[CUWiN-Dev] Re: Recommendations on 802.11b PCI 2.1 cards for CUWin ?
Sascha Meinrath
sascha at ucimc.org
Fri Mar 18 16:25:34 CST 2005
Hi James,
Folks on the -dev list may be able to help you (I've cc-ed the list -- if
anyone has ideas where James can get an appropriate wireless card, let us
know. The problem about changing chipsets is a big one -- I'm hoping
someone can provide a URL where you can get a fully supported card online.
--Sascha
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005, James A. Stori wrote:
> Sasha,
>
> Thanks again for the help, and for entering us into the database.
>
> I have been looking for a 802.11b wireless NIC that will work in our old
> Pentium PC, and I am having a fair amount of trouble.
>
> I believe that we need a card that will work on PCI 2.1 (our PC uses the
> Intel 430HX chipset which supports 2.1 not 2.2).
>
> The CUWin Supported chipsets were listed as follows:
> * Intersil Prism II, 2.5, 3.
> * Atheros a/b/g chips --- need more testing in ad hoc mode.
> * Lucent/Orinoco/Avaya/Agere/Proxim/whatever 802.11b: might have problems
> w/ ibss splits, need to find out the best firmware version.
> * Cisco Aironet: might have problems w/ ibss splits, need to find out the
> best firmware version.
> * ADMtek ADM8211A
> * ADMtek ADM8211C/CR support anticipated.
> * Realtek RTL8180 support in progress.
> From the above, I gathered that the "safest" bets would be Prism II, 2.5, 3
> or ADM8211A. I realize that CUWin was also encouraging use of the Atheros
> cards, however these mostly seem to require PCI 2.2 support.
>
> I have been looking at the Belkin F5D6001, Netgear MA311, DlinkDwl520, and
> Linksys WMP11 cards, but the search appears to be complicated by the fact
> that many of the cards seem to keep changing the chipset used (different
> versions), and there is conflicting information about which ones will work on
> a PCI 2.1 system.
>
> One card that looked promising was the Belkin F5D6001. However, I couldn't
> find anyone selling the v.1 Prism-based card. Version 2101 listed the chipset
> as ADM8211 rather than ADM8211A (is there a difference?). Then, the V.3 uses
> RTL8180 which is listed as "support in progress." Should I stay away from
> these cards?
>
> Would you happen to know of any specific PCI NICs that might fit the bill?
> (and would be available via ebay or retail)
>
> Thanks very much !
>
> - Jamie
--
Sascha Meinrath
President * Project Coordinator * Policy Analyst
Acorn Worker Collective *** CU Wireless Network *** Free Press
www.acorncollective.com * www.cuwireless.net * www.freepress.net
More information about the CU-Wireless-Dev
mailing list