[CWN-Summit] RE: CWN-Summit Digest, Vol 2, Issue 9

[Stelios Valavanis]

sounds like PR for the carriers to me. he makes relevant points about the 
limits of wifi but is way overemphasizing them. distance is more like 1200' 
open air with an omni and properly placed antennas can bring service indoors 
easily. i wish i knew more about wimax. much of what he was saying was news 
to me and i've looked around before. my opinion is that any such deployment 
is good groundwork regardless of how much better upcoming technology is.

On Tuesday 14 September 2004 01:15 pm, Bart Preecs wrote:
> I would love to hear what people on this list think about this skeptical
> analysis of the potential for municipal & community wireless.  /Bart
> Preecs
>
> http://www.slate.com/id/2106657/
> Barbed Wireless
> Why high-speed Net access won't be free.
> By Paul Boutin
> Posted Tuesday, Sept. 14, 2004, at 9:03 AM PT
>
> The Philadelphia city government recently announced that it will launch
> a citywide wireless network by the spring of 2006. The plan is to mount
> up to 16 Wi-Fi routers per square mile on streetlights in order to
> provide "some level of free wireless Internet access to everyone living,
> working or visiting the city." Boston and Madison, Wis. are also
> considering citywide Wi-Fi that's free, or at least cheaper than DSL.
> You might think this means that wireless will be free everywhere in a
> few years. You'd be wrong.
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cwn-summit-bounces at cuwireless.net
> [mailto:cwn-summit-bounces at cuwireless.net] On Behalf Of
> cwn-summit-request at cuwireless.net
> Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 10:01 AM
> To: cwn-summit at cuwireless.net
> Subject: CWN-Summit Digest, Vol 2, Issue 9
>
>
> Send CWN-Summit mailing list submissions to
> 	cwn-summit at cuwireless.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/cwn-summit
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	cwn-summit-request at cuwireless.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	cwn-summit-owner at cuwireless.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
> "Re: Contents of CWN-Summit digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. UTX, OTARD Uh-Oh! (Harold Feld)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 17:43:40 -0400
> From: Harold Feld <hfeld at mediaaccess.org>
> Subject: [CWN-Summit] UTX, OTARD Uh-Oh!
> To: cwn-summit at cuwireless.net
> Message-ID: <6.1.2.0.0.20040909174148.100a39b8 at mail.his.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
>
> Folks here may have seen the Slashdot piece on the University of TX at
> Dallas' policy shutting down "hidden" access points.  I have written  up
> my
> analysis on my blog, Tales of the Sausage Factory, at
> http://www.wetmachine.com
>
> Harold
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWN-Summit mailing list
> CWN-Summit at cuwireless.net
> http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/cwn-summit
> http://www.communitywirelesssummit.org
> http://www.cuwireless.net
>
> End of CWN-Summit Digest, Vol 2, Issue 9
> ****************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWN-Summit mailing list
> CWN-Summit at cuwireless.net
> http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/cwn-summit
>
> !DSPAM:41473af0186801105350640!

-- 
_______________________________________
stel valavanis  http://www.onshore.com/