[Peace-discuss] International Women's Day Anti-War Statement
Brooke Anderson
brooke at shout.net
Fri Mar 7 14:28:15 CST 2003
PRC Statement Against War on International Women's Day
By Brooke Anderson, PRC Co-Coordinator
Friday, March 7th, 2003
(217) 493-2637 or brooke at shout.net
Tomorrow, on International Women's Day, hundreds of thousands of
women worldwide will gather to protest the war. Today we stand in
solidarity with these global protests and add local women's voices to
the world outcry against Bush's plans to slaughter Iraqi people.
International Women's Day began in 1910 to commemorate the New York
garment workers strike of March 8th, 1857 and the March 8th, 1908
women's needle trades strikes for shorter hours, fair pay, and better
working conditions. On International Women's Day 1917, Russian women
struck for "bread and roses" in protest of World War I. The holiday
came to the United States in full force in 1961 when Women's Strike
for Peace organized 50,000 women to walk out on their jobs and to
protest the Vietnam War.
WOMEN'S HISTORICAL ROLE IN ANTI-WAR MOVEMENTS.
So, this year's International Women's Day anti-war protests are no
anomaly. Whether the male-dominated history books record it this way
or not, women have historically been at the forefront of anti-war
mobilizations and other movements for social justice.
Indeed, there is a very rich and inspiring history of local women's
organizing for peace, including a tradition of International Women's
Day being used by C-U women to protest U.S. foreign policy. Beginning
in 1968, the local Women's International League for Peace and Freedom
protested the U.S. war in Vietnam. They held demonstrations on tax
day and on International Women's Day to protest the war, and later to
protest nuclear proliferation. From 1985-1991, women's groups
celebrated the day with rallies right here on this Quad nearly every
year addressing sexual violence against women, war and militarism,
and equal rights. When the U.S. bombed Libya in 1985, these women
activists erected an encampment surrounding the ROTC Building and
distributed literature opposing the bombing. On Hiroshima Day in
1986, Women Rising in Resistance held a Women Take Liberty
Celebration of Peace condemning military rallies at and corporate
exploitation of the Statue of Liberty. This International Women's Day
we join our sisters worldwide in protest of the impending war on Iraq.
WHY A WOMEN'S RALLY?
Today's emphasis on women's voices for peace is not meant to
reinforce traditional gender roles (though some of us are
particularly proud of our pink and purple banners and armbands!). By
celebrating women's resistance to war, we are not suggesting that
women are innately peaceful or that all men are violent warmongers.
The despicable and cowardly politics of Condaleeza Rice, Laura Bush,
and Margaret Thatcher would certainly prove us wrong, as would the
efforts of millions of men worldwide working to prevent the war.
Nonetheless, it is historically true that the majority of imperialism
and state violence has been ordered and carried out by men (and not
just all men, but frequently it is wealthy white men in power that
send mostly young, poor men into battle to kill and be killed). This
is because men have always held most of the elected and appointed
positions of power in the world, and in our violent cultures, power
is exercised through violence, therefore war has traditionally been
"men's business."
But these powerful men who benefit from the spoils of war are the
last and least likely to suffer war's tragedies. Women - who have
little voice in the politics and decision-making that govern our
lives - gain little (and poor women and women of color gain even
less) from the acquired colonies and stolen wealth of war, but we pay
the price with our bodies, our health, our homes, and our families.
Struggling for our freedom at every turn, we know first hand what
happens when decision-making is left up to politicians and
corporations. Women lose! People of color lose! Poor people lose! So,
if we lose when men in D.C. busy themselves with war, we women will
make it our business to wage - and win! - the struggle for peace.
Today, we embrace our power and responsibility to make social change
- to be creators, not just survivors, of our fate.
A FEMINIST ANALYSIS OF VIOLENCE
Patriarchy and war are inseparable forces of repression and violence
in our world and must be resisted together - and that fight
necessitates women's leadership, your leadership. Along with racism
and homophobia, sexism and militarism divide the world into the human
(white, male, Christian, American wealthy lives) and the dehumanized
(female, immigrant, foreign, diverse, and poor lives), and then uses
violence to maintain men's power over women, white power over people
of color and so on. This patriarchal world favors violence,
punishment, and coercion over creative problem solving and attempts
at mutual understanding, and it exploits concepts of masculinity that
make violence a condition of manhood to anesthetize us and make us
accepting of violence in daily life. As Emma Goldman, great anarchist
leader, said: "It is organized violence on the top that creates
individual violence at the bottom."
