[Imc-makerspace] In Congress Fwd: Re: [hackerspaces] National Fab Lab Network Act of 2010 (111-HR6003)

Stewart Dickson MathArt at Emsh.CalArts.edu
Thu Sep 23 13:25:16 CDT 2010


  Sponsor: Bill Foster, 14th District, Illinois (Batavia, Elgin, Aurora, 
East Moline)
House Subcommittee on Technology and Innovation:
Judy Biggert (Illinois) 13th district, Hinsdale  http://www.biggert.com
Committee on Energy and Commerce:
Bobby L. Rush, IL 1st District (Chicago, South Side) 
http://www.house.gov/rush
John Shimkus, IL 19th District (SE Springfield, E. St. Louis) 
http://shimkus.house.gov
Jan Schakowsky, IL 9th District (Evanston)  http://schakowsky.house.gov

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	Re: [hackerspaces] National Fab Lab Network Act of 2010 
(111-HR6003)
Date: 	Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:28:42 -0700
From: 	Matt Joyce <matt at nycresistor.com>
Reply-To: 	Hackerspaces General Discussion List 
<discuss at lists.hackerspaces.org>
To: 	Hackerspaces General Discussion List <discuss at lists.hackerspaces.org>



That's awesome!

On Sep 23, 2010 10:27 AM, "Bryan Bishop" <kanzure at gmail.com 
<mailto:kanzure at gmail.com>> wrote:
 > I got wind of this from Ted Hall ("the ShopBot guy") on the open
 > manufacturing group. There's a good chance the committee won't get the
 > bill out the door for general debate, but this is worth watching,
 > talking about, and maybe supporting (somehow). Also, if you know
 > anyone of the committee members (listed below) asking them "what's up"
 > would be cool :-).
 >
 > National Fab Lab Network Act of 2010
 > http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-6003
 >
 > full text:
 > http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:h6003:
 >
 > """
 > HR 6003 IH
 >
 > 111th CONGRESS
 >
 > 2d Session
 >
 > H. R. 6003
 >
 > To provide for the establishment of the National Fab Lab Network to
 > build out a network of community based, networked Fabrication
 > Laboratories across the United States to foster a new generation with
 > scientific and engineering skills and to provide a workforce capable
 > of producing world class individualized and traditional manufactured
 > goods.
 >
 > IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 >
 > July 30, 2010
 >
 > Mr. FOSTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
 > Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on
 > Science and Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by
 > the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall
 > within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
 >
 > A BILL
 >
 > To provide for the establishment of the National Fab Lab Network to
 > build out a network of community based, networked Fabrication
 > Laboratories across the United States to foster a new generation with
 > scientific and engineering skills and to provide a workforce capable
 > of producing world class individualized and traditional manufactured
 > goods.
 >
 > Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United
 > States of America in Congress assembled,
 >
 > SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
 >
 > This Act may be cited as the ‘National Fab Lab Network Act of 2010’.
 >
 > SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
 >
 > Congress finds the following:
 >
 > (1) The United States is the world leader in scientific research,
 > discovery, and innovation.
 >
 > (2) There exists a strong social and economic incentive to create the
 > fewest barriers to entry for those interested in furthering education,
 > discovery, invention, and innovation in the scientific, technological,
 > engineering, and mathematical fields.
 >
 > (3) The United States has a strong strategic interest in promoting a
 > robust, well trained, highly capable, and geographically diverse
 > manufacturing base.
 >
 > (4) MIT’s Center for Bits and Atoms has contributed significantly to
 > the advancement of these goals through its work in creating and
 > advancing Fabrication Laboratories (Fab Labs) in the United States and
 > abroad.
 >
 > (5) A new kind of national infrastructure will be required in order to
 > adequately take advantage of leading edge digital fabrication
 > technologies to secure the United States’ leading position in
 > scientific fields and to promote a robust manufacturing base.
 >
 > (6) A focused, dedicated national effort will be required in order to
 > ensure the creation of such an infrastructure takes place as quickly
 > and effectively as possible.
 >
 > SEC. 3. ESTABLISHMENT OF NATIONAL FAB LAB NETWORK.
 >
 > (a) Establishment- The National Fab Lab Network incorporated by this
 > Act (hereinafter in this section referred to as the ‘NFLN’) is hereby
 > authorized and empowered to receive either real or personal property
 > and to hold the same absolutely or in trust, and to invest, reinvest,
 > and manage the same in accordance with the provisions of its
 > constitution and to apply said property and the income arising
 > therefrom to the objects of its creation and according to the
 > instructions of its donors.
 >
 > (b) In General- The National Fab Lab Network (NFLN) shall exist as a
 > nonprofit entity whose purpose is to facilitate the piece by piece
 > construction of an actual network of connected labs. The NFLN itself
 > shall not represent an overseeing, regulating, or coordinating body of
 > this distributed network, but will merely exist to facilitate its
 > construction.
 >
 > (c) Definitions- In this section, the term ‘Fabrication Laboratory’
 > also referred to as a ‘Fab Lab’ means a facility containing a variety
 > of manufacturing and other fabrication tools operable by means of
