[Imc-web] Edited Post

[Mike Lehman]

Reference Comment:
http://www.ucimc.org/editor/index.php?class=Article&function=editor_display&id=134563

I edited it, based on a complaint taht it violated the recent decision 
that those who are reported as crime victims in public records would NOT 
be identified on the UC IMC website.

I then posted this comment:
http://www.ucimc.org/editor/index.php?class=Article&function=editor_display&id=134590

> UC IMC policy is to not publish the names of those who claim to be 
> victims of sexual assault. This was subject to some discussion, due to 
> the fact that there are legitimate issues of both gender and 
> journalism in suppressing such publiclly available information.
>
> Based on a discussion sparked, in part, by the very discussions 
> referenced, UC IMC established a policy that we would NOT publish the 
> name of this person or other alleged victims of such offenses. 
> Previous stories here were edited to reflect this decision.
>
> As anyone who knows how the web works, it is difficult to 
> retroactively enforce a policy. However, please do NOT post such 
> references here. They will be edited or removed.
>
> "For the Record"s intent may have been innocent. But like the "raped 
> babies" content in another thread that was recently introduced to 
> supposedly demonstrate how some amorphous group called "the left" 
> supposedly supports child abuse, insinuating that the whole mess is 
> somehow the IMC's fault, I have to question the actual motivation of 
> someone pretending they actually care about this issue, then turning 
> right around and aggravating the problem they claim to be incensed over.