Immigrants (as well as those from North Africa) are changing the population map of both the Middle East and Europe. Why is the US taking in so few of those who are fleeing? What is our responsibility as advocates for peace to those who flee from war and violence? What do the American people know of all this? Once again our mass media has let us all down. What kind of educational campaign can we launch to quicken the sensibilities of the good folk of the United States? What about the belief in America as a moral force in the world? So many opportunities for America to shine get lost as our treasure goes to "solving" problems with military might. Instead of the greed and corruption fomented by corporations -- particularly in the military-industrial area -- American ingenuity and trillion dollar investment could dig in with creative answers to climate change. We could lead the world in public education that serves every child in our very diverse democracy. The biggest challenge of all is to address the burgeoning gaps between rich and poor both in this country and across the globe because until that changes, perpetual wars continue. Let's keep dreaming of a peaceful world and acting to make it so. *Sponsors*: UFPJ, PDA, Code Pink *Moderator*: Jackie Cabasso, UFPJ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ PhyllisBennis.jpgPhyllis Bennis is a Fellow of the Institute for Policy Studies, where she directs the New Internationalism project working to change US policy in the broader Middle East. She was a co-founder of both the US Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation and United for Peace and Justice coalitions, and continues work with both the US and global anti-war movements. Her most recent books include */Understanding the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict/*, and */Understanding ISIS & the New Global War on Terror: A Primer/*. Progressive Democrats of America http://pda.nationbuilder.com/ Facebook.jpg Twitter.jpg Logo-Flickr.jpg YouTube.jpg pinterest3.jpg Paid for by Progressive Democrats of America (http://www.pdamerica.org ) Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Progressive Democrats of America · Grand Rapids, MI 49515, United States This email was sent to stuartnlevy at gmail.com. To stop receiving emails, click here . Created with NationBuilder , software for leaders. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naiman at justforeignpolicy.org Wed Sep 14 21:51:01 2016 From: naiman at justforeignpolicy.org (Robert Naiman) Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 16:51:01 -0500 Subject: [Peace] Human Rights Watch: Stop Arming Saudi Arabia Message-ID: Wow, look at that! I don't ever remember getting an alert like this from Human Rights Watch before. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Human Rights Watch Date: Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 4:38 PM Subject: Stop Arming Saudi Arabia To: naiman at justforeignpolicy.org [image: Human Rights Watch] *STOP ARMING* *SAUDI ARABIA* Follow us on: [image: Facebook] [image: Twitter] [image: YouTube] [image: StumbleUpon] Six coalition bombs hit the al-Shihab Industrial Compound in Sanaa, killing one and wounding three civilians, on January 29 and 30, 2016. The facility stored food and pharmaceutical products. © 2016 Belkis Wille/Human Rights Watch Dear Robert, Markets, schools, and hospitals bombed. *Hundreds of civilians—including at least 200 children—killed* so far in unlawful airstrikes. Repeated use of internationally banned cluster bombs that have caused civilian casualties. These are just some of the devastating consequences of the Saudi-led coalition’s 18 month-long air campaign in Yemen. Yet… despite extensive on-the-ground documentation by Human Rights Watch of these violations, the US continues to fuel the conflict. After selling *over $20 billion dollars in weapons* to Saudi Arabia in 2015, some in Washington want to add another *$1.15 billion dollars in arms sales*. A bipartisan group of US senators are taking action to *stop enabling Saudi Arabia’s to commit more abuses in Yemen* . They have introduced legislation to slow this sale. Time is running out—the Senate will vote on this resolution as early as Tuesday, September 20. *WE NEED YOU *to tell your senators to support this critical resolution now. Thank you for your support, John Sifton Deputy Washington Director Human Rights Watch Follow us on: [image: Facebook] [image: Twitter] [image: YouTube] [image: StumbleUpon] Home | Take action | Privacy | Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th Floor New York, NY 10118 USA Tel: +1 (212) 290-4700 | news at hrw.org [image: supporter] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From karenaram at hotmail.com Thu Sep 15 12:56:00 2016 From: karenaram at hotmail.com (Karen Aram) Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 12:56:00 +0000 Subject: [Peace] Thank you for signing Protect Freedom of The Press! Drop Arrest Warrant for Amy Goodman In-Reply-To: <20160915123506.86969C6E0CED@ngms01.care2.com> References: <20160915123506.86969C6E0CED@ngms01.care2.com> Message-ID: On Sep 15, 2016, at 05:35, Care2 Petitions > wrote: [Care2 Petitionsite - the #1 petition site in the world] thank you for signing this urgent petition: [http://dingo.care2.com/pictures/petition_images/petition/575/268169-1473733624-wide.jpg] Protect Freedom of The Press! Drop Arrest Warrant for Amy Goodman [-------------------------] now you can help even more by sharing: [Post to Facebook] [Post to Twitter] [Email Your Friends] [Post to Tumblr] You signed up to receive updates on this petition. You can change your preferences, here. With your help, we will succeed! Want to make a difference on other important petitions? [sign now] [Make a difference - Start a Petition] The link to this petition is: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/268/169/575/protect-freedom-of-the-press-drop-arrest-warrant-for-amy-goodman/ You can use this link to remove your signature If you don't want any more 'thank you for signing' emails, it's easy to edit your email preferences or unsubscribe ________________________________ Care2.com, Inc. 275 Shoreline Drive, Suite 300 Redwood City, CA 94065 http://www.care2.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From karenaram at hotmail.com Fri Sep 16 01:39:35 2016 From: karenaram at hotmail.com (Karen Aram) Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 01:39:35 +0000 Subject: [Peace] Coda: The Elephant Stampede In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Prof. Boyle, you missed your true calling of poet. I did attend, so I will comment: Prof. Amar a Constitutional Law Prof. of Yale was supposed to be speaking on the Constitution but it was Poli Sci 101 promoting his book and Hillary, as was expected. Three people asked questions related to law and he not only disparaged third parties but blamed Nader for Bush and the wars. He talked about how awful Trump was, and how “moderate” Hillary is and why we need her, he even mentioned Tammy Duckworth a local democratic candidate. I asked him "how could he support Hillary given her record as Sec. of State, responsible along with Obama for the death and destruction, of the thousands of people of Libya, Syria, Yemen, as well as Iraq.” continuing with "having heard you speak yesterday on NPR, how could you support our Constitutional Law Prof. President, Obama, who has broken not only international law but our laws, by extending the Bush wars to as many as eight nations”. Then said "I came here expecting a conversation on “Freedom of Speech” instead I’m hearing a promotion of Hillary and the democrats." He responded with “your exercising your freedom of speech and I’m exercising mine" He defended the wars as “mistakes", referring to Gadafi as a dictator, with only five American people having died, emphasizing “only five”, as if the thousands of non Americans don’t matter. It offered me, a Green, the opportunity to link up with the local Libertarians for future joint activities against war. I hope we can prepare for the Oct. 28th speaking engagement of Harold Killer Koh, at the COL, with protests and enough media coverage to publicize the perfidy of these people who care so little about the lives they are responsible for destroying. On Sep 15, 2016, at 18:11, Boyle, Francis A > wrote: Sorry I could not make it today over to our Bull-twaddling panel on “free speech on campus” by our professional Illinois/Yale Law bull-twaddlers from the Illinois/Yale Mafia Schools of Law. So I cannot make a comment on it.But in lieu thereof, and speaking of bull-twaddle I thought I would send you this poem and coda I wrote in honor of our Disgraced, Fired and ABA-sanctioned NeoCon Bull-Twaddling Dean Hurricane Heidi Hurd. Ditto for our Disgraced, Fired and ABA-Sanctioned Illinois/Yale Law Mafia Bull-Twaddling Dean Uncle Brucie Smith. Enjoy! Fab. Coda Ringling has now retired their elephants No more krapping elephant stampedes But our 2 krapping ex-Deans still remain Stinking up the place Alas! On both counts! Krapping elephants amused me as a kid But krapping ex-law-deans today do not They should go stink up somewhere else For both are all krapped out here. The Elephant Stampede When I was a young boy Every year with my Dad We would go to see The Ringling Brothers, Barnum and Bailey Circus At the Old Amphitheater Three Rings At the end of the show Came their famous elephant stampede All the pachyderms would line up in a row With scantily clad young women on top And at the appointed time With their trunks they would grasp The tails of the elephants in front And rumble around all 3 rings Like an earthquake The band played on The girls riding bareback But elephants are an incontinent lot Pissing and crapping as they plodded along So at the rear of each pach Was a man dressed as a janitor With a metal garbage can on wheelies And a coal shovel. So as each animal would crap Its man would reach in with his shovel And scoop it right out And plop the poop in the can Before the next elephant stomped on it Magnificently choreographed for all to see A Ballet of elephants and men and poop on a scoop But every once in a while The man could not get in there on time And so the next elephant would stomp On a dropped pile of shit That would splat around the Old Amphitheater I am reminded of this childhood spectacle Now at the start of my 38th year here At the college of law After eleven years of Deans Hurd and Smith Dropping their crap all around These Ivy bedecked halls In two separate scandals One after the other Up to our necks in their crap Who is going to scoop it all up? Where are we going to put it? Or will we just let it ferment? As it wafts up our nostrils As it has done all these years Onward and upward To our brains Now fermented in shit For well over a decade. Here’s to Deans Hurd and Smith Long may they live In the Annals of College of Law Shit Fab Francis A. Boyle Law Building 504 E. Pennsylvania Ave. Champaign, IL 61820 USA 217-333-7954 (phone) 217-244-1478 (fax) (personal comments only) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kmedina67 at gmail.com Fri Sep 16 02:53:52 2016 From: kmedina67 at gmail.com (Karen Medina) Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 21:53:52 -0500 Subject: [Peace] AWARE has been asked to consider supporting the 13 demands of the BSFR at UIUC Message-ID: Dear Peace-Discuss, At the next AWARE meeting*, I will present the 13 demands of the "Black Students for Revolution" at UIUC for consideration. BSFRUIUC has asked if AWARE will sign on to be a community supporter/endorser of the demands. http://www.bsfruiuc.com/our-demands *(I might miss this upcoming meeting, but the next week's meeting then) -- karen medina ------------------------------- 1. WE DEMAND that UIUC immediately and permanently halt tuition hikes. 2. WE DEMAND that the racial and economic demographics of UIUC students, faculty and staff reflect the racial and economic demographics of Illinois by 2032. 3. WE DEMAND that all on-campus sexual predators, especially those affiliated with the Greek Life system, face severe penalties for all forms of sexual violence. 4. WE DEMAND that UIUC makes a permanent commitment not to consolidate or combine the LGBT Resource Center and Women’s Resource Center in addition to the continued autonomy of all cultural centers and ethnic studies programs. 5. WE DEMAND that UIUC collect and track gender and sexuality based demographics as an official population. 6. WE DEMAND that queer and trans students be given priority for all university sponsored all-gendered housing options and that genderqueer and trans students be offered these spaces at a discounted rate corresponding with the less expensive standard housing option. 7. WE DEMAND that UIUC hire a truly independent consultant to review the salaries of all University employees in order to detect and correct gender and race-based pay inequality 8. WE DEMAND a living wage for all University employees and subcontracted workers and that this rate be indexed for inflation. 9. WE DEMAND all employees of UIUC have access to at least six months of paid parental leave following the birth or adoption of a child. 10. WE DEMAND that UIUC cease and desist job outsourcing and hire directly from underrepresented populations in Urbana-Champaign and the surrounding communities. 11. WE DEMAND that UIUC work towards bridging the gap between this campus and the surrounding Black community of Urbana-Champaign. 12. WE DEMAND that UIUC implement fair-chance admissions and employment policies for those with past conviction records (Ban the Box). 13. WE DEMAND that UIUC release an annual, easily-accessible, and comprehensive report of all its investments and move to divest from socially and politically negligent corporations. List of Endorsing Local Organizations ​ 1. Black Students for Revolution 2. SJP - Students for Justice in Palestine 3. Planner’s Network 4. MEChA - Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan 5. AASSCC - African American Studies Scholars Cultural Committee 6. CUTES - Campus Union for Trans Equality and Support 7. UMMA - United Muslim & Minority Advocates 8. GEO - Graduate Employees Organization 9. MSU - Mixed Student Union 10. Women of Pride 11. BLM-CU (community) - Black Lives Matter - Champaign Urbana 12. SACC - Students for an Arab Cultural Center at Illinois 13. The Gharbzadegi Art Collective 14. Allies and Accomplices for Racial Justice 15. Men of Impact* 16. Students Against Sexual Assault 17. My Sister’s Keeper* 18. STEM Boycotts the War Machine 19. NAISO - Native American and Indigenous Student Organization 20. SECS - Students for Environmental ConcernS 21. WORD - Writers Organizing Realistic Dialect 22. ASA - Arab Student Association 23. UIUC Beyond Coal 24. Black Rose/Rosa Negra Central Illinois Chapter -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naiman at justforeignpolicy.org Fri Sep 16 16:13:07 2016 From: naiman at justforeignpolicy.org (Robert Naiman) Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 11:13:07 -0500 Subject: [Peace] Urbana: (draft) Resolution Opposing The Dakota Access Pipeline Message-ID: This was posted yesterday. If anyone has any objections to this, it would be strategic to raise them today, because an amendment is much more likely to be successful on Monday if it has been circulated in advance and agreed to by a majority of council members. Any objection that surfaces for the first time on Monday evening is likely to be significantly discounted. RESOLUTION NO. 2016-09-061R Resolution Opposing The Dakota Access Pipeline http://www.urbanaillinois.us/sites/default/files/attachments/Resolution_2016-09-061R.pdf === Robert Naiman Policy Director Just Foreign Policy www.justforeignpolicy.org naiman at justforeignpolicy.org (202) 448-2898 x1 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From brussel at illinois.edu Fri Sep 16 21:45:52 2016 From: brussel at illinois.edu (Brussel, Morton K) Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 21:45:52 +0000 Subject: [Peace] AWARE has been asked to consider supporting the 13 demands of the BSFR at UIUC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <908112D8-8292-42F1-9265-F4F3DC74C276@illinois.edu> Many reasonable “demands”, several “over the top”—not realistic/feasible for sundry reasons not all in the power of UIUC "powers that be" to implement. Better not to “demand,”but to suggest. I wouldn’t endorse it. —mkb On Sep 15, 2016, at 9:53 PM, Karen Medina via Peace > wrote: Dear Peace-Discuss, At the next AWARE meeting*, I will present the 13 demands of the "Black Students for Revolution" at UIUC for consideration. BSFRUIUC has asked if AWARE will sign on to be a community supporter/endorser of the demands. http://www.bsfruiuc.com/our-demands *(I might miss this upcoming meeting, but the next week's meeting then) -- karen medina ------------------------------- 1. WE DEMAND that UIUC immediately and permanently halt tuition hikes. 2. WE DEMAND that the racial and economic demographics of UIUC students, faculty and staff reflect the racial and economic demographics of Illinois by 2032. 3. WE DEMAND that all on-campus sexual predators, especially those affiliated with the Greek Life system, face severe penalties for all forms of sexual violence. 4. WE DEMAND that UIUC makes a permanent commitment not to consolidate or combine the LGBT Resource Center and Women’s Resource Center in addition to the continued autonomy of all cultural centers and ethnic studies programs. 5. WE DEMAND that UIUC collect and track gender and sexuality based demographics as an official population. 6. WE DEMAND that queer and trans students be given priority for all university sponsored all-gendered housing options and that genderqueer and trans students be offered these spaces at a discounted rate corresponding with the less expensive standard housing option. 7. WE DEMAND that UIUC hire a truly independent consultant to review the salaries of all University employees in order to detect and correct gender and race-based pay inequality 8. WE DEMAND a living wage for all University employees and subcontracted workers and that this rate be indexed for inflation. 9. WE DEMAND all employees of UIUC have access to at least six months of paid parental leave following the birth or adoption of a child. 10. WE DEMAND that UIUC cease and desist job outsourcing and hire directly from underrepresented populations in Urbana-Champaign and the surrounding communities. 11. WE DEMAND that UIUC work towards bridging the gap between this campus and the surrounding Black community of Urbana-Champaign. 12. WE DEMAND that UIUC implement fair-chance admissions and employment policies for those with past conviction records (Ban the Box). 13. WE DEMAND that UIUC release an annual, easily-accessible, and comprehensive report of all its investments and move to divest from socially and politically negligent corporations. List of Endorsing Local Organizations ​ 1. Black Students for Revolution 2. SJP - Students for Justice in Palestine 3. Planner’s Network 4. MEChA - Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan 5. AASSCC - African American Studies Scholars Cultural Committee 6. CUTES - Campus Union for Trans Equality and Support 7. UMMA - United Muslim & Minority Advocates 8. GEO - Graduate Employees Organization 9. MSU - Mixed Student Union 10. Women of Pride 11. BLM-CU (community) - Black Lives Matter - Champaign Urbana 12. SACC - Students for an Arab Cultural Center at Illinois 13. The Gharbzadegi Art Collective 14. Allies and Accomplices for Racial Justice 15. Men of Impact* 16. Students Against Sexual Assault 17. My Sister’s Keeper* 18. STEM Boycotts the War Machine 19. NAISO - Native American and Indigenous Student Organization 20. SECS - Students for Environmental ConcernS 21. WORD - Writers Organizing Realistic Dialect 22. ASA - Arab Student Association 23. UIUC Beyond Coal 24. Black Rose/Rosa Negra Central Illinois Chapter _______________________________________________ Peace mailing list Peace at lists.chambana.net https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mickalideh at gmail.com Sat Sep 17 02:31:11 2016 From: mickalideh at gmail.com (Harry Mickalide) Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 21:31:11 -0500 Subject: [Peace] AWARE has been asked to consider supporting the 13 demands of the BSFR at UIUC In-Reply-To: <908112D8-8292-42F1-9265-F4F3DC74C276@illinois.edu> References: <908112D8-8292-42F1-9265-F4F3DC74C276@illinois.edu> Message-ID: I absolutely support the demands. To achieve them would require a radical change of the university and we should embrace this. On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Brussel, Morton K via Peace < peace at lists.chambana.net> wrote: > Many reasonable “demands”, several “over the top”—not realistic/feasible > for sundry reasons not all in the power of UIUC "powers that be" to > implement. Better not to “demand,”but to suggest. I wouldn’t endorse it. > > —mkb > > > On Sep 15, 2016, at 9:53 PM, Karen Medina via Peace < > peace at lists.chambana.net> wrote: > > Dear Peace-Discuss, > > At the next AWARE meeting*, I will present the 13 demands of the "Black > Students for Revolution" at UIUC for consideration. BSFRUIUC has asked if > AWARE will sign on to be a community supporter/endorser of the demands. > http://www.bsfruiuc.com/our-demands > > *(I might miss this upcoming meeting, but the next week's meeting then) > -- karen medina > ------------------------------- > 1. WE DEMAND that UIUC immediately and permanently halt tuition hikes. > 2. > WE DEMAND that the racial and economic demographics of UIUC students, > faculty and staff reflect the racial and economic demographics of Illinois > by 2032. > 3. > WE DEMAND that all on-campus sexual predators, especially those affiliated > with the Greek Life system, face severe penalties for all forms of sexual > violence. > 4. WE DEMAND that UIUC makes a permanent commitment not to consolidate or > combine the LGBT Resource Center and Women’s Resource Center in addition to > the continued autonomy of all cultural centers and ethnic studies programs. > 5. WE DEMAND that UIUC collect and track gender and sexuality based > demographics as an official population. > 6. WE DEMAND that queer and trans students be given priority for all > university sponsored all-gendered housing options and that genderqueer and > trans students be offered these spaces at a discounted rate corresponding > with the less expensive standard housing option. > 7. WE DEMAND that UIUC hire a truly independent consultant to review the > salaries of all University employees in order to detect and correct gender > and race-based pay inequality > 8. WE DEMAND a living wage for all University employees and subcontracted > workers and that this rate be indexed for inflation. > 9. WE DEMAND all employees of UIUC have access to at least six months of > paid parental leave following the birth or adoption of a child. > 10. WE DEMAND that UIUC cease and desist job outsourcing and hire > directly from underrepresented populations in Urbana-Champaign and the > surrounding communities. > 11. WE DEMAND that UIUC work towards bridging the gap between this campus > and the surrounding Black community of Urbana-Champaign. > 12. WE DEMAND that UIUC implement fair-chance admissions and employment > policies for those with past conviction records (Ban the Box). > 13. WE DEMAND that UIUC release an annual, easily-accessible, and > comprehensive report of all its investments and move to divest from > socially and politically negligent corporations. > > List of Endorsing Local Organizations > ​ > > 1. > > Black Students for Revolution > 2. > > SJP - Students for Justice in Palestine > 3. > > Planner’s Network > 4. > > MEChA - Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan > 5. > > AASSCC - African American Studies Scholars Cultural Committee > 6. > > CUTES - Campus Union for Trans Equality and Support > 7. > > UMMA - United Muslim & Minority Advocates > 8. > > GEO - Graduate Employees Organization > 9. > > MSU - Mixed Student Union > 10. > > Women of Pride > 11. > > BLM-CU (community) - Black Lives Matter - Champaign Urbana > 12. > > SACC - Students for an Arab Cultural Center at Illinois > 13. > > The Gharbzadegi Art Collective > 14. > > Allies and Accomplices for Racial Justice > 15. > > Men of Impact* > 16. > > Students Against Sexual Assault > 17. > > My Sister’s Keeper* > 18. > > STEM Boycotts the War Machine > 19. > > NAISO - Native American and Indigenous Student Organization > 20. > > SECS - Students for Environmental ConcernS > 21. > > WORD - Writers Organizing Realistic Dialect > 22. > > ASA - Arab Student Association > 23. > > UIUC Beyond Coal > 24. > > Black Rose/Rosa Negra Central Illinois Chapter > > > _______________________________________________ > Peace mailing list > Peace at lists.chambana.net > https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace > > > > _______________________________________________ > Peace mailing list > Peace at lists.chambana.net > https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From galliher at illinois.edu Sat Sep 17 03:35:28 2016 From: galliher at illinois.edu (Carl G. Estabrook) Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 22:35:28 -0500 Subject: [Peace] AWARE has been asked to consider supporting the 13 demands of the BSFR at UIUC In-Reply-To: References: <908112D8-8292-42F1-9265-F4F3DC74C276@illinois.edu> Message-ID: <5ECD57AA-756F-45C4-BCA2-7EC3520B1FB7@illinois.edu> I think we should try to have a serious discussion of this proposal, online and perhaps in several meetings. The central question would seem to be, How does it comport with AWARE's antiwar remit? But there are obviously other important questions, e.g., What do we know of ‘Black Students for Revolution’? A severe critic might suggest that a similar list could be circulated by ‘Some Students for Self-Promotion.’ I’m old enough to remember where the loudest voices for ‘militant action’ came from during the Vietnam war: they were provocateurs. The list certainly raises (once again) questions of the nature and provenance of identity politics (the mainstay of the Clinton campaign). See Adolph Reed's mordant description (expressed I admit in somewhat clotted prose): "[Identity] politics is not an alternative to class politics; it is a class politics, the politics of the left-wing of neoliberalism. It is the expression and active agency of a political order and moral economy in which capitalist market forces are treated as unassailable nature. "An integral element of that moral economy is displacement of the critique of the invidious outcomes produced by capitalist class power onto equally naturalized categories of ascriptive identity that sort us into groups supposedly defined by what we essentially are rather than what we do. As I have argued, following Walter Michaels and others, within that moral economy a society in which 1% of the population controlled 90% of the resources could be just, provided that roughly 12% of the 1% were black, 12% were Latino, 50% were women, and whatever the appropriate proportions were LGBT people. "It would be tough to imagine a normative ideal that expresses more unambiguously the social position of people who consider themselves candidates for inclusion in, or at least significant staff positions in service to, the ruling class” . It’s difficult to see how a serious critique of US war-making can arise from identity politics. (Not enough blacks and women among Special Forces killers?) It would seem that US war-making arises from domestic and foreign class conflicts; given that we’ve killed more than 20 million in 37 nations since WWII, we should be clear about causes. . AWARE has seen as its task for 15 years to encourage awareness of how and why the US government is the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today. And to do that we must tell the truth and shame the devil, as Hotspur says. I’m not convinced that endorsing these demands contributes to that effort. —CGE >> On Sep 15, 2016, at 9:53 PM, Karen Medina via Peace wrote: >> >> Dear Peace-Discuss, >> >> At the next AWARE meeting*, I will present the 13 demands of the "Black Students for Revolution" at UIUC for consideration. BSFRUIUC has asked if AWARE will sign on to be a community supporter/endorser of the demands. >> http://www.bsfruiuc.com/our-demands >> *(I might miss this upcoming meeting, but the next week's meeting then) >> -- karen medina >> ------------------------------- >> 1. WE DEMAND that UIUC immediately and permanently halt tuition hikes. >> 2. >> WE DEMAND that the racial and economic demographics of UIUC students, faculty and staff reflect the racial and economic demographics of Illinois by 2032. >> 3. >> WE DEMAND that all on-campus sexual predators, especially those affiliated with the Greek Life system, face severe penalties for all forms of sexual violence. >> 4. WE DEMAND that UIUC makes a permanent commitment not to consolidate or combine the LGBT Resource Center and Women’s Resource Center in addition to the continued autonomy of all cultural centers and ethnic studies programs. >> 5. WE DEMAND that UIUC collect and track gender and sexuality based demographics as an official population. >> 6. WE DEMAND that queer and trans students be given priority for all university sponsored all-gendered housing options and that genderqueer and trans students be offered these spaces at a discounted rate corresponding with the less expensive standard housing option. >> 7. WE DEMAND that UIUC hire a truly independent consultant to review the salaries of all University employees in order to detect and correct gender and race-based pay inequality >> 8. WE DEMAND a living wage for all University employees and subcontracted workers and that this rate be indexed for inflation. >> 9. WE DEMAND all employees of UIUC have access to at least six months of paid parental leave following the birth or adoption of a child. >> 10. WE DEMAND that UIUC cease and desist job outsourcing and hire directly from underrepresented populations in Urbana-Champaign and the surrounding communities. >> 11. WE DEMAND that UIUC work towards bridging the gap between this campus and the surrounding Black community of Urbana-Champaign. >> 12. WE DEMAND that UIUC implement fair-chance admissions and employment policies for those with past conviction records (Ban the Box). >> 13. WE DEMAND that UIUC release an annual, easily-accessible, and comprehensive report of all its investments and move to divest from socially and politically negligent corporations. >> >> List of Endorsing Local Organizations >> ​ >> • Black Students for Revolution >> >> • SJP - Students for Justice in Palestine >> >> • Planner’s Network >> >> • MEChA - Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan >> >> • AASSCC - African American Studies Scholars Cultural Committee >> >> • CUTES - Campus Union for Trans Equality and Support >> >> • UMMA - United Muslim & Minority Advocates >> >> • GEO - Graduate Employees Organization >> >> • MSU - Mixed Student Union >> >> • Women of Pride >> >> • BLM-CU (community) - Black Lives Matter - Champaign Urbana >> >> • SACC - Students for an Arab Cultural Center at Illinois >> >> • The Gharbzadegi Art Collective >> >> • Allies and Accomplices for Racial Justice >> >> • Men of Impact* >> >> • Students Against Sexual Assault >> >> • My Sister’s Keeper* >> >> • STEM Boycotts the War Machine >> >> • NAISO - Native American and Indigenous Student Organization >> >> • SECS - Students for Environmental ConcernS >> >> • WORD - Writers Organizing Realistic Dialect >> >> • ASA - Arab Student Association >> >> • UIUC Beyond Coal >> >> • Black Rose/Rosa Negra Central Illinois Chapter >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Peace mailing list >> Peace at lists.chambana.net >> https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace > From mickalideh at gmail.com Sun Sep 18 04:46:06 2016 From: mickalideh at gmail.com (Harry Mickalide) Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 23:46:06 -0500 Subject: [Peace] AWARE has been asked to consider supporting the 13 demands of the BSFR at UIUC In-Reply-To: <5ECD57AA-756F-45C4-BCA2-7EC3520B1FB7@illinois.edu> References: <908112D8-8292-42F1-9265-F4F3DC74C276@illinois.edu> <5ECD57AA-756F-45C4-BCA2-7EC3520B1FB7@illinois.edu> Message-ID: Allow me to address two of Carl's concerns. 1) The demands are not just being pursued by a loud minority, but are supported by an extensive list of campus organizations which are listed in Karen's original email. The student activist community as a whole has rallied around the list of demands. 2) We do not have to speculate if these demands critique US war-making because the full text of demand 13, the divestment demand, explicitly calls on the university to divest from "corporations which actively support or enable states currently carrying out human right’s abuses (e.g., Israel, Saudi Arabia, Myanmar), all private prison corporations, and all private military contractors and weapons manufacturers." -Harry On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:35 PM, Carl G. Estabrook via Peace < peace at lists.chambana.net> wrote: > I think we should try to have a serious discussion of this proposal, > online and perhaps in several meetings. > > The central question would seem to be, How does it comport with AWARE's > antiwar remit? > > But there are obviously other important questions, e.g., What do we know > of ‘Black Students for Revolution’? > A severe critic might suggest that a similar list could be circulated by > ‘Some Students for Self-Promotion.’ > I’m old enough to remember where the loudest voices for ‘militant action’ > came from during the Vietnam war: they were provocateurs. > > The list certainly raises (once again) questions of the nature and > provenance of identity politics (the mainstay of the Clinton campaign). > See Adolph Reed's mordant description (expressed I admit in somewhat > clotted prose): > > "[Identity] politics is not an alternative to class politics; it > is a class politics, the politics of the left-wing of neoliberalism. It is > the expression and active agency of a political order and moral economy in > which capitalist market forces are treated as unassailable nature. > "An integral element of that moral economy is displacement of the > critique of the invidious outcomes produced by capitalist class power onto > equally naturalized categories of ascriptive identity that sort us into > groups supposedly defined by what we essentially are rather than what we > do. As I have argued, following Walter Michaels and others, within that > moral economy a society in which 1% of the population controlled 90% of the > resources could be just, provided that roughly 12% of the 1% were black, > 12% were Latino, 50% were women, and whatever the appropriate proportions > were LGBT people. > "It would be tough to imagine a normative ideal that expresses > more unambiguously the social position of people who consider themselves > candidates for inclusion in, or at least significant staff positions in > service to, the ruling class” reed-identity-politics-is-neoliberalism/>. > > It’s difficult to see how a serious critique of US war-making can arise > from identity politics. (Not enough blacks and women among Special Forces > killers?) > It would seem that US war-making arises from domestic and foreign class > conflicts; given that we’ve killed more than 20 million in 37 nations since > WWII, we should be clear about causes. > in-37-nations-since-wwii/>. > > AWARE has seen as its task for 15 years to encourage awareness of how and > why the US government is the greatest purveyor of violence in the world > today. > And to do that we must tell the truth and shame the devil, as Hotspur says. > > I’m not convinced that endorsing these demands contributes to that effort. > —CGE > > > >> On Sep 15, 2016, at 9:53 PM, Karen Medina via Peace < > peace at lists.chambana.net> wrote: > >> > >> Dear Peace-Discuss, > >> > >> At the next AWARE meeting*, I will present the 13 demands of the "Black > Students for Revolution" at UIUC for consideration. BSFRUIUC has asked if > AWARE will sign on to be a community supporter/endorser of the demands. > >> http://www.bsfruiuc.com/our-demands > >> *(I might miss this upcoming meeting, but the next week's meeting then) > >> -- karen medina > >> ------------------------------- > >> 1. WE DEMAND that UIUC immediately and permanently halt tuition hikes. > >> 2. > >> WE DEMAND that the racial and economic demographics of UIUC students, > faculty and staff reflect the racial and economic demographics of Illinois > by 2032. > >> 3. > >> WE DEMAND that all on-campus sexual predators, especially those > affiliated with the Greek Life system, face severe penalties for all forms > of sexual violence. > >> 4. WE DEMAND that UIUC makes a permanent commitment not to consolidate > or combine the LGBT Resource Center and Women’s Resource Center in addition > to the continued autonomy of all cultural centers and ethnic studies > programs. > >> 5. WE DEMAND that UIUC collect and track gender and sexuality based > demographics as an official population. > >> 6. WE DEMAND that queer and trans students be given priority for all > university sponsored all-gendered housing options and that genderqueer and > trans students be offered these spaces at a discounted rate corresponding > with the less expensive standard housing option. > >> 7. WE DEMAND that UIUC hire a truly independent consultant to review > the salaries of all University employees in order to detect and correct > gender and race-based pay inequality > >> 8. WE DEMAND a living wage for all University employees and > subcontracted workers and that this rate be indexed for inflation. > >> 9. WE DEMAND all employees of UIUC have access to at least six months > of paid parental leave following the birth or adoption of a child. > >> 10. WE DEMAND that UIUC cease and desist job outsourcing and hire > directly from underrepresented populations in Urbana-Champaign and the > surrounding communities. > >> 11. WE DEMAND that UIUC work towards bridging the gap between this > campus and the surrounding Black community of Urbana-Champaign. > >> 12. WE DEMAND that UIUC implement fair-chance admissions and employment > policies for those with past conviction records (Ban the Box). > >> 13. WE DEMAND that UIUC release an annual, easily-accessible, and > comprehensive report of all its investments and move to divest from > socially and politically negligent corporations. > >> > >> List of Endorsing Local Organizations > >> ​ > >> • Black Students for Revolution > >> > >> • SJP - Students for Justice in Palestine > >> > >> • Planner’s Network > >> > >> • MEChA - Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan > >> > >> • AASSCC - African American Studies Scholars Cultural Committee > >> > >> • CUTES - Campus Union for Trans Equality and Support > >> > >> • UMMA - United Muslim & Minority Advocates > >> > >> • GEO - Graduate Employees Organization > >> > >> • MSU - Mixed Student Union > >> > >> • Women of Pride > >> > >> • BLM-CU (community) - Black Lives Matter - Champaign Urbana > >> > >> • SACC - Students for an Arab Cultural Center at Illinois > >> > >> • The Gharbzadegi Art Collective > >> > >> • Allies and Accomplices for Racial Justice > >> > >> • Men of Impact* > >> > >> • Students Against Sexual Assault > >> > >> • My Sister’s Keeper* > >> > >> • STEM Boycotts the War Machine > >> > >> • NAISO - Native American and Indigenous Student Organization > >> > >> • SECS - Students for Environmental ConcernS > >> > >> • WORD - Writers Organizing Realistic Dialect > >> > >> • ASA - Arab Student Association > >> > >> • UIUC Beyond Coal > >> > >> • Black Rose/Rosa Negra Central Illinois Chapter > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Peace mailing list > >> Peace at lists.chambana.net > >> https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace > > > > _______________________________________________ > Peace mailing list > Peace at lists.chambana.net > https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From galliher at illinois.edu Sun Sep 18 12:20:23 2016 From: galliher at illinois.edu (Carl G. Estabrook) Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 07:20:23 -0500 Subject: [Peace] AWARE has been asked to consider supporting the 13 demands of the BSFR at UIUC In-Reply-To: References: <908112D8-8292-42F1-9265-F4F3DC74C276@illinois.edu> <5ECD57AA-756F-45C4-BCA2-7EC3520B1FB7@illinois.edu> Message-ID: <7925EF4D-AAC6-4044-AA0A-C28525D09C87@illinois.edu> Harry— 1.) Who organized BSFR and wrote these demands? What are their politics? 2.) Even the 'full text of demand 13’ falls short of AWARE’s call for the end of US offensive military operations, from the Obama-Clinton administration’s attacks on eight countries (Bush only attacked six) to Obama’s drone assassination program, which Noam Chomsky has called “the most extreme terrorist campaign of modern times,” and the activities - in more than half the countries of the world - of the US ’secret army’, the 70,000-member Special Operations Command; for bringing home all US troops abroad; and for the closing of the 1,000 US military bases in foreign countries. Does BSFR endorse AWARE’s demands? Regards, Carl > On Sep 17, 2016, at 11:46 PM, Harry Mickalide wrote: > > Allow me to address two of Carl's concerns. > > 1) The demands are not just being pursued by a loud minority, but are supported by an extensive list of campus organizations which are listed in Karen's original email. The student activist community as a whole has rallied around the list of demands. > > 2) We do not have to speculate if these demands critique US war-making because the full text of demand 13, the divestment demand, explicitly calls on the university to divest from "corporations which actively support or enable states currently carrying out human right’s abuses (e.g., Israel, Saudi Arabia, Myanmar), all private prison corporations, and all private military contractors and weapons manufacturers." > > -Harry > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:35 PM, Carl G. Estabrook via Peace > wrote: > I think we should try to have a serious discussion of this proposal, online and perhaps in several meetings. > > The central question would seem to be, How does it comport with AWARE's antiwar remit? > > But there are obviously other important questions, e.g., What do we know of ‘Black Students for Revolution’? > A severe critic might suggest that a similar list could be circulated by ‘Some Students for Self-Promotion.’ > I’m old enough to remember where the loudest voices for ‘militant action’ came from during the Vietnam war: they were provocateurs. > > The list certainly raises (once again) questions of the nature and provenance of identity politics (the mainstay of the Clinton campaign). > See Adolph Reed's mordant description (expressed I admit in somewhat clotted prose): > > "[Identity] politics is not an alternative to class politics; it is a class politics, the politics of the left-wing of neoliberalism. It is the expression and active agency of a political order and moral economy in which capitalist market forces are treated as unassailable nature. > "An integral element of that moral economy is displacement of the critique of the invidious outcomes produced by capitalist class power onto equally naturalized categories of ascriptive identity that sort us into groups supposedly defined by what we essentially are rather than what we do. As I have argued, following Walter Michaels and others, within that moral economy a society in which 1% of the population controlled 90% of the resources could be just, provided that roughly 12% of the 1% were black, 12% were Latino, 50% were women, and whatever the appropriate proportions were LGBT people. > "It would be tough to imagine a normative ideal that expresses more unambiguously the social position of people who consider themselves candidates for inclusion in, or at least significant staff positions in service to, the ruling class” >. > > It’s difficult to see how a serious critique of US war-making can arise from identity politics. (Not enough blacks and women among Special Forces killers?) > It would seem that US war-making arises from domestic and foreign class conflicts; given that we’ve killed more than 20 million in 37 nations since WWII, we should be clear about causes. > >. > > AWARE has seen as its task for 15 years to encourage awareness of how and why the US government is the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today. > And to do that we must tell the truth and shame the devil, as Hotspur says. > > I’m not convinced that endorsing these demands contributes to that effort. —CGE > > > >> On Sep 15, 2016, at 9:53 PM, Karen Medina via Peace > wrote: > >> > >> Dear Peace-Discuss, > >> > >> At the next AWARE meeting*, I will present the 13 demands of the "Black Students for Revolution" at UIUC for consideration. BSFRUIUC has asked if AWARE will sign on to be a community supporter/endorser of the demands. > >> http://www.bsfruiuc.com/our-demands > >> *(I might miss this upcoming meeting, but the next week's meeting then) > >> -- karen medina > >> ------------------------------- > >> 1. WE DEMAND that UIUC immediately and permanently halt tuition hikes. > >> 2. > >> WE DEMAND that the racial and economic demographics of UIUC students, faculty and staff reflect the racial and economic demographics of Illinois by 2032. > >> 3. > >> WE DEMAND that all on-campus sexual predators, especially those affiliated with the Greek Life system, face severe penalties for all forms of sexual violence. > >> 4. WE DEMAND that UIUC makes a permanent commitment not to consolidate or combine the LGBT Resource Center and Women’s Resource Center in addition to the continued autonomy of all cultural centers and ethnic studies programs. > >> 5. WE DEMAND that UIUC collect and track gender and sexuality based demographics as an official population. > >> 6. WE DEMAND that queer and trans students be given priority for all university sponsored all-gendered housing options and that genderqueer and trans students be offered these spaces at a discounted rate corresponding with the less expensive standard housing option. > >> 7. WE DEMAND that UIUC hire a truly independent consultant to review the salaries of all University employees in order to detect and correct gender and race-based pay inequality > >> 8. WE DEMAND a living wage for all University employees and subcontracted workers and that this rate be indexed for inflation. > >> 9. WE DEMAND all employees of UIUC have access to at least six months of paid parental leave following the birth or adoption of a child. > >> 10. WE DEMAND that UIUC cease and desist job outsourcing and hire directly from underrepresented populations in Urbana-Champaign and the surrounding communities. > >> 11. WE DEMAND that UIUC work towards bridging the gap between this campus and the surrounding Black community of Urbana-Champaign. > >> 12. WE DEMAND that UIUC implement fair-chance admissions and employment policies for those with past conviction records (Ban the Box). > >> 13. WE DEMAND that UIUC release an annual, easily-accessible, and comprehensive report of all its investments and move to divest from socially and politically negligent corporations. > >> > >> List of Endorsing Local Organizations > >> ​ > >> • Black Students for Revolution > >> > >> • SJP - Students for Justice in Palestine > >> > >> • Planner’s Network > >> > >> • MEChA - Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan > >> > >> • AASSCC - African American Studies Scholars Cultural Committee > >> > >> • CUTES - Campus Union for Trans Equality and Support > >> > >> • UMMA - United Muslim & Minority Advocates > >> > >> • GEO - Graduate Employees Organization > >> > >> • MSU - Mixed Student Union > >> > >> • Women of Pride > >> > >> • BLM-CU (community) - Black Lives Matter - Champaign Urbana > >> > >> • SACC - Students for an Arab Cultural Center at Illinois > >> > >> • The Gharbzadegi Art Collective > >> > >> • Allies and Accomplices for Racial Justice > >> > >> • Men of Impact* > >> > >> • Students Against Sexual Assault > >> > >> • My Sister’s Keeper* > >> > >> • STEM Boycotts the War Machine > >> > >> • NAISO - Native American and Indigenous Student Organization > >> > >> • SECS - Students for Environmental ConcernS > >> > >> • WORD - Writers Organizing Realistic Dialect > >> > >> • ASA - Arab Student Association > >> > >> • UIUC Beyond Coal > >> > >> • Black Rose/Rosa Negra Central Illinois Chapter > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Peace mailing list > >> Peace at lists.chambana.net > >> https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace > > > > _______________________________________________ > Peace mailing list > Peace at lists.chambana.net > https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mickalideh at gmail.com Sun Sep 18 17:58:24 2016 From: mickalideh at gmail.com (Harry Mickalide) Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 12:58:24 -0500 Subject: [Peace] AWARE has been asked to consider supporting the 13 demands of the BSFR at UIUC In-Reply-To: <7925EF4D-AAC6-4044-AA0A-C28525D09C87@illinois.edu> References: <908112D8-8292-42F1-9265-F4F3DC74C276@illinois.edu> <5ECD57AA-756F-45C4-BCA2-7EC3520B1FB7@illinois.edu> <7925EF4D-AAC6-4044-AA0A-C28525D09C87@illinois.edu> Message-ID: 1) The demands have been co-written among many groups. One of the lead organizers of the demands is my good friend Muhammad Yousuf, a member of Students for Justice in Palestine who is fiercely critical of America's military. 2) I will ask them if they support this demand and get back to you! On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 7:20 AM, Carl G. Estabrook wrote: > Harry— > > 1.) Who organized BSFR and wrote these demands? What are their politics? > > 2.) Even the 'full text of demand 13’ falls short of AWARE’s call for the > end of US offensive military operations, from the Obama-Clinton > administration’s attacks on eight countries (Bush only attacked six) to > Obama’s drone assassination program, which Noam Chomsky has called “the > most extreme terrorist campaign of modern times,” and the activities - in > more than half the countries of the world - of the US ’secret army’, the > 70,000-member Special Operations Command; for bringing home all US troops > abroad; and for the closing of the 1,000 US military bases in foreign > countries. > > Does BSFR endorse AWARE’s demands? > > Regards, Carl > > > On Sep 17, 2016, at 11:46 PM, Harry Mickalide > wrote: > > Allow me to address two of Carl's concerns. > > 1) The demands are not just being pursued by a loud minority, but are > supported by an extensive list of campus organizations which are listed in > Karen's original email. The student activist community as a whole has > rallied around the list of demands. > > 2) We do not have to speculate if these demands critique US war-making > because the full text > of > demand 13, the divestment demand, explicitly calls on the university to > divest from "corporations which actively support or enable states > currently carrying out human right’s abuses (e.g., Israel, Saudi Arabia, > Myanmar), all private prison corporations, and all private military > contractors and weapons manufacturers." > > -Harry > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:35 PM, Carl G. Estabrook via Peace < > peace at lists.chambana.net> wrote: > >> I think we should try to have a serious discussion of this proposal, >> online and perhaps in several meetings. >> >> The central question would seem to be, How does it comport with AWARE's >> antiwar remit? >> >> But there are obviously other important questions, e.g., What do we know >> of ‘Black Students for Revolution’? >> A severe critic might suggest that a similar list could be circulated by >> ‘Some Students for Self-Promotion.’ >> I’m old enough to remember where the loudest voices for ‘militant action’ >> came from during the Vietnam war: they were provocateurs. >> >> The list certainly raises (once again) questions of the nature and >> provenance of identity politics (the mainstay of the Clinton campaign). >> See Adolph Reed's mordant description (expressed I admit in somewhat >> clotted prose): >> >> "[Identity] politics is not an alternative to class politics; it >> is a class politics, the politics of the left-wing of neoliberalism. It is >> the expression and active agency of a political order and moral economy in >> which capitalist market forces are treated as unassailable nature. >> "An integral element of that moral economy is displacement of the >> critique of the invidious outcomes produced by capitalist class power onto >> equally naturalized categories of ascriptive identity that sort us into >> groups supposedly defined by what we essentially are rather than what we >> do. As I have argued, following Walter Michaels and others, within that >> moral economy a society in which 1% of the population controlled 90% of the >> resources could be just, provided that roughly 12% of the 1% were black, >> 12% were Latino, 50% were women, and whatever the appropriate proportions >> were LGBT people. >> "It would be tough to imagine a normative ideal that expresses >> more unambiguously the social position of people who consider themselves >> candidates for inclusion in, or at least significant staff positions in >> service to, the ruling class” > eed-identity-politics-is-neoliberalism/ >> >> >. >> >> It’s difficult to see how a serious critique of US war-making can arise >> from identity politics. (Not enough blacks and women among Special Forces >> killers?) >> It would seem that US war-making arises from domestic and foreign class >> conflicts; given that we’ve killed more than 20 million in 37 nations since >> WWII, we should be clear about causes. >> > 20-million-in-37-nations-since-wwii/ >> >> >. >> >> AWARE has seen as its task for 15 years to encourage awareness of how and >> why the US government is the greatest purveyor of violence in the world >> today. >> And to do that we must tell the truth and shame the devil, as Hotspur >> says. >> >> I’m not convinced that endorsing these demands contributes to that >> effort. —CGE >> >> >> >> On Sep 15, 2016, at 9:53 PM, Karen Medina via Peace < >> peace at lists.chambana.net> wrote: >> >> >> >> Dear Peace-Discuss, >> >> >> >> At the next AWARE meeting*, I will present the 13 demands of the >> "Black Students for Revolution" at UIUC for consideration. BSFRUIUC has >> asked if AWARE will sign on to be a community supporter/endorser of the >> demands. >> >> http://www.bsfruiuc.com/our-demands >> >> >> *(I might miss this upcoming meeting, but the next week's meeting then) >> >> -- karen medina >> >> ------------------------------- >> >> 1. WE DEMAND that UIUC immediately and permanently halt tuition hikes. >> >> 2. >> >> WE DEMAND that the racial and economic demographics of UIUC students, >> faculty and staff reflect the racial and economic demographics of Illinois >> by 2032. >> >> 3. >> >> WE DEMAND that all on-campus sexual predators, especially those >> affiliated with the Greek Life system, face severe penalties for all forms >> of sexual violence. >> >> 4. WE DEMAND that UIUC makes a permanent commitment not to consolidate >> or combine the LGBT Resource Center and Women’s Resource Center in addition >> to the continued autonomy of all cultural centers and ethnic studies >> programs. >> >> 5. WE DEMAND that UIUC collect and track gender and sexuality based >> demographics as an official population. >> >> 6. WE DEMAND that queer and trans students be given priority for all >> university sponsored all-gendered housing options and that genderqueer and >> trans students be offered these spaces at a discounted rate corresponding >> with the less expensive standard housing option. >> >> 7. WE DEMAND that UIUC hire a truly independent consultant to review >> the salaries of all University employees in order to detect and correct >> gender and race-based pay inequality >> >> 8. WE DEMAND a living wage for all University employees and >> subcontracted workers and that this rate be indexed for inflation. >> >> 9. WE DEMAND all employees of UIUC have access to at least six months >> of paid parental leave following the birth or adoption of a child. >> >> 10. WE DEMAND that UIUC cease and desist job outsourcing and hire >> directly from underrepresented populations in Urbana-Champaign and the >> surrounding communities. >> >> 11. WE DEMAND that UIUC work towards bridging the gap between this >> campus and the surrounding Black community of Urbana-Champaign. >> >> 12. WE DEMAND that UIUC implement fair-chance admissions and >> employment policies for those with past conviction records (Ban the Box). >> >> 13. WE DEMAND that UIUC release an annual, easily-accessible, and >> comprehensive report of all its investments and move to divest from >> socially and politically negligent corporations. >> >> >> >> List of Endorsing Local Organizations >> >> ​ >> >> • Black Students for Revolution >> >> >> >> • SJP - Students for Justice in Palestine >> >> >> >> • Planner’s Network >> >> >> >> • MEChA - Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan >> >> >> >> • AASSCC - African American Studies Scholars Cultural Committee >> >> >> >> • CUTES - Campus Union for Trans Equality and Support >> >> >> >> • UMMA - United Muslim & Minority Advocates >> >> >> >> • GEO - Graduate Employees Organization >> >> >> >> • MSU - Mixed Student Union >> >> >> >> • Women of Pride >> >> >> >> • BLM-CU (community) - Black Lives Matter - Champaign Urbana >> >> >> >> • SACC - Students for an Arab Cultural Center at Illinois >> >> >> >> • The Gharbzadegi Art Collective >> >> >> >> • Allies and Accomplices for Racial Justice >> >> >> >> • Men of Impact* >> >> >> >> • Students Against Sexual Assault >> >> >> >> • My Sister’s Keeper* >> >> >> >> • STEM Boycotts the War Machine >> >> >> >> • NAISO - Native