[Peace-discuss] NYT fingerprinting coverage whitewash
Rosemary Braun
braun at uiuc.edu
Thu Jun 6 18:20:31 CDT 2002
This, from a friend of mine: he snapshotted [?!] the online NYT's
fickle coverage of the fingerprinting story. I know many of us
have noticed NYT's "updates" before; here's some more evidence,
and a link to a copy of the article as it first appeared.
| From: Justin Gullingsrud <justin at ks.uiuc.edu>
| Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 11:57:57 -0500
| Subject: whitewash
|
| I've about had it with the New York Times and their whitewashing of articles.
| The topic of news sites "updating" their content as stories progress has come
| up on Slashdot and other places, but I've never seen anyone mention any
| systematic shift in editorial slant. I first noticed this in coverage of
| the Presidential debates and ranted about it then; now I have actual
| saved pages to document the phenomenon.
|
| Have a look at
| http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/~justin/ashcroft-v1.html and
| and
| http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/~justin/ashcroft-v2.html
|
| v1 is a snapshot as of about 6:30 last night, close to when the story was
| first posted, I think. v2 is from today at around 11:30. Obvious differences
| are:
|
| - the new version is just over half the size of the original version;
|
| - In the original, the first paragraph attributes to John Ashcroft the
| statement that the proposed regulations would affect "tens of thousands
| of Muslim and Middle Eastern visa holders"; in the new version, the first
| paragraph only says "foreign students, tourists, researchers and other
| visitors";
|
| - Many noteworthy Ashcroft quotes from the original were excised from later
| versions;
|
| - The original states that "The proposal ignited a raging debate in the Bush
| administration. White House officials supported the Justice proposal, but
| the State Department lodged objections..." Absolutely no mention is made
| of this division of opinion in later versions.
|
| - The original ends with some interesting background information on how the
| proposals came to be written and who was involved; the latest version
| states that "reaction to the proposal was divided largely along partisan
| lines" and quotes a Republican (Sensenbrenner) as saying that the propsal
| is "a reasonable first step".
|
| --
|
| Justin Gullingsrud 3111 Beckman Institute
| H: (217) 384-4220 I got a million ideas that I ain't even rocked yet...
| W: (217) 244-8946 -- Mike D
--
rosemary braun :: theoretical biophysics, univ. illinois :: braun at uiuc.edu
vocation www.ks.uiuc.edu/~braun :: avocation www.ks.uiuc.edu/~braun/personal
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list