[CUWiN] Soekris images not quite right?

[David Young]

On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 09:50:27AM -0600, Bill Comisky wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, simon-cuw at uc.org wrote:
> 
> >Hi,
> >
> >I decided to re-image a soekris node that was misbehaving (my first;
> >someone else had done all the previous configs), and I've run into a bit
> >of a problem...
> >
> >After installing the CUWiN 0.6.0 Soekris image using the metrix PXE boot
> >images, I noticed that the disk is not being fully utilized:
> >
> ># df -k
> >Filesystem  1K-blocks      Used     Avail Capacity  Mounted on
> >/dev/wd0a       22615     22010      -525   102%    /
> >mfs:8              47        40         4    90%    /dev
> >mfs:1242         7223      1456      5406    21%    /mfs
> >/etc            22615     22010      -525   102%    /permanent/etc
> >/home           22615     22010      -525   102%    /permanent/home
> >/tmp            22615     22010      -525   102%    /permanent/tmp
> >/var            22615     22010      -525   102%    /permanent/var
> >/mfs/etc         7223      1456      5406    21%    /etc
> >/mfs/home        7223      1456      5406    21%    /home
> >/mfs/tmp         7223      1456      5406    21%    /tmp
> >/mfs/var         7223      1456      5406    21%    /var
> >
> >
> >Disklabel shows that I should have more like 31248 blocks available:
> >
> >5 partitions:
> >#        size    offset     fstype [fsize bsize cpg/sgs]
> >a:     62497        63     4.2BSD      0     0     0  # (Cyl.      0*-    
> >488*)
> >c:     62497        63     unused      0     0        # (Cyl.      0*-    
> >488*)
> >d:    125056         0     unused      0     0        # (Cyl.      0 -    
> >976)
> >e:     62496     62560     4.2BSD      0     0     0  # (Cyl.    488*-    
> >976)
> >#

I had not noticed the offset of 63 before.  An 0.6.0 image should have
an offset of 32.  Maybe that has something to do with your difficulties.

Dave

-- 
David Young             OJC Technologies
dyoung at ojctech.com      Urbana, IL * (217) 278-3933