 > digital input as well as the software and computers required to design
 > for and operate those tools. These labs serve a broad range of
 > purposes, but each allow for clear guidelines for how members of the
 > local community, local businesses, and academic or educational
 > purposes can be pursued with the labs’ resources consistent with a
 > charter to be established by the NFLN.
 >
 > (d) Functions- The functions of the NFLN shall be the following:
 >
 > (1) To serve as the coordinating body for all efforts to create a
 > coordinated, collaborative network of Fab Labs in the United States.
 >
 > (2) To serve as the first point of contact for organizations
 > interested in constructing and operating a Fab Lab and to maintain a
 > first-come first-serve wait list of those organizations.
 >
 > (3) To work out to the satisfaction of NFLN staff and board members
 > the ability of interested organizations to successfully host a Fab
 > Lab. In particular, the staff and board members of the NFLN shall
 > examine the ability of the organization to supply a physical location
 > for the lab, their financial ability to pay for sufficient staff to
 > operate the lab and train its users, an ability to engage the local
 > community or other sufficient user base, and an awareness of those
 > long term obligations.
 >
 > (4) To match those organizations who meet with the NFLN’s approval for
 > those criteria specified in paragraph (3) with available sources of
 > funding and individuals with personal experience in establishing and
 > operating Labs in other organizations so as to expedite the process of
 > making new Labs operational. In general, the NFLN should not bring to
 > this stage or continue to engage with those organizations that do not
 > meet the NFLN’s approval on those criteria described in paragraph (3).
 >
 > (5) To advertise or perform other outreach activities to those
 > organizations that might have interest in or otherwise benefit from
 > creating a Fab Lab, and to notify those organizations of the specific
 > purposes the NFLN can perform.
 >
 > (e) Purposes- In carrying out its functions, the NFLN’s purposes and
 > goals shall be--
 >
 > (1) to facilitate the construction of a new type of information and
 > digital fabrication infrastructure; specifically, in all its actions
 > to facilitate and encourage the construction of a decentralized
 > network of connected Fab Labs;
 >
 > (2) to promote the goals of greater science, technology, engineering,
 > and math education, workforce development in the areas of
 > manufacturing and product design, increased innovation and invention
 > in the private sector, as well as scientific and academic discovery
 > through the use of distributed digital fabrication tools; and
 >
 > (3) to seek to establish at least one Fab Lab per every 700,000
 > individuals in the United States in the first ten years of its
 > operation.
 >
 > (f) Funding- The NFLN may accept donations from private individuals,
 > corporations, government agencies, or other organizations.
 > """
 >
 > referred to the Subcommittee on Technology and Innovation:
 > http://science.house.gov/subcommittee/tech.aspx
 >
 > people:
 > David Wu (Oregon)
 > Donna F. Edwards (Maryland)
 > Ben Ray Luján (New Mexico)
 > Paul D. Tonko (New York)
 > Harry E. Mitchell (Arizona)
 > Gary Peters (Michigan)
 > John Garamendi (California)
 > Bart Gordon (Tennessee)
 > Adrian Smith (Nebraska)
 > Judy Biggert (Illinois)
 > W. Todd Akin (Missouri)
 > Paul Broun (Georgia)
 > Ralph M. Hall (Texas)
 >
 > also referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce:
 > http://energycommerce.house.gov/
 >
 > people:
 > Henry A. Waxman, California, Chairman
 > John D. Dingell, MI,
 > Joe Barton, TX, Ranking Member
 > Edward J. Markey, MA
 > Ralph M. Hall, TX
 > Rick Boucher, VA
 > Fred Upton, MI
 > Frank Pallone, Jr., NJ
 > Cliff Stearns, FL
 > Bart Gordon, TN
 > Ed Whitfield, KY
 > Bobby L. Rush, IL
 > John Shimkus, IL
 > Anna G. Eshoo, CA
 > John Shadegg, AZ
 > Bart Stupak, MI
 > Roy Blunt, MO, Deputy Ranking Member
 > Eliot L. Engel, NY
 > Steve Buyer, IN
 > Gene Green, TX
 > George Radanovich, CA
 > Diana DeGette, CO, Vice Chair
 > Joseph R. Pitts, PA
 > Lois Capps, CA
 > Mary Bono Mack, CA
 > Mike Doyle, PA
 > Lee Terry, NE
 > Jane Harman, CA
 > Mike Rogers, MI
 > Jan Schakowsky, IL
 > Sue Wilkins Myrick, NC
 > Charles A. Gonzalez, TX
 > John Sullivan, OK
 > Jay Inslee, WA
 > Tim Murphy, PA
 > Tammy Baldwin, WI
 > Michael C. Burgess, TX
 > Mike Ross, AR
 > Marsha Blackburn, TN
 > Anthony D. Weiner, NY
 > Phil Gingrey, GA
 > Jim Matheson, UT
 > Steve Scalise, LA
 > G. K. Butterfield, NC
 > Parker Griffith, AL1
 > Charlie Melancon, LA
 > Robert E. Latta, OH2
 > John Barrow, GA
 > Baron P. Hill, IN
 > Doris O. Matsui, CA
 > Donna M. Christensen, VI
 > Kathy Castor, FL
 > John P. Sarbanes, MD
 > Christopher S. Murphy, CT
 > Zachary T. Space, OH
 > Jerry McNerney CA
 > Betty Sutton, OH
 > Bruce L. Braley, IA
 > Peter Welch, VT
 >
 > The sponsor was Bill Foster:
 > http://www.govtrack.us/congress/person.xpd?id=412257
 > http://foster.house.gov/
 > http://www.facebook.com/CongressmanBillFoster
 >
 > - Bryan
 > http://heybryan.org/
 > 1 512 203 0507
 > _______________________________________________
 > Discuss mailing list
 > Discuss at lists.hackerspaces.org <mailto:Discuss at lists.hackerspaces.org>
 > http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/imc-makerspace/attachments/20100923/b78fdb3a/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: Attached Message Part
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/imc-makerspace/attachments/20100923/b78fdb3a/attachment-0001.ksh>


More information about the Imc-makerspace mailing list