IMPACT ON WOMEN IN IRAQ AND THE MIDDLE EAST
This organized violence will be very devastating for the women of the
Middle East. Women experience war as death, injury, illness,
impoverishment, sexual violence, widowhood, displacement, and
detention.
In the first Gulf War, civilian casualties comprised 90% of all
casualties, and many of these were women and children. Women as
noncombatants are very much the victims and survivors of war. If we
are on the frontlines of the killings fields as much as men, we need
to be on the front lines of the resistance as much as or more than
men.
Rape has always and forever been a weapon of war. Women's bodies are
just as much the battlefields of war as the deserts and the trenches.
Our bodies are made the prizes for the conquerors and a means of
humiliating and demoralizing the enemy. Systematic use of rape by
invading armies is a deliberate policy of inducing terror and
genocide - for example the detainment camps set up in the former
Yugoslavia for the purpose of rape and forced pregnancy as part of an
overall program of ethnic cleansing. Women in wartime are also used
for forced prostitution and sexual slavery (really just forms of
repeated and systematic rape) in and around military bases.
The U.S. decade long bombing campaign has utterly devastated the
Iraqi environment, causing unprecedented health problems for Iraqi
citizens - and especially Iraqi women - and at a time when medical
facilities, supplies, and medicines are scarce or non-existent due to
sanctions. An intensified war against Iraq will only worsen this
irreparable damage.
In war, women comprise the majority of refugees, and experience great
horrors and abuse when forced to flee their homes. Women are 80% of
the health care and other aid workers at refugee camps who place
themselves in harms way to aid the sick, injured, and dying.
With the devastation of civilian infrastructure in a new war, Iraqi
schools will be bombed, teachers maimed, and books unaffordable. It
could be a decade before Iraqi educational institutions could
re-build, leaving a generation of women without formal education.
Like women here, women in the Middle East face great discrimination
within their own society. But Bush attempted to justify his war on
Afgahnistan in part by pretending the U.S. marines were on a feminist
mission to liberate Afghani women from their burqahs, when clearly
revenge and oil were our priorities and when the U.S. government
cannot event make it safe for women to walk alone at night on the
streets of America. And we know that a new war on Iraq will only
worsen the condition of women in Iraq. So, when women's equality and
liberation are being touted as justifications for regime change and
massive destruction in the Middle East, we need to raise our voices
and say that Iraqi women should be the only ones to define what
counts as moral authority and just means of liberation. We can help
by echoing their demand that no bombs be dropped, no tanks be
deployed, no children mutilated in the name of women's liberation and
supporting their pleas for an end to the sanctions, an increase in
real aid, and human rights inspectors in Iraq.
IMPACT ON WOMEN IN THE UNITED STATES
While the women in Iraq will surely suffer the most from a U.S.
invasion, women in the United States certainly won't gain either. As
Virginia Woolf once said: if you insist upon fighting to protect
me, or "our "country, let it be understood, soberly and rationally
between us, that you are fighting to procure benefits which I have
not shared and probably will not share; but not to gratify my
instincts, or to protect either myself or my country. As a woman, my
country is the whole world.
The violence against U.S. women during this war will not as likely be
physical violence. It will be structural and economic violence as we
watch hundreds of billions of dollars that could be spent women and
children's programs go to tanks and bombs, death and starvation.
Every dollar spent on this war is a dollar not diverted to social
programs that guarantee basic life necessities for women and
children. With this militarization of our nation and our world has
come a lowering of the standard of living for billions of people
around the world - the largest percentage of which are families
headed by single women, a phenomena named the feminization of
poverty. If they're feminizing poverty, I say we feminize the
national budget and feminize this nation's plan for national
security. As women, we need a voice in deciding what constitutes
"national security." For us, national security is not the Patriot Act
(1 or 2!), it is not the Homeland Security Department, and is
certainly not the color-coded terrorism alerts! For us, national
security is child care and maternity leave, job training, housing,
transportation, education, and health care and care for the elderly
and disabled. If we do a gender analysis of the budget priorities of
the federal budget, or any national budget on earth for that matter,
we see that male gender interests dominate the budget, neglecting
women's needs.
WE NEED A NEW, FEMINIST VISION OF A JUST WORLD
We are women's voices, not just women's voices for peace, but voices
that provide an alternative analysis of the constellation of
patriarchy, racism, and militarism that create such vast inequality
in our world. The peace we seek is not merely the absence of war, but
rather the presence of social, racial, and economic justice and
freedom for all people.
In wartime, women are always asked to postpone indefinitely our
struggles for equality while "more important" issues are addressed.
And, it's true, the prospect of millions of people dying in this
senseless war is huge and merits the choice of many feminist
activists who have channeled their energies into the anti-war
movement. But, by exposing the relationship between sexism and
militarism, and by making the equal status of women in society a
condition of a just, peaceable world, we can work for both at the
same time. Peace is a women's issue. Women's rights must be part and
parcel the anti-war movement. Ending the oppression of women and
working toward a just, non-violent society are not mutually exclusive
objectives - rather, they are inseparable.
When Simone de Beauvoir spoke of women's resistance to war, she said
that "to refuse to countenance a war that dares not speak its true
name you can no longer mumble the old excuse, "We didn't know"; and
now that you do know, can you continue to feign ignorance, or content
yourselves with mere token utterance of horrified sympathy"? So, if
you aren't already involved in the anti-war movement, hopefully today
you have been inspired to join us. All movements for social justice
have to guard against male dominance in the movement and take
pro-active steps to elevate and encourage women's leadership in the
movement. We hope that today is one strong step in that direction.
Slavery abolitionist and early feminist Sojourner Truth once said: If
the first woman God ever made was strong enough to turn the world
upside down, these women together ought to be able to turn it right
side up again. And I believe that we will together turn this world
right side up again. The generations of women to come may never know
our name or face, but their world and the world of their
grand-daughters will be a safer place for our efforts.
BUSH'S PRESS CONFERENCE
Last night during the Presidential press conference, little Bush
reached new height in the arrogance of power. He said that we are in
the final stages of diplomacy before we go to war for peace, no
matter what the rest of the world or his own people think, and that
anyone who doesn't want to be in harm's way should leave Iraq! If
he's in the final stage of diplomacy before bombing the living shit
out of another country, then it is no time to stand aside and look
helpless. It's time to stand up, fight back again this war, and put
George W in the final stages of his presidency for violating the
Constitution of the United States and the sanctity of international
law. Down/out with Bush!
In additional to the mind-blowing inability to answer the most basic
of questions about the war, I was also struck last night by the
difference in his responses to men and to women reporters. When
calling on and answering women reporters, Bush spoke oh so softly and
sweetly so as not to offend our delicate natures with talk of war.
Well, if there is one fatal mistake a man can make, it is to
underestimate the strength of a woman. Never underestimate the
strength of a woman. And he has underestimated the strength of not
one woman, but millions of women who know who the real axis of evil
is and are ready to organize to unseat him!
While he is assembling his arsenal of destruction - his fighter jets,
bombs, tanks, and missiles, as though they were all toys in his
infantile world - we will be assembling our own army of millions of
women to stop him! Out of the schools and the hospitals, out of the
prisons and the kitchens and into the streets we will go to take this
nation back from George W, back from the military, back from the oil
companies, and back from the multi-national corporations that have
this nation in a death grip. We can do it and we will!!!
--
**************************************
Brooke Anderson
Champaign County Health Care Consumers
44 E. Main St., Suite 208
Champaign, IL 61820
Phone = (217) 352-6533, x 17
Fax = (217) 352-9745
Email = brooke at shout.net
**************************************
--
**************************************
Brooke Anderson
Champaign County Health Care Consumers
44 E. Main St., Suite 208
Champaign, IL 61820
Phone = (217) 352-6533, x 17
Fax = (217) 352-9745
Email = brooke at shout.net
**************************************
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list