American and Indigenous Student Organization >> >> >> >> • SECS - Students for Environmental ConcernS >> >> >> >> • WORD - Writers Organizing Realistic Dialect >> >> >> >> • ASA - Arab Student Association >> >> >> >> • UIUC Beyond Coal >> >> >> >> • Black Rose/Rosa Negra Central Illinois Chapter >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Peace mailing list >> >> Peace at lists.chambana.net >> >> https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace >> >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Peace mailing list >> Peace at lists.chambana.net >> https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace >> >> > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From carl at newsfromneptune.com Sun Sep 18 18:03:18 2016 From: carl at newsfromneptune.com (C. G. Estabrook) Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 13:03:18 -0500 Subject: [Peace] AWARE has been asked to consider supporting the 13 demands of the BSFR at UIUC In-Reply-To: <00fd01d211c3$37c97450$a75c5cf0$@comcast.net> References: <908112D8-8292-42F1-9265-F4F3DC74C276@illinois.edu> <5ECD57AA-756F-45C4-BCA2-7EC3520B1FB7@illinois.edu> <002a01d210e8$54cb4370$fe61ca50$@comcast.net> <00fd01d211c3$37c97450$a75c5cf0$@comcast.net> Message-ID: <2F770B4C-7D53-4473-B519-9CC6F97956FD@newsfromneptune.com> David— You suggest that "AWARE has gained a reputation of being aloof from the community.” That’s true if and only if the community is taken to be represented by Democratic liberals from Tammy Duckworth thru Mark Wicklund to Carol Ammons. AWARE rejects their objective support for Bush-Obama-Clinton war-making (see e.g. >). AWARE has claimed from its inception to represent the real interests of our neighbors in opposing the Bush-Obama government's ongoing wars and the racism they inspire. AWARE has criticized the disingenuous assertion of identity politics that the issue is a free-floating problem of race relations, unconnected to the economy and war - a view that serves to defend neoliberal economics and neocon war, which have characterized both administrations - and also probably the next. The major historical parallel is adduced by the historian Barbara Fields: "Probably a majority of American historians think of slavery in the United States as primarily a system of race relations—as though the chief business of slavery were the production of white supremacy rather than the production of cotton, sugar, rice and tobacco. One historian has gone so far as to call slavery ‘the ultimate segregator’. He does not ask why Europeans seeking the ‘ultimate’ method of segregating Africans would go to the trouble and expense of transporting them across the ocean for that purpose, when they could have achieved the same end so much more simply by leaving the Africans in Africa. No one dreams of analysing the struggle of the English against the Irish as a problem in race relations, even though the rationale that the English developed for suppressing the ‘barbarous’ Irish later served nearly word for word as a rationale for suppressing Africans and indigenous American Indians. Nor does anyone dream of analysing serfdom in Russia as primarily a problem of race relations, even though the Russian nobility invented fictions of their innate, natural superiority over the serfs as preposterous as any devised by American racists." The question is whether endorsement of these demands advances AWARE’s anti-war anti-racism program. It may, but I’m not convinced it does; it may serve as a distraction. —CGE > On Sep 18, 2016, at 10:42 AM, David Johnson wrote: > > Gus Wood is one of the founding members. > > They organized last Fall 2015 > > They have repeatedly in their public speeches ( the founding rally last Fall and the more recent May Day rally ) have specifically spoke out against capitalism, austerity, police militarization, and racism / white supremacy ( and made a specific clear distinction between white supremacy and being " anti-white " ). > > Of the individuals I know in the group who are the main founders and organizers, they are all anti-war. > > Do we want to split hairs here as to if they represent / advocate for ALL of AWARE's demands or do we find common ground with the fact that they share almost all of our values and goals. Anti-authoritarian, anti racist and anti capitalist. > > After all, part of AWARE's name is " anti-racism ". > > The concern about supporting liberal identity politics group is a legitimate concern, as those of you know me, know that I hate liberal identity politics, and I wouldn't be asking this of AWARE if I didn't think they were deserving of support. > Also, for whatever reason, AWARE has gained a reputation of being aloof from the community. An endorsement of the black Students for Revolution ( primarily for the reasons I stated above ) would help greatly in countering that misconception. > > Do what you want, but in my humble opinion, this would be a good move. > > David Johnson > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Carl G. Estabrook [mailto:galliher at illinois.edu] > Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2016 8:56 AM > To: David Johnson > Cc: davegreen84 at yahoo.com; karenaram at hotmail.com; kmedina67 at gmail.com; Ron Szoke; stuartnlevy at gmail.com; salevy at illinois.edu > Subject: Re: [Peace] AWARE has been asked to consider supporting the 13 demands of the BSFR at UIUC > > Who are they and what's their history? > > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Sep 17, 2016, at 8:35 AM, David Johnson wrote: >> >> Black Students for Revolution is NOT an Identity Politics organization ! >> >> I have been conversing and interacting with many of the students in this organization for some time now. >> >> They are unabashed ANTI-CAPITALISTS ! >> >> They have stated this publicly on many occasions, in particular at the recent May Day rally on campus. >> >> The following demands in the list also indicates that they are class >> based ; >> >>>> 1. WE DEMAND that UIUC immediately and permanently halt tuition hikes. >>>> 2. >> WE DEMAND that the racial and ECONOMIC demographics of UIUC students, faculty and staff reflect the racial and ECONOMIC demographics of Illinois by 2032. >> 8. WE DEMAND a living wage for all University employees and subcontracted workers and that this rate be indexed for inflation. >>>> 9. WE DEMAND all employees of UIUC have access to at least six months of paid parental leave following the birth or adoption of a child. >>>> 10. WE DEMAND that UIUC cease and desist job outsourcing and hire directly from underrepresented populations in Urbana-Champaign and the surrounding communities. >>>> 11. WE DEMAND that UIUC work towards bridging the gap between this campus and the surrounding Black community of Urbana-Champaign. >>>> 12. WE DEMAND that UIUC implement fair-chance admissions and employment policies for those with past conviction records (Ban the Box). >>>> 13. WE DEMAND that UIUC release an annual, easily-accessible, and comprehensive report of all its investments and move to divest from socially and politically negligent corporations. >> >> They of course advocate for African American rights, which is understandable, but they do NOT just focus on that, like an identity politics organization would. As you see they have at it's core a class based economic agenda / demands. >> >> They also as an organization have worked and supported the rights of the Palestinian people and the local U of I organization " Students for Justice in Palestine. >> >> This is called " CLASS based intersectionality " as opposed to JUST intersectionality with NO class base, which is merely a smogasboard of identity politics groups. >> BIG difference ! >> >> For the reasons stated above, I think we SHOULD endorse the Black Students for Revolution. >> >> I hate identity politics , in particular how it is used by neo-liberals to divide us, and I would not advocate for any organization that was not class based and anti-capitalist and anti war. >> Remember, police militarization and brutality is the counterpart of the policy of endless war. >> >> David Johnson >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Peace [mailto:peace-bounces at lists.chambana.net] On Behalf Of >> Carl G. Estabrook via Peace >> Sent: Friday, September 16, 2016 10:35 PM >> To: Peace-discuss List >> Cc: Brussel, Morton K; Karen Medina; peace >> Subject: Re: [Peace] AWARE has been asked to consider supporting the >> 13 demands of the BSFR at UIUC >> >> I think we should try to have a serious discussion of this proposal, online and perhaps in several meetings. >> >> The central question would seem to be, How does it comport with AWARE's antiwar remit? >> >> But there are obviously other important questions, e.g., What do we know of ‘Black Students for Revolution’? >> A severe critic might suggest that a similar list could be circulated by ‘Some Students for Self-Promotion.’ >> I’m old enough to remember where the loudest voices for ‘militant action’ came from during the Vietnam war: they were provocateurs. >> >> The list certainly raises (once again) questions of the nature and provenance of identity politics (the mainstay of the Clinton campaign). >> See Adolph Reed's mordant description (expressed I admit in somewhat clotted prose): >> >> "[Identity] politics is not an alternative to class politics; it is a class politics, the politics of the left-wing of neoliberalism. It is the expression and active agency of a political order and moral economy in which capitalist market forces are treated as unassailable nature. >> "An integral element of that moral economy is displacement of the critique of the invidious outcomes produced by capitalist class power onto equally naturalized categories of ascriptive identity that sort us into groups supposedly defined by what we essentially are rather than what we do. As I have argued, following Walter Michaels and others, within that moral economy a society in which 1% of the population controlled 90% of the resources could be just, provided that roughly 12% of the 1% were black, 12% were Latino, 50% were women, and whatever the appropriate proportions were LGBT people. >> "It would be tough to imagine a normative ideal that expresses more unambiguously the social position of people who consider themselves candidates for inclusion in, or at least significant staff positions in service to, the ruling class” . >> >> It’s difficult to see how a serious critique of US war-making can arise from identity politics. (Not enough blacks and women among Special Forces killers?) It would seem that US war-making arises from domestic and foreign class conflicts; given that we’ve killed more than 20 million in 37 nations since WWII, we should be clear about causes. >> . >> >> AWARE has seen as its task for 15 years to encourage awareness of how and why the US government is the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today. >> And to do that we must tell the truth and shame the devil, as Hotspur says. >> >> I’m not convinced that endorsing these demands contributes to that >> effort. —CGE >> >> >>>> On Sep 15, 2016, at 9:53 PM, Karen Medina via Peace wrote: >>>> >>>> Dear Peace-Discuss, >>>> >>>> At the next AWARE meeting*, I will present the 13 demands of the "Black Students for Revolution" at UIUC for consideration. BSFRUIUC has asked if AWARE will sign on to be a community supporter/endorser of the demands. >>>> http://www.bsfruiuc.com/our-demands >>>> *(I might miss this upcoming meeting, but the next week's meeting >>>> then) >>>> -- karen medina >>>> ------------------------------- >>>> 1. WE DEMAND that UIUC immediately and permanently halt tuition hikes. >>>> 2. >>>> WE DEMAND that the racial and economic demographics of UIUC students, faculty and staff reflect the racial and economic demographics of Illinois by 2032. >>>> 3. >>>> WE DEMAND that all on-campus sexual predators, especially those affiliated with the Greek Life system, face severe penalties for all forms of sexual violence. >>>> 4. WE DEMAND that UIUC makes a permanent commitment not to consolidate or combine the LGBT Resource Center and Women’s Resource Center in addition to the continued autonomy of all cultural centers and ethnic studies programs. >>>> 5. WE DEMAND that UIUC collect and track gender and sexuality based demographics as an official population. >>>> 6. WE DEMAND that queer and trans students be given priority for all university sponsored all-gendered housing options and that genderqueer and trans students be offered these spaces at a discounted rate corresponding with the less expensive standard housing option. >>>> 7. WE DEMAND that UIUC hire a truly independent consultant to review >>>> the salaries of all University employees in order to detect and correct gender and race-based pay inequality 8. WE DEMAND a living wage for all University employees and subcontracted workers and that this rate be indexed for inflation. >>>> 9. WE DEMAND all employees of UIUC have access to at least six months of paid parental leave following the birth or adoption of a child. >>>> 10. WE DEMAND that UIUC cease and desist job outsourcing and hire directly from underrepresented populations in Urbana-Champaign and the surrounding communities. >>>> 11. WE DEMAND that UIUC work towards bridging the gap between this campus and the surrounding Black community of Urbana-Champaign. >>>> 12. WE DEMAND that UIUC implement fair-chance admissions and employment policies for those with past conviction records (Ban the Box). >>>> 13. WE DEMAND that UIUC release an annual, easily-accessible, and comprehensive report of all its investments and move to divest from socially and politically negligent corporations. >>>> >>>> List of Endorsing Local Organizations ​ >>>> • Black Students for Revolution >>>> >>>> • SJP - Students for Justice in Palestine >>>> >>>> • Planner’s Network >>>> >>>> • MEChA - Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan >>>> >>>> • AASSCC - African American Studies Scholars Cultural Committee >>>> >>>> • CUTES - Campus Union for Trans Equality and Support >>>> >>>> • UMMA - United Muslim & Minority Advocates >>>> >>>> • GEO - Graduate Employees Organization >>>> >>>> • MSU - Mixed Student Union >>>> >>>> • Women of Pride >>>> >>>> • BLM-CU (community) - Black Lives Matter - Champaign Urbana >>>> >>>> • SACC - Students for an Arab Cultural Center at Illinois >>>> >>>> • The Gharbzadegi Art Collective >>>> >>>> • Allies and Accomplices for Racial Justice >>>> >>>> • Men of Impact* >>>> >>>> • Students Against Sexual Assault >>>> >>>> • My Sister’s Keeper* >>>> >>>> • STEM Boycotts the War Machine >>>> >>>> • NAISO - Native American and Indigenous Student Organization >>>> >>>> • SECS - Students for Environmental ConcernS >>>> >>>> • WORD - Writers Organizing Realistic Dialect >>>> >>>> • ASA - Arab Student Association >>>> >>>> • UIUC Beyond Coal >>>> >>>> • Black Rose/Rosa Negra Central Illinois Chapter >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Peace mailing list >>>> Peace at lists.chambana.net >>>> https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Peace mailing list >> Peace at lists.chambana.net >> https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace >> > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naiman at justforeignpolicy.org Mon Sep 19 00:55:26 2016 From: naiman at justforeignpolicy.org (Robert Naiman) Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 19:55:26 -0500 Subject: [Peace] Monday: Support Urbana stand against Dakota Access Pipeline Message-ID: We sent this out to ~ 200 people on our list within 10 miles of 61801. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Robert Naiman, Just Foreign Policy Date: Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 7:32 PM Subject: Monday: Support Urbana stand against Dakota Access Pipeline To: naiman at justforeignpolicy.org [image: Just Foreign Policy] Dear Robert, *Support Urbana taking a stand against the Dakota Access Pipeline.* *Attend the meeting Sign our petition * Monday evening, September 19, the Urbana City Council will consider a resolution against the Dakota Access Pipeline. You can read the draft resolution *here* . Please come out, if you can, to support Urbana Mayor Laurel Prussing and the Urbana City Council in taking this action. *There is a sign-up here.* Or you can just reply to this email to let me know you might be able to come. Please *sign and share our MoveOn petition* to the Council in support of this action. Here's some reasons why this is important: 1. There's going to be media coverage. More people in support = better media coverage. 2. We want to set a strong precedent. We want to encourage other local governments and local institutions to take a similar stand. A strong showing in Urbana will set a good precedent and give us momentum for future actions. 3. It's a chance to tell your story against the pipeline to a bunch of people who won't hear it otherwise: the people in the room, and the people watching the meeting on TV. Please join us at 6:30 to greet people with #NoDAPL signs as they come into the meeting. Some helpful things to know about public participation at the Urbana City Council meeting: 1. Public participation is right at the beginning of the meeting. It's helpful to be there before 7 so you can sign in to participate. 2. In order to participate, you have to fill out one of the public participation yellow slips and hand it to the City Clerk. 3. You can participate without speaking in front of the Council. You can just mark on the form that you want to be recorded in support of the resolution and hand the resolution to the City Clerk. It will be announced that X people recorded themselves in support. If it's like last week, the number of people who recorded themselves in support will be reported in the press. 4. You don't have the stay for the whole meeting if you don't want to or can't. If you need to leave after the public participation period is over, that's fine. Please *join us if you can* . And, either way, *please sign and share our petition* . Thanks for all you do to help make America more just, Robert Naiman Just Foreign Policy *Help support our work!* If you think our work is important, support us with a $15 donation. http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/donate [image: Please support our work. Donate for a Just Foreign Policy] © 2016 Just Foreign Policy -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From karenaram at hotmail.com Mon Sep 19 15:09:43 2016 From: karenaram at hotmail.com (Karen Aram) Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 15:09:43 +0000 Subject: [Peace] AWARE has been asked to consider supporting the 13 demands of the BSFR at UIUC In-Reply-To: References: <908112D8-8292-42F1-9265-F4F3DC74C276@illinois.edu> <5ECD57AA-756F-45C4-BCA2-7EC3520B1FB7@illinois.edu> Message-ID: I’m only now seeing the full text of the “demands” given so much is buried amongst other emails, and I’m a little slow with technology. I was only viewing the list that Karen Medina submitted below, not seeing the website that she also provided. It does provide a better understanding of intent if nothing else. On Sep 17, 2016, at 21:46, Harry Mickalide via Peace > wrote: Allow me to address two of Carl's concerns. 1) The demands are not just being pursued by a loud minority, but are supported by an extensive list of campus organizations which are listed in Karen's original email. The student activist community as a whole has rallied around the list of demands. 2) We do not have to speculate if these demands critique US war-making because the full text of demand 13, the divestment demand, explicitly calls on the university to divest from "corporations which actively support or enable states currently carrying out human right’s abuses (e.g., Israel, Saudi Arabia, Myanmar), all private prison corporations, and all private military contractors and weapons manufacturers." -Harry On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:35 PM, Carl G. Estabrook via Peace > wrote: I think we should try to have a serious discussion of this proposal, online and perhaps in several meetings. The central question would seem to be, How does it comport with AWARE's antiwar remit? But there are obviously other important questions, e.g., What do we know of ‘Black Students for Revolution’? A severe critic might suggest that a similar list could be circulated by ‘Some Students for Self-Promotion.’ I’m old enough to remember where the loudest voices for ‘militant action’ came from during the Vietnam war: they were provocateurs. The list certainly raises (once again) questions of the nature and provenance of identity politics (the mainstay of the Clinton campaign). See Adolph Reed's mordant description (expressed I admit in somewhat clotted prose): "[Identity] politics is not an alternative to class politics; it is a class politics, the politics of the left-wing of neoliberalism. It is the expression and active agency of a political order and moral economy in which capitalist market forces are treated as unassailable nature. "An integral element of that moral economy is displacement of the critique of the invidious outcomes produced by capitalist class power onto equally naturalized categories of ascriptive identity that sort us into groups supposedly defined by what we essentially are rather than what we do. As I have argued, following Walter Michaels and others, within that moral economy a society in which 1% of the population controlled 90% of the resources could be just, provided that roughly 12% of the 1% were black, 12% were Latino, 50% were women, and whatever the appropriate proportions were LGBT people. "It would be tough to imagine a normative ideal that expresses more unambiguously the social position of people who consider themselves candidates for inclusion in, or at least significant staff positions in service to, the ruling class” . It’s difficult to see how a serious critique of US war-making can arise from identity politics. (Not enough blacks and women among Special Forces killers?) It would seem that US war-making arises from domestic and foreign class conflicts; given that we’ve killed more than 20 million in 37 nations since WWII, we should be clear about causes. . AWARE has seen as its task for 15 years to encourage awareness of how and why the US government is the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today. And to do that we must tell the truth and shame the devil, as Hotspur says. I’m not convinced that endorsing these demands contributes to that effort. —CGE >> On Sep 15, 2016, at 9:53 PM, Karen Medina via Peace > wrote: >> >> Dear Peace-Discuss, >> >> At the next AWARE meeting*, I will present the 13 demands of the "Black Students for Revolution" at UIUC for consideration. BSFRUIUC has asked if AWARE will sign on to be a community supporter/endorser of the demands. >> http://www.bsfruiuc.com/our-demands >> *(I might miss this upcoming meeting, but the next week's meeting then) >> -- karen medina >> ------------------------------- >> 1. WE DEMAND that UIUC immediately and permanently halt tuition hikes. >> 2. >> WE DEMAND that the racial and economic demographics of UIUC students, faculty and staff reflect the racial and economic demographics of Illinois by 2032. >> 3. >> WE DEMAND that all on-campus sexual predators, especially those affiliated with the Greek Life system, face severe penalties for all forms of sexual violence. >> 4. WE DEMAND that UIUC makes a permanent commitment not to consolidate or combine the LGBT Resource Center and Women’s Resource Center in addition to the continued autonomy of all cultural centers and ethnic studies programs. >> 5. WE DEMAND that UIUC collect and track gender and sexuality based demographics as an official population. >> 6. WE DEMAND that queer and trans students be given priority for all university sponsored all-gendered housing options and that genderqueer and trans students be offered these spaces at a discounted rate corresponding with the less expensive standard housing option. >> 7. WE DEMAND that UIUC hire a truly independent consultant to review the salaries of all University employees in order to detect and correct gender and race-based pay inequality >> 8. WE DEMAND a living wage for all University employees and subcontracted workers and that this rate be indexed for inflation. >> 9. WE DEMAND all employees of UIUC have access to at least six months of paid parental leave following the birth or adoption of a child. >> 10. WE DEMAND that UIUC cease and desist job outsourcing and hire directly from underrepresented populations in Urbana-Champaign and the surrounding communities. >> 11. WE DEMAND that UIUC work towards bridging the gap between this campus and the surrounding Black community of Urbana-Champaign. >> 12. WE DEMAND that UIUC implement fair-chance admissions and employment policies for those with past conviction records (Ban the Box). >> 13. WE DEMAND that UIUC release an annual, easily-accessible, and comprehensive report of all its investments and move to divest from socially and politically negligent corporations. >> >> List of Endorsing Local Organizations >> ​ >> • Black Students for Revolution >> >> • SJP - Students for Justice in Palestine >> >> • Planner’s Network >> >> • MEChA - Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan >> >> • AASSCC - African American Studies Scholars Cultural Committee >> >> • CUTES - Campus Union for Trans Equality and Support >> >> • UMMA - United Muslim & Minority Advocates >> >> • GEO - Graduate Employees Organization >> >> • MSU - Mixed Student Union >> >> • Women of Pride >> >> • BLM-CU (community) - Black Lives Matter - Champaign Urbana >> >> • SACC - Students for an Arab Cultural Center at Illinois >> >> • The Gharbzadegi Art Collective >> >> • Allies and Accomplices for Racial Justice >> >> • Men of Impact* >> >> • Students Against Sexual Assault >> >> • My Sister’s Keeper* >> >> • STEM Boycotts the War Machine >> >> • NAISO - Native American and Indigenous Student Organization >> >> • SECS - Students for Environmental ConcernS >> >> • WORD - Writers Organizing Realistic Dialect >> >> • ASA - Arab Student Association >> >> • UIUC Beyond Coal >> >> • Black Rose/Rosa Negra Central Illinois Chapter >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Peace mailing list >> Peace at lists.chambana.net >> https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace > _______________________________________________ Peace mailing list Peace at lists.chambana.net https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace _______________________________________________ Peace mailing list Peace at lists.chambana.net https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naiman at justforeignpolicy.org Mon Sep 19 16:16:25 2016 From: naiman at justforeignpolicy.org (Robert Naiman) Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 11:16:25 -0500 Subject: [Peace] please call Mark Kirk today against Saudi arms deal! Message-ID: To get to 51 - that's what we need to pass this resolution - we need five Republicans, even if we get every Senate Democrat. Which we probably won't. If it's like the cluster bomb vote in the House, we get 90% of Democrats and 20% of Republicans. We need five, six, seven Republicans. We have Rand Paul. We have Mike Lee. Maybe we get Jerry Moran from Kansas. We need Mark Kirk. Call him now. Takes 15 seconds. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Robert Naiman, Just Foreign Policy Date: Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 11:11 AM Subject: Saudi arms deal - your Senate calls are making a difference! To: naiman.uiuc at gmail.com [image: Just Foreign Policy] Dear Robert, A vote on the Paul-Murphy-Lee-Franken resolution to disapprove the Saudi arms deal is expected as early as *Tuesday*. Senator Murphy's office told us that they are hearing interest from other Senate offices about the resolution, because they're getting phone calls about it. We're getting through. But we're reaching towards 51 votes, in a Senate that only has 46 Democrats. That's why we need more phone calls. *Call Sen. Mark Kirk now at (202) 224-2854 <%28202%29%20224-2854>.* When you reach a staffer or leave a message, you can say something like: "I urge you to vote YES on SJ Res 39, the Paul-Murphy-Lee-Franken resolution to disapprove the Saudi arms deal." When you've made your call, *please report it here .* Human Rights Watch says hundreds of civilians—including at least 200 children—have been killed so far in U.S.-enabled unlawful Saudi airstrikes in Yemen. But despite extensive documentation by Human Rights Watch of these violations, the US continues to fuel the conflict. After selling over $20 billion dollars in weapons to Saudi Arabia in 2015, some in Washington want to add another $1.15 billion dollars in arms sales. That why Human Rights Watch is calling on the Senate to pass the Paul-Murphy-Lee-Franken resolution. *Call Sen. Mark Kirk at (202) 224-2854 <%28202%29%20224-2854> now*. Report your call *here *. After you've made your call, please read and share my strategy piece this morning in LobeLog: Contesting the U.S.