[Peace-discuss] Fwd: [sftalk] Undercover War Begins as US Forces Enter Iraq

Alfred Kagan akagan at uiuc.edu
Mon Jan 6 16:41:18 CST 2003


>X-eGroups-Return: 
>sentto-7892592-50-1041892424-akagan=uiuc.edu at returns.groups.yahoo.com
>X-Sender: jboy at nycap.rr.com
>X-Apparently-To: sftalk at yahoogroups.com
>To: "SF Talk" <sftalk at yahoogroups.com>,
>    "Schdy Greens" <Schdy_Grn at yahoogroups.com>
>X-Priority: 3
>From: "Jeff Boy" <jboy at nycap.rr.com>
>Mailing-List: list sftalk at yahoogroups.com; contact 
>sftalk-owner at yahoogroups.com
>Delivered-To: mailing list sftalk at yahoogroups.com
>List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:sftalk-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com>
>Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 17:33:39 -0500
>Subject: [sftalk] Undercover War Begins as US Forces Enter Iraq
>Reply-To: sftalk at yahoogroups.com
>X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.3 required=5.0
>	tests=BIG_FONT,EGP_HTML_BANNER,FROM_EGROUPS,
>	      HTML_COMMENT_UNIQUE_ID,HTML_FONT_COLOR_BLUE,MEMBER_2,
>	      MORTGAGE_OBFU,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,SPAM_REDIRECTOR,
>	      SUPERLONG_LINE,TO_BE_REMOVED_REPLY,USER_AGENT_OE,WEB_BUGS
>	version=2.43
>X-Spam-Level:
>
>The war has started  !!!!!
>JEFF
>
>Published on Monday, January 6, 2003 by the 
><http://www.smh.com.au/>Sydney Morning Herald (Australia)
>Undercover War Begins as US Forces Enter Iraq
>by John Donnelly in Washington and Tom Allard in Canberra
>
>
>About 100 United States special forces personnel and more than 50 
>CIA officers have been inside Iraq for at least four months, looking 
>for missile-launchers, monitoring oil fields, marking minefields and 
>helping their pilots target air-defence systems.
>
>The operations, which are said to have included some Australian, 
>Jordanian and British commandos, are seen as part of the opening 
>phase of a war, intelligence officials and military analysts say.
>
>This is despite the Bush Administration agreeing to the schedule of 
>United Nations weapons inspections.
>
>A spokeswoman for the Minister for Defence, Robert Hill, rejected 
>the suggestion that Australians - even individual soldiers attached 
>to US or British commando units - had been involved in covert 
>incursions. "Australians haven't been operating in Iraq," she said.
>
>Australia is believed to have a policy of not sending special forces 
>on covert operations into hostile countries, but the spokeswoman 
>described this as hypothetical.
>
>The action by US and British special forces in Iraq breaches 
>international law because it is not sanctioned by the UN.
>
>But it also reflects the new warfare, which targets terrorists and 
>hidden weapons and relies heavily on commando operations and 
>pre-emptive strikes.
>
>On January 27 the UN inspectors will report on whether they have 
>found evidence of a program to develop chemical, biological or 
>nuclear weapons.
>
>Soon after, the US is expected to announce whether Iraq is in 
>"material breach" of UN resolutions and whether that is a trigger 
>for an invasion aimed at toppling President Saddam Hussein.
>
>War preparations have been in full swing for months. The Pentagon 
>says 60,000 troops are in the Gulf region, and that number could 
>double in coming weeks.
>
>Even as President George Bush repeated at the weekend that it was 
>not too late to avert war if Saddam complies with the inspectors, 
>bombing by US jets over the no-fly zone, coupled with the commando 
>operations, means that a fight is already unfolding.
>
>"We're bombing practically every day as we patrol the no-fly zones, 
>taking out air defence batteries, and there are all kinds of CIA and 
>special forces operations going on," said Timur Eads, a former US 
>special operations officer. "I would call it the beginning of a war."
>
>Naseer Aruri, professor emeritus of political science at the 
>University of Massachusetts at Dartmouth, said the Bush 
>Administration was being duplicitous in conducting undercover 
>operations while agreeing to the UN inspections.
>
>"Certainly, the Arab world and the Islamic world would see it as 
>being inconsistent with the weapons inspections, as well as an 
>infringement on Iraq's sovereignty."
>
>A US intelligence official said the Iraq missions were separate from 
>the work of the inspectors, but that the two operations might be 
>moving in parallel.
>
>Some special forces members were following movements around 
>suspected weapons sites, and this information could be handed to the 
>UN teams.
>
>The US has so far refused to do so, out of concern that the reports 
>might be passed to Iraqi officials.
>
>Copyright © 2003. The Sydney Morning Herald
>
>###
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>ADVERTISEMENT
><http://rd.yahoo.com/M=234081.2821106.4184440.1925585/D=egroupweb/S=1705060375:HM/A=1327986/R=0/*http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4870027;7586687;a?http://www.ameriquestmortgage.com/welcome.html?ad=Yahoo01>
>
>
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>sftalk-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the 
><http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>Yahoo! Terms of Service.


-- 


Al Kagan
African Studies Bibliographer and Professor of Library Administration
Africana Unit, Room 328
University of Illinois Library
1408 W. Gregory Drive
Urbana, IL 61801, USA

tel. 217-333-6519
fax. 217-333-2214
e-mail. akagan at uiuc.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/mailman/archive/peace-discuss/attachments/20030106/50c51099/attachment.htm


More information about the Peace-discuss mailing list