[Peace-discuss] Fwd: [sftalk] Undercover War Begins as US Forces Enter Iraq
Alfred Kagan
akagan at uiuc.edu
Mon Jan 6 16:41:18 CST 2003
>X-eGroups-Return:
>sentto-7892592-50-1041892424-akagan=uiuc.edu at returns.groups.yahoo.com
>X-Sender: jboy at nycap.rr.com
>X-Apparently-To: sftalk at yahoogroups.com
>To: "SF Talk" <sftalk at yahoogroups.com>,
> "Schdy Greens" <Schdy_Grn at yahoogroups.com>
>X-Priority: 3
>From: "Jeff Boy" <jboy at nycap.rr.com>
>Mailing-List: list sftalk at yahoogroups.com; contact
>sftalk-owner at yahoogroups.com
>Delivered-To: mailing list sftalk at yahoogroups.com
>List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:sftalk-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com>
>Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 17:33:39 -0500
>Subject: [sftalk] Undercover War Begins as US Forces Enter Iraq
>Reply-To: sftalk at yahoogroups.com
>X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.3 required=5.0
> tests=BIG_FONT,EGP_HTML_BANNER,FROM_EGROUPS,
> HTML_COMMENT_UNIQUE_ID,HTML_FONT_COLOR_BLUE,MEMBER_2,
> MORTGAGE_OBFU,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,SPAM_REDIRECTOR,
> SUPERLONG_LINE,TO_BE_REMOVED_REPLY,USER_AGENT_OE,WEB_BUGS
> version=2.43
>X-Spam-Level:
>
>The war has started !!!!!
>JEFF
>
>Published on Monday, January 6, 2003 by the
><http://www.smh.com.au/>Sydney Morning Herald (Australia)
>Undercover War Begins as US Forces Enter Iraq
>by John Donnelly in Washington and Tom Allard in Canberra
>
>
>About 100 United States special forces personnel and more than 50
>CIA officers have been inside Iraq for at least four months, looking
>for missile-launchers, monitoring oil fields, marking minefields and
>helping their pilots target air-defence systems.
>
>The operations, which are said to have included some Australian,
>Jordanian and British commandos, are seen as part of the opening
>phase of a war, intelligence officials and military analysts say.
>
>This is despite the Bush Administration agreeing to the schedule of
>United Nations weapons inspections.
>
>A spokeswoman for the Minister for Defence, Robert Hill, rejected
>the suggestion that Australians - even individual soldiers attached
>to US or British commando units - had been involved in covert
>incursions. "Australians haven't been operating in Iraq," she said.
>
>Australia is believed to have a policy of not sending special forces
>on covert operations into hostile countries, but the spokeswoman
>described this as hypothetical.
>
>The action by US and British special forces in Iraq breaches
>international law because it is not sanctioned by the UN.
>
>But it also reflects the new warfare, which targets terrorists and
>hidden weapons and relies heavily on commando operations and
>pre-emptive strikes.
>
>On January 27 the UN inspectors will report on whether they have
>found evidence of a program to develop chemical, biological or
>nuclear weapons.
>
>Soon after, the US is expected to announce whether Iraq is in
>"material breach" of UN resolutions and whether that is a trigger
>for an invasion aimed at toppling President Saddam Hussein.
>
>War preparations have been in full swing for months. The Pentagon
>says 60,000 troops are in the Gulf region, and that number could
>double in coming weeks.
>
>Even as President George Bush repeated at the weekend that it was
>not too late to avert war if Saddam complies with the inspectors,
>bombing by US jets over the no-fly zone, coupled with the commando
>operations, means that a fight is already unfolding.
>
>"We're bombing practically every day as we patrol the no-fly zones,
>taking out air defence batteries, and there are all kinds of CIA and
>special forces operations going on," said Timur Eads, a former US
>special operations officer. "I would call it the beginning of a war."
>
>Naseer Aruri, professor emeritus of political science at the
>University of Massachusetts at Dartmouth, said the Bush
>Administration was being duplicitous in conducting undercover
>operations while agreeing to the UN inspections.
>
>"Certainly, the Arab world and the Islamic world would see it as
>being inconsistent with the weapons inspections, as well as an
>infringement on Iraq's sovereignty."
>
>A US intelligence official said the Iraq missions were separate from
>the work of the inspectors, but that the two operations might be
>moving in parallel.
>
>Some special forces members were following movements around
>suspected weapons sites, and this information could be handed to the
>UN teams.
>
>The US has so far refused to do so, out of concern that the reports
>might be passed to Iraqi officials.
>
>Copyright © 2003. The Sydney Morning Herald
>
>###
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>ADVERTISEMENT
><http://rd.yahoo.com/M=234081.2821106.4184440.1925585/D=egroupweb/S=1705060375:HM/A=1327986/R=0/*http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4870027;7586687;a?http://www.ameriquestmortgage.com/welcome.html?ad=Yahoo01>
>
>
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>sftalk-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
><http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>Yahoo! Terms of Service.
--
Al Kagan
African Studies Bibliographer and Professor of Library Administration
Africana Unit, Room 328
University of Illinois Library
1408 W. Gregory Drive
Urbana, IL 61801, USA
tel. 217-333-6519
fax. 217-333-2214
e-mail. akagan at uiuc.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/mailman/archive/peace-discuss/attachments/20030106/50c51099/attachment.htm
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list