[CUWiN] Activity?
David Young
dyoung at pobox.com
Tue Aug 5 15:33:48 CDT 2008
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 11:19:56AM -0700, Todd Boyle wrote:
> I love your footnotes!
>
> Re. the CUWIN wireless mesh apparatus, isn't it completely obsoleted
> by products like Meraki that do the same thing for $50 without
> requiring technical expertise? This is just the march of time, the
> march of history.
Todd,
I don't follow Meraki too closely. I believe that CUWiN, regarded
as a mesh system only, still leads Meraki with some of its features
and concepts.
I don't understand what you mean about technical expertise. It has
always seemed to me that building a basic CUWiN network takes essentially
zero expertise.
A few more things:
The principle complaint that I hear about Meraki is that what promised
to be inexpensive mesh hardware/software product has turned into a
for-pay service. That doesn't suit all of Meraki's would-be customers,
and it goes against the community wireless ethos, at least the ethos as
I felt it was.
I have always thought that CUWiN was a better investment than Meraki
in terms of social impact (or potential thereof) per dollar spent.
CUWiN developers have created a lot by using meager resources. I estimate
that the CUWiN's productivity per dollar spent has always been much higher
than Meraki's, as much as 25x. And I think that the CUWiN developers
have been more creative and forward-thinking, too. To keep creative,
productive people working on CUWiN is always hard because you have to
pay them.
> It seems to me the Meraki or CUWIN things still have niches in the US
> suburbs but they're pretty sparse, pretty narrow niches. Such as
> emergency connectivity, or a rare cirucmstances of gamers or file
> sharers who happen to live nearby, and happen to have that rare
> combination of social affinity/trust and technical savvy, etc. Very rare.
I think that you think of CUWiN as a solution for a small set of
networking problems, especially networking between pals in order to
overcome problems with asymmetric bandwidth or latency, then it is
definitely a niche product.
Instead, if you think of CUWiN as a single embodiment of a big idea
about what networks can and should be, then I think that there is broad
latent demand.
Dave
--
David Young OJC Technologies
dyoung at ojctech.com Urbana, IL * (217) 278-3933 ext 24
More information about the CU-Wireless
mailing list