[Newspoetry] interregnum

[ben emerick]

ispell typo.  the stanza:

> but not it told me so causally
> nor 0, effortlessly
> 

ought to have read:

but not it told me so causally
nor inertia, effortlessly

ben

* ben emerick <bemerick at anacroatan.org> [07.11.02 17:00] stated:
> interregnum
> 11/5/02
> 
> just going to show that voting and writing just mix
> or did you vote, real?
> 
> the vote system will indicate where cnn is using that real second-source 
> information.
> really, the vote system will indicate where cnn is using that second-source 
> information.
> the vote system will indicate where the real cnn is using that second-source 
> information.
> 
> or entitlementality
> oh! inside pundits
> 
> the vote system will... indicate, really, where cnn is using that second-source 
> information.
> the vote system will indicate where cnn is using that second-source 
> real information.
> 
> and conflict, chaos
> 
> the vote system will indicate where cnn really is using that second-source 
> information.
> the real vote system will indicate where cnn is using that second-source 
> information.
> the vote system will indicate where cnn is using, really, that second-source 
> information.
> 
> but not it told me so causally
> nor 0, effortlessly
> 
> the "vote real, system" will indicate where cnn is using that second-source 
> information.
> 
> oops
> tidal change?
> the voting system?
> filiblustering?
> 
> the vote system really will indicate where cnn is using that second-source 
> information.
> the vote system will really indicate where cnn is using that second-source 
> information.
> the vote system will indicate where cnn is really using that second-source 
> information.
> the vote system will indicate where cnn is using that second-source 
> information, really.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Newspoetry maillist  -  Newspoetry at lists.groogroo.com
> http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/newspoetry
>