[Cu-wireless] major interference
David Young
dyoung at pobox.com
Wed Aug 20 20:41:45 CDT 2003
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 10:08:00AM -0500, Sascha Meinrath wrote:
> I think it will probably be easier for the CUW network to move ourselves
> from channel 11 -- I recommend channel 3 since no one seems to be using it
> and it's fairly far from both channel 6 and channel 1. Most off the shelf
> hardware defaults to channel 11, so I would expect that we'd constantly
> have interference problems popping up on it. I think if we hard-coded our
> software to use channel 3 we'd be able to do a network wide switchover in
> just a couple hours.
On channel 3, we will take heavy interference from volo.net on "both
sides," channels 1 and 6. Interference from consumer gear on channel 11
will ordinarily be lighter than volo interference. If we tune channel 8,
9, or 10, then we may better off than at 3.
Dave
--
David Young OJC Technologies
dyoung at ojctech.com Urbana, IL * (217) 278-3933
More information about the CU-Wireless
mailing list