-Saudi Bromance With 1,000 Cuts Thanks for all you do to help make U.S. foreign policy more just, Robert Naiman Just Foreign Policy *Help support our work!* If you think our work is important, support us with a $15 donation. http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/donate [image: Please support our work. Donate for a Just Foreign Policy] © 2016 Just Foreign Policy -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kmedina67 at gmail.com Mon Sep 19 19:34:57 2016 From: kmedina67 at gmail.com (Karen Medina) Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 14:34:57 -0500 Subject: [Peace] donate gently used items to Channing-Murray "Trivia Night" fundraiser Message-ID: Dear Peace, Channing-Murray Foundation is having a "Trivia Night" fundraiser. Saturday, September 24, 2016 7pm $5 per person / $4 per student (I guess they are not persons) Do you have some gently used items that you would like to go to a good cause? Please consider donating them to the Channing-Murray. Channing-Murray has an upcoming Trivia Night fundraiser and needs prizes to give away to the participants. But wait, why am I posting this to the Peace List? * Channing-Murray and the anti-war movement go way back, back to the 1960s. * Channing-Murray is uniquely situated close enough to campus to bring in students yet connected to the very roots of the community of Champaign Urbana. * Channing-Murray's dedication to supporting social action is well-known. The Channing-Murray depends on donations and community support. Please consider donating items for the Trivia Night. Event invitation: https://www.facebook.com/events/1353420378019969/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From deb.pdamerica at gmail.com Tue Sep 20 10:53:32 2016 From: deb.pdamerica at gmail.com (Debra Schrishuhn) Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 05:53:32 -0500 Subject: [Peace] Medea Benjamin book signing event in Champaign Message-ID: Central Illinois chapter of Progressive Democrats of America is hosting CODEPINK Co-Founder and author Medea Benjamin at a book signing for her new book, Kingdom of the Unjust: the U.S.-Saudi Connection, 4:00-5:30 pm on Saturday, Nov. 5, at McKinley Presbyterian Church in Champaign. It is a free event, and we welcome any organization or individual who wishes to co-sponsor with us. Please contact me at deb at pdamerica.org to co-sponsor. Thanks, Deb From naiman at justforeignpolicy.org Tue Sep 20 15:42:34 2016 From: naiman at justforeignpolicy.org (Robert Naiman) Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:42:34 -0500 Subject: [Peace] Oxfam: help Yemen, call your Senator today against Saudi arms deal Message-ID: *The Hill* said last night that a vote is expected Wednesday. The first time you use the Oxfam call tool, it connects you with your Senator who's a better prospect to support (Durbin, in our case.) The second time, it connects you with your other Senator (Kirk, in our case.) So, if you use the Oxfam call tool twice, you are one who "deserves the love and thanks of man and woman," as Tom Paine put it. "These are the times that try men's souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands by it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman." - Tom Paine, "The Crisis," December 1776 Robert Naiman Policy Director Just Foreign Policy www.justforeignpolicy.org naiman at justforeignpolicy.org (202) 448-2898 x1 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Mason Weintraub, Oxfam America Action Fund Date: Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 3:36 PM Subject: If you do one thing today, help Yemen To: Robert Naiman If the Senate doesn't act, $1.15 BILLION in tanks and weapons of war to Saudi Arabia that will be used to fuel the war in Yemen. [image: masthead] [image: Oxfam America] *Robert, urgent action needed now: call your Senators and ask them to OPPOSE the arms deal that will fuel the humanitarian crisis in Yemen.* Your call could save lives. The Senate may vote as soon as TOMORROW so there's no time to waste. *Text "Yemen" to 97779 so we can route your call. * If you aren't able to call on Monday, please try on Tuesday! Robert, I'm going to cut right to the chase: just a few minutes of your time today could help save innocent lives in Yemen. Yemen is facing one of the biggest humanitarian crises in the world where *over 80% of the population needs immediate life-saving aid.* After over a year of war, the the situation is only getting worse. Thousands of civilians have been killed and millions have been forced from their homes. *But the worst could be yet to come.* The Senate is now considering an arms sale to Saudi Arabia that would provide *even more* ammunition to carry out fighting in Yemen. *The $1.15 BILLION sale, which includes tanks and weapons of war, shows the world that the US isn't serious about ending the conflict in Yemen.* The Senate will vote on the deal as early as tomorrow. *That means that we only have a matter of HOURS to convince our Senators to BLOCK the deal!* Please, Robert, if you do one thing today to support Oxfam and people living in poverty, make it this: *raise your voice now and tell your Senators to OPPOSE the sale of weapons to Saudi Arabia and to support peace in Yemen.* *All you have to do is text "Yemen" to 97779 to be automatically connected to your Senator's office. * Once you're connected, you'll hear some quick tips about what to say during your call. We've also included these tips below in case you prefer to read off your screen: - Hi, I am a constituent in your state and I am calling to ask you to do more to stop the violence in Yemen. - The war in Yemen has killed thousands of people and more than four out of five Yemenis are in need of immediate, life-saving humanitarian aid. - The US's support of the Saudi-led coalition is enabling the war in Yemen and fueling its humanitarian crisis. - Please co-sponsor S.J. Resolution 32, the Murphy-Paul resolution to disapprove of the proposed foreign military sale to Saudi Arabia and support all efforts to bring peace to Yemen. We need to convince each Senator to oppose the deal, and hearing from you will make a big difference. *Please call now! Just text "Yemen" to 97779 to start your call.* If you can't find the time to make your call on Monday afternoon, please try Tuesday morning! *As long as American tanks and bombs are involved in the conflict, the humanitarian crisis will escalate and more lives will be lost.* Thank you for speaking out on behalf of those caught up in this terrible violence. Sincerely, Mason Weintraub Digital Engagement Director P.S. Thank you if you already made your call! If you haven't already, please call twice so that you can reach both of your Senators. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naiman at justforeignpolicy.org Wed Sep 21 00:19:38 2016 From: naiman at justforeignpolicy.org (Robert Naiman) Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 19:19:38 -0500 Subject: [Peace] WILL: Urbana City Council Passes Resolution Opposing Dakota Access Pipeline Message-ID: (audio recording of the proceedings at link) http://will.illinois.edu/news/story/urbana-city-council-passes-resolution-opposing-dakota-access-pipeline illinois public media news Urbana City Council Passes Resolution Opposing Dakota Access Pipeline September 20, 2016 BY JIM MEADOWS A resolution opposing the controversial Dakota Access Pipeline project passed the Urbana City Council Monday night on a unanimous voice vote. The pipeline would transport oil from North Dakota to Illinois, although orders from three federal agencies have temporarily halted its construction. The resolution cites the potential environmental risk of oil spills from the pipeline, and the damage already caused to sacred spaces during construction --- according to the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe. Ward Four Alderman Bill Brown says he believes the world will need fossil fuels such as oil for some time to come. But he said he couldn’t ignore the pipeline’s dangers --- danger the pipeline poses to the environment and to Native American cultural sites. “There’s no easy solution from an energy perspective, but certainly, in this instance, from a cultural perspective and the way the people were treated, I think this is the right thing to do,” said Brown. The only opposition came from the lone Republican on the Council. Ward Six Alderman Michael P. Madigan said he had empathy for the Standing Rock Sioux and their concerns. But he says the oil intended for the pipeline would be extracted and transported with or without it --- and that the pipeline provided the safest means. “It is the way that the oil can be moved with the least amount of detriment to the environment,” said Madigan “And if somebody would rather have it moved by semi or train, I would ask you, are you not for reducing the carbon footprint?” Despite his criticisms, Madigan did not oppose the resolution in Monday night’s voice vote. The measure asks the president to review the pipeline’s construction permit … and to make sure federal requirements for pipeline construction consider the impact on water, global warming and the impact on “Tribal nations”. Members of the public had called on the Urbana City Council to pass the resolution. Several of them voiced their support during the public comment section of Monday’s city council meeting, just as they had during an earlier committee-of-the-whole meeting. Story source: WILL === Robert Naiman Policy Director Just Foreign Policy www.justforeignpolicy.org naiman at justforeignpolicy.org (202) 448-2898 x1 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From deb.pdamerica at gmail.com Wed Sep 21 08:24:56 2016 From: deb.pdamerica at gmail.com (Debra Schrishuhn) Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 03:24:56 -0500 Subject: [Peace] Food Stamp Day of Action 9/22 Message-ID: We will meet at DHS office, 708 N Country Fair Dr, Champaign, at noon for 30-minute informational picket. We have flyers and will deliver a letter to the office. We ask that Gov. Rauner apply for a federal SNAP waiver to prevent 80,000 Illinoisans from losing SNAP benefits and that he fully fund human services. Alliance for Community Services is coordinating actions around the state. Hope you can join us! Deb From karenaram at hotmail.com Wed Sep 21 12:06:39 2016 From: karenaram at hotmail.com (Karen Aram) Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 12:06:39 +0000 Subject: [Peace] Has anyone noticed? Message-ID: UN General Assembly convenes amid global military escalation 21 September 2016 The 71st United Nations General Assembly convened this week beneath the shadow of a series of global crises that threaten to throw humanity into a new world war. This was the backdrop against which US President Barack Obama gave his final address to the Assembly on Tuesday. Obama’s rambling speech, which at times appeared to be ad-libbed, was an exercise in self-contradiction and absurd lies, with Obama’s depiction of the current geopolitical situation standing reality on its head. He declared, with a straight face, “Our international order has been so successful that we take it as a given that great powers no longer fight world wars; that the end of the Cold War lifted the shadow of nuclear Armageddon; that the battlefields of Europe have been replaced by peaceful union.” With due apologies to Shakespeare, some people are born liars, others become liars, others have lies thrust upon them, but all three definitions apply to the current president of the United States. Obama’s proclamation that the “shadow of nuclear Armageddon” has passed flies in the face not only of his own $1 trillion nuclear rearmament program, but the proclamation of the Union of Concerned Scientists that the US and China are “a few poor decisions away from starting a war that could escalate rapidly and end in a nuclear exchange.” The president, moreover, did not mention that the “peaceful union” that replaced “the battlefields of Europe” was in the midst of dissolution amid growing national antagonisms. Obama was speaking at the first UN General Assembly to take place since the vote by Britain in June 2016 to leave the European Union, giving rise to demands for copycat votes throughout Europe and warnings of a break-up of the entire Eurozone. As for “the battlefields of Europe,” NATO is moving ahead with its deployment of 4,000 troops to the Russian border, with high ranking NATO officials announcing this weekend that all of the troops will be in place by May. Behind the scenes, in the documents of military think tanks, such border troops are spoken of as “tripwires,” creating the rationale for military escalation by NATO in the event of a conflict between the Baltic States and Russia, substantially increasing the chances of a full-scale war between the two most powerful nuclear powers. A substantial portion of Obama’s remarks were devoted to hurling barbs at Russia, tacitly asserting that it is a society “that asks less of oligarchs than ordinary citizens” and declaring that Russia is “attempting to recover lost glory through force.” But these declarations would have been directed far more appropriately at the US, the most unequal developed country in the world. The American ruling class has been engaged in unending war in the effort to counter its long-term economic decline. Obama framed his remarks as a reflection on the past eight years of his administration, as well as on the 25 years that have passed since the dissolution of the USSR. “A quarter century after the end of the Cold War, the world is by many measures less violent and more prosperous than ever before,” Obama declared, adding that the US has “been a force for good” over this period. Contrary to Obama’s half-hearted declarations, the past quarter century has abjectly failed to live up to the proponents of capitalist triumphalism, who declared that the fall of the USSR would usher in a new era of peace and democracy. The US, far from being “a force for good” over this period, has been the single greatest purveyor of destabilization, violence and disorder. Beginning with the First Gulf War in 1991, the US has been perpetually at war, having bombed or invaded Iraq, Somalia, Bosnia, Yugoslavia, Serbia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Libya, Yemen and Syria, and carried out destabilization operations in countless other countries. These wars are now metastasizing into an increasingly direct conflict with Russia and China. This is accompanied by the militarization of the major imperialist powers, including Japan and Germany, as ruling classes throughout the world prepare for military conflict. The General Assembly opened in the aftermath of Saturday’s bombing of a Syrian army base by the US military, in a flagrant violation of the ceasefire brokered between the US and its proxies on one side, and the Syrian government, backed by Russia, on the other. The attack led to over 90 fatalities and was carried out with the assistance of British, Australian and German forces, potentially embroiling these countries in a military conflict with Russia. The bombing took place as Turkish President Erdogan, Washington’s ally in the Syria conflict, said Monday that Turkey plans to dramatically expand the area of Syria under its direct control by more than five-fold, to 5,000 square kilometers. US ground forces are fighting alongside Turkish-backed insurgents, raising the danger of a clash between Russian forces operating in Northern Syria and US ground troops fighting alongside Turkey. But the conflict in Syria is just one in an innumerable series of global flashpoints throughout Europe and Asia. Last week, Japan announced it would participate in US-led patrols in the disputed South China Sea, sparking condemnation from China, which Japan invaded and occupied in the run-up to World War II. Meanwhile in Kashmir, 11 more people were killed in recent days following an attack Sunday that left 18 Indian soldiers dead, in the heaviest fighting in years in the region. Were the conflict, escalated to a fever pitch by the US-led “Pivot to Asia,” to escalate into a war between India and Pakistan, it would be the first ever war between two nuclear-armed powers. Any one of these or other complex conflicts—in which multiple countries are each engaged in low-level proxy fighting and jockeying for their regional interests—risks sparking an uncontrolled escalation, like the conflict that began in the Balkans in June 1914. Obama intended to make his speech an account of the “progress that we’ve made these last eight years.” In the end, all he succeeded in doing was to emphasize how much closer to global war the world has come during his administration. Andre Damon -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From karenaram at hotmail.com Wed Sep 21 12:30:56 2016 From: karenaram at hotmail.com (Karen Aram) Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 12:30:56 +0000 Subject: [Peace] TTP, TTIP now rebranded as TISA or is it just a sibling, note the word "just". Message-ID: Greenpeace Netherlands exposed the threats to democracy and climate action contained within the little-known Trade in Services Agreement (TISA) on Tuesday with new leaksdivulging several chapters of the clandestine global trade agreement. "It's a sad day for democracy when ordinary people are dependent on leaks to learn about the far-reaching consequences of toxic trade deals that are being cooked up behind closed doors," said Nick Dearden, head of the U.K.-based Global Justice Now. And TISA is perhaps the least well-known and most highly protected of the imminent agreements: "Somehow TISA is also even more secret than the notoriously covert CETA, TTIP and TPP deals, with parties unable to release details of negotiations until five years after it has taken effect," Greenpeace observes. These latest leaks "confirm what civil society groups, trade unions, and consumer watch dogs across the world have been warning against, that TISA is a turbo-charged privatization and deregulation deal that will enormously benefit corporations at the expense of ordinary people and democracy itself," Dearden added. Indeed, the leaks from the highly secretive deal—currently being negotiated by 50 nations around the world—affirm that with the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) on the ropes, other such "democracy-wrecking" deals are looming. "The deal, a spiritual and practical sibling of the much-maligned TTIP and TPP free trade agreements, is designed to drive deregulation across the vast global services sector,"observes Greenpeace, "increasing international trade in everything from banking to energy services." In its analysis (pdf) of the TISA leaks, Greenpeace explains that the deal's emphasis on deregulation presents a grave threat to countries' ability to adhere to the terms agreed upon in the Paris climate accord: Countries that sign up to TISA will be required to lock-in liberalization and could be prevented from rolling back failed policies due of two key clauses—the 'standstill' and 'ratchet' clauses. The standstill clause freezes the extent of liberalization in certain sectors, which means the markets of TISA state can never be less liberalized than they were at the time they signed the deal. Meanwhile the ratchet clause—which sometimes appears in other trade agreements—stops countries from reintroducing trade barriers that had been previously and unilaterally removed. Together these two clauses undermine the ability of governments to ever reverse the liberalization of services, even if elected on a mandate to do it. That means they could be stopped from testing liberalizing policies, since there would be no way to reversing them if things went awry. In order to make the objectives of the Paris Agreement a reality and in order to cut greenhouse gas emissions to the point where the worst impacts of climate change can be avoided, governments must be allowed to interfere and use all policy tools available to them. Arbitrarily locking governments into deregulation could have hugely negative impacts on their capacity to implement the kind of climate policies we need to stay within 1.5 degrees. Greenpeace also notes that while going "[w]idely unnoticed by the public, TISA could be finalized by the end of this year." "We now know that TISA will undermine COP21, further deregulate the financial sector, stop failed privatizations being brought back into public hands, and undermine data privacy laws," commented Rosa Pavanelli, general secretary of Public Service International. "What else are our governments keeping secret from us?" -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From karenaram at hotmail.com Wed Sep 21 12:39:34 2016 From: karenaram at hotmail.com (Karen Aram) Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 12:39:34 +0000 Subject: [Peace] UIUC Student Greens Event Message-ID: * clock Thursday, September 22 at 6 PM - 8 PM in CDT Tomorrow * pin School of Library and Information Science, 5th and Daniel, room 126 The UIUC Student Greens are hosting a panel event. Speakers include the Prairie Greens, Scott Summers (Illinois Green Party candidate for U.S. Senate), and music by HarryoftheEarth Music. All will be followed by a Q&A, so come with questions or discussion points! About UIUC Student Greens [https://scontent.ford1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/c74.0.100.100/p100x100/14183726_605821299598667_2992080495996986385_n.png?oh=0db20ec4cbf657617c176e247895b62a&oe=588183A2] UIUC Student Greens Political Organization This is the student organization at the U of Illinois supporting the Green Party of the United States.R -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From karenaram at hotmail.com Wed Sep 21 13:51:27 2016 From: karenaram at hotmail.com (Karen Aram) Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 13:51:27 +0000 Subject: [Peace] My experience with the U of I recently Message-ID: I attended what was supposed to be a talk on Constitutional Law last week at the COL U of I, by Prof. Anil Amar a Constitutional Law Professor at Yale University, and the brother of the Dean of the College of Law U of I. I was planning to raise questions related to the firing of Professor Salaita for exercising his "freedom of speech" on social media, and bringing in Harold “Killer” Koh, to campaign for his client Hillary Clinton only ten days before the election in violation of Illinois statues. It was Poli Sci 101 with Prof. Amar promoting his book and Hillary. Due to lack of time, he only took questions. Two people asked questions related to issues and law which he addressed with much discussion related to the electoral collage, former Pres. Lincoln and Obama, then progressing to disparaging third parties, blaming Nader for Bush and our current wars. He talked about how awful Trump is, and how moderate Hillary is and why we need her, even mentioning Tammy Duckworth as someone who should be supported. I restrained myself from walking out, and raised my hand instead. I asked "how can you support Hillary given her record as Sec. of State, responsible, along with Obama, for the death and destruction of thousands/millions of people of Libya, Syria, Yemen, as well as Iraq?" and then asked again, "having heard you speak yesterday on NPR, how can you support our Constitutional Law Prof. President, Obama, who has broken not only International law, but our laws, by extending the Bush wars to as many as 8 countries”? Then followed with "I came here expecting a conversation on “Freedom of Speech” instead I’m hearing a promotion of Hillary and the Democrats." He responded with “you’re exercising your freedom of speech and I’m exercising mine.” He then attempted to defend his position. He was clearly rattled, and floundering, though he was floundering all over the place from the very beginning, now worse. One of his most disturbing statements was in relation to his defense of Hillary and the destruction of Libya, “only five Americans died in Libya, emphasizing with fingers raised, "only five.” I guess to some, only American lives matter. The millions of non Americans the US is responsible for killing with impunity, and no remorse, sadly, don’t matter. He was then pulled off to another speaking engagement. From karenaram at hotmail.com Wed Sep 21 14:10:17 2016 From: karenaram at hotmail.com (Karen Aram) Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 14:10:17 +0000 Subject: [Peace] "Killer Koh" Message-ID: In relation to the U of I , COL bringing Harold “Killer” as he is known, Koh, to campaign for Hillary.[http://publici.ucimc.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/PiMasthead1.jpeg] Skip to content * About Us * Contributors * Sustainers * In Print (Archives) * UC-IMC * Have a comment, tip, photo or story idea? ← Activists Among Us: Claire Szoke CU Schools Need to Work Harder to Involve African American Parents → October Surprise: Harold “Killer” Koh to Lecture at UI Law School in Election Week Posted on September 2016 by Midge O'Brien [th] Harold Hongju Koh Harold Hongju Koh, Hillary Clinton’s former legal advisor at the State Department has been invited as an ‘endowed speaker’ at the U.I. College of Law, twelve days prior to the November election. Koh, currently a Yale Law School professor and former Dean, is a close friend of Yale Law School graduates Bill and Hillary Clinton. He was appointed by President Bill Clinton as Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy, Human Rights and Labor; and by President Obama, as senior legal advisor to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton: he provided legal advice to her during the 2009 coup in Honduras, the 2011 US/NATO attack on Libya, and Obama’s ongoing drone assassinations – as well as damage-control in her email controversy. He won’t say what that advice was, claiming “attorney-client privilege” – despite the Supreme Court ruling against attorney-client confidences between government lawyers and government officials. An avid advocate of the targeted killing program, “Killer Koh” supports the legality of what he terms “extrajudicial killing” in Pakistan, Yemen and other Middle Eastern countries in the US “war on terror,” saying it complies “with all applicable law, including the laws of war,” and citing the ‘principle of proportionality’ in “taking great care in planning and execution to ensure that only ‘legitimate’ objectives are targeted and that collateral damage is kept to a minimum.” In a feeble attempt at transparency, the Obama administration recently released a modest admission that some “116 civilians” may have been victims of U. S. drone attacks – a figure that is not reconcilable with the accounts of eyewitnesses, journalists and human rights researchers, who have documented many thousands of casualties. President Obama said – in a revealing moment of self-reflection – “Turns out I’m really good at killing people … Didn’t know that was gonna be a strong suit of mine” (from Mark Halperin & John Heilemann, “Double Down: Game Change 2012”). If Hillary Clinton is elected president, with the advice of Tim Kaine and Killer Koh, she may be even more eager to mass-murder than her predecessor: the number of casualties would likely exceed that of Obama’s kill list, just as his toll today greatly outnumbers G. W. Bush’s. Late on Friday 5 August, the White House grudgingly complied with an Federal Court order (from an ACLU suit) and released a redacted “President’s Policy Guidance” (PPG) on Obama’s program of targeted killings. The PPG stipulates that “nothing in this PPG shall be construed to prevent the President from exercising his Constitutional authority … to authorize lethal force against an individual who poses a continuing, imminent threat to another country’s persons.” (Killing US citizens requires specific approval by the President). Death lists are drawn up weekly by the ‘nominating committee’ and are reviewed by lawyers of the nominating agencies (CIA, Pentagon, NSC, officials of the State Department and “deputies and principals of the nominating committee”). Of the seven Middle Eastern countries where drone assassinations take place, “active war zones” – Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan (it’s not clear if Libya is included) – do not require prior approval. With this protocol in place, the White House and the National Security Council are insulated from outside scrutiny, even by Congress. It assumes that the Commander in Chief can do anything s/he wants; it would provide a President Clinton #2, with the approval of hawks Tim Kaine and Harold Koh, immense power and license to kill. Koh as the (former) State Department lawyer has publicly defended extrajudicial killing as “due process under the Constitution in the age of moral and political degeneration.” In a speech at the Oxford Political Union in 2013 he said, “This Administration has not done enough to be transparent about the legal standards and decision making process … fostering a growing perception that the program [extrajudicial killing] is not lawful and necessary…,” adding that this lack of transparency is counterproductive and has led to the “negative public image” of targeted killing. Does Prof. Koh think the recent exposure of the (heavily redacted) PPG ordered by the Court provides the “transparency” to satisfy critics of the legality of targeted killing? Although Koh has been described as a prominent advocate of human and civil rights (apparently exclusively of US citizens), he has been an “equal opportunist” as a legal advisor to Reagan, Clinton and Obama administrations – all of whom have violated the human rights of foreign nationals. He hardly represented human and civil rights as a member of the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel to the President in the Reagan administration, when that office justified violations of international law, the Charter of United Nations and the US Constitution, in grievous violation of human rights and attempts to destabilize the countries of Grenada, El Salvador, Nicaragua (attempting to withdraw from the International Court of Justice, which denounced the US for bombing Nicaraguan harbors), Guatemala, Libya, Angola and elsewhere in southern Africa; and when it supported the South African apartheid government against its black population, supported Israel’s invasion and massacres of Palestinian refugee camps in Lebanon, and supported illegal Israeli settlements in the Palestinian Occupied Territories – for which the US exercised its veto in the U.N. Security Council, in opposition to sanctions against US. In addition, the Reagan administration and its legal advisors refused to support nuclear test ban treaties, instead proliferating first-strike nuclear weapons, SDI (“star wars”) and MX missiles. Not a record to be proud of for someone serving as legal counsel to the president. The opportunity extended Harold Koh to lecture potential scholars of political and international law poses the question, Is the University of Illinois College of Law – with its record of sanctions – qualified to educate future lawyers, when it sponsors a person of Harold H. Koh’s character in these politically charged times? The Nuremberg Military Tribunal in 1947 stated unequivocally that the crimes of the ten civilian Nazi defendants who were convicted of murder and other atrocities, conspiracy to commit war crimes and crimes against humanity of civilians and nationals of occupied territories, were liable to severe penalty whether or not they had engaged in military action. The Nuremberg judgment still stands in international law. A reception to protest Professor Koh’s appearance is planned at the north courtyard of the College of Law before the lecture on the afternoon of October 28. (Midge O’Brien was an academic professional in U. of I. life science laborotories over twenty years and secretary in the Union of Professional Employees; was an election judge twelve years; a member of Nuclear Freeze, and Prairie Alliance against nuclear power; and an anti-war activist since 1965. She is a member of the Green Party.) