[IMC-Tech] Re: [RFU] Re: RFU Website Access Issues

[Mike Lehman]

Thanks, Matt and Dan.

I'm not sure that on our end, we're yet able to deal with SSH and other 
such things, but we can try.  I want to avoid frustrating anyone any 
more than they already have been with the technical side of this.

Ann and Zernial,
If this ends up being confusing or difficult, we may have to wait until 
we have a new webmaster solidly on board, who can handle the technical, 
back-end stuff that needs to be configured to make this work. As I 
discussed with Rev. Z on the phone last night, if we can't get easy 
access for you both to the website right now, then we'll go back to 
paper and pencil to track schedule changes for the time being. We'll let 
people know that the website schedule is out of date and that they 
should check with you via email or at a meeting on what is available for 
new shows.

I suspect that some updates to the schedule will be necessary after we 
compile the survey results in a week or so, since anyone who does not 
turn in a survey will be bumped from the schedule at that point.

Is there anyone who can volunteer to be the RFU webmaster? Just let us 
know and then contact Dan or Matt. It would be really nice to get a 
message up about the birthday event, etc to update the website.
Mike Lehman

Matt Isaacs wrote:
>
> Web services are no longer hosted on IMSAHP; it functions only as a a 
> mail server (and mail related functions).
>
> If someone needs access to the web server via SSH to manage the site 
> in question, we need, at a minimum, their name, email address, the 
> website their are administering, and an SSH public key.  This 
> information nedes to be sent to the IMC-TECH list.
>
> If email accounts are needed as well, please let us know, and we can 
> create the appropriate accounts on IMSAHP.  I'm not sure what info is 
> needed there or what the requirements are, but we will at least need 
> their name and an SSH public key.
>
> I'm not sure if we do this or not, but for either set of accounts, it 
> wouldn't hurt to list one or two choices for a preferred username.
>
> We're sorry if there was any confusion and/or we missed any previous 
> requests relating to this.