[Peace-discuss] Gulf War I to Gulf War II
Dlind49 at aol.com
Dlind49 at aol.com
Wed Oct 9 06:54:27 CDT 2002
Veterans Groups Berate U.S. Biochemical Force Protection
<< Dave Eberhart, NewsMax.com
Wednesday, Oct. 9, 2002 >>
Editor’s note: This is the second in a series. Part one: <A
HREF="http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/10/6/170909.shtml">Are We
Ready for War?</A>
"Our protective gear – gas masks and chemical suits – were defective during
Gulf War round one, and it is the same this time around,” Denise Nichols,
vice chairman of the National Vietnam and Gulf War Veterans Coalition, tells
NewsMax.com.
Nichols adds: "The GAO [Government Accounting Office] did a study on ours
[chemical suits], and just last week testified to the Government Reform
Committee. It’s the same story again!
"Pray for our troops because that is more protective that their force
protective gear.”
In that hearing, members of the House committee lamented over testimony about
the possibility that troops heading for battle in Iraq may be issued flawed
chemical suits manufactured by a discredited contractor. Defense officials
could not say for sure if the Department of Defense supply system had been
purged of the defective suits, but believed the unaccounted-for 1989 vintage
suits were used for training and then discarded.
However, Joseph Schmitz, the inspector general for the DoD, said that his
team just months ago "continued to identify units that have not segregated
those defective over-garments from their inventories.”
Unsafe From Any Lot
Meanwhile, some veterans advocates warn that, whether issued from a defective
lot or not, the suits will not stand up to sustained battlefield conditions
in Iraq.
"Although DOD is fielding new NBC equipment, troops currently deploying are
leaving with the same equipment troops deployed into Iraq 12 years ago,” says
Kirt P. Love, director of the Desert Storm Battle Registry and a Gulf War
veteran.
"We headed to war with the same faulty M8 alarms that set off 14,000 false
alarms 12 years ago, while detecting [bio-chemical agents] at
thousands-of-times lethal dose – too late to do any good,” Love warns.
"The masks do not have .5 sub-micron filtration needed for small pox or
anthrax, and these mask are only good for sarin – and not cyclosarin,
mustard, ammonia-based products, or solvent-based products that dissolve the
rubber mask. These mask are only good for 20 to 30 minutes in a contaminated
environment before the cartridges are overwhelmed."
Love also advises, "Carbon-based porous overgarments [such as those used by
our troops now] provide temporary resistance, but once the suit is removed
from its protective plastic, it’s only good for 24 hours, regardless of
environment.”
He finds this shortcoming inconsistent with what many experts forecast as
protracted urban combat, perhaps even becoming hand-to-hand.
Repeating the Mistakes of Gulf War I
Nichols and Love are just part of a growing army of veterans’ advocates
warning that some health-hazarding mistakes of the 1991 Gulf War seem about
to be repeated.
Steve Robinson, executive director of the National Gulf War Resources Center,
is not at all happy with the state of affairs, as the U.S. stands poised to
once again invade the <A
HREF="http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/10/8/63000.shtml">toxic
land of Iraq</A>. Among other things, he wants speedy implementation of the
Force Health Protection Law.
This law requires pre-deployment, during deployment and post-deployment
screening of soldiers – including serum collection and physical inspection by
a clinician.
Robinson says that scrupulous implementation of the public law is imperative
to prevent U.S. troops from having to repeat the Gulf War I exercise of
having to fight their own government for years to get compensation for
service-connected injury and illness:
"So far, science has taken 11 years to understand the exposures that veterans
of the last Gulf War faced. Science has absolutely shown that the illnesses
GWS veterans face are not as a result of the stressors of war, but as a
result of exposures, unapproved vaccines, unapproved pills and a myriad of
other things that have not yet been researched.”
Love agrees with Robinson and professes dissatisfaction with what he learned
during a recent meeting with the Pentagon’s Deployment Health Support
Directorate:
"Special Forces would deploy with a…database system to track health record
information of soldiers on classified missions. But collecting other medical
records of troops in Iraq was not high priority,” Love says.
Insidious Lesson
Meanwhile, all the veterans advocates seem to be concerned about what they
see as an insidious lesson to be drawn from fighting Saddam the first time.
As for 1991’s Desert Storm operation, there remains to this day no hard
evidence that the mad dictator fired any biochemical agents at allied forces.
Yet the battlefield was still so toxic as to create frightening statistics
about the health consequences suffered by the U.S. troops that fought there.
The advocates point to the latest Department of Veterans Affairs report on
Gulf War I personnel, including medical illnesses and deaths in the 11 years
since Operation Desert Storm.
For instance, the Gulf War’s totals of 148 combat deaths, 145 non-combat
fatalities and 213 wounded out of the 537,000 U.S. personnel who served in
the Persian Gulf region belies what has over the ensuing years evolved into a
health crisis for Gulf War vets.
The startling reality is that 36 percent (about 206,861) have filed medical
claims with the VA for illnesses stemming from their Desert Storm service.
(Note: a figure less than the 206,861 have to date been granted
service-connected disability.)
In historical context, the Korean conflict, which lasted years rather than
days, resulted in over 33,000 Americans killed in combat, and some 10,000
dying as a result of wounds, disease and accidents. The combat wounded total
was about 104,000.
Despite that vast disparity in numbers between the two American wars, of the
2.3 million American veterans now receiving compensation, 172,600 are Korean
War-era veterans, a number only 13,000 more than the Gulf War veterans.
What’s more, according to the VA report, a surprising 8,013 Gulf War I
veterans who served in the conflict have already died.
Further attesting to the toxic nature of the last Gulf War’s battlefields,
the VA report discloses that a large number of service personnel who were
deployed into the Persian Gulf region after the war ended on Feb. 28, 1991,
have also become ill.
Nichols concluded recently in a column, "As we watch yet another group of
warriors prepare once more for war in the Gulf region, we know that existing
force protection, medical care and reporting accountability deficiencies have
not been resolved.”
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list