[Peace-discuss] crying wolf about nukes

[patton paul]

Iranian Nukes: Why Should World Believe US?
Editorial


When the International Atomic Energy Agency recently said it lacked
evidence that Iran had an ongoing nuclear weapons program, American
officials were dumbstruck. Undersecretary of State John Bolton declared
the IAEA conclusion "impossible to believe." Iran has fooled the IAEA for
many years, Bolton said, implying that it has done so again.

Bolton may have a point, but unfortunately it's not the IAEA or Iran
that's beyond belief in this matter. It's the United States, because of
Iraq. If you put the U.S. prewar account of Iraq's nuclear-weapons program
up against that of the IAEA, the agency record comes out rating far
superior.

After the Gulf War, the agency had spent years in Iraq gathering
intelligence, inspecting facilities and, ultimately, destroying the
equipment and securing the radioactive material involved in Saddam
Hussein's nuclear-weapons project. From 1998 to 2002, it was not in Iraq,
but it went back last fall when the United States began pressing for
united action against Saddam and contending he had "reconstituted" his
nuclear program.

After Secretary of State Colin Powell's presentation of the U.S. case
against Iraq last November, IAEA inspectors checked out each of his
assertions. They found "no evidence or plausible indication of the revival
of a nuclear weapons programme in Iraq." The aluminum tubes Powell said
were for centrifuges were found to be for rockets. The nuclear-project
buildings Powell said were being reconstructed were found not in use for
any nuclear-related work. The effort Iraq supposedly made to secure
uranium in Niger (and which Powell left out of his U.N. litany) was found
to be mistaken, and based on forged documents. The magnets Powell said
were for nuclear use were found most likely to be for other uses, though
the IAEA wanted further examination of the magnet question.

Before the United States went to war, the IAEA had effectively demolished
the most serious case for doing so -- Iraq's ongoing effort to build
nuclear arms. Postwar American efforts to find nuclear materials have
proven the IAEA right and the United States wrong.

So now comes the IAEA saying it has no evidence that Iran has a nuclear
weapons program, while the United States asserts that one exists. Who's
the world, and the American people for that matter, more likely to
believe?

The problem is, as we said, that Bolton may have a point. Iran, under
intense pressure from the IAEA, backed by pressure from the United States
and a number of other countries, recently admitted it had for 18 years
hidden a quite sophisticated effort to enrich uranium. In an astonishing
turnabout, it pledged to stop the enrichment program and to be totally
transparent on nuclear issues. Moreover, it agreed to accept additional
requirements imposed by the IAEA and to allow ongoing, intrusive
inspections.

Powell noted Tuesday in Brussels that Iran "seems to be moving in the
right direction now," but added that "we can't be satisfied until Iran has
demonstrated that all of the programs it had been pursuing have now been
made known . . . and they are now being brought to a halt."

The IAEA hasn't said Iran has no weapons program; it has said there is no
evidence of such a program. On the weapons question, IAEA head Mohammed El
Baradei says the agency's effort in Iran "is a work in progress" and that
the jury is still out. The IAEA is meticulous in its work and careful with
its words. As El Baradei told Time Magazine in response to Bolton's
comment, "We are not in the business of judging intentions. What we look
for are facts and proof, and so far we have no proof of a nuclear-weapons
program."

But the IAEA got fooled by Iran for 18 years, so perhaps it is being
fooled again. Perhaps the United States, meanwhile, has solid proof that
Tehran really is trying to develop nukes. Unfortunately, even if it does,
the proof won't do any good -- because the United States presented the
world with a case against Iraq that turned out to be so much flim-flam.

The Bush administration cried "wolf," the IAEA proved there wasn't one,
but still the United States went to war -- without a U.N. endorsement. Now
few will listen when Washington insists Iran, too, is a wolf. And Iran
might actually turn out to have long teeth.

 Copyright 2003 Star Tribune
k