[IMC-Tech] File 13 for Email, I Give Up

Joe Futrelle futrelle at shout.net
Mon Oct 16 10:34:43 CDT 2006


Mailman's issue with its crappy admin interface is longstanding and I  
don't think we can wait for it to be fixed. That said, I'm as unclear  
as Stuart about how to interpose an open-source spam filter between  
incoming mail and whatever's running the distro lists--Mailman or its  
eventual replacement. Rolling our own spam filter with heuristics  
will only buy us time.

--
Joe Futrelle
Person


On Oct 16, 2006, at 10:21 AM, Stuart Levy wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 09:06:47AM -0500, Mike Lehman wrote:
>> Hi Dan,
>> I am going to have to give up on trying to manually extract email
>> domains to be banned.  The problem has just gotten too big and it  
>> takes
>> too much time to do this by cutting and pasting. The last list of  
>> names
>> of below my sig.
>>
>> I think it is clear that Mailman is totally inadequate, like Dada  
>> was,
>> for dealing with spam given the current state of internet abuse.  
>> Banning
>> individual email accounts, which is the only option admins have, is
>> pointless. Unless Mailman can be configured to ban email domains with
>> one click, I think we really need to explore other solutions. Even  
>> that
>> solution seems to only be a stopgap, without some sort of strong
>> whitelist or other features to automatically start weeding out  
>> spam posts.
>> Mike Lehman
>
> Curious -- are there simple patterns in the spam that gets through?
>
> Almost all of the stuff that slips through the filters to the
> peace@ and peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net lists
> is stock-pumping spam which has, so far, a pretty reliable structure:
> a randomly generated From address, 1- to 3-word random english title,
> a bunch of innocuous English text and then an attached ".gif" image
> containing the stock ad.  We're getting maybe 50 of those per list  
> per day --
> there's other stuff, much detectable with simple patterns like PH[a- 
> z]*RMA,
> but little enough gets through to be noise.
>
> Would it be appropriate simply to ban image attachments (gif/jpeg/ 
> png),
> is there any way to do that?   Detecting them looks straightforward  
> with procmail,
> but I don't know how mail gets fed into mailman.
> _______________________________________________
> IMC-Tech mailing list
> IMC-Tech at lists.ucimc.org
> http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/listinfo/imc-tech


More information about the IMC-Tech mailing list