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From davegreen84 at yahoo.com Wed Sep 21 15:05:34 2016 From: davegreen84 at yahoo.com (David Green) Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 15:05:34 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Peace] [Peace-discuss] My experience with the U of I recently References: <1203659885.2354112.1474470334418.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1203659885.2354112.1474470334418@mail.yahoo.com> Even though I'm generally opposed to overt disruption of speaking events as a political tactic, the nature of such events as this one, with no opportunity for genuine discourse and no willingness by the speaker to take that seriously, might force me to reconsider. -------------------------------------------- On Wed, 9/21/16, Karen Aram via Peace-discuss wrote: Subject: [Peace-discuss] My experience with the U of I recently To: "Peace Discuss" , "peace" , "Peace-discuss List" Date: Wednesday, September 21, 2016, 8:51 AM I attended what was supposed to be a talk on Constitutional Law last week at the COL U of I, by Prof. Anil Amar a Constitutional Law Professor at Yale University, and the brother of the Dean of the College of Law U of I. I was planning to raise questions related to the firing of Professor Salaita for exercising his "freedom of speech" on social media, and bringing in Harold “Killer” Koh, to campaign for his client Hillary Clinton only ten days before the election in violation of Illinois statues. It was Poli Sci 101 with Prof. Amar promoting his book and Hillary.  Due to lack of time, he only took questions. Two people asked questions related to issues and law which he addressed with much discussion related to the electoral collage, former Pres. Lincoln and Obama, then progressing to disparaging third parties, blaming Nader for Bush and our current wars. He talked about how awful Trump is, and how moderate Hillary is and why we need her, even mentioning Tammy Duckworth as someone who should be supported. I restrained myself from walking out, and raised my hand instead.   I asked "how can you support Hillary given her record as Sec. of State, responsible, along with Obama, for the death and destruction of thousands/millions of people of Libya, Syria, Yemen, as well as Iraq?" and then asked again, "having heard you speak yesterday on NPR, how can you support our Constitutional Law Prof. President, Obama, who has broken not only International law, but our laws, by extending the Bush wars to as many as 8 countries”?  Then followed with "I came here expecting a conversation on “Freedom of Speech” instead I’m hearing a promotion of Hillary and the Democrats." He responded with “you’re exercising your freedom of speech and I’m exercising mine.”  He then attempted to defend his position. He was clearly rattled, and floundering, though he was floundering all over the place from the very beginning, now worse. One of his most disturbing statements was in relation to his defense of Hillary and the destruction of Libya, “only five Americans died in Libya, emphasizing with fingers raised, "only five.” I guess to some, only American lives matter. The millions of non Americans the US is responsible for killing with impunity, and no remorse, sadly, don’t matter. He was then pulled off to another speaking engagement. _______________________________________________ Peace-discuss mailing list Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss From carl at newsfromneptune.com Wed Sep 21 16:46:05 2016 From: carl at newsfromneptune.com (C. G. Estabrook) Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 11:46:05 -0500 Subject: [Peace] [Peace-discuss] My experience with the U of I recently In-Reply-To: <1203659885.2354112.1474470334418@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1203659885.2354112.1474470334418.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1203659885.2354112.1474470334418@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <60C4DC6F-F21E-4B5A-BB48-D243A976D913@newsfromneptune.com> Preventing anyone from speaking - even Nazis and Democrats - almost always militates against the True and the Good. But large demonstrations against such speakers can have the opposite effect. That’s why the powers that be want to characterize such demonstrations as ‘denials of free speech.’ —CGE > On Sep 21, 2016, at 10:05 AM, David Green via Peace-discuss wrote: > > Even though I'm generally opposed to overt disruption of speaking events as a political tactic, the nature of such events as this one, with no opportunity for genuine discourse and no willingness by the speaker to take that seriously, might force me to reconsider. > -------------------------------------------- > On Wed, 9/21/16, Karen Aram via Peace-discuss wrote: > > Subject: [Peace-discuss] My experience with the U of I recently > To: "Peace Discuss" , "peace" , "Peace-discuss List" > Date: Wednesday, September 21, 2016, 8:51 AM > > I attended what was supposed to be a > talk on Constitutional > Law last week at the COL U of I, by Prof. Anil Amar a > Constitutional Law Professor at Yale University, and the > brother of the Dean of the College of Law U of I. > > I was planning to raise questions related to the firing of > Professor Salaita for exercising his "freedom of speech" on > social media, and bringing in Harold “Killer” Koh, to > campaign for his client Hillary Clinton only ten days before > the election in violation of Illinois statues. > > It was Poli Sci 101 with Prof. Amar promoting his book and > Hillary. Due to lack of time, he only took questions. > Two people asked questions related to issues and law > which he addressed with much discussion related to the > electoral collage, former Pres. Lincoln and Obama, then > progressing to disparaging third parties, blaming Nader for > Bush and our current wars. He talked about how awful Trump > is, and how moderate Hillary is and why we need her, even > mentioning Tammy Duckworth as someone who should be > supported. > I restrained myself from walking out, and raised my hand > instead. > > I asked "how can you support Hillary given her record as > Sec. of State, responsible, along with Obama, for the death > and destruction of thousands/millions of people of Libya, > Syria, Yemen, as well as Iraq?" and then asked again, > "having heard you speak yesterday on NPR, how can you > support our Constitutional Law Prof. President, Obama, who > has broken not only International law, but our laws, by > extending the Bush wars to as many as 8 > countries”? Then followed with "I came here > expecting a conversation on “Freedom of Speech” > instead I’m hearing a promotion of Hillary and the > Democrats." > > He responded with “you’re > exercising your freedom of speech and I’m exercising > mine.” He then attempted to defend his position. He > was clearly > rattled, and floundering, though he was floundering all over > the place from the very beginning, now worse. One of his > most disturbing statements was in relation to his defense of > Hillary and the destruction of Libya, “only five Americans > died in Libya, emphasizing with fingers raised, "only > five.” > > I guess to some, only American lives matter. The millions of > non Americans the US is responsible for killing with > impunity, and no remorse, sadly, don’t matter. > > He was then pulled off to another speaking engagement. > > > _______________________________________________ > Peace-discuss mailing list > Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net > https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss > > _______________________________________________ > Peace-discuss mailing list > Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net > https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss From karenaram at hotmail.com Wed Sep 21 17:10:05 2016 From: karenaram at hotmail.com (Karen Aram) Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 17:10:05 +0000 Subject: [Peace] [Peace-discuss] My experience with the U of I recently In-Reply-To: <60C4DC6F-F21E-4B5A-BB48-D243A976D913@newsfromneptune.com> References: <1203659885.2354112.1474470334418.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1203659885.2354112.1474470334418@mail.yahoo.com> <60C4DC6F-F21E-4B5A-BB48-D243A976D913@newsfromneptune.com> Message-ID: I felt my handling, by countering the propaganda, in an orderly fashion was appropriate. It gave everyone a chance to hear a counter argument, to be considered. However, providing someone with a soapbox or forum such as the COL U of I, did and is continuing to do so, by bringing Killer Koh here to promote Hillary in October, is providing support, and therefore the COL U of I is complicit, just as we are when we provide a platform or support for a racist to speak on our Peace List. We maybe countering him, but we are also providing him and therefore we are complicit with the spread of his lies, and propaganda. > On Sep 21, 2016, at 09:46, C. G. Estabrook wrote: > > Preventing anyone from speaking - even Nazis and Democrats - almost always militates against the True and the Good. > > But large demonstrations against such speakers can have the opposite effect. > > That’s why the powers that be want to characterize such demonstrations as ‘denials of free speech.’ > > —CGE > >> On Sep 21, 2016, at 10:05 AM, David Green via Peace-discuss wrote: >> >> Even though I'm generally opposed to overt disruption of speaking events as a political tactic, the nature of such events as this one, with no opportunity for genuine discourse and no willingness by the speaker to take that seriously, might force me to reconsider. >> -------------------------------------------- >> On Wed, 9/21/16, Karen Aram via Peace-discuss wrote: >> >> Subject: [Peace-discuss] My experience with the U of I recently >> To: "Peace Discuss" , "peace" , "Peace-discuss List" >> Date: Wednesday, September 21, 2016, 8:51 AM >> >> I attended what was supposed to be a >> talk on Constitutional >> Law last week at the COL U of I, by Prof. Anil Amar a >> Constitutional Law Professor at Yale University, and the >> brother of the Dean of the College of Law U of I. >> >> I was planning to raise questions related to the firing of >> Professor Salaita for exercising his "freedom of speech" on >> social media, and bringing in Harold “Killer” Koh, to >> campaign for his client Hillary Clinton only ten days before >> the election in violation of Illinois statues. >> >> It was Poli Sci 101 with Prof. Amar promoting his book and >> Hillary. Due to lack of time, he only took questions. >> Two people asked questions related to issues and law >> which he addressed with much discussion related to the >> electoral collage, former Pres. Lincoln and Obama, then >> progressing to disparaging third parties, blaming Nader for >> Bush and our current wars. He talked about how awful Trump >> is, and how moderate Hillary is and why we need her, even >> mentioning Tammy Duckworth as someone who should be >> supported. >> I restrained myself from walking out, and raised my hand >> instead. >> >> I asked "how can you support Hillary given her record as >> Sec. of State, responsible, along with Obama, for the death >> and destruction of thousands/millions of people of Libya, >> Syria, Yemen, as well as Iraq?" and then asked again, >> "having heard you speak yesterday on NPR, how can you >> support our Constitutional Law Prof. President, Obama, who >> has broken not only International law, but our laws, by >> extending the Bush wars to as many as 8 >> countries”? Then followed with "I came here >> expecting a conversation on “Freedom of Speech” >> instead I’m hearing a promotion of Hillary and the >> Democrats." >> >> He responded with “you’re >> exercising your freedom of speech and I’m exercising >> mine.” He then attempted to defend his position. He >> was clearly >> rattled, and floundering, though he was floundering all over >> the place from the very beginning, now worse. One of his >> most disturbing statements was in relation to his defense of >> Hillary and the destruction of Libya, “only five Americans >> died in Libya, emphasizing with fingers raised, "only >> five.” >> >> I guess to some, only American lives matter. The millions of >> non Americans the US is responsible for killing with >> impunity, and no remorse, sadly, don’t matter. >> >> He was then pulled off to another speaking engagement. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Peace-discuss mailing list >> Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net >> https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Peace-discuss mailing list >> Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net >> https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss > From carl at newsfromneptune.com Wed Sep 21 17:19:23 2016 From: carl at newsfromneptune.com (C. G. Estabrook) Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 12:19:23 -0500 Subject: [Peace] [Peace-discuss] My experience with the U of I recently In-Reply-To: References: <1203659885.2354112.1474470334418.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1203659885.2354112.1474470334418@mail.yahoo.com> <60C4DC6F-F21E-4B5A-BB48-D243A976D913@newsfromneptune.com> Message-ID: 百花齊放 /百花齐放 , 百家爭鳴 /百家争鸣 > On Sep 21, 2016, at 12:10 PM, Karen Aram wrote: > > I felt my handling, by countering the propaganda, in an orderly fashion was appropriate. > > It gave everyone a chance to hear a counter argument, to be considered. > > However, providing someone with a soapbox or forum such as the COL U of I, did and is continuing to do so, by bringing Killer Koh here to promote Hillary in October, is providing support, and therefore the COL U of I is complicit, just as we are when we provide a platform or support for a racist to speak on our Peace List. We maybe countering him, but we are also providing him and therefore we are complicit with the spread of his lies, and propaganda. > > >> On Sep 21, 2016, at 09:46, C. G. Estabrook wrote: >> >> Preventing anyone from speaking - even Nazis and Democrats - almost always militates against the True and the Good. >> >> But large demonstrations against such speakers can have the opposite effect. >> >> That’s why the powers that be want to characterize such demonstrations as ‘denials of free speech.’ >> >> —CGE >> >>> On Sep 21, 2016, at 10:05 AM, David Green via Peace-discuss wrote: >>> >>> Even though I'm generally opposed to overt disruption of speaking events as a political tactic, the nature of such events as this one, with no opportunity for genuine discourse and no willingness by the speaker to take that seriously, might force me to reconsider. >>> -------------------------------------------- >>> On Wed, 9/21/16, Karen Aram via Peace-discuss wrote: >>> >>> Subject: [Peace-discuss] My experience with the U of I recently >>> To: "Peace Discuss" , "peace" , "Peace-discuss List" >>> Date: Wednesday, September 21, 2016, 8:51 AM >>> >>> I attended what was supposed to be a >>> talk on Constitutional >>> Law last week at the COL U of I, by Prof. Anil Amar a >>> Constitutional Law Professor at Yale University, and the >>> brother of the Dean of the College of Law U of I. >>> >>> I was planning to raise questions related to the firing of >>> Professor Salaita for exercising his "freedom of speech" on >>> social media, and bringing in Harold “Killer” Koh, to >>> campaign for his client Hillary Clinton only ten days before >>> the election in violation of Illinois statues. >>> >>> It was Poli Sci 101 with Prof. Amar promoting his book and >>> Hillary. Due to lack of time, he only took questions. >>> Two people asked questions related to issues and law >>> which he addressed with much discussion related to the >>> electoral collage, former Pres. Lincoln and Obama, then >>> progressing to disparaging third parties, blaming Nader for >>> Bush and our current wars. He talked about how awful Trump >>> is, and how moderate Hillary is and why we need her, even >>> mentioning Tammy Duckworth as someone who should be >>> supported. >>> I restrained myself from walking out, and raised my hand >>> instead. >>> >>> I asked "how can you support Hillary given her record as >>> Sec. of State, responsible, along with Obama, for the death >>> and destruction of thousands/millions of people of Libya, >>> Syria, Yemen, as well as Iraq?" and then asked again, >>> "having heard you speak yesterday on NPR, how can you >>> support our Constitutional Law Prof. President, Obama, who >>> has broken not only International law, but our laws, by >>> extending the Bush wars to as many as 8 >>> countries”? Then followed with "I came here >>> expecting a conversation on “Freedom of Speech” >>> instead I’m hearing a promotion of Hillary and the >>> Democrats." >>> >>> He responded with “you’re >>> exercising your freedom of speech and I’m exercising >>> mine.” He then attempted to defend his position. He >>> was clearly >>> rattled, and floundering, though he was floundering all over >>> the place from the very beginning, now worse. One of his >>> most disturbing statements was in relation to his defense of >>> Hillary and the destruction of Libya, “only five Americans >>> died in Libya, emphasizing with fingers raised, "only >>> five.” >>> >>> I guess to some, only American lives matter. The millions of >>> non Americans the US is responsible for killing with >>> impunity, and no remorse, sadly, don’t matter. >>> >>> He was then pulled off to another speaking engagement. >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Peace-discuss mailing list >>> Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net >>> https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Peace-discuss mailing list >>> Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net >>> https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From niloofar.peace at gmail.com Wed Sep 21 17:30:27 2016 From: niloofar.peace at gmail.com (Niloofar Shambayati) Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 12:30:27 -0500 Subject: [Peace] WILL: Urbana City Council Passes Resolution Opposing Dakota Access Pipeline In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: This is great! Thanks for your efforts to push for this resolution. Now, is Champaign's turn! On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 7:19 PM, Robert Naiman via Peace < peace at lists.chambana.net> wrote: > (audio recording of the proceedings at link) > > http://will.illinois.edu/news/story/urbana-city-council- > passes-resolution-opposing-dakota-access-pipeline > > illinois public media news > Urbana City Council Passes Resolution Opposing Dakota Access Pipeline > September 20, 2016 > BY JIM MEADOWS > > A resolution opposing the controversial Dakota Access Pipeline project > passed the Urbana City Council Monday night on a unanimous voice vote. > > The pipeline would transport oil from North Dakota to Illinois, although > orders from three federal agencies have temporarily halted its > construction. The resolution cites the potential environmental risk of oil > spills from the pipeline, and the damage already caused to sacred spaces > during construction --- according to the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe. > > Ward Four Alderman Bill Brown says he believes the world will need fossil > fuels such as oil for some time to come. But he said he couldn’t ignore the > pipeline’s dangers --- danger the pipeline poses to the environment and to > Native American cultural sites. > > “There’s no easy solution from an energy perspective, but certainly, in > this instance, from a cultural perspective and the way the people were > treated, I think this is the right thing to do,” said Brown. > > The only opposition came from the lone Republican on the Council. Ward Six > Alderman Michael P. Madigan said he had empathy for the Standing Rock Sioux > and their concerns. But he says the oil intended for the pipeline would be > extracted and transported with or without it --- and that the pipeline > provided the safest means. > > “It is the way that the oil can be moved with the least amount of > detriment to the environment,” said Madigan “And if somebody would rather > have it moved by semi or train, I would ask you, are you not for reducing > the carbon footprint?” > > Despite his criticisms, Madigan did not oppose the resolution in Monday > night’s voice vote. > > The measure asks the president to review the pipeline’s construction > permit … and to make sure federal requirements for pipeline construction > consider the impact on water, global warming and the impact on “Tribal > nations”. > > Members of the public had called on the Urbana City Council to pass the > resolution. Several of them voiced their support during the public comment > section of Monday’s city council meeting, just as they had during an > earlier committee-of-the-whole meeting. > Story source: WILL > === > > Robert Naiman > Policy Director > Just Foreign Policy > www.justforeignpolicy.org > naiman at justforeignpolicy.org > (202) 448-2898 x1 > > > _______________________________________________ > Peace mailing list > Peace at lists.chambana.net > https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From karenaram at hotmail.com Wed Sep 21 17:39:42 2016 From: karenaram at hotmail.com (Karen Aram) Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 17:39:42 +0000 Subject: [Peace] [Peace-discuss] My experience with the U of I recently In-Reply-To: References: <1203659885.2354112.1474470334418.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1203659885.2354112.1474470334418@mail.yahoo.com> <60C4DC6F-F21E-4B5A-BB48-D243A976D913@newsfromneptune.com> Message-ID: Translation please. I understand the people, but I never learned the language. On Sep 21, 2016, at 10:19, C. G. Estabrook > wrote: 百花齊放/百花齐放 , 百家爭鳴/百家争鸣 On Sep 21, 2016, at 12:10 PM, Karen Aram > wrote: I felt my handling, by countering the propaganda, in an orderly fashion was appropriate. It gave everyone a chance to hear a counter argument, to be considered. However, providing someone with a soapbox or forum such as the COL U of I, did and is continuing to do so, by bringing Killer Koh here to promote Hillary in October, is providing support, and therefore the COL U of I is complicit, just as we are when we provide a platform or support for a racist to speak on our Peace List. We maybe countering him, but we are also providing him and therefore we are complicit with the spread of his lies, and propaganda. On Sep 21, 2016, at 09:46, C. G. Estabrook > wrote: Preventing anyone from speaking - even Nazis and Democrats - almost always militates against the True and the Good. But large demonstrations against such speakers can have the opposite effect. That’s why the powers that be want to characterize such demonstrations as ‘denials of free speech.’ —CGE On Sep 21, 2016, at 10:05 AM, David Green via Peace-discuss > wrote: Even though I'm generally opposed to overt disruption of speaking events as a political tactic, the nature of such events as this one, with no opportunity for genuine discourse and no willingness by the speaker to take that seriously, might force me to reconsider. -------------------------------------------- On Wed, 9/21/16, Karen Aram via Peace-discuss > wrote: Subject: [Peace-discuss] My experience with the U of I recently To: "Peace Discuss" >, "peace" >, "Peace-discuss List" > Date: Wednesday, September 21, 2016, 8:51 AM I attended what was supposed to be a talk on Constitutional Law last week at the COL U of I, by Prof. Anil Amar a Constitutional Law Professor at Yale University, and the brother of the Dean of the College of Law U of I. I was planning to raise questions related to the firing of Professor Salaita for exercising his "freedom of speech" on social media, and bringing in Harold “Killer” Koh, to campaign for his client Hillary Clinton only ten days before the election in violation of Illinois statues. It was Poli Sci 101 with Prof. Amar promoting his book and Hillary. Due to lack of time, he only took questions. Two people asked questions related to issues and law which he addressed with much discussion related to the electoral collage, former Pres. Lincoln and Obama, then progressing to disparaging third parties, blaming Nader for Bush and our current wars. He talked about how awful Trump is, and how moderate Hillary is and why we need her, even mentioning Tammy Duckworth as someone who should be supported. I restrained myself from walking out, and raised my hand instead. I asked "how can you support Hillary given her record as Sec. of State, responsible, along with Obama, for the death and destruction of thousands/millions of people of Libya, Syria, Yemen, as well as Iraq?" and then asked again, "having heard you speak yesterday on NPR, how can you support our Constitutional Law Prof. President, Obama, who has broken not only International law, but our laws, by extending the Bush wars to as many as 8 countries”? Then followed with "I came here expecting a conversation on “Freedom of Speech” instead I’m hearing a promotion of Hillary and the Democrats." He responded with “you’re exercising your freedom of speech and I’m exercising mine.” He then attempted to defend his position. He was clearly rattled, and floundering, though he was floundering all over the place from the very beginning, now worse. One of his most disturbing statements was in relation to his defense of Hillary and the destruction of Libya, “only five Americans died in Libya, emphasizing with fingers raised, "only five.” I guess to some, only American lives matter. The millions of non Americans the US is responsible for killing with impunity, and no remorse, sadly, don’t matter. He was then pulled off to another speaking engagement. _______________________________________________ Peace-discuss mailing list Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss _______________________________________________ Peace-discuss mailing list Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From carl at newsfromneptune.com Wed Sep 21 17:45:09 2016 From: carl at newsfromneptune.com (C. G. Estabrook) Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 12:45:09 -0500 Subject: [Peace] [Peace-discuss] My experience with the U of I recently In-Reply-To: References: <1203659885.2354112.1474470334418.