[Peace-discuss] Re: Hans van Sponeck on US Aggression v Iraq
Alfred Kagan
akagan at uiuc.edu
Mon Sep 30 08:46:08 CDT 2002
Ricky, these are good ideas.
At 1:55 AM -0400 9/30/02, Ricky Baldwin wrote:
>Thanks for posting this, Al.
>
>How can we use this kind of overview, and others like the British
>MPs' counter-dossier? Post them on our website under "More on US v
>Iraq" or something? Maybe a follow-up letter to Tim Johnson,
>thanking him for meeting our representatives, and attaching this
>Q&A? Include it in a press packet for whenever we decide to
>demonstrate (the day Congress authorizes the use of force, or the
>day attacks begin, etc.)?
>
>Just a couple of comments below...
>
>Ricky
>
>---------------------------------------------
>It is only those who do nothing who make no mistakes. - Peter Kropotkin
>----------------------------------------------
>
>[snip]
>
> >IRAQ: Four Questions, Four Answers
> >by
> >Hans C. von Sponeck
> >UN Humanitarian Coordinator for Iraq (1998-2000)
> >at the European Colloquium
> >Brussels, 25 September 2002
> >http://www.irak.be/ned/bivv/iraq4questions4answers.htm
>
>[snip]
>
> >Attempts to link acts of terrorism involving the 1993 and 2001 WTC,
>
> >the US
> >Embassies in Nairobi and Dar-Es-salaam, the USS Cole in Aden, the
> >Anthrax
> >cases in the US and collaboration with Al Qaeda to the Government of
> >Iraq
>
> >have failed.
>
>And, we should point out, the US Administration seemingly could not
>care less who really is responsible for any of these attacks,
>judging from how quickly officials assigned blame without offering a
>shred of evidence - except in the anthrax cases, of course, where
>they simply seem to have stopped looking altogether. For that
>matter, they seem to be trying to turn our attention from their 'big
>search' for Osama bin Laden, too, right?
>
>[snip]
>
> >My visit to these two sites (accompanied by the ARD German TV)
>
> >showed
> >conclusively that Al Dora and Al Fallujah III facilities had been
> >destroyed (it should be noted that the IISS report acknowledges this
> >for
> >Al Fallujah III). What is destroyed can not be a threat.
> >
> >Conclusions: The evidence offered by the US and UK administration as
> >well
> >as the IISS assessment of Iraq's WMD status does not support in any
> >way
> >the contention that an imminent threat emanates from Iraq justifying
> >a
> >military offensive. The US government promoted mass hysteria and the
> >psycho war are internationally unacceptable. In the interest of
> >preventing
> >such a war, the Iraqi Foreign Minister's statement to the UN/GA that
> >the
> >country is free of WMD and the agreement by the Iraqi authorities to
> >re-admit unconditionally UN arms inspectors at this stage should be
> >taken
> >at face value and UNMOVIC's installation in Baghdad be pursued
> >without
> >delay.
>
>Here's a keeper, right along with Scott Ritter's statements.
>
> >Question No.2: What explains the present US Government Iraq policy?
>
>
>
>This part's another keeper, I think. It's the hardest part for some
>of us to articulate.
>
>
>
> >1998 much more literal than the Clinton administration did. The Act
>
>I guess he means "literally" - German doesn't generally distinguish
>between adjectives and adverbs, in case anyone cares...
>
>[snip]
>
> >Another dramatic indicator of the ill being of the population
>
> >relates to
> >child mortality. UNICEF in its annual State of the Children's report
> >identified Iraq as the country which showed an increase of 160% in
> >the
> >mortality rate of children under five for the period 1990 to 1999.
> >This
> >constitutes the highest recorded increase of all the 188 countries
> >surveyed. According to the same organisation, female literacy has
> >slipped
> >to 45% in 1995 while in 1987 Iraq had received from UNESCO
> >international
> >recognition that it had achieved a literacy level of 80%. There are
> >other
> >alarming figures published by WHO showing that the number of youth
> >with
> >mental disorders has more than doubled between 1990 and 1998.
>
>This is part of what we were looking for, for the farmers' mkt.
>
>[snip]
>
> >the
>
> >Arab League, the Holy Sea and the International Court of Justice.
> >
> >An important first step towards improved cooperation among different
> >national groups working towards the lifting of economic sanctions
> >and
> >averting an unjustified war against Iraq would be the preparation of
> >a
>
> >master-list of cooperating entities and their coordinates.
>
>
>
>I assume he means "Holy See". Anyway, his suggestions are not all
>that inspiring, but maybe it's this practical stuff we need to
>suggest. What do others think?
>
>
>
>Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger:
><http://g.msn.com/1HM1ENUS/c144??PS=47575>Click Here
>_______________________________________________ Peace-discuss
>mailing list Peace-discuss at lists.cu.groogroo.com
>http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/peace-discuss
--
Al Kagan
African Studies Bibliographer and Professor of Library Administration
Africana Unit, Room 328
University of Illinois Library
1408 W. Gregory Drive
Urbana, IL 61801, USA
tel. 217-333-6519
fax. 217-333-2214
e-mail. akagan at uiuc.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/mailman/archive/peace-discuss/attachments/20020930/1f604801/attachment.html
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list