[Imc-tech] resigning spoke

[Zachary C. Miller]

Is Web it's own working group or is it a subgroup of Tech? A lot of my
concerns about tech disolving had to do with editting authority over
the website. If Web takes on that responsibility (and perhaps already
has) then I can see how radio and print could take on the production
room maintenance, web could take on the software maintenance and
editting, and space could take care of the public and staffing
computers.

I think it is especially hard for tech to be an effective group
without a budget.

It also seems like tech was kind of schizo in its goals. Were we there
to fix computers? To manage A/V hardware? To write software? I'd like
to see an ad hoc software group for at some point.

If tech wants to live I'd be willing to be a tech spoke if tech is
willing to only meet once a month and preferably on a Thursday.  

Paul Bengt Riismandel wrote:
> Hey Techies,
> 
> I don't think we ever came to a consensus on how tech will proceed, and I have to admit that I have no inclination to be the motivator on this issue.  
> 
> So, given that tech has not met in months and I'm giving up my Wed. staffing shift, I am also resigning as tech spoke effective immediately.
> 
> I'll be glad to meet again with tech if and when some other meeting schedule is agreed upon, but I do not want to be spoke.
> 
> --Paul
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Imc-tech mailing list
> Imc-tech at urbana.indymedia.org
> http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/imc-tech
> 

-- 
Zachary C. Miller - @= - http://wolfgang.groogroo.com/
IMSA 1995 - UIUC 2000 - Just Another Leftist Muppet - Ya Basta!
 Social Justice, Community, Nonviolence, Decentralization, Feminism,
 Sustainability, Responsibility, Diversity, Democracy, Ecology