[Imc] RE: [Imc-web] Jack Ryan 19 May

[SugarPie Press]

I agree with Paul.  Perhaps he's waiting for the censorship.  Obviously this person has idle time to play these games.  With the crap happening w/IMC and performance space et al----this may not be the time to fry this fish.  Especially when it is still somewhat palatable.  Hence, when it becomes truly rancid----then it would be a professional call and no one, even this Jack, could refute the decision unless he chanced exposing his poisoned pen tactics (which clearly serve no purpose other than). CiaoMelodye

Paul Bengt Riismandel <p-riism at ad.uiuc.edu> wrote:I don't know, I think it's pushing it to hide it. So much of what's on
the site can be hidden under this clause depending on interpretation,
and I'm not convinced this post goes far enough.

Jack's a pain in the ass, but I'm not sure it's worth the time and
effort to hide his posts unless they're outrageous. 

--paul

-----Original Message-----
From: mlehman [mailto:mlehman at students.uiuc.edu] 
Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2003 11:13 PM
To: imc at ucimc.org
Cc: imc-web at ucimc.org
Subject: [Imc-web] Jack Ryan 19 May

Hidden:

Comment to:

Off-Topic Post: "posts that are baldly and clearly inappropriate, whose 
purpose seems clearly to be other than informing, educating or adding to
a 
public discourse."

Mike Lehman

_______________________________________________
Imc-web mailing list
Imc-web at lists.cu.groogroo.com
http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/imc-web

_______________________________________________
IMC mailing list
IMC at www.ucimc.org
http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/imc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/archive/imc-web/attachments/20030519/8f44c826/attachment.htm