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1203659885.2354112.1474470334418@mail.yahoo.com> <60C4DC6F-F21E-4B5A-BB48-D243A976D913@newsfromneptune.com> Message-ID: And you know I speak none of the language beyond "Hello.” But they had me from that. 百花齊放/百花齐放 (bǎihuāqífàng, “let one hundred flowers bloom”) + 百家爭鳴/百家争鸣 (bǎijiāzhēngmíng, “let one hundred schools of thought contend”): the phrase was used by Mao Zedong in 1957 to launch the Hundred Flowers Campaign. —CGE > On Sep 21, 2016, at 12:39 PM, Karen Aram wrote: > > Translation please. I understand the people, but I never learned the language. >> On Sep 21, 2016, at 10:19, C. G. Estabrook > wrote: >> >> 百花齊放 /百花齐放 , 百家爭鳴 /百家争鸣 >> >> >> >>> On Sep 21, 2016, at 12:10 PM, Karen Aram > wrote: >>> >>> I felt my handling, by countering the propaganda, in an orderly fashion was appropriate. >>> >>> It gave everyone a chance to hear a counter argument, to be considered. >>> >>> However, providing someone with a soapbox or forum such as the COL U of I, did and is continuing to do so, by bringing Killer Koh here to promote Hillary in October, is providing support, and therefore the COL U of I is complicit, just as we are when we provide a platform or support for a racist to speak on our Peace List. We maybe countering him, but we are also providing him and therefore we are complicit with the spread of his lies, and propaganda. >>> >>> >>>> On Sep 21, 2016, at 09:46, C. G. Estabrook > wrote: >>>> >>>> Preventing anyone from speaking - even Nazis and Democrats - almost always militates against the True and the Good. >>>> >>>> But large demonstrations against such speakers can have the opposite effect. >>>> >>>> That’s why the powers that be want to characterize such demonstrations as ‘denials of free speech.’ >>>> >>>> —CGE >>>> >>>>> On Sep 21, 2016, at 10:05 AM, David Green via Peace-discuss > wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Even though I'm generally opposed to overt disruption of speaking events as a political tactic, the nature of such events as this one, with no opportunity for genuine discourse and no willingness by the speaker to take that seriously, might force me to reconsider. >>>>> -------------------------------------------- >>>>> On Wed, 9/21/16, Karen Aram via Peace-discuss > wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Subject: [Peace-discuss] My experience with the U of I recently >>>>> To: "Peace Discuss" >, "peace" >, "Peace-discuss List" > >>>>> Date: Wednesday, September 21, 2016, 8:51 AM >>>>> >>>>> I attended what was supposed to be a >>>>> talk on Constitutional >>>>> Law last week at the COL U of I, by Prof. Anil Amar a >>>>> Constitutional Law Professor at Yale University, and the >>>>> brother of the Dean of the College of Law U of I. >>>>> >>>>> I was planning to raise questions related to the firing of >>>>> Professor Salaita for exercising his "freedom of speech" on >>>>> social media, and bringing in Harold “Killer” Koh, to >>>>> campaign for his client Hillary Clinton only ten days before >>>>> the election in violation of Illinois statues. >>>>> >>>>> It was Poli Sci 101 with Prof. Amar promoting his book and >>>>> Hillary. Due to lack of time, he only took questions. >>>>> Two people asked questions related to issues and law >>>>> which he addressed with much discussion related to the >>>>> electoral collage, former Pres. Lincoln and Obama, then >>>>> progressing to disparaging third parties, blaming Nader for >>>>> Bush and our current wars. He talked about how awful Trump >>>>> is, and how moderate Hillary is and why we need her, even >>>>> mentioning Tammy Duckworth as someone who should be >>>>> supported. >>>>> I restrained myself from walking out, and raised my hand >>>>> instead. >>>>> >>>>> I asked "how can you support Hillary given her record as >>>>> Sec. of State, responsible, along with Obama, for the death >>>>> and destruction of thousands/millions of people of Libya, >>>>> Syria, Yemen, as well as Iraq?" and then asked again, >>>>> "having heard you speak yesterday on NPR, how can you >>>>> support our Constitutional Law Prof. President, Obama, who >>>>> has broken not only International law, but our laws, by >>>>> extending the Bush wars to as many as 8 >>>>> countries”? Then followed with "I came here >>>>> expecting a conversation on “Freedom of Speech” >>>>> instead I’m hearing a promotion of Hillary and the >>>>> Democrats." >>>>> >>>>> He responded with “you’re >>>>> exercising your freedom of speech and I’m exercising >>>>> mine.” He then attempted to defend his position. He >>>>> was clearly >>>>> rattled, and floundering, though he was floundering all over >>>>> the place from the very beginning, now worse. One of his >>>>> most disturbing statements was in relation to his defense of >>>>> Hillary and the destruction of Libya, “only five Americans >>>>> died in Libya, emphasizing with fingers raised, "only >>>>> five.” >>>>> >>>>> I guess to some, only American lives matter. The millions of >>>>> non Americans the US is responsible for killing with >>>>> impunity, and no remorse, sadly, don’t matter. >>>>> >>>>> He was then pulled off to another speaking engagement. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Peace-discuss mailing list >>>>> Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net >>>>> https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Peace-discuss mailing list >>>>> Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net >>>>> https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss >>>> >>> >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kmedina67 at gmail.com Wed Sep 21 18:14:48 2016 From: kmedina67 at gmail.com (Karen Medina) Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 13:14:48 -0500 Subject: [Peace] donate gently used items to Channing-Murray "Trivia Night" fundraiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Donations of baked goods is also needed! Bake sale items and/or snacks for the attendees. Where and when to drop off baked goods: Time: before 6:30pm on Date: Saturday, September 24, 2016. Address: at the Channing-Murray / 1209 W. Oregon St./ Urbana, IL 61801 email: channingmurrayfoundation at gmail.com Tel 217-344-1176 Office Hours if you need to drop off stuff: Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday, 12 pm-3 pm On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Karen Medina wrote: > Dear Peace, > > Channing-Murray Foundation is having a "Trivia Night" fundraiser. > Saturday, September 24, 2016 > 7pm > $5 per person / $4 per student (I guess they are not persons) > > Do you have some gently used items that you would like to go to a good > cause? Please consider donating them to the Channing-Murray. > Channing-Murray has an upcoming Trivia Night fundraiser and needs prizes to > give away to the participants. > > > But wait, why am I posting this to the Peace List? > > * Channing-Murray and the anti-war movement go way back, back to the 1960s. > > * Channing-Murray is uniquely situated close enough to campus to bring in > students yet connected to the very roots of the community of Champaign > Urbana. > * Channing-Murray's dedication to supporting social action is well-known. > The Channing-Murray depends on donations and community support. > > > Please consider donating items for the Trivia Night. > > Event invitation: https://www.facebook.com/events/1353420378019969/ > -- -- karen medina "The really great make you feel that you, too, can become great." - Mark Twain -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From karenaram at hotmail.com Wed Sep 21 21:17:50 2016 From: karenaram at hotmail.com (Karen Aram) Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 21:17:50 +0000 Subject: [Peace] Protests underway in Charlotte, NC after another Killing. Message-ID: Published on Wednesday, September 21, 2016 by Common Dreams Protesters, Police Clash After Fatal Police Shooting in Charlotte, NC Demonstrations erupted after a black man was shot and killed by police on Tuesday by Nika Knight, staff writer * * * * * * * 37 Comments [Protesters clashed with police after the fatal police shooting of Keith Scott in Charlotte, North Carolina.] Protesters clashed with police after the fatal police shooting of Keith Scott in Charlotte, North Carolina. (Photo: Reuters) Protests erupted late Tuesday in Charlotte, North Carolina after police officer fatally shot a black man while attempting to serve a warrant on a separate individual. The demonstrators clashed with police in riot gear, several people were injured, and five protesters were ultimately arrested, the New York Times reports. The Los Angeles Times writes that tear gas was used by police, about a dozen police officers were hurt, and a highway was eventually shut down as the demonstrations continued into early Wednesday. Police, according to reports, say that 43-year-old Keith Lamont Scott was armed and "posed an imminent deadly threat" before he was fatally shot Tuesday afternoon by Charlotte-Mecklenburg officer Brentley Vinson, who is also black. Scott's family disputes the police account, saying that he was disabled, unarmed, and reading a book in his car when he was shot. The Guardian described the contradictory accounts surrounding Scott's death: Police said officers went to a Charlotte apartment complex around 4pm looking for a suspect with an outstanding warrant when they encountered Scott, who was not the suspect they were looking for, inside a car. According to department spokesman Keith Trietley, officers saw the man get out the car with a gun and then get back in. When officers approached the car, the man got out of the car with the gun again. At that point, officers deemed the man a threat and at least one fired a weapon, he said. A weapon was recovered by detectives at the scene. According to police, officers immediately began rendering aid after the shots were fired. Scott, a father of seven, was pronounced dead at Carolinas Medical Center. The police version is at odds with that of Scott's family who have insisted that he was disabled, sitting in his car reading a book, and had no gun. "He sits in the shade, reads his book and waits on his kid to get off the bus," Scott's sister told reporters. "He didn't have no gun, he wasn't messing with nobody." "As protests swelled on Tuesday night, police used tear gas in an attempt to disperse crowds heard yelling 'Black lives matter,' and 'Hands up, don't shoot!' One person held up a sign saying 'Stop killing us'; another sign said: 'It was a book,'" the Guardian adds. "In statements the Charlotte-Mecklenburg police department distinguished between 'agitators' and 'demonstrators,' blaming the former for damaging police vehicles and causing injuries to at least a dozen officers. One officer was reportedly struck in the face with a rocks," notes the Guardian. The Los Angeles Times reports that "Charlotte Mayor Jennifer Roberts appealed for calm and tweeted that 'the community deserves answers.'" The fatal police shooting in Charlotte came only a few days after police in Tulsa, Oklahoma, shot and killed an unarmed black man, at a moment when the Movement for Black Lives has created a national debate on police brutality that activists say disproportionately targets black communities. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From divisek at yahoo.com Thu Sep 22 16:01:31 2016 From: divisek at yahoo.com (Dianna Visek) Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 16:01:31 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Peace] Snowden movie continues at Savoy 16 In-Reply-To: <1140533423.2985509.1474559884242@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1140533423.2985509.1474559884242.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1140533423.2985509.1474559884242@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <2064750661.3091813.1474560091205@mail.yahoo.com> If you haven't seen Snowden, you need to.  It's fabulous.  The depiction of the CIA and NSA operations center made me sick.  As did the drone strikes. It's showing for at least the next week at the Savoy 16, but the times have changed.  It's now 12:40, 3:40, 6:40 and 9:40.  I'm hoping to see it a second time, so I can focus on the details. Dianna -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stuartnlevy at gmail.com Thu Sep 22 16:15:10 2016 From: stuartnlevy at gmail.com (Stuart Levy) Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 11:15:10 -0500 Subject: [Peace] Snowden movie continues at Savoy 16 In-Reply-To: <2064750661.3091813.1474560091205@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1140533423.2985509.1474559884242.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1140533423.2985509.1474559884242@mail.yahoo.com> <2064750661.3091813.1474560091205@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <4a85c6cd-c391-876c-ad39-756c24cec74c@gmail.com> Dianna, Thanks for the recommendation. I've heard it's very good from others, too. Karen and Pam C. and I are aiming to see it at Savoy this Sunday 9/25 at 12:40, if anyone would like to join us. On 9/22/16 11:01 AM, Dianna Visek via Peace wrote: > If you haven't seen Snowden, you need to. It's fabulous. The > depiction of the CIA and NSA operations center made me sick. As did > the drone strikes. > > It's showing for at least the next week at the Savoy 16, but the times > have changed. It's now 12:40, 3:40, 6:40 and 9:40. I'm hoping to see > it a second time, so I can focus on the details. > > Dianna > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Peace mailing list > Peace at lists.chambana.net > https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From carl at newsfromneptune.com Thu Sep 22 19:32:54 2016 From: carl at newsfromneptune.com (C. G. Estabrook) Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 14:32:54 -0500 Subject: [Peace] AWARE on the Air, 16 Feb. 2016 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <745FA348-0FE6-4122-86C3-7F01FC157753@newsfromneptune.com> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tU0WpJP6Z-U War news commentary from the 'Anti-War Anti-Racism Effort' of Champaign-Urbana IL, 20 September 2016 From carl at newsfromneptune.com Thu Sep 22 19:36:18 2016 From: carl at newsfromneptune.com (C. G. Estabrook) Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 14:36:18 -0500 Subject: [Peace] AWARE on the Air for 20 Sept. 2016 [correction] In-Reply-To: <745FA348-0FE6-4122-86C3-7F01FC157753@newsfromneptune.com> References: <745FA348-0FE6-4122-86C3-7F01FC157753@newsfromneptune.com> Message-ID: <5489C839-553A-4E34-B30A-E11DC2FC15FA@newsfromneptune.com> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tU0WpJP6Z-U War news commentary from the 'Anti-War Anti-Racism Effort' of Champaign-Urbana IL, 20 September 2016 ### From karenaram at hotmail.com Thu Sep 22 20:44:15 2016 From: karenaram at hotmail.com (Karen Aram) Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 20:44:15 +0000 Subject: [Peace] Student Greens Program tonight Message-ID: Details The UIUC Student Greens are hosting a panel event. Speakers include the Prairie Greens, Scott Summers (Illinois Green Party candidate for U.S. Senate), and music by HarryoftheEarth Music. All will be followed by a Q&A, so come with questions or discussion points! About UIUC Student Greens [https://scontent.ford1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/c74.0.100.100/p100x100/14183726_605821299598667_2992080495996986385_n.png?oh=0db20ec4cbf657617c176e247895b62a&oe=588183A2] UIUC Student Greens Political Organization This is the student organization at the U of Illinois supporting the Green Party of the United States. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From carl at newsfromneptune.com Fri Sep 23 02:58:05 2016 From: carl at newsfromneptune.com (C. G. Estabrook) Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 21:58:05 -0500 Subject: [Peace] Student Greens Program tonight In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: GREEN PARTY FOREIGN & MILITARY POLICY [1] A Green party president, such as Jill Stein, would stop the vicious war-making over which the current US president presides. Like all American presidents for more than a generation, President Obama is making war around the world. [2] Since World War II, US presidents have killed more than 20 million people in 37 nations. The US remains in the Obama administration what Martin Luther King called it long ago: “the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today.” [3] When the new president is inaugurated next January, Barack Obama will have become the first US president - ever - to have been at war throughout two presidential terms. He has attacked eight countries - two more than George Bush - and is today conducting what has been called “the most extreme terrorist campaign of modern times” - his drone assassinations. He has killed thousands of civilians with drones, including U.S. citizens and hundreds of children. The New York Times says he chooses the targets himself, from lists prepared by the CIA. [4] In addition to conducting wars throughout the Mideast, the Obama administration is acting with belligerence toward China, and promoting an ongoing proxy war against Russia in Ukraine; that war has already killed more people than Israel killed (with US permission) in Gaza in 2014. The president is risking war with both Russia and China, even nuclear war. He also commands through the National Security Council a 70,000-member private army, the Special Operations Command, active in half the countries of the world. Their operations include kidnapping ("rendition"), murder, and torture. [5] Not only is the Obama administration risking nuclear war, they’re preparing for it: President Obama has launched a 1o-year trillion dollar program to update nuclear weapons - and make them more usable! [6] The Obama administration is also responsible for the vicious civil war in Syria that has killed thousands and flooded Europe with refugees. Hillary Clinton, responsible for horrors in Honduras, Libya, Syria and elsewhere, as president would only continue and intensify the warmongering of the Bush and Obama administrations, the blowback from which is now producing terrorist attacks in Europe and America. [7] The Green party says instead, “Establish a foreign policy based on diplomacy, international law, and human rights. End the wars [in the Mideast and elsewhere] and [stop the] drone attacks; cut military spending by at least 50% and close the more than 700 foreign military bases that are turning our republic into a bankrupt empire. [Neither Russia nor China has more than 12.] Stop U.S. support and arms sales to human rights abusers [notably Israel], and lead on global nuclear disarmament.” [Jill2016] [8] That’s a call for a reversal of the Obama administration’s foreign and military policy. The positions of the Green party’s presidential candidate, Jill Stein, on foreign and domestic policy - to say nothing of climate catastrophe - are far better than those of the major party candidates, but I won't be dissuaded by the argument that voting for a third party helps Trump - because his positions on war and the economy are substantially better than Clinton's. [9] Clinton is the candidate of the ‘defense’ industries and Wall Street because they see accurately that she is both neoconservative (which means more war) and neoliberal (which means more austerity) - and that Trump isn’t. [10] Not only have the leading neoliberals rallied to Clinton, the leading neocons have fled the Republicans to support her. With Clinton as president, we're certain to get more war, in the tradition of the last 25 years. With Trump as president, we might not. [11] John Pilger has written, “The CIA has demanded Trump [not be] elected. Pentagon generals have demanded he [not be] elected. The pro-war New York Times - taking a breather from its relentless low-rent Putin smears [of Russian president Putin] - demands that he [not be] elected. Something is up. These [promoters] of "perpetual war" are terrified that the multi-billion-dollar business of war by which the United States maintains its dominance will be undermined if Trump does a deal with Putin, then with China's Xi Jinping. Their panic at the possibility of the world's great power talking peace - however unlikely - would be the blackest farce were the issues not so dire.” [12] But there is in fact a candidate talking peace - and a reversal of Obama’s war policies - even more than Trump, and that’s Jill Stein of the Green party. —CGE > On Sep 22, 2016, at 3:44 PM, Karen Aram via Peace wrote: > > Details > The UIUC Student Greens are hosting a panel event. Speakers include the Prairie Greens, Scott Summers (Illinois Green Party candidate for U.S. Senate), and music by HarryoftheEarth Music . All will be followed by a Q&A, so come with questions or discussion points! > About UIUC Student Greens > > UIUC Student Greens > Political Organization > This is the student organization at the U of Illinois supporting the Green Party of the United States. > _______________________________________________ > Peace mailing list > Peace at lists.chambana.net > https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From karenaram at hotmail.com Fri Sep 23 12:09:41 2016 From: karenaram at hotmail.com (Karen Aram) Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 12:09:41 +0000 Subject: [Peace] Syria Message-ID: No hope for cease fire in Syria. Kerry is insisting on a “no fly zone”. Remember the “no-fly zone” over Libya? Total destruction. The only thing the US wants is regime change at any cost. Never mind the death and destruction to the people of Syria. The Russians have walked away. From galliher at illinois.edu Fri Sep 23 12:28:37 2016 From: galliher at illinois.edu (Carl G. Estabrook) Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 07:28:37 -0500 Subject: [Peace] Syria In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <40CE35BF-FA3C-4BDB-B4B0-1B37099D98BB@illinois.edu> What “the US wants” is dependent upon who the effective government of the US is, right now: http://blackagendareport.com/us_rulers_split_over_syria Not that whoever that is, is particularly concerned about "the death and destruction to the people of Syria. —CGE > On Sep 23, 2016, at 7:09 AM, Karen Aram via Peace wrote: > > No hope for cease fire in Syria. Kerry is insisting on a “no fly zone”. > Remember the “no-fly zone” over Libya? Total destruction. > > The only thing the US wants is regime change at any cost. Never mind the death and destruction to the people of Syria. > > The Russians have walked away. > _______________________________________________ > Peace mailing list > Peace at lists.chambana.net > https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From karenaram at hotmail.com Fri Sep 23 13:18:45 2016 From: karenaram at hotmail.com (Karen Aram) Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 13:18:45 +0000 Subject: [Peace] Syria In-Reply-To: <40CE35BF-FA3C-4BDB-B4B0-1B37099D98BB@illinois.edu> References: <40CE35BF-FA3C-4BDB-B4B0-1B37099D98BB@illinois.edu> Message-ID: I see little or no difference between the foreign policy actions of either Democrats or Republicans. Which is why I support the Green Party. While I consider the “US foreign policy related to Syria” analysis below by the Black Agenda Report, to be an excellent analysis, and agree that Hillary will carry out the most egregious acts against humanity, based upon her behavior as Sec. of State, and those advisors with whom she has surrounded her self. I don’t believe a Trump Presidential win will change anything, even if that is his goal. The corporate and military advisors in power known as the neocons of the military/industrial complex, are the powers that be behind the throne. The fact that Harold “Killer” Koh, along with Zbigniew Brzezinski both, though Democrats, also acted as advisors to the Reagan government is just one example of how our foreign policy works. The Council on Foreign Relations, is made up of both Democrats and Republicans who act as advisors to the Administration. Kissinger is another example. Yes, there is dissension between those within the State Dept, and the Pentagon and every other institution as Glen Ford has pointed out, but often their dissent is based on “process” wanting results “now”. Not laws or any moral concern for the peoples whose lives are destroyed. On Sep 23, 2016, at 05:28, Carl G. Estabrook > wrote: What “the US wants” is dependent upon who the effective government of the US is, right now: http://blackagendareport.com/us_rulers_split_over_syria Not that whoever that is, is particularly concerned about "the death and destruction to the people of Syria. —CGE On Sep 23, 2016, at 7:09 AM, Karen Aram via Peace > wrote: No hope for cease fire in Syria. Kerry is insisting on a “no fly zone”. Remember the “no-fly zone” over Libya? Total destruction. The only thing the US wants is regime change at any cost. Never mind the death and destruction to the people of Syria. The Russians have walked away. _______________________________________________ Peace mailing list Peace at lists.chambana.net https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From karenaram at hotmail.com Fri Sep 23 14:09:01 2016 From: karenaram at hotmail.com (Karen Aram) Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 14:09:01 +0000 Subject: [Peace] Is the Sales Tax a Jails Tax? Public Forum on Oct. 5th In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: A very important local issue to be addressed. On Sep 22, 2016, at 19:57, Build Programs,Not Jails > wrote: Is the Sales Tax a Jails Tax? There have been many questions about the "Public Facilities" sales tax referendum that will be on the ballot in our county this November. To help dissect this controversial ballot measure, Build Programs Not Jails will be hosting an educational panel and discussion. Urbana Alderman and long-time activist Aaron Ammons will moderate a panel that explains the details of the referendum, lays out possible alternative paths for solving the county's facilities issues, and outlines the case for opposing the sales tax referendum. A dialog with the audience will follow the panel. Please join us in this crucial discussion so we can make an informed decision at the polls this November. Wednesday, October 5th at 6:45pm in Robeson Room A at the Champaign Public Library Build Programs, Not Jails Champaign-Urbana, Illinois -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stuartnlevy at gmail.com Fri Sep 23 17:44:52 2016 From: stuartnlevy at gmail.com (Stuart Levy) Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 12:44:52 -0500 Subject: [Peace] 6pm tonight(Fri) - No More Stolen Lives rally - Urbana courthouse Message-ID: No More Stolen Lives! Black Lives Matter Champaign-Urbana is organizing a rally, this evening - *6pm Friday 9/23* - in front of the County Courthouse in downtown Urbana, 101 E. Main. They write: https://www.facebook.com/events/431653483671527/ Every day, we encounter more stories of Black lives taken by folks via racist policing, homicides, and toxic masculinity. We lift up the names of those who have suffered and been targeted by the evil in this life and reinforce the need for the struggle we have taken on. We welcome members of the community to stand with us as we acknowledge those past and fight for Black futures. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From karenaram at hotmail.com Sat Sep 24 12:56:42 2016 From: karenaram at hotmail.com (Karen Aram) Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 12:56:42 +0000 Subject: [Peace] WAR with Russia Message-ID: * Print * Leaflet * Feedback * Share » Top US general warns Syrian “no-fly” zone means war with Russia By Bill Van Auken 24 September 2016 The enforcement of a “no-fly” zone in Syria would mean a US war with both Syria and Russia, the top US uniformed commander told the Senate Armed Services Committee Thursday. Marine Gen. Joseph Dunford, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, spelled out the grave implications of the policy advocated by both predominant sections within the Republican Party as well as Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton amid rising violence in Syria and increasing pressure by Washington on the Russian government to unilaterally agree to grounding its own aircraft as well as those of the Syrian government. Secretary of State John Kerry has repeatedly demanded that Russia adhere to what would essentially be a one-sided “no-fly” zone under conditions in which US warplanes would continue carrying out airstrikes. Kerry presented his proposal as a means of reviving and restoring “credibility” to a ceasefire agreement that he and the Russian Foreign Minister negotiated on September 9. This cessation of hostilities collapsed less than a week after its implementation in the face of hundreds of violations by US-backed Islamist “rebels” who have refuse to accept its terms, as well as two major back-to-back attacks. The first was carried out by US and allied warplanes one week ago against a Syrian army position, killing as many as 90 Syrian soldiers and wounding another 100. Washington claimed that the bombing was a mistake, but Syrian officials have pointed to what appeared to be a coordination of the airstrike with a ground offensive by Islamic State (also known as ISIS) fighters who briefly overran the bombed position. This was followed on September 19 by an attack on a humanitarian aid convoy in Aleppo that killed at least 20 and destroyed 18 trucks. The US immediately blamed Russia for the attack, without providing any evidence to support the charge. Russia and the Syrian government have denied responsibility and suggested that the so-called “rebels” shelled the convoy. The US position was reflected in the testimony of both Dunford and Defense Secretary Ashton Carter before the Senate panel Thursday. The general admitted to the committee, “I don’t have the facts,” as to what planes carried out the attack, but quickly added, “There is no doubt in my mind that the Russians are responsible.” Similarly, Carter declared, “The Russians are responsible for this strike whether they conducted it or not.” The collapse of the ceasefire under the weight of these incidents abrogated an agreement that had been bitterly opposed by both Carter and the Pentagon’s uniformed command. The latter have publicly declared their opposition—in terms bordering on insubordination—to the deal’s provision for coordinated actions and intelligence sharing with Russia, which America’s top generals see as the main enemy. This view was reiterated Thursday by General Dunford, who declared that based on the “combination of their behavior and their military capability, Russia is the most significant threat to our national interests.” Asked if he supported the proposal for intelligence sharing, Dunford responded, “We don’t have any intention of having an intelligence-sharing arrangement with the Russians.” Speaking in New York Thursday night after the so-called International Syria Support Group ended a meeting with no progress toward restoring the US-Russian ceasefire agreement, Secretary of State Kerry declared: “The only way to achieve that [cessation of hostilities and violence] is if the ones who have the air power in this part of the conflict simply stop using it—not for one day or two, but for as long as possible so that everyone can see that they are serious.” After leaving the same meeting, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov rejected the demand that the Syrian government take “unilateral steps” under conditions in which the US-backed “rebels” reject the ceasefire. “We insist and find support for steps being taken by the opposition as well, so as not to let Jabhat al-Nusra take advantage of this situation,” he said. This, however, is precisely the aim of Washington. The US military and intelligence complex is increasingly concerned that with the backing of Russia and Iran, the Syrian government is on the brink of breaking the five-year-old siege waged by the Islamist militias armed and paid by the CIA and Washington’s principal US allies, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Qatar. Syrian and Russian planes began intense bombardment of “rebel”-held eastern Aleppo Friday in what has been reported as preparation for a major ground offensive to retake this area of the city. If the offensive proves successful, the US war for regime change will have suffered a strategic reversal. Al Nusra, the Syrian affiliate of Al Qaeda, which is formally designated by both the US and the UN as a terrorist organization, constitutes the backbone of the proxy forces employed by US imperialism to effect regime change in Syria. One of the major controversies surrounding the US-Russian truce agreement was its call for the US to persuade the “rebels” on its payroll to separate themselves from Al Nusra. This Washington was unable and unwilling to do, both because they are so closely integrated with the Al Qaeda elements and because they could not survive as a fighting force without them. The imposition of a no-fly zone over Aleppo and other Al Nusra-controlled areas is increasingly seen as a life and death matter for the US-backed Islamists. As Thursday’s Senate hearing indicated, while Kerry is appealing to Russia to voluntarily stand down, there are significant elements within the US state that are calling for the imposition of the no-fly zone by force. Gen. Dunford was asked by Mississippi Republican Senator Roger Wicker if the US could take “decisive action” in imposing a no-fly zone. Wicker indicated that he had discussed the matter with Democrats, who indicated that they would support such a venture if the US intervention were given another name. “For now, for us to control all the airspace in Syria would require us to go to war with Syria and Russia,” Dunford replied to the Senator. “That’s a pretty fundamental decision that certainly I’m not going to make.” Dunford’s remark provoked an intervention by the committee chairman, Republican Senator John McCain of Arizona, who pushed him to clarify that total control of the Syrian airspace would require war with Russia and Syria, while a no-fly zone could potentially be imposed short of that. The hearing provided a chilling exposure of the discussions going on within the US state and its military over actions that could quickly spiral into an all-out confrontation with nuclear-armed Russia, bringing humanity to the brink of catastrophe. In separate remarks the day before the Senate hearing, both Carter and Dunford stressed that the US will maintain its military deployment in the Middle East long after the defeat of ISIS, the pretext for the current interventions in Iraq and Syria. Speaking to the Air Force Association conference, Dunford declared, “If you assume, like I do, that we’re going to be in that region, if not Iraq, for many, many years to come,” decisions would have to be taken on the establishment of permanent military headquarters and command-and-control infrastructure. “What is obvious and very clear is that we’re going to be in that region for a while,” Carter declared in a “troop talk” streamed live on social media. He added: “ISIL is a big problem, but one we’re going to take care of through defeat. But we have Iran over there, we have other issues in the Middle East.” In other words, Washington is planning the continuation of its unending wars in the Middle East, including military action directed against Iran, with the aim of imposing American hegemony over the region’s vast energy resources and strategically weakening the principal targets of US imperialist aggression, Russia and China. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From divisek at yahoo.com Sat Sep 24 15:26:39 2016 From: divisek at yahoo.com (Dianna Visek) Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 15:26:39 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Peace] Jim Dey on Madigan movie References: <981555298.133627.1474730799550.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <981555298.133627.1474730799550@mail.yahoo.com> Dey: 'Madigan' producer says film gives pol a fair shake | | | | | | | | | | | Dey: 'Madigan' producer says film gives pol a fair shake Far from being the “hit” piece critics have claimed, John Papola said he stands behind what he calls the even-ha... | | | | -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From karenaram at hotmail.com Sat Sep 24 17:58:04 2016 From: karenaram at hotmail.com (Karen Aram) Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 17:58:04 +0000 Subject: [Peace] America's Worldwide Impunity Message-ID: America’s Worldwide Impunity Published on Monday, September 19, 2016 by Consortium News America’s Worldwide Impunity The mainstream U.S. media is treating the U.S.-led airstrike that killed scores of Syrian troops as an unfortunate boo-boo, ignoring that the U.S. and its allies have no legal right to operate in Syria at all by Robert Parry * * * * * * * 73 Comments [http://www.commondreams.org/sites/default/files/styles/cd_large/public/views-article/new-york-times-building.jpg?itok=OdQ8nrRQ] "The New York Times now reeks of propaganda, especially aimed at two of the current targets, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and Russian President Vladimir Putin," writes Robert Parry. (Photo: Sam Chills/flickr/cc) After several years of arming and supporting Syrian rebel groups that often collaborated with Al Qaeda’s Nusra terror affiliate, the United States launched an illegal invasion of Syria two years ago with airstrikes supposedly aimed at Al Qaeda’s Islamic State spin-off, but on Saturday that air war killed scores of Syrian soldiers and aided an Islamic State victory. Yet, the major American news outlets treat this extraordinary set of circumstances as barely newsworthy, operating with an imperial hubris that holds any U.S. invasion or subversion of another country as simply, ho-hum, the way things are supposed to work. In the world of Official Washington, the United States has the right to intervene anywhere, anytime, for whatever reason it chooses. On Monday, The Washington Post dismissed the devastating airstrike at Deir al-Zour killing at least 62 Syrian soldiers as one of several “mishaps” that had occurred over the past week and jeopardized a limited ceasefire, arranged between Russia and the Obama administration. But the fact that the U.S. and several allies have been routinely violating Syrian sovereign airspace to carry out attacks was not even an issue, nor is it a scandal that the U.S. military and CIA have been arming and training Syrian rebels. In the world of Official Washington, the United States has the right to intervene anywhere, anytime, for whatever reason it chooses. President Barack Obama even has publicly talked about authorizing military strikes in seven different countries, including Syria, and yet he is deemed “weak” for not invading more countries, at least more decisively. Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton has vowed to engage in a larger invasion of Syria, albeit wrapping the aggression in pretty words like “safe zone” and “no-fly zone,” but it would mean bombing and killing more Syrian soldiers. As Secretary of State, Clinton used similar language to justify invading Libya and implementing a “regime change” that killed the nation’s leader, Muammar Gaddafi, and unleashed five years of violent political chaos. If you were living a truly democratic country with a truly professional news media, you would think that this evolution of the United States into a rogue superpower violating pretty much every international law and treaty of the post-World War II era would be a regular topic of debate and criticism. Those crimes include horrendous acts against people, such as torture and other violations of the Geneva Conventions, as well as acts of aggression, which the Nuremberg Tribunals deemed “the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.” Justifying ‘Regime Change’ Yet, instead of insisting on accountability for American leaders who have committed these crimes, the mainstream U.S. news media spreads pro-war propaganda against any nation or leader that refuses to bend to America’s imperial demands. In other words, the U.S. news media creates the rationalizations and arranges the public acquiescence for U.S. invasions and subversions of other countries. In particular, The New York Times now reeks of propaganda, especially aimed at two of the current targets, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and Russian President Vladimir Putin. With all pretenses of professionalism cast aside, the Times has descended into the status of a crude propaganda organ. If anyone operates with “impunity,” it has been the leadership of the U.S. government. On Sunday, the Times described Assad’s visit to a town recently regained from the rebels this way: “Assad Smiles as Syria Burns, His Grip and Impunity Secure.” That was the headline. The article began: “On the day after his 51st birthday, Bashar al-Assad, the president of Syria, took a victory lap through the dusty streets of a destroyed and empty rebel town that his forces had starved into submission. “Smiling, with his shirt open at the collar, he led officials in dark suits past deserted shops and bombed-out buildings before telling a reporter that — despite a cease-fire announced by the United States and Russia — he was committed ‘to taking back all areas from the terrorists.’ When he says terrorists, he means all who oppose him.” The story by Ben Hubbard continues in that vein, although oddly the accompanying photograph doesn’t show Assad smiling but rather assessing the scene with a rather grim visage. But let’s unpack the propaganda elements of this front-page story, which is clearly intended to paint Assad as a sadistic monster, rather than a leader fighting a foreign-funded-and-armed rebel movement that includes radical jihadists, including powerful groups linked to Al Qaeda and others forces operating under the banner of the brutal Islamic State. The reader is supposed to recoil at Assad who “smiles as Syria burns” and who is rejoicing over his “impunity.” Then, there’s the apparent suggestion that his trip to Daraya was part of his birthday celebration so he could take “a victory lap” while “smiling, with his shirt open at the collar,” although why his collar is relevant is hard to understand. Next, there is the argumentative claim that when Assad refers to “terrorists” that “he means all who oppose him.” As much as the U.S. news media likes to pride itself on its “objectivity,” it is hard to see how this article meets any such standard, especially when the Times takes a far different posture when explaining, excusing or ignoring U.S. forces slaughtering countless civilians in multiple countries for decades and at a rapid clip over the past 15 years. If anyone operates with “impunity,” it has been the leadership of the U.S. government. Dubious Charge On Sunday, the Times also asserted as flat fact the dubious charge against Assad that he has “hit civilians with gas attacks” when the most notorious case – the sarin attack outside Damascus on Aug. 21, 2013 – appears now to have been carried out by rebels trying to trick the United States into intervening more directly on their side. A recent United Nations report blaming Syrian forces for two later attacks involving chlorine was based on slim evidence and produced under great political pressure to reach that conclusion – while ignoring the absence of any logical reason for the Syrian forces to have used such an ineffective weapon and brushing aside testimony about rebels staging other gas attacks. We find ourselves in a world in which propaganda has come to dominate the foreign policy debates and – despite the belated admissions of lies used to justify the invasions of Iraq and Libya – the U.S. media insists on labeling anyone who questions the latest round of propaganda as a “fill-in-the-blank apologist.” More often than not, U.N. officials bend to the will of the American superpower, failing to challenge any of the U.S.-sponsored invasions over recent decades, including something as blatantly illegal as the Iraq War. After all, for an aspiring U.N. bureaucrat, it’s clear which side his career bread is buttered. We find ourselves in a world in which propaganda has come to dominate the foreign policy debates and – despite the belated admissions of lies used to justify the invasions of Iraq and Libya – the U.S. media insists on labeling anyone who questions the latest round of propaganda as a “fill-in-the-blank apologist.” So, Americans who want to maintain their mainstream status shy away from contesting what the U.S. government and its complicit media assert, despite their proven track record of deceit. This is not just a case of being fooled once; it is being fooled over and over with a seemingly endless willingness to accept dubious assertion after dubious assertion. In the same Sunday edition which carried the creepy portrayal about Assad, the Times’ Neil MacFarquhar pre-disparaged Russia’s parliamentary elections because the Russian people were showing little support for the Times’ beloved “liberals,” the political descendants of the Russians who collaborated with the U.S.-driven “shock therapy” of the 1990s, a policy that impoverished a vast number of Russians and drastically reduced life expectancy. Why those Russian “liberals” have such limited support from the populace is a dark mystery to the mainstream U.S. news media, which also can’t figure out why Putin is popular for significantly reversing the “shock therapy” policies and restoring Russian life expectancy to its previous levels. No, it can’t be that Putin delivered for the Russian people; the only answer must be Putin’s “totalitarianism.” The New York Times and Washington Post have been particularly outraged over Russia’s crackdown on “grassroots” organizations that are funded by the U.S. government or by billionaire financial speculator George Soros, who has publicly urged the overthrow of Putin. So has Carl Gershman, president of the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), which funnels U.S. government cash to political and media operations abroad. The Post has decried a Russian legal requirement that political entities taking money from foreign sources must register as “foreign agents” and complains that such a designation discredits these organizations. What the Post doesn’t tell its readers is that the Russian law is modeled after the American “Foreign Agent Registration Act,” which likewise requires people trying to influence policy in favor of a foreign sponsor to register with the Justice Department. Nor do the Times and Post acknowledge the long history of the U.S. government funding foreign groups, either overtly or covertly, to destabilize targeted regimes. These U.S.-financed groups often do act as “fifth columnists” spreading propaganda designed to undermine the credibility of the leaders, whether that’s Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh in 1953 or Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych in 2014. Imperfect Leaders That’s not to say that these targeted leaders were or are perfect. They are often far from it. But the essence of propaganda is to apply selective outrage and exaggeration to the leader that is marked for removal. Similar treatment does not apply to U.S.-favored leaders. The pattern of the Times and Post is also to engage in ridicule when someone in a targeted country actually perceives what is going on. The correct perception is then dismissed as some sort of paranoid conspiracy theory. Take, for example, the Times’ MacFarquhar describing a pamphlet and speeches from Nikolai Merkushkin, the governor of Russian region of Samara, that MacFarquhar says “cast the blame for Russia’s economic woes not on economic mismanagement or Western sanctions after the annexation of Crimea but on a plot by President Obama and the C.I.A. to undermine Russia.” The pattern of the Times and Post is also to engage in ridicule when someone in a targeted country actually perceives what is going on. The correct perception is then dismissed as some sort of paranoid conspiracy theory. The Times article continues: “Opposition candidates are a fifth column on the payroll of the State Department and part of the scheme, the pamphlet said, along with the collapse in oil prices and the emergence of the Islamic State. Mr. Putin is on the case, not least by rebuilding the military, the pamphlet said, noting that ‘our country forces others to take it seriously and this is something that American politicians don’t like very much.’” Yet, despite the Times’ mocking tone, the pamphlet’s perceptions are largely accurate. There can be little doubt that the U.S. government through funding of anti-Putin groups inside Russia and organizing punishing sanctions against Russia, is trying to make the Russian economy scream, destabilize the Russian government and encourage a “regime change” in Moscow. Further, President Obama has personally bristled at Russia’s attempts to reassert itself as an important world player, demeaning the former Cold War superpower as only a “regional power.” The U.S. government has even tread on that “regional” status by helping to orchestrate the 2014 putsch that overthrew Ukraine’s elected President Yanukovych on Russia’s border. After quickly calling the coup regime “legitimate,” the U.S. government supported attempts to crush resistance in the south and east which were Yanukovych’s political strongholds. Crimea’s overwhelming decision to secede from Ukraine and rejoin Russia was deemed by The New York Times a Russian “invasion” although the Russian troops that helped protect Crimea’s referendum were already inside Crimea as part of the Sevastopol basing agreement. The U.S.-backed Kiev regime’s attempt to annihilate resistance from ethnic Russians in the east – through what was called an “Anti-Terrorism Operation” that has slaughtered thousands of eastern Ukrainians – also had American backing. Russian assistance to these rebels is described in the mainstream U.S. media as Russian “aggression.” Oddly, U.S. news outlets find nothing objectionable about the U.S. government launching military strikes in countries halfway around the world, including the recent massacre of scores of Syrian soldiers, but are outraged that Russia provided military help to ethnic Russians being faced with annihilation on Russia’s border. Because of the Ukraine crisis, Hillary Clinton likened Vladimir Putin to Adolf Hitler. Seeing No Coup For its part, The New York Times concluded that there had been no coup in Ukraine – by ignoring the evidence that there was one, including an intercepted pre-coup telephone call between U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland and U.S. Ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt discussing who should be made the new leaders of Ukraine. The evidence of a coup was so clear that George Friedman, founder of the global intelligence firm Stratfor, said in an interview that the overthrow of Yanukovych “really was the most blatant coup in history.” But the Times put protecting the legitimacy of the post-coup regime ahead of its journalistic responsibilities to its readers, as it has done repeatedly regarding Ukraine. The fact that Russians, like Americans, will rally around their national leader when they perceive the country to be under assault – think, George W. Bush after the 9/11 attacks – is another reality that the Times can’t tolerate. Another stunning case of double standards has been the mainstream U.S. media’s apoplexy about alleged Russian hacking into emails of prominent Americans and then making them public. These blame-Russia articles have failed to present any solid evidence that the Russians were responsible and also fail to note that the United States leads the world in using electronic means to vacuum up personal secrets about foreign leaders as well as average citizens. In a number of cases, these secrets appear to have been used to blackmail foreign leaders to get them to comply with U.S. demands, such as the case in 2002-03 of the George W. Bush administration spying on diplomats on the U.N. Security Council to coerce their votes on authorizing the U.S. invasion of Iraq, a ploy that failed. U.S. intelligence also tapped the cell phone of German Chancellor Angela Merkel, whose cooperation on Ukraine and other issues of the New Cold War is important to Washington. And then there’s the massive collection of data about virtually everybody on the planet, including U.S. citizens, over the past 15 years during the “war on terror.” Earlier this year, the mainstream U.S. news media congratulated itself over its use of hacked private business data from a Panama-based law firm, material that was said to implicate Putin in some shady business dealings even though his name never showed up in the documents. No one in the mainstream media protested that leak or questioned who did the hacking. Such mainstream media bias is pervasive. In the case of Sunday’s Russian elections, the Times seems determined to maintain the fiction that the Russian people don’t really support Putin, despite consistent opinion polls showing him with some 80 percent approval. In the Times’ version of reality, Putin’s popularity must be some kind of trick, a case of totalitarian repression of the Russian people, which would be fixed if only the U.S.-backed “liberals” were allowed to keep getting money from NED and Soros without having to divulge where the funds were coming from. The fact that Russians, like Americans, will rally around their national leader when they perceive the country to be under assault – think, George W. Bush after the 9/11 attacks – is another reality that the Times can’t tolerate. No, the explanation must be mind control. The troubling reality is that the Times, Post and other leading American news outlets have glibly applied one set of standards on “enemies” and another on the U.S. government. The Times may charge that Bashar al-Assad has “impunity” for his abuses, but what about the multitude of U.S. leaders – and, yes, journalists – who have their hands covered in the blood of Iraqis, Libyans, Afghans, Yemenis, Syrians, Somalis and other nationalities. Where is their accountability? © 2016 Consortium News [Robert Parry] Robert Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories in the 1980s for the Associated Press and Newsweek. His latest book, Neck Deep: The Disastrous Presidency of George W. Bush, was written with two of his sons, Sam and Nat. His two previous books are Secrecy & Privilege: The Rise of the Bush Dynasty from Watergate to Iraq and Lost History: Contras, Cocaine, the Press & 'Project Truth'. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From marinammanetti at yahoo.com Sun Sep 25 15:02:23 2016 From: marinammanetti at yahoo.com (Peace) Date: RANDOM_Sun, 25 Sep 2016 18:02:23 +0300 Subject: [Peace] need your help, please Message-ID: <00005879b383$e0e91a3e$9d6a8f2d$@yahoo.com> Hello! Please take a look at that cool stuff and help me choose something really worthy, check this out Peace -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naiman at justforeignpolicy.org Sun Sep 25 21:19:13 2016 From: naiman at justforeignpolicy.org (Robert Naiman) Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 16:19:13 -0500 Subject: [Peace] City of Urbana: Resolution Opposing The Dakota Access Pipeline Message-ID: Final Urbana resolution as passed by the Council and signed by Mayor Prussing. Passed: September 19, 2016 Signed: September 21, 2016 RESOLUTION N0.2016-09-061R Resolution Opposing The Dakota Access Pipeline https://www2.city.urbana.il.us/_Ordinances_-_Resolutions/Resolutions/2016/Resolution_2016-09-061R.pdf === Robert Naiman Policy Director Just Foreign Policy www.justforeignpolicy.org naiman at justforeignpolicy.org (202) 448-2898 x1 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From carl at newsfromneptune.com Tue Sep 27 04:37:08 2016 From: carl at newsfromneptune.com (C. G. Estabrook) Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 23:37:08 -0500 Subject: [Peace] Tonight's debate Message-ID: <3C9BFC52-61DE-4B38-BE63-DEABE23CC3E9@newsfromneptune.com> Style: I think J. St. Clair of CounterPunch had it right: "If this was a fight, Trump probably would have won on points as the aggressor. But probably missed twice as many punches as he landed. Hillary was flat-footed, defending failed policies, offering little more than policy papers." Substance: Trump attacked Clinton's neoliberalism (trade pacts from NAFTA to TPP) and her neoconservatism (wars in MENA from Iraq to Libya and Syria). His are the policies that resonate with most Americans; the Clinton camp knows that - and are afraid. [Friends’ comments on style: “Trump won the early rounds and then it was a pathetic draw.” "My favorite moment was when she made a sales pitch for her book [which is not doing well at all].”] [Friends’ comment on substance: “Trump said that he was opposed to nuclear first strike, which Obama has refused to say.”] —CGE From jbw292002 at gmail.com Tue Sep 27 06:17:58 2016 From: jbw292002 at gmail.com (John W.) Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 01:17:58 -0500 Subject: [Peace] Tonight's debate In-Reply-To: <3C9BFC52-61DE-4B38-BE63-DEABE23CC3E9@newsfromneptune.com> References: <3C9BFC52-61DE-4B38-BE63-DEABE23CC3E9@newsfromneptune.com> Message-ID: I quite disagree with your assessment of the first debate, Carl, but does it really matter? John Wason On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 11:37 PM, C. G. Estabrook via Peace < peace at lists.chambana.net> wrote: Style: I think J. St. Clair of CounterPunch had it right: "If this was a > fight, Trump probably would have won on points as the aggressor. But > probably missed twice as many punches as he landed. Hillary was > flat-footed, defending failed policies, offering little more than policy > papers." > > Substance: Trump attacked Clinton's neoliberalism (trade pacts from NAFTA > to TPP) and her neoconservatism (wars in MENA from Iraq to Libya and > Syria). His are the policies that resonate with most Americans; the Clinton > camp knows that - and are afraid. > > [Friends’ comments on style: “Trump won the early rounds and then it was a > pathetic draw.” "My favorite moment was when she made a sales pitch for her > book [which is not doing well at all].”] [Friends’ comment on substance: > “Trump said that he was opposed to nuclear first strike, which Obama has > refused to say.”] > > —CGE > _______________________________________________ > Peace mailing list > Peace at lists.chambana.net > https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From carl at newsfromneptune.com Tue Sep 27 09:59:04 2016 From: carl at newsfromneptune.com (C. G. Estabrook) Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 04:59:04 -0500 Subject: [Peace] Tonight's debate In-Reply-To: References: <3C9BFC52-61DE-4B38-BE63-DEABE23CC3E9@newsfromneptune.com> Message-ID: <6D2BFDAC-B491-484A-B3B0-0952601E6885@newsfromneptune.com> Does it really matter which of them becomes president, John? I think it does - but probably not too much. Would the sum of human happiness have been much altered by a Romney rather than an Obama presidency? I doubt it. —CGE > On Sep 27, 2016, at 1:17 AM, John W. wrote: > > > I quite disagree with your assessment of the first debate, Carl, but does it really matter? > > John Wason > > > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 11:37 PM, C. G. Estabrook via Peace > wrote: > > Style: I think J. St. Clair of CounterPunch had it right: "If this was a fight, Trump probably would have won on points as the aggressor. But probably missed twice as many punches as he landed. Hillary was flat-footed, defending failed policies, offering little more than policy papers." > > Substance: Trump attacked Clinton's neoliberalism (trade pacts from NAFTA to TPP) and her neoconservatism (wars in MENA from Iraq to Libya and Syria). His are the policies that resonate with most Americans; the Clinton camp knows that - and are afraid. > > [Friends’ comments on style: “Trump won the early rounds and then it was a pathetic draw.” "My favorite moment was when she made a sales pitch for her book [which is not doing well at all].”] [Friends’ comment on substance: “Trump said that he was opposed to nuclear first strike, which Obama has refused to say.”] > > —CGE > _______________________________________________ > Peace mailing list > Peace at lists.chambana.net > https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From carl at newsfromneptune.com Tue Sep 27 12:19:31 2016 From: carl at newsfromneptune.com (C. G. Estabrook) Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 07:19:31 -0500 Subject: [Peace] [Peace-discuss] Tonight's debate In-Reply-To: <1810708284.6830863.1474978355481@mail.yahoo.com> References: <3C9BFC52-61DE-4B38-BE63-DEABE23CC3E9@newsfromneptune.com> <1810708284.6830863.1474978355481@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <76705035-D577-4CB4-AA6E-956BC70C090A@newsfromneptune.com> Pro-jobs and anti-war - after 15 years of growing (and accelerating) inequality and war. Trump’s voters see their life-chances as not equal to their parents’ - that’s why they respond to “Make America great again." > On Sep 27, 2016, at 7:12 AM, Gregg Gordon via Peace-discuss wrote: > > What are his policies that resonate? The racist ones? > > > On Monday, September 26, 2016 11:37 PM, C. G. Estabrook via Peace wrote: > > > Style: I think J. St. Clair of CounterPunch had it right: "If this was a fight, Trump probably would have won on points as the aggressor. But probably missed twice as many punches as he landed. Hillary was flat-footed, defending failed policies, offering little more than policy papers." > > Substance: Trump attacked Clinton's neoliberalism (trade pacts from NAFTA to TPP) and her neoconservatism (wars in MENA from Iraq to Libya and Syria). His are the policies that resonate with most Americans; the Clinton camp knows that - and are afraid. > > [Friends’ comments on style: “Trump won the early rounds and then it was a pathetic draw.” "My favorite moment was when she made a sales pitch for her book [which is not doing well at all].”] [Friends’ comment on substance: “Trump said that he was opposed to nuclear first strike, which Obama has refused to say.”] > > —CGE > _______________________________________________ > Peace mailing list > Peace at lists.chambana.net > https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace > > > _______________________________________________ > Peace-discuss mailing list > Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net > https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss From carl at newsfromneptune.com Tue Sep 27 12:32:06 2016 From: carl at newsfromneptune.com (C. G. Estabrook) Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 07:32:06 -0500 Subject: [Peace] [Peace-discuss] Tonight's debate In-Reply-To: <1974323132.6870849.1474978993587@mail.yahoo.com> References: <3C9BFC52-61DE-4B38-BE63-DEABE23CC3E9@newsfromneptune.com> <1810708284.6830863.1474978355481@mail.yahoo.com> <76705035-D577-4CB4-AA6E-956BC70C090A@newsfromneptune.com> <1974323132.6870849.1474978993587@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <85416C2D-F8A7-489F-AEFE-AE523451FCAF@newsfromneptune.com> They reject Clinton’s identity-politics solution (help favored groups) for the immiseration of an economic class. Trump’s call for opposition to ISIS, which (he rightly says) Obama-Clinton war policy in MENA (Libya, Iraq and Syria) promoted. > On Sep 27, 2016, at 7:23 AM, Gregg Gordon wrote: > > And why do they not see their life chances as being equal to their parents? Because the blacks and Hispanics are getting too much. > > And explain to me how "bombing the shit out of them" is an anti-war message. > > > On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 7:19 AM, C. G. Estabrook wrote: > > > Pro-jobs and anti-war - after 15 years of growing (and accelerating) inequality and war. > > Trump’s voters see their life-chances as not equal to their parents’ - that’s why they respond to “Make America great again." > > > > On Sep 27, 2016, at 7:12 AM, Gregg Gordon via Peace-discuss wrote: > > > > What are his policies that resonate? The racist ones? > > > > > > On Monday, September 26, 2016 11:37 PM, C. G. Estabrook via Peace wrote: > > > > > > Style: I think J. St. Clair of CounterPunch had it right: "If this was a fight, Trump probably would have won on points as the aggressor. But probably missed twice as many punches as he landed. Hillary was flat-footed, defending failed policies, offering little more than policy papers." > > > > Substance: Trump attacked Clinton's neoliberalism (trade pacts from NAFTA to TPP) and her neoconservatism (wars in MENA from Iraq to Libya and Syria). His are the policies that resonate with most Americans; the Clinton camp knows that - and are afraid. > > > > [Friends’ comments on style: “Trump won the early rounds and then it was a pathetic draw.” "My favorite moment was when she made a sales pitch for her book [which is not doing well at all].”] [Friends’ comment on substance: “Trump said that he was opposed to nuclear first strike, which Obama has refused to say.”] > > > > —CGE > > _______________________________________________ > > Peace mailing list > > Peace at lists.chambana.net > > https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Peace-discuss mailing list > > Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net > > https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss > > > From carl at newsfromneptune.com Tue Sep 27 13:56:15 2016 From: carl at newsfromneptune.com (C. G. Estabrook) Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 08:56:15 -0500 Subject: [Peace] [Peace-discuss] Tonight's debate In-Reply-To: <1836539698.6822150.1474981526628@mail.yahoo.com> References: <3C9BFC52-61DE-4B38-BE63-DEABE23CC3E9@newsfromneptune.com> <1810708284.6830863.1474978355481@mail.yahoo.com> <76705035-D577-4CB4-AA6E-956BC70C090A@newsfromneptune.com> <1974323132.6870849.1474978993587@mail.yahoo.com> <85416C2D-F8A7-489F-AEFE-AE523451FCAF@newsfromneptune.com> <1836539698.6822150.1474981526628@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <2949B2D9-8BD4-441C-8602-1B67C187B875@newsfromneptune.com> Trump condemns the Obama-Clinton war policy, and their support for jihadis - as do most Americans. http://harpers.org/archive/2016/01/a-special-relationship/ > On Sep 27, 2016, at 8:05 AM, Gregg Gordon via Peace-discuss wrote: > > That doesn't answer my question. > > The head of ISIS is a former prisoner at Abu Ghraib, so if you want to blame any American politicians, I'd suggest Rumsfeld and Cheney. > > Trump has made it clear that he's pro-torture, so I don't think he's our solution. > > > On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 7:32 AM, C. G. Estabrook wrote: > > > They reject Clinton’s identity-politics solution (help favored groups) for the immiseration of an economic class. > > Trump’s call for opposition to ISIS, which (he rightly says) Obama-Clinton war policy in MENA (Libya, Iraq and Syria) promoted. > > > > On Sep 27, 2016, at 7:23 AM, Gregg Gordon wrote: > > > > And why do they not see their life chances as being equal to their parents? Because the blacks and Hispanics are getting too much. > > > > And explain to me how "bombing the shit out of them" is an anti-war message. > > > > > > On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 7:19 AM, C. G. Estabrook wrote: > > > > > > Pro-jobs and anti-war - after 15 years of growing (and accelerating) inequality and war. > > > > Trump’s voters see their life-chances as not equal to their parents’ - that’s why they respond to “Make America great again." > > > > > > > On Sep 27, 2016, at 7:12 AM, Gregg Gordon via Peace-discuss wrote: > > > > > > What are his policies that resonate? The racist ones? > > > > > > > > > On Monday, September 26, 2016 11:37 PM, C. G. Estabrook via Peace wrote: > > > > > > > > > Style: I think J. St. Clair of CounterPunch had it right: "If this was a fight, Trump probably would have won on points as the aggressor. But probably missed twice as many punches as he landed. Hillary was flat-footed, defending failed policies, offering little more than policy papers." > > > > > > Substance: Trump attacked Clinton's neoliberalism (trade pacts from NAFTA to TPP) and her neoconservatism (wars in MENA from Iraq to Libya and Syria). His are the policies that resonate with most Americans; the Clinton camp knows that - and are afraid. > > > > > > [Friends’ comments on style: “Trump won the early rounds and then it was a pathetic draw.” "My favorite moment was when she made a sales pitch for her book [which is not doing well at all].”] [Friends’ comment on substance: “Trump said that he was opposed to nuclear first strike, which Obama has refused to say.”] > > > > > > —CGE > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Peace mailing list > > > Peace at lists.chambana.net > > > https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Peace-discuss mailing list > > > Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net > > > https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Peace-discuss mailing list > Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net > https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss From karenaram at hotmail.com Tue Sep 27 14:13:34 2016 From: karenaram at hotmail.com (Karen Aram) Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 14:13:34 +0000 Subject: [Peace] [Peace-discuss] Tonight's debate In-Reply-To: <1836539698.6822150.1474981526628@mail.yahoo.com> References: <3C9BFC52-61DE-4B38-BE63-DEABE23CC3E9@newsfromneptune.com> <1810708284.6830863.1474978355481@mail.yahoo.com> <76705035-D577-4CB4-AA6E-956BC70C090A@newsfromneptune.com> <1974323132.6870849.1474978993587@mail.yahoo.com> <85416C2D-F8A7-489F-AEFE-AE523451FCAF@newsfromneptune.com> <1836539698.6822150.1474981526628@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: My comment on the debates last night: I didn’t watch because they only represent the two party imperialist system. This is what the U of I Student Greens were doing, and my support goes to them and the Green Party. [https://scontent.ford1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-1/c2.0.48.48/p48x48/14117691_605820719598725_7933334291613054965_n.png?oh=6a78a93b01e5f7811a7af7fbf5f4305a&oe=58845902] UIUC Student Greens 13 hrs · We're protesting the debates on the union porch. We have flyers with non-partisan petitions to open the debates and an awesome poster! On Sep 27, 2016, at 06:05, Gregg Gordon via Peace-discuss > wrote: That doesn't answer my question. The head of ISIS is a former prisoner at Abu Ghraib, so if you want to blame any American politicians, I'd suggest Rumsfeld and Cheney. Trump has made it clear that he's pro-torture, so I don't think he's our solution. On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 7:32 AM, C. G. Estabrook > wrote: They reject Clinton’s identity-politics solution (help favored groups) for the immiseration of an economic class. Trump’s call for opposition to ISIS, which (he rightly says) Obama-Clinton war policy in MENA (Libya, Iraq and Syria) promoted. > On Sep 27, 2016, at 7:23 AM, Gregg Gordon > wrote: > > And why do they not see their life chances as being equal to their parents? Because the blacks and Hispanics are getting too much. > > And explain to me how "bombing the shit out of them" is an anti-war message. > > > On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 7:19 AM, C. G. Estabrook > wrote: > > > Pro-jobs and anti-war - after 15 years of growing (and accelerating) inequality and war. > > Trump’s voters see their life-chances as not equal to their parents’ - that’s why they respond to “Make America great again." > > > > On Sep 27, 2016, at 7:12 AM, Gregg Gordon via Peace-discuss > wrote: > > > > What are his policies that resonate? The racist ones? > > > > > > On Monday, September 26, 2016 11:37 PM, C. G. Estabrook via Peace > wrote: > > > > > > Style: I think J. St. Clair of CounterPunch had it right: "If this was a fight, Trump probably would have won on points as the aggressor. But probably missed twice as many punches as he landed. Hillary was flat-footed, defending failed policies, offering little more than policy papers." > > > > Substance: Trump attacked Clinton's neoliberalism (trade pacts from NAFTA to TPP) and her neoconservatism (wars in MENA from Iraq to Libya and Syria). His are the policies that resonate with most Americans; the Clinton camp knows that - and are afraid. > > > > [Friends’ comments on style: “Trump won the early rounds and then it was a pathetic draw.” "My favorite moment was when she made a sales pitch for her book [which is not doing well at all].”] [Friends’ comment on substance: “Trump said that he was opposed to nuclear first strike, which Obama has refused to say.”] > > > > —CGE > > _______________________________________________ > > Peace mailing list > > Peace at lists.chambana.net > > https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Peace-discuss mailing list > > Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net > > https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss > > > _______________________________________________ Peace-discuss mailing list Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naiman at justforeignpolicy.org Tue Sep 27 15:55:58 2016 From: naiman at justforeignpolicy.org (Robert Naiman) Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 10:55:58 -0500 Subject: [Peace] please call Durbin & Kirk today on Saudi Arabia Message-ID: The Senate is expected to vote tomorrow on overriding the President's veto of the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act, which would limit the immunity of Saudi Arabia from lawsuits related to the 9/11 attacks. A strong vote to override will increase the political space for challenging the U.S.-Saudi relationship in the future. In addition, we are trying to get Senators who voted against the Saudi arms deal last week (both Durbin and Kirk voted against it) to mention the Saudi war in Yemen during the debate tomorrow. So, feel free to add that to your ask: "I also urge you to raise concerns about the Saudi war in Yemen during the debate." I just made my two calls. Took me two minutes. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Just Foreign Policy Date: Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 9:31 AM Subject: Senate to Vote Wednesday on Saudi 9/11 Bill Veto Override To: naiman at justforeignpolicy.org [image: Just Foreign Policy] Dear Robert, The Senate is expected to vote *Wednesday* on overriding the President's veto of the Justice Against Sponsors of Terror Act [JASTA]. This bill would remove Saudi Arabia's immunity from lawsuits brought by 9/11 families over the alleged responsibility of Saudi officials for the 9/11 attacks. [1] Override of the President's veto would be a *historic repudiation* of the previously unaccountable U.S.-Saudi relationship, *which has been a root cause of many terribly destructive wars in the region, including the war in Yemen and the war in Syria*. *Call Sen. Dick Durbin now at (202) 224-2152 <%28202%29%20224-2152>.* When you reach a staffer or leave a message, you can say something like: "I urge you to vote to override the veto of the Justice Against Sponsors of Terror Act, so 9/11 families can have their day in court against the Saudi government." When you've made your call, *please report it here .* *Then call Sen. Mark Kirk at (202) 224-2854 <%28202%29%20224-2854>.* When you reach a staffer or leave a message, you can say something like: "I urge you to vote to override the veto of the Justice Against Sponsors of Terror Act, so 9/11 families can have their day in court against the Saudi government." When you've made your call, *please report it here .* *And if you haven't signed our petition to Congress yet, you can do that here .* Thanks for all you do to help make U.S. foreign policy more just, Robert Naiman, Avram Reisman, and Sarah Burns Just Foreign Policy *Help support our work!* If you think our work is important, support us with a $15 donation. http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/donate [image: Please support our work. Donate for a Just Foreign Policy] © 2016 Just Foreign Policy -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ggstanto at yahoo.com Tue Sep 27 18:36:04 2016 From: ggstanto at yahoo.com (Gabriel Stanton) Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 18:36:04 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Peace] please call Durbin & Kirk today on Saudi Arabia In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <635819606.1641439.1475001364996@mail.yahoo.com> blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted { margin-left: 0 !important; border-left:1px #715FFA solid !important; padding-left:1ex !important; background-color:white !important; } I made two calls! Thank you for bringing this to my attention! Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Tuesday, September 27, 2016, 10:56 AM, Robert Naiman via Peace wrote: The Senate is expected to vote tomorrow on overriding the President's veto of the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act, which would limit the immunity of Saudi Arabia from lawsuits related to the 9/11 attacks.  A strong vote to override will increase the political space for challenging the U.S.-Saudi relationship in the future.  In addition, we are trying to get Senators who voted against the Saudi arms deal last week (both Durbin and Kirk voted against it) to mention the Saudi war in Yemen during the debate tomorrow. So, feel free to add that to your ask: "I also urge you to raise concerns about the Saudi war in Yemen during the debate." I just made my two calls. Took me two minutes.  ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Just Foreign Policy Date: Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 9:31 AM Subject: Senate to Vote Wednesday on Saudi 9/11 Bill Veto Override To: naiman at justforeignpolicy.org Dear Robert, The Senate is expected to vote Wednesday on overriding the President's veto of the Justice Against Sponsors of Terror Act [JASTA]. This bill would remove Saudi Arabia's immunity from lawsuits brought by 9/11 families over the alleged responsibility of Saudi officials for the 9/11 attacks. [1] Override of the President's veto would be a historic repudiation of the previously unaccountable U.S.-Saudi relationship, which has been a root cause of many terribly destructive wars in the region, including the war in Yemen and the war in Syria. Call Sen. Dick Durbin now at (202) 224-2152. When you reach a staffer or leave a message, you can say something like: "I urge you to vote to override the veto of the Justice Against Sponsors of Terror Act, so 9/11 families can have their day in court against the Saudi government." When you've made your call, please report it here. Then call Sen. Mark Kirk at (202) 224-2854. When you reach a staffer or leave a message, you can say something like: "I urge you to vote to override the veto of the Justice Against Sponsors of Terror Act, so 9/11 families can have their day in court against the Saudi government." When you've made your call, please report it here. And if you haven't signed our petition to Congress yet, you can do that here. Thanks for all you do to help make U.S. foreign policy more just, Robert Naiman, Avram Reisman, and Sarah Burns Just Foreign Policy Help support our work! If you think our work is important, support us with a $15 donation.  http://www.justforeignpolicy. org/donate © 2016 Just Foreign Policy _______________________________________________ Peace mailing list Peace at lists.chambana.net https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jbw292002 at gmail.com Tue Sep 27 20:38:33 2016 From: jbw292002 at gmail.com (John W.) Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 15:38:33 -0500 Subject: [Peace] [Peace-discuss] Tonight's debate In-Reply-To: <76705035-D577-4CB4-AA6E-956BC70C090A@newsfromneptune.com> References: <3C9BFC52-61DE-4B38-BE63-DEABE23CC3E9@newsfromneptune.com> <1810708284.6830863.1474978355481@mail.yahoo.com> <76705035-D577-4CB4-AA6E-956BC70C090A@newsfromneptune.com> Message-ID: On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 7:19 AM, C. G. Estabrook via Peace < peace at lists.chambana.net> wrote: Pro-jobs and anti-war - after 15 years of growing (and accelerating) > inequality and war. > Well, for whatever it's worth, Trump is vacuous and mendacious. His trickle-down economics will do nothing to "create jobs". We know that; we've experienced that; we know why it doesn't work. His stop and frisk will constitute a (further) war on minorities. He vacillates on foreign policy. He doesn't want us to police the world, but he thinks we should have left troops in Iraq to prevent the formation of ISIS. The world leaders he respects most are Putin and that murderous goofball with the ridiculous haircut in North Korea. Trump's "policies" aren't even worth discussing, except satirically. He's a narcissistic empty suit. He speaks in third-grade sounds bites which sound good to the basket of deplorables, who wouldn't vote in their own self-interest, let alone the nation's, if it was the only option on the ballot. Anyone who compares Trump to either Hillary or Obama is....well, no need to finish the sentence. > Trump’s voters see their life-chances as not equal to their parents’ - > that’s why they respond to “Make America great again." > An empty sound bite. Not even particularly full of sound and fury. JBW > > On Sep 27, 2016, at 7:12 AM, Gregg Gordon via Peace-discuss < > peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net> wrote: > > > > What are his policies that resonate? The racist ones? > > > > > > On Monday, September 26, 2016 11:37 PM, C. G. Estabrook via Peace < > peace at lists.chambana.net> wrote: > > > > > > Style: I think J. St. Clair of CounterPunch had it right: "If this was a > fight, Trump probably would have won on points as the aggressor. But > probably missed twice as many punches as he landed. Hillary was > flat-footed, defending failed policies, offering little more than policy > papers." > > > > Substance: Trump attacked Clinton's neoliberalism (trade pacts from > NAFTA to TPP) and her neoconservatism (wars in MENA from Iraq to Libya and > Syria). His are the policies that resonate with most Americans; the Clinton > camp knows that - and are afraid. > > > > [Friends’ comments on style: “Trump won the early rounds and then it was > a pathetic draw.” "My favorite moment was when she made a sales pitch for > her book [which is not doing well at all].”] [Friends’ comment on > substance: “Trump said that he was opposed to nuclear first strike, which > Obama has refused to say.”] > > > > —CGE > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From carl at newsfromneptune.com Tue Sep 27 21:12:17 2016 From: carl at newsfromneptune.com (C. G. Estabrook) Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 16:12:17 -0500 Subject: [Peace] [Peace-discuss] Tonight's debate In-Reply-To: References: <3C9BFC52-61DE-4B38-BE63-DEABE23CC3E9@newsfromneptune.com> <1810708284.6830863.1474978355481@mail.yahoo.com> <76705035-D577-4CB4-AA6E-956BC70C090A@newsfromneptune.com> Message-ID: <89B5F268-9770-4F3E-9423-C8336B99E64B@newsfromneptune.com> If vacuity and mendacity were excised from US politics, there'd be very little left. "Trump's ‘policies' aren't even worth discussing, except satirically”: that’s what Clinton et al. are desperate to get you to believe, because they know his criticisms, however ill-formed, attack the real issues - Clinton's neoliberalism (more inequality) and neoconservatism (more war). So they insist you not take them seriously - it’s too dangerous. Trump’s surge in the polls comes from people’s recognition that that’s so, in spite of corporate media. Cf. what happened in the UK, where the media and ‘informed opinion' were overwhelmingly opposed to Brexit, and it (quite properly) won. Trump may do the same. —CGE > On Sep 27, 2016, at 3:38 PM, John W. wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 7:19 AM, C. G. Estabrook via Peace > wrote: > > Pro-jobs and anti-war - after 15 years of growing (and accelerating) inequality and war. > > Well, for whatever it's worth, Trump is vacuous and mendacious. > > His trickle-down economics will do nothing to "create jobs". We know that; we've experienced that; we know why it doesn't work. > > His stop and frisk will constitute a (further) war on minorities. > > He vacillates on foreign policy. He doesn't want us to police the world, but he thinks we should have left troops in Iraq to prevent the formation of ISIS. The world leaders he respects most are Putin and that murderous goofball with the ridiculous haircut in North Korea. > > Trump's "policies" aren't even worth discussing, except satirically. He's a narcissistic empty suit. He speaks in third-grade sounds bites which sound good to the basket of deplorables, who wouldn't vote in their own self-interest, let alone the nation's, if it was the only option on the ballot. > > Anyone who compares Trump to either Hillary or Obama is....well, no need to finish the sentence. > > > Trump’s voters see their life-chances as not equal to their parents’ - that’s why they respond to “Make America great again." > > An empty sound bite. Not even particularly full of sound and fury. > > JBW > > > > > On Sep 27, 2016, at 7:12 AM, Gregg Gordon via Peace-discuss > wrote: > > > > What are his policies that resonate? The racist ones? > > > > > > On Monday, September 26, 2016 11:37 PM, C. G. Estabrook via Peace > wrote: > > > > > > Style: I think J. St. Clair of CounterPunch had it right: "If this was a fight, Trump probably would have won on points as the aggressor. But probably missed twice as many punches as he landed. Hillary was flat-footed, defending failed policies, offering little more than policy papers." > > > > Substance: Trump attacked Clinton's neoliberalism (trade pacts from NAFTA to TPP) and her neoconservatism (wars in MENA from Iraq to Libya and Syria). His are the policies that resonate with most Americans; the Clinton camp knows that - and are afraid. > > > > [Friends’ comments on style: “Trump won the early rounds and then it was a pathetic draw.” "My favorite moment was when she made a sales pitch for her book [which is not doing well at all].”] [Friends’ comment on substance: “Trump said that he was opposed to nuclear first strike, which Obama has refused to say.”] > > > > —CGE -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: