[Peace-discuss] Buchanan on our side

[C. G. Estabrook]

The point is not to assess Buchanan's purity nor to descry his
thought-crimes (which are surely manifold) but to see that what he says
here about the war is better than that said by many soi-disant liberals
(including practically all of the leading Democratic contenders). --CGE


On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Joseph T. Miller wrote:

> Might be worthwhile to discuss just why someone like Buchanan would be
> considered an ally of any progressive movement on any issue.  What is
> the essence of his isolationism and anti-internationalism?  Can the
> troops really trust him and his ilk to bring them home AND to provide
> for the needs of returning troops? Is he really all about the working
> class and the needs of the average US citizen? Is there reason to be
> at all concerned about the right-wing populism that he represents?
> 
> Joe www.vvaw.org
> 
> 
> At 03:17 PM 6/30/2003, C. G. Estabrook wrote:
> >[Another indication that AWARE's allies are not to be found just on the
> >"left."  Buchanan holds some objectionable views, but he's better on
> >issues touched on here than Howard Dean.  Regards, Carl]
> >
> >http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=33326
> >
> >Monday, June 30, 2003
> >
> >Why are we still here?
> >
> >By Patrick J. Buchanan
>