[C-U Smokefree] Smokefree workplaces new study: tobacco industry will lose $2.3bln/yr

Theotskl at aol.com Theotskl at aol.com
Mon Jun 21 18:19:09 CDT 2004


Hi there--

this just in from a new study on the benefits of a situation in which all 
workplaces (as opposed to about 69% of all US workers being employed in indoor 
smofree places currently ) going smokefree.

Cheers!

Theo

Theo Tsoukalas, Ph.D.

Cardiovascular health and economic effects of smoke-free workplaces

Abstract

Purpose
Smoking is the leading controllable risk factor for heart disease. Only
about 69% of U.S. indoor workers are currently covered by a smoke-free
workplace policy. This analysis projects the cardiovascular health and
economic effects of making all U.S. workplaces smoke free after 1 year and
at steady state.

Methods
We estimated the number of U.S. indoor workers not covered by smoke-free
workplace policies, and the effects of making all workplaces smoke free on
smoking behavior and on the relative risks of acute myocardial infarctions
and strokes. One-year and steady-state results were calculated using an
exponential decline model. A Monte Carlo simulation was performed for a
sensitivity analysis.

Results
The first-year effect of making all workplaces smoke free would produce
about 1.3 million new quitters and prevent over 950 million cigarette packs
from being smoked annually, worth about $2.3 billion in pretax sales to the
tobacco industry. In 1 year, making all workplaces smoke free would prevent
about 1500 myocardial infarctions and 350 strokes, and result in nearly $49
million in savings in direct medical costs [from heart attacks; including
the strokes, the total is $60 million]. At steady state, 6250 myocardial
infarctions and 1270 strokes would be prevented, and $224 million would be
saved in direct medical costs annually [from heart attacks; including
strokes the number is $279 million]. Reductions in passive smoking would
account for 60% of effects among acute myocardial infarctions.

Conclusion
Making all U.S. workplaces smoke free would result in considerable health
and economic benefits within 1 year. Reductions in passive smoking would
account for a majority of these savings. Similar effects would

You can get to the whole article at
(It will be
posted in the www.tobaccoscam.ucsf.edu Resource Center in the next couple
days.)


More information about the CU-Smokefree mailing list