[Imc] Steering Committee Notes 3/9
Paul Kotheimer
herringb at prairienet.org
Mon Mar 11 05:38:59 UTC 2002
hi
i have to be at work at 6:30PM on Wednesdays.
i may have some recommendations. dot dot dot.
i respond to questions. my expertise works best when it is invited.
commmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmunity,
oh yeah. and peace.
paulkotheimer:)
On
Sun, 10 Mar 2002, Clint
Popetz wrote:
>
> Steering Committee, 3/9/02
>
> Attending: Sascha (facilitating), Paul R, Jenny, Avram, Russ, Mike L,
> James J, Ellen, Brian H, Clint (taking notes), Michael F.
>
> Next week: Paul's show proposals, Back back room approval, overall
> structure, alcohol at shows.
>
> Intros skipped, we know each other.
>
> Reports:
>
> Librarians - Processed a bunch of books, fixed cgi script on archive search.
> There is now an archive drop box for the news group. It's big, noticeable,
> has signs on it, on the desk in the production room. We will be making
> headway on librarian-crap.
>
> Outreach - Back back room almost done, and usable. Stage extensions would
> be useful.
>
> Space - Security issues being worked on. Two new keys, and Mike L. has
> ordered a safe and can cut a drop slot in.
>
> Staffing - Still have openings on Sun/Mon/Tues.
>
> Radio News - Thinking of putting editorial space in news program, maybe five
> minutes.
>
> Shows - First two shows went well. No problems with sound, but there money
> issues, brought up under "concerns." There is a show tonight, and two next
> week. From March 20th-31st there will be no shows, as a break to deal with
> issues.
>
> Tech - Paul R is taking over "taking heat" on fines and such from Brian.
> Mojo is happy again, Print server is working again. Web site / newswire went
> down, but Zach restarted it. Quickbooks has been moved to mojo.
>
> Aside - What is the copmosting situation. Clint volunteers to take it
> back to his house.
>
> Finance - $300 brought in as profit from show. Tuesday at noon GMT (6am
> local) we will become official fiscal sponsors of global network. Around
> $42k will be transferred to our accounts. We have to figure out what to
> propose in terms of investment and interest to the global group. Work
> on grants and funders continuing. Founding funders still drying up. So
> far we are still ok, but we may have to re-evaluate our budget around
> mid-year. We could really use help getting the around $7k owed to the
> IMC from funders. If anyone knows lawyers or CPAs that could be
> helpful long-term friends, please let Sascha know.
>
> Print - March issue should go to printer tommorow. Meeting today to
> work out distribution.
>
> Old Business:
>
> Membership meeting - Michael sez: I have talked to Cope, she won't be
> able to do invitations for the 19th. So Michael will do invitations
> today, make copies tommorow and get them in the mail tommorow. We may
> have the old postcard files; Michael will contact Peter or Danielle. No
> agenda yet. This meeting will happen on March 30th; it will be
> advertised in the public i. Clint will coordinate refreshments for the
> meeting.
>
> Theft - Facts are that a person took $40 out of cash register, was
> caught doing so, and gave the money back. This person came to the space
> meeting and talked about why this happened and proposals for helping
> rebuild trust and preventing future incidents. Two proposals were
> brought. One was that this person be allowed at the imc, but not
> allowed behind the desk for some period of time ( 6 months.) Another
> proposal was that he not be allowed at the imc for a similar period of
> time except to attend events. He has agreed that if he does not show up
> to the steering committee, he will abide by the decisions of the
> steering committee.
>
> Paul proposes: He not be allowed to be here for six months except for
> scheduled events or meetings, i.e. where he will be here in a group. If
> during that time he proposes doing volunteer work as a way to rebuild
> trust, he should be allowed to do that. He must follow this agreement
> without enforcement, or the agreement is void and he can be banned
> completely from the premises.
>
> Mike L: I would amend that he shouldn't be allowed to be associated
> with money for another six months.
>
> No objections to the proposal.
>
> Second proposal: put notes on the desires and designs board, _with_ the
> name of the person in question. No objections. Russ will also mail
> staffers telling them to read the notes there, and a note will be placed
> next to the register.
>
> New business:
>
> Concerns:
>
> Paul: We have never given explicit consensus to the back back broom's
> opening and running as a venue.
>
> Sascha: We haven't entered into an agreement with the landlord. We
> haven't committed IMC resources.
>
> Clint: Except for lots of money and people-power.
>
> Mike L: It has been implicit consensus.
>
> Paul R: I reject that for all but tiniest things.
>
> Russ: Also, the "temporary" decisions are turning into permanent ones,
> and we haven't considered things like liability insurance.
>
> Ellen: The question isn't secrecy, it's rather process. There was no
> steering committee discussion of explicitly approving the back back room
> work. The onus has been on the wrong end, making any people with
> objections raise a red flag rather than asking them first. Also,
> tensions are very high on this issue.
>
> Michael F: Media productions has dramatically suffered due to the work
> on the back-back room. I feel like we are losing focus on making news,
> as an organization.
>
> Brian: I would argue that previously we devoted resources to one type
> of news (radio/web/print) and now we are devoting resources to another
> (performance as media.)
>
> Paul R: I don't want to block progress, but I would like to see a
> budget and plan. I also have an objection to the person who raises
> money having control over how the money is spent.
>
> Mike L: This has been brought up at every steering committee.
>
> Ellen: But this was never a heading on the agenda, never a proposal,
> always a reporting of "what has happenened."
>
> (Big fight occurred here.)
>
> Reiteration of proposal: We need to see a proposal and budget for the
> back-back room, with lots of detail.
>
> Brian: This proposal should be under the authorship of some working
> group. I think the space group should do this.
>
> Paul: Also, no work should continue on the back room until the plan is
> approved.
>
> Sascha: Lets split this into two proposals.
>
>
> In summary (Clint gets tired of the running commentary):
>
> Space will have a special meeting Wednesday night at 6:30 to create a
> plan/budget for the back-back room, including what has happened until
> now. Steering committee will address this plan next Sunday. For the
> intervening week, no imc capital expenditure be spent on the back room.
> Volunteer labor and money are not constrained by this proposal.
> Approved.
>
> Added notes. Please read Becca's comments posted on the Desires and
> Designs board.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IMC mailing list
> IMC at urbana.indymedia.org
> http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/imc
>
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
THE HAND-MADE RECORD LABEL
www.handmaderecords.com
c/o the School for Designing a Society
409 North Race Street
Urbana, IL 61801
217 384 0299 phone (no fax)
More information about the IMC
mailing list