[Trees-executive] Needed input

Mary C. Schlembach schlemba at uiuc.edu
Wed Mar 14 10:52:47 CST 2001


I, too, agree with John and Carl.

-m

Mary C. Schlembach
Asst. Engineering Librarian for Digital Services
154 Grainger Engineering Library
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
1301 W. Springfield Ave.
Urbana, IL 61801
217.333.3158
FAX 217.244.7764
schlemba at uiuc.edu

> -----Original Message-----
> From: trees-executive-admin at lists.groogroo.com
> [mailto:trees-executive-admin at lists.groogroo.com]On Behalf Of Carl H.
> Malmgren, II
> Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 10:07 AM
> To: trees-executive at lists.groogroo.com
> Cc: JMcma83890 at aol.com
> Subject: [Trees-executive] Needed input
>
>
> Dear All,
>
> I looked over this and agree with John.  Please e-mail John your
> position and then we can get this taken care of.
>
> BTW I am gone starting tomorrow.
>
> Carl
>
>
>
>
> >Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 11:04:42 -0500
> >To: JMcma83890 at aol.com
> >From: "Carl H. Malmgren, II" <malmgren at life.uiuc.edu>
> >Subject: Re: ICC Notice
> >Cc:
> >Bcc:
> >X-Attachments:
> >
> >>Carl,
> >>
> >>If you check the e-docket you should see that the attorney for the
> >>intervening cities in the IP area has objected to the petition
> to intervene
> >>by AmerenCIPS and Ameren UE and that the hearing officer has given all
> >>parties until 3/19 to file replies. My view is that it best serves our
> >>purposes to remain noncommittal on this matter, i.e., file no
> reply. I do not
> >>want to oppose Mr. Ader because, at least so far, he remains a
> useful ally
> >>and I'd like to keep it that way. On the other hand, he wants
> to keep this
> >>proceeding as neat and tidy as possible, which is why he
> doesn't want parties
> >>outside the IP area intervening. For our purposes, I want to
> remain free to
> >>support other activist groups outside the IP area, like the
> Peoria group. We
> >>can more credibly support such groups if we do not oppose
> intervention by
> >>utility companies outside the IP area. Further, the more out of
> control this
> >>proceeding gets, the clearer it should be to the ICC that IP
> has stirred up a
> >>hornet's nest and that the public is paying very close
> attention to what the
> >>ICC does.
> >>
> >>Anyway, there's my view. If the executive committee sees it differently,
> >>please let me know ASAP so that I can prepare a reply.
> >>
> >>John McMahon
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Trees-executive mailing list
> Trees-executive at lists.groogroo.com
> http://lists.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/trees-executive
>





More information about the Trees-